Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1188-1195, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.062 (Published online 21 February 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.10.062v1
47/6/1188    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: VASCULAR DISEASE

Relationship Between Increasing Body Weight, Insulin Resistance, Inflammation, Adipocytokine Leptin, and Coronary Circulatory Function

Thomas H. Schindler, MD*, Jerson Cardenas, MD*, John O. Prior, MD, PhD*, Alvaro D. Facta, MD*, Michael C. Kreissl, MD*, Xiao-Li Zhang, MD, PhD*, James Sayre, PhD*, Magnus Dahlbom, PhD*, Julio Licinio, MD{dagger} and Heinrich R. Schelbert, MD, PhD*,*

* Departments of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
{dagger} Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science and Medicine/Endocrinology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Manuscript received August 6, 2005; revised manuscript received September 30, 2005, accepted October 10, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Heinrich H. Schelbert, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, 23-120 CHS, Box 173517, Los Angeles, California 90095-1735 (Email: hschelbert{at}mednet.ucla.edu).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate effects of obesity, insulin resistance, and inflammation on coronary circulatory function and its relationship to leptin plasma levels.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether obesity, commonly paralleled by insulin resistance, inflammation, and leptin, is independently associated with coronary circulatory dysfunction.

METHODS: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) responses to cold pressor test (CPT) and pharmacologic vasodilation was measured with positron emission tomography and 13N-ammonia. Study participants were divided into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI, kg/m2): control, 20 ≤ BMI <25 (n = 19); overweight, 25 ≤ BMI <30 (n = 21); and obese, BMI >30 (n = 32).

RESULTS: Body mass index was significantly correlated to the Homeostasis Model Assessment Index of insulin resistance and C-reactive protein levels (r = 0.60 and r = 0.47, p < 0.0001). Compared with control subjects, endothelium-related change in MBF ({Delta}MBF) to CPT progressively declined in overweight and obese groups (0.32 ± 0.09 vs. 0.21 ± 0.19 and 0.07 ± 0.16 ml/g/min; p < 0.03 and p < 0.0001). The dipyridamole-induced total vasodilator capacity was significantly lower in obese than in control subjects (1.77 ± 0.51 vs. 2.04 ± 0.37 ml/g/min, p < 0.02). On multivariate analysis, BMI (p < 0.012) and age (p < 0.035) were significant independent predictors of {Delta}MBF. Finally, only in the obese group leptin plasma levels significantly correlated with {Delta}MBF (r = 0.37, p < 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS: Increased body weight is independently associated with abnormal coronary circulatory function that progresses from an impairment in endothelium-related coronary vasomotion in overweight individuals to an impairment of the total vasodilator capacity in obese individuals. The findings that elevated leptin plasma levels in patients that are obese might exert beneficial effects on the coronary endothelium to counterbalance the adverse effects of increases in body weight on coronary circulatory function should be tested.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ANOVA = analysis of variance
  BMI = body mass index
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CPT = cold pressor test
  CRP = C-reactive protein
  CVR = coronary vascular resistance
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  HDL = high-density lipoprotein
  HOMA = Homeostasis Model Assessment
  LDL = low-density lipoprotein
  MBF = myocardial blood flow
  PET = positron emission tomography
  ROS = reactive oxygen species
  RPP = rate-pressure product
  WHR = waist-hip ratio


The prevalence of obesity in the U.S. has increased between 1994 and 2000 from 22.9% to 30.5%. Because obesity is recognized as a risk factor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the increasing incidence of obesity is of considerable public health concern (1). The mechanisms by which obesity initiates and accelerates vascular disease are still poorly understood. The functional integrity of the vascular endothelium exerts antiatherosclerotic and antithrombotic effects (2). Conversely, impaired endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotor function describes a proatherosclerotic state with substantial diagnostic and prognostic implications (3,4). Previous studies have reported an association between obesity and endothelial dysfunction of the peripheral circulation (5,6). A similar association between obesity and coronary endothelial dysfunction also has been observed in patients with angiographically normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries and with traditional coronary risk factors (7). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that dysfunctional endothelium of the coronary circulation may reflect a mechanistic link that confers an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcome in obesity. Metabolic abnormalities within the insulin resistance syndrome (insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and decreased high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol) and chronic inflammation commonly parallel the excess of body weight and may directly affect the development and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) (8,9). To date, the effect of increased body weight, insulin resistance, and of chronic inflammation on the coronary circulatory function has not been investigated.

Adipocytokines such as leptin have been implicated as direct participants in the regulation of coronary vasomotor function in obesity (10). For example, the administration of leptin may stimulate increases in oxidative stress in in vitro cultured human endothelial cells (11). Increases in oxidative stress in the vascular endothelium may interact with nitric oxide to form peroxynitrite and, thereby, decrease the bioavailability of nitric oxide, which is associated with an impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation (10). This theory is in contrast to findings in leptin-deficient mice, in whom the administration of leptin restored endothelium-dependent vasodilation by receptor-mediated endothelial release of nitric oxide (12). These findings suggest a direct relationship between leptin and the coronary vasomotor tone that, however, has not been examined in humans.

The aims of the current study were therefore to evaluate in normal, overweight, and obese individuals without traditional coronary risk factors: 1) possible effects of increased body weight, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation on the coronary circulatory function, and 2) a possible relationship between leptin plasma levels and coronary circulatory function.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population and design.   A total of 72 persons (35 men and 37 women; mean age 37 ± 11 years) without traditional coronary risk factors for CAD was studied prospectively. All participants underwent an initial screening visit that included a physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure measurements, and routine blood chemistry. Study participants were only included if traditional coronary risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia (total serum cholesterol ≥240 mg/dl and/or low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol ≥155 mg/dl), arterial hypertension (blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg), smoking, and diabetes mellitus (fasting plasma glucose obtained on more than two occasions >126 mg/dl) were excluded. Furthermore, study applicants were recruited if they were without a history of variant angina, a family history of premature CAD, or clinically manifest cardiovascular or any other disease. All were normal on physical examination and had normal resting ECGs. No study participant was on any cardiac or vasoactive medication, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, beta-blockers, or statins. Finally, enrolled study participants were then grouped by the body mass index (BMI, kg/m2): control group, 20 ≤ BMI <25 (n = 19); overweight group, 25 ≤ BMI <30 (n = 21); and obese group, BMI >30 (n = 32) (7). In addition, the waist-hip ratio (WHR) was measured and defined as the minimal abdominal circumference between the xiphoid process and the iliac crest (waist) divided by the circumference determined over the femoral heads (hip).

Laboratory tests included plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, insulin, free fatty acids, total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides levels, and high sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP). Assessment of insulin resistance using the Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) was determined as described previously (13). In each patient, leptin plasma levels (Radioimmunoassay, Quest Diagnostic, Los Angeles, California) were determined from peripheral arm vein blood samples. All study participants had a low probability of significant obstructive CAD, as evidenced by a normal homogenous 13N-ammonia tracer uptake on visual inspection and polar map analysis of the 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) images at rest and during dipyridamole stimulated hyperemia (14). Study participants refrained from consuming caffeine-containing food or beverages for >24 h before the PET baseline examination to determine coronary circulatory function. The study was approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board, and each study participant signed the approved informed consent form.

Noninvasive quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) with PET.   Myocardial blood flow was determined noninvasively with intravenous 13N-ammonia, serial image acquisition by PET (ECAT EXACT HR+, Siemens/CTI model 931/08-12, Siemens AG, Munich, Germany), and a two-compartment tracer kinetic model (15). The relative myocardial perfusion was assessed by visual inspection and polar map analysis of the 13N-ammonia PET images. Time-activity curves derived from the first 12 dynamic frames were used to determine absolute estimates of mean MBF in ml/g/min (15). Measurements of MBF using PET were performed at baseline, during cold pressor test (CPT; reflecting predominantly endothelium-dependent vasomotion), and during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia with standard dose dipyridamole (140 µg/kg/min; reflecting predominantly endothelium-independent vasomotion) as described previously (16,17). The change in the MBF from rest to CPT was defined as {Delta}MBF.

Heart rate, blood pressure, and a 12-lead ECG were recorded continuously during each MBF measurement. From the average of heart rate and blood pressure during the first 2 min of each image acquisition, the rate-pressure product (RPP) was determined as an index of cardiac work. An index of coronary vascular resistance (CVR) was determined as the ratio of mean arterial blood pressure to MBF (mm Hg/ml/min/g).

Statistical analysis.   Data are presented as mean ± SD for quantitative and absolute frequencies for qualitative variables. For comparison of differences, appropriate t tests for independent or paired samples were used (Statistical Analysis Software Institute, Cary, North Carolina). A comparison of CPT-induced change in MBF and dipyridamole MBFs between the different groups was performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Scheffe’s multiple comparison test. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), assuming a linear regression, was calculated to investigate the associations between CPT- and dipyridamole-induced changes in MBFs and laboratory parameters. Multivariate analysis was performed with the linear regression model. Statistical significance was assumed if the null hypothesis could be rejected at p < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient characteristics and metabolic profile.   The clinical characteristics of the three study groups are given in Table 1. The increase in BMI in the three study groups was paralleled by the WHR so that BMI and WHR significantly correlated (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001). Overweight and obese groups demonstrated significantly lower levels of HDL cholesterol compared with the control group, whereas total and LDL cholesterol levels were similar among groups. Fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides, and leptin plasma levels were significantly higher in the obese than in the control group but did not differ significantly between the control and overweight groups. Furthermore, insulin, the HOMA as index for insulin resistance, and high-sensitive CRP were significantly elevated in the overweight and obese groups compared with the control group. Although the differences in plasma insulin and HOMA index were significant between the overweight and obese groups, statistically there was no difference in high-sensitive CRP levels. Finally, no difference among all three groups with regard to free fatty acids and HbA1c levels was found.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Study Population (n = 72)
 
Correlations between metabolic parameters.   In the entire study population, Pearson’s regression analysis revealed significant correlations between BMI and insulin resistance (HOMA) (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001), BMI and leptin (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001), and leptin and insulin resistance (HOMA) (r = 0.40, p < 0.0009), indicating an interrelation between these metabolic parameters. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol also showed significant and inverse correlations with BMI (r = –0.34, p < 0.004) and with insulin resistance (HOMA, r = –0.33, p < 0.006) but none with leptin (r = 0.02, p = NS). Furthermore, the regression analysis demonstrated also significant correlations between BMI and high-sensitive CRP plasma levels (r = 0.47, p < 0.0001), insulin resistance (HOMA) and high-sensitive CRP (r = 0.34, p < 0.009), HDL and high-sensitive CRP (r = –0.26, p < 0.04), and leptin and high-sensitive CRP (r = 0.40, p < 0.0001), relating metabolic and inflammatory cardiovascular disease mechanism together.

Hemodynamic parameters.   At baseline, heart rate and blood pressures were comparable among the study groups (Table 2). Sympathetic stimulation with CPT lead to significant increases in heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05), that did not differ between the three groups. Consequently, RPPs were similar between the three groups either at baseline or during CPT (Table 2). Furthermore, the percent change of RPP to CPT in the control, overweight, and obese group was similar (%{Delta}RPP: 39 ± 20% vs. 37 ± 20% vs. 39 ± 23%, respectively). Pharmacologic vasodilation with dipyridamole produced significant increases in heart rate in the three study groups (p < 0.05), whereas systolic and diastolic blood pressures remained essentially unchanged from baseline. No significant differences in heart rate or RPP existed between the three study groups during pharmacologic vasodilation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Hemodynamic Results and Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) During Positron Emission Tomography
 
Myocardial blood flow.   At baseline, MBF did not differ among the three groups (Table 2, Fig. 1). Cold pressor test-induced MBFs were significantly less in the obese group than in the control group (Table 2, Fig. 1). Furthermore, MBFs during CPT in the obese group were significantly lower than in the overweight group (Table 2, Fig. 1). Although the MBF during CPT in the overweight group was lower than in the control group, statistically it did not reach significance (Table 2, Fig. 1). When looking at the {Delta}MBF to CPT, it was significantly less in the overweight and obese groups than in the control group, respectively (Table 2, Fig. 2). Furthermore, {Delta}MBF was significantly more reduced in the obese group than in the overweight group (Table 2, Fig. 2). The group comparison between the {Delta}MBF in the control group was significant as compared with the overweight and obese groups (p < 0.0001 by ANOVA). Dipyridamole MBFs and, thus, the total vasodilator capacity, were statistically not significantly lower in the overweight group compared with the control group but were significantly less in the obese group (Table 2, Fig. 1). Dipyridamole MBFs did not differ significantly between the overweight and obese group (Table 2, Fig. 1). The group comparison of dipyridamole MBFs was not significant (p = NS by ANOVA). To account for interindividual variations in the coronary driving pressure, an index of CVR was calculated as ratio of mean arterial blood pressure to MBF. As depicted in Table 2, the CVR at rest, during CPT, and pharmacologic vasodilation reflected those of MBF for each study group.


