|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:362-367, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.067
(Published online 22 December 2005). © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
,


,||
* Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Medicines Evaluation Board, the Hague, the Netherlands
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands
|| Inspectorate for Healthcare, the Hague, the Netherlands
¶ Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Manuscript received May 22, 2005; revised manuscript received July 11, 2005, accepted August 1, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bruno H. Ch. Stricker, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands. (Email: b.stricker{at}erasmusmc.nl).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: In developed countries, sudden cardiac death is a major cause of cardiovascular mortality. Prolongation of the QTc interval has been associated with ventricular arrhythmias, but in most population-based studies no consistent association was found between QTc prolongation and total or cardiovascular mortality. Only very few of these studies specifically addressed sudden cardiac death.
METHODS: This study was conducted as part of the Rotterdam Study, a prospective population-based cohort study that comprises 3,105 men and 4,878 women aged 55 years and older. The QTc interval on the electrocardiogram was determined during the baseline visit (1990 to 1993) and the first follow-up examination (1993 to 1995). The association between a prolonged QTc interval and sudden cardiac death was estimated using Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: During an average follow-up period of 6.7 years (standard deviation, 2.3 years) 125 patients died of sudden cardiac death. An abnormally prolonged QTc interval (>450 ms in men, >470 ms in women) was associated with a three-fold increased risk of sudden cardiac death (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.7), after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and heart rate. In patients with an age below the median of 68 years, the corresponding relative risk was 8.0 (95% confidence interval 2.1 to 31.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal QTc prolongