|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:594-597, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.044
(Published online 13 January 2006). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Cardiology, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
Manuscript received July 8, 2005; revised manuscript received August 31, 2005, accepted September 8, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jean-Jacques Blanc, Department of Cardiology, Brest University Hospital, Boulevard Tanguy Prigent, 29609 Brest Cedex, France (Email: jean-jacques.blanc{at}univ-brest.fr).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Syncope remains of unknown origin in almost 30% of the patients. Injection of ATP induces in some of these patients, but not in control patients, a ventricular pause
6 s.
METHODS: Patients with syncope of unknown origin had an intravenous injection of 20 mg of ATP. All patients had a tilt test.
RESULTS: Among 214 patients, 19 (8.9%) had a positive ATP test result. The proportion of positive test results was higher (p < 0.002) in women (14.3%) than in men (2.2%). Ten patients (4.7%) had positive ATP and tilt test results. These patients (exclusively women) were older (p < 0.05) at the time of their fist syncope than the 67 patients with a negative ATP test result but a positive tilt test result. There was a trend for these two test results to be correlated (p = 0.07). Side effects were of short duration and benign. The mean duration of pauses was longer in women (p = 0.009). During a mean period of 31 ± 14 months, recurrences of syncope were reported in 25% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The ATP test is a safe test with an "abnormal" result in <10% of patients with syncope of unknown origin. The profile of these patients is characteristic.
| |||||||
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Management of patients with syncope. Patients underwent a systematic clinical investigation including careful history taking (9), measurement of blood pressure in an upright position, and an electrocardiogram. When this workup remained inconclusive, carotid sinus massage and 24-h Holter monitoring were performed. When this second line of investigations remained negative, according to the presence or absence of overt heart disease and/or electrocardiographic abnormalities, electrophysiologic study (EPS) or HUT was performed. The alternative investigation (EPS or HUT) was performed during the following step. Only patients with negative baseline evaluation and negative subsequent test results, including EPS when necessary, were included.
Protocol of investigations. Investigations were performed and interpreted according to recommendations (8). Only the protocol of the ATP test will be described in detail. Patients were investigated in the morning. The ATP and tilt tests were successively performed, and the delay between the two procedures was long enough to allow complete recovery after the first test.
ATP test. Patients were advised of the likelihood of face flushing but not of other possible side effects to avoid excessive emotional stress. Patients with asthma were excluded. Except for drugs known to interact with ATP, the usual treatment was continued.
Twenty milligrams of the drug was dissolved in 10 ml saline solution and injected as a bolus. Electrocardiogram and blood pressure were monitored before and for 2 min after the injection. Patients were asked to report all of their feelings, and they were carefully reported by the physician.
The longest recorded RR interval was measured by the same investigator blinded to other results. The ATP test result was considered positive when the maximum RR interval was
6 s (6). In all of our cases, the ventricular pause resulted from atrioventricular (AV) block.
Tilt test. The protocol of HUT in our laboratory is conventional. Its duration was planned for 45 min or until the patient showed syncope. At the end of the 45 min, 400 µg of glyceryl nitrate was administered sublingually and the tilt period was prolonged for 20 min.
Follow-up. Every patient in whom the maximum RR interval measured during the ATP test exceeded four seconds was prospectively followed up. This follow-up was obtained by questionnaire or telephone interview of the patient, his family, or the general practitioner.
Statistical analysis. The chi-square test was used to compare nominal parameters between the groups. Mean ages were compared by the Student t test. The mean number of syncopal episodes was compared by the non-parametric test of Mann-Whitney. The relationship between the HUT and ATP test was explored by the chi-square test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results of the ATP test. A positive ATP test result was observed in 19 patients (8.9%), who reported a mean number of 4.9 ± 2.6 (range, 2 to 15) previous episodes (Table 1). The first syncope occurred at a mean age of 64.5 ± 19.7 years, and they were 72.1 ± 15.9 years old at the time of the ATP test. The mean duration of the ventricular pause during ATP was 10.7 ± 11.1 s. Women (89.5%) had this significantly (p < 0.0006) more frequently than men (10.5%), and the proportion of positive ATP test results was higher in the subgroup of women than in the subgroup of men (14.3% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.002).
|
Results of the ATP test in patients with a negative tilt test result. Among the 214 patients included, 77 had a positive HUT result, suggesting that syncope was vasovagal. Therefore, the remaining 137 patients (64%) could be considered as having SUO. The ATP test result was positive in 9 of these 137 patients (6.6%). The mean number of previous episodes was 5.3 ± 2.7 (range, 2 to 15). The mean age of the 9 patients at time of the first syncope was 63.6 ± 10.9 years, and was 74.8 ± 10.9 years at the time of ATP test. The mean duration of ventricular pause during ATP was 7.9 ± 8.1 s. The number of women (7, or 77.8%) was higher (p < 0.06) than the number of men (2, or 22.2%). When reported as the number of patients from each gender among the 137 patients, the proportion of positive ATP test results remained higher in women (9.7% vs. 3.1%).
Comparison between patients with only one positive test result. Results of the comparison among the 9 patients with only a positive ATP test result and the 67 patients with only a positive HUT result are listed in Table 2.
|
The relationship between the two tests was not significant, but a clear trend toward a positive association (p = 0.07) was observed: when the HUT result was positive (77 cases), the ATP test result was positive in 10 cases (13%), and when the ATP test result was positive (19 cases), the HUT result was positive in 10 patients (52.6%).
Long-term follow-up of patients with prolonged asystole during the ATP test.
Patients with a ventricular asystole lasting four seconds or more were prospectively followed up. The value of four seconds was chosen because a slight increase in the number of patients after this cutoff point was observed (Fig. 1). Forty-three patients were included: 16 had a pause lasting between 4 and 5 s, 8 between 5 and 6 s, and 19
6 s. Sixteen patients had to be excluded: 14 because of pacemaker implantation and two because they died (pulmonary embolism and cancer). Three additional patients were lost to follow-up. Finally, 24 patients were followed up for a mean period of 29 ± 13 months (range, 5 to 49 months). Recurrences of syncope were reported in 6 patients (23%): 4 had ventricular pauses between 4 and 5 s, and two of 7 s. Among the 8 patients with a pause
6 s and followed up for 31 ± 14 months without treatment, 2 (25%) had recurrence of syncope.
|
|
2 s (Fig. 1). The mean duration of the pause was longer (p = 0.009) in women (3.3 ± 5.5 s) than in men (1.9 ± 1.5 s). Only women (6 patients) had pauses
10 s. No relationship between duration of the pause and weight, analyzed in a subgroup of 69 women, was found (Fig. 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Is the ATP test really safe?. The observed side-effects were expected in most instances, of short duration, completely reversible, and not life threatening. However, induction of long ventricular pauses requiring limited resuscitation maneuvers in <1% of cases leads us to recommend the attendance of a physician during the test.
Does the ATP test select a "new category" of patients with syncope?. Patients with SUO and a positive ATP test result were older and more frequently women than were patients with SUO and a negative ATP test result (7,10). These findings were particularly evident in our study. Furthermore, we found that patients were also older at the time of their first syncope and that women were more sensitive to injection of ATP (longer pauses within the normal range are observed in women). These demographic findings are of value when considering that patients with a positive ATP test result represent a distinctive group among patients with syncope.
Does a positive ATP test result suggest that a spontaneous syncope is an "ATP-sensitive" syncope?. Patients with a positive ATP test result have a special epidemiologic profile, but this is only a weak argument. The reproducibility of the test is another parameter that has been studied and reported as very good (11). However, the most powerful argument would be to monitor cardiac rhythm during spontaneous syncope in patients with a positive ATP test result. This study has been performed in 16 patients (12). Bradycardia was documented by an implantable loop recorder during syncope in 11 patients, and 8 of them had long ventricular pauses, an expected result for patients with a positive ATP test result. Conversely, the five remaining patients were free of bradycardia during syncope. Finally, these results remain controversial especially because patients with a positive HUT result were included.
What are the outcomes of patients with "long pauses" during the ATP test?. This survey was not designed to answer this question, and the proportion of patients lost to follow-up is so great as to substantially bias the results. However, the recurrence rate of syncope seems to be relatively low.
Relationship between ATP and tilt tests. Although we failed to show a significant link between ATP and tilt tests, we observed as others (7,12) an important overlap between the tests. This does not imply that they explore the same phenomenon, but that there is probably a relationship between the possible common underlying phenomena.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Viskin, D. Justo, and A. Halkin Should the 'adenosine-challenge test' be part of the routine work-up for syncope? Europace, August 1, 2007; 9(8): 557 - 558. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brignole, R. Sutton, C. Menozzi, R. Garcia-Civera, A. Moya, W. Wieling, D. Andresen, D. G. Benditt, N. Grovale, T. De Santo, et al. Lack of correlation between the responses to tilt testing and adenosine triphosphate test and the mechanism of spontaneous neurally mediated syncope Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2006; 27(18): 2232 - 2239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |