Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.
Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 3 Agreement for assessment of end-systolic volume between MRI and MSCT (A) and MRI and CVG (B) in 88 patients. The agreement is also compared with the reference standard (MRI) for MSCT and Echo (C and D) in the subset of 30 patients according to Bland and Altman as described in Figure 1. There were significantly larger limits of agreement for the comparison of CVG and Echo with MRI than for the comparisons of MSCT with MRI, and there was also a significantly larger overestimation of the end-systolic volume with CVG than with MSCT. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
|