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest, during cold pressor testing (CPT), and during pharmacologic vasodilation with dipyridamole for the three study groups (significant difference by t test).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Change of myocardial blood flow ({Delta}MBF) during cold pressor testing (CPT) for the three study groups (significant difference by t test).

 
Changes in MBF related to leptin plasma levels.   Pearson regression analysis did not show a significant correlation between leptin plasma levels and {Delta}MBF to CPT in the entire study population (Fig. 3). Also, leptin plasma levels did not correlate with dipyridamole MBFs (r = 0.07, p = NS). In the overweight group, the regression analysis between leptin plasma levels and {Delta}MBF did not correlate (Fig. 4), whereas in the obese group a significant association was found (Fig. 5). Thus, in the obese group higher leptin plasma levels were associated with relatively higher {Delta}MBFs. In regard to leptin plasma levels and dipyridamole MBFs, the regression analysis did not show an association for either the overweight group (r = 0.10, p = NS) or the obese group (r = 0.15, p = NS).


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation between leptin plasma levels and change of myocardial blood flow ({Delta}MBF) during cold pressor testing (CPT) in the entire study group.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Correlation between leptin plasma levels and change of myocardial blood flow ({Delta}MBF) during cold pressor testing (CPT) in the overweight group.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Correlation between leptin plasma levels and change of myocardial blood flow ({Delta}MBF) during cold pressor testing (CPT) in the obese group.

 
Determinants of {Delta}MBF.   In the entire study group, on univariate analysis only BMI, HDL cholesterol, HOMA, and CRP levels were significantly associated with {Delta}MBF (Table 3). As demonstrated in Table 3, by multivariate analysis only BMI and age remained statistically independently predictors of {Delta}MBF. The univariate analysis in the overweight group (Table 4) demonstrated age to be significantly associated with {Delta}MBF. By multivariate analysis none of the parameters was an independent predictor of the {Delta}MBF (p = NS). Finally, on univariate analysis in the obese group (Table 5), only leptin plasma levels were significantly associated with {Delta}MBF. By multivariate analysis leptin plasma levels and HDL were independently associated with the {Delta}MBF. Further, regarding the attenuated dipyridamole MBFs in the obese group, on univariate analysis only age showed a significant association with the MBFs during dipyridamole (p < 0.029), whereas on multivariate analysis none of the parameters were independently predictive for the dipyridamole MBFs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Entire Study Group
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Overweight Group
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Obese Group
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the present study provide several new findings. First, increased body weight, paralleled by an increase in plasma markers of the insulin-resistance syndrome and chronic inflammation, is independently associated with abnormal coronary circulatory function that progresses from an impairment in endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion in overweight individuals to an impairment of the total vasodilator capacity in obese individuals. This progressive worsening of the coronary circulatory function might provide a mechanistic link between abnormal coronary vasomotion and adverse cardiovascular outcome. Second, in the obese individuals, increased leptin plasma levels were significantly associated with relatively higher endothelium-mediated MBF increases to CPT, which might reflect a beneficial effect of leptin and/or leptin-related but still-undetermined factors on the coronary vascular endothelium to counteract the adverse effects of increases in body weight on coronary vasomotor function.

BMI and coronary vascular function.   Steinberg et al. (5), in their observations, were first to demonstrate that obesity is associated with peripheral endothelial dysfunction, which may be related to insulin resistance. Recent findings support the Steinberg et al. (5) observations by adding (16) that endothelium-mediated coronary vasodilation is progressively impaired with increasing severity of insulin resistance and carbohydrate intolerance. Al Suwaidi et al. (7) studied the coronary vascular reactivity in a large group of 397 consecutive patients with angiographically normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries. These patients were mostly treated for coronary risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes; 48% of them were also smokers. Notably, Al Suwaidi et al. (7) identified obesity as an independent predictor of coronary endothelial dysfunction, strongly suggesting obesity as a possible alternate mediator of coronary vascular disease rather than as an epiphenomenon related to other traditional coronary risk factors commonly associated with obesity. This observation appears to be consistent with recent ones in obese individuals and components of the metabolic syndrome (18), where the waist circumference (as an anthropomorphic index for body weight) and systolic blood pressure were independently related to peripheral endothelial dysfunction.

However, adding HOMA index of insulin resistance removed the independent contribution of waist circumference in the modulation of endothelial dysfunction. Therefore, it is equally possible that the effects of obesity on endothelial dysfunction are primarily related to insulin resistance. In particular, this premise may hold true because obesity is a major cause of insulin resistance and chronic inflammation (8,9). Because previous assessment of coronary vasoreactivity (7) did not evaluate the effect of insulin resistance and chronic inflammation on coronary endothelial function, it remains uncertain whether obesity does indeed independently contribute to the determination of coronary endothelial dysfunction. The results of the current study in a relatively young study population provide first evidence that, indeed, increases in body weight exert a direct effect on coronary endothelial dysfunction independent of overweight- and obesity-related insulin resistance and chronic inflammation. Interestingly and also contrary to a previous investigation (7), impaired coronary vasodilator function was not confined to endothelium-mediated mechanism but extended to an impairment in predominantly endothelium-independent MBF increases to pharmacologic vasodilation in obesity. We also found that endothelium-mediated MBF increases to CPT were not only impaired in obesity but also in overweight individuals. This observation may indicate that, even in otherwise-healthy individuals, being overweight may predispose an individual to an increased risk for future cardiovascular events (3,4).

In the current study population, components of the metabolic syndrome such as BMI, HDL cholesterol, insulin resistance, and CRP plasma level were predictive of the alterations in MBF to sympathetic stimulation. By multivariate analysis, however, only BMI and age remained independent predictors of the CPT-induced changes in MBF. Because on regression analysis BMI revealed significant associations with components of the metabolic syndrome (low HDL cholesterol, insulin resistance, and CRP plasma levels), the independent predictive value of BMI for CPT-induced MBF alterations also suggests that a complex interplay of low HDL cholesterol, insulin resistance, and systemic inflammation affects endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotor function with increases in body weight (8,19). Thus, these results add further evidence for increased body weight as an important integrating determinant of coronary vascular homeostasis (8). Interestingly, the age of study participants also proved to independently predict changes in MBF to cold exposure, which may indicate the endothelium-related change in MBF is not only be related to the age of the study participants and the numbers of cardiovascular risk factors (2) but also to the duration of its exposure (20,21).

The reason for the mechanistic link between increases in body weight and the progressive impairment of coronary circulatory function is not fully understood but is likely multifactorial in etiology, possibly being related to alterations in glucose tolerance, lipid profile, triglycerides, and microinflammation (9). Apart from insulin resistance, elevated plasma free fatty acid levels combined with increased plasma triglycerides and small, dense LDL bodies may alter intracellular signaling of the nitric oxide synthase activity (2,9). In addition, increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) through activation of nicotinamide-adenine-dinucleotide phosphate oxidase may diminish the bioavailability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (22,23). Beneficial effects of acute antioxidant vitamin C challenges on endothelial dysfunction of the brachial artery (24) indeed suggests the involvement of ROS underlying endothelial dysfunction in obesity. The contribution of ROS in mediating abnormal coronary vasomotion in obesity, however, remains to be determined.

Adipocytokine leptin and coronary vasomotion.   Leptin is primarily synthesized in adipocytes and its concentration has been shown to increase as a direct function of increasing percentage body fat, even though for the same amount of body fat there can be up to threefold differences in leptin levels (10,25). Notably, leptin specifically targets receptors on the vascular endothelium and smooth muscle cells (10) that in in vitro studies have been shown to lead to leptin-stimulated prothatherosclerotic effects, such as increases in ROS in cultured human endothelial cells (11), acceleration of vascular cell calcification, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and migration (10). Furthermore, in a mice model elevated leptin plasma levels appear to directly mediate arterial thrombotic disease in vivo (26). On the other hand, leptin has been demonstrated to evoke both endothelium-dependent and -independent vasorelaxation (27,28). Intracoronary infusion of leptin in humans with angiographically normal coronary arteries also may directly lead to a coronary vasodilation of the conduit and arteriolar vessels (29).

In addition, there is, in conclusion, a large body of in vivo evidence indicating that leptin may stimulate increases in the release of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in a rat model (12,28,30), suggesting important antiatherosclerotic and antithrombotic effects (2). In the current study, we found a significant association (r = 0.37, p < 0.036) between increases in leptin plasma levels and CPT-induced changes in MBF in the obese, whereas there was no such association in overweight and in the study populations as a whole. Thus, in obese individuals, increased leptin plasma levels were associated with relatively higher increases in MBF to CPT, which could possibly reflect a beneficial effect of leptin and/or leptin-related but still undetermined factors on the coronary endothelium. The latter observation is also consistent with the observed beneficial effects of leptin administration on endothelium-dependent vasomotion in obese leptin knockout mice (12). However, to provide more definite answers regarding the role of leptin in the regulation of coronary vasomotor control in obesity further studies are needed.

Conclusions.   This study demonstrates for the first time that increased body weight, paralleled by an increase in plasma markers of the insulin-resistance syndrome and chronic inflammation, is independently associated with abnormal coronary circulatory function that progresses from an impairment in endothelium-related coronary vasomotion in overweight individuals to an impairment of the total vasodilator capacity in obese individuals. Moreover, the finding that elevated plasma leptin levels in obesity might exert beneficial effects on the coronary endothelium to counterbalance the adverse effects of increases in body weight on coronary circulatory function warrants further investigations.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Research Grant HL 33177, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; Grant DK058851, DK063240, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases; and Grant RR016996 from the National Center of Research Resources.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Eckel RH, Daniels SR, Jacobs AK, Robertson RM. America’s childrena critical time for prevention. Circulation 2005;111:1866-1868.[Free Full Text]

2. Widlansky ME, Gokce N, Keaney Jr JF, Vita JA. The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1149-1160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Lerman A, Zeiher AM. Endothelial functioncardiac events. Circulation 2005;111:363-368.[Free Full Text]

4. Schindler TH, Nitzsche EU, Schelbert HR, et al. Positron emission tomography-measured abnormal responses of myocardial blood flow to sympathetic stimulation are associated with the risk of developing cardiovascular events J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1505-1512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance J Clin Invest 1996;97:2601-2610.[Web of Science][Medline]

6. Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Nakagawa K, et al. Low body mass index is a risk factor for impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humansrole of nitric oxide and oxidative stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:256-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Al Suwaidi J, Higano ST, Holmes Jr DR, Lennon R, Lerman A. Obesity is independently associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1523-1528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Dandona P, Aljada A, Chaudhuri A, Mohanty P, Garg R. Metabolic syndromea comprehensive perspective based on interactions between obesity, diabetes, and inflammation. Circulation 2005;111:1448-1454.[Free Full Text]

9. Sinaiko AR, Steinberger J, Moran A, et al. Relation of body mass index and insulin resistance to cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory factors, and oxidative stress during adolescence Circulation 2005;111:1985-1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Cooke JP, Oka RK. Does leptin cause vascular disease? Circulation 2002;106:1904-1905.[Free Full Text]

11. Bouloumie A, Marumo T, Lafontan M, Busse R. Leptin induces oxidative stress in human endothelial cells FASEB J 1999;13:1231-1238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Winters B, Mo Z, Brooks-Asplund E, et al. Reduction of obesity, as induced by leptin, reverses endothelial dysfunction in obese (Lep(ob)) mice J Appl Physiol 2000;89:2382-2390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessmentinsulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412-419.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

14. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-1358.[Abstract]

15. Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang SC, et al. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging Circulation 1992;86:1004-1017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Prior JO, Quinones MJ, Hernandez-Pampaloni M, et al. Coronary circulatory dysfunction in insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus Circulation 2005;111:2291-2298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Schindler TH, Nitzsche EU, Olschewski M, et al. PET-measured responses of MBF to cold pressor testing correlate with indices of coronary vasomotion on quantitative coronary angiography J Nucl Med 2004;45:419-428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Lteif AA, Han K, Mather KJ. Obesity, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndromedeterminants of endothelial dysfunction in whites and blacks. Circulation 2005;112:32-38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Schindler TH, Nitzsche EU, Olschewski M, et al. Chronic inflammation and impaired coronary vasoreactivity in patients with coronary risk factors Circulation 2004;110:1069-1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Di Carli MF, Janisse J, Grunberger G, Ager J. Role of chronic hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetes J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1387-1393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Clarkson P, Celermajer DS, Donald AE, et al. Impaired vascular reactivity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is related to disease duration and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:573-579.[Abstract]

22. Munzel T, Daiber A, Ullrich V, Mulsch A. Vascular consequences of endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling for the activity and expression of the soluble guanylyl cyclase and the cGMP-dependent protein kinase Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:1551-1557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Schindler TH, Nitzsche EU, Munzel T, et al. Coronary vasoregulation in patients with various risk factors in response to cold pressor testingcontrasting myocardial blood flow responses to short- and long-term vitamin C administration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:814-822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Perticone F, Ceravolo R, Candigliota M, et al. Obesity and body fat distribution induce endothelial dysfunction by oxidative stressprotective effect of vitamin C. Diabetes 2001;50:159-165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Licinio J, Negrao AB, Mantzoros C, et al. Sex differences in circulating human leptin pulse amplitudeclinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:4140-4147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Konstantinides S, Schafer K, Loskutoff DJ. The prothrombotic effects of leptin possible implications for the risk of cardiovascular disease in obesity Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;947:134-141discussion 141–2.[Web of Science][Medline]

27. Vecchione C, Maffei A, Colella S, et al. Leptin effect on endothelial nitric oxide is mediated through Akt-endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation pathway Diabetes 2002;51:168-173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Lembo G, Vecchione C, Fratta L, et al. Leptin induces direct vasodilation through distinct endothelial mechanisms Diabetes 2000;49:293-297.[Abstract]

29. Matsuda K, Teragawa H, Fukuda Y, Nakagawa K, Higashi Y, Chayama K. Leptin causes nitric-oxide independent coronary artery vasodilation in humans Hypertens Res 2003;26:147-152.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

30. Kimura K, Tsuda K, Baba A, et al. Involvement of nitric oxide in endothelium-dependent arterial relaxation by leptin Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000;273:745-749.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. R. Schelbert
Coronary circulatory function abnormalities in insulin resistance insights from positron emission tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 3, 2009; 53(5 Suppl): S3 - S8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. D. Hingorani, T. Shah, J. P. Casas, S. E. Humphries, and P. J. Talmud
C-Reactive Protein and Coronary Heart Disease: Predictive Test or Therapeutic Target?
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2009; 55(2): 239 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. I. Levy, E. L. Schiffrin, J.-J. Mourad, D. Agostini, E. Vicaut, M. E. Safar, and H. A.J. Struijker-Boudier
Impaired Tissue Perfusion: A Pathology Common to Hypertension, Obesity, and Diabetes Mellitus
Circulation, August 26, 2008; 118(9): 968 - 976.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
I. Torre-Villalvazo, A. R. Tovar, V. E. Ramos-Barragan, M. A. Cerbon-Cervantes, and N. Torres
Soy Protein Ameliorates Metabolic Abnormalities in Liver and Adipose Tissue of Rats Fed a High Fat Diet
J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 462 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. D. Knudson, G. M. Dick, and J. D. Tune
Adipokines and Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2007; 232(6): 727 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. Johannsson, T. Henriksen, and P. O. Iversen
Increase in matrix metalloproteinases from endothelial cells exposed to umbilical cord plasma from high birth weight newborns
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): R1563 - R1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T H Schindler, A D Facta, J O Prior, J Cadenas, W A Hsueh, M J Quinones, and H R Schelbert
Improvement in coronary vascular dysfunction produced with euglycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes
Heart, March 1, 2007; 93(3): 345 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. T. Siegrist, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, T. Schepis, M. Namdar, I. Valenta, F. Aiello, S. Fleischmann, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann
Repeatability of Cold Pressor Test-Induced Flow Increase Assessed with H215O and PET
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1420 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.10.062v1
47/6/1188    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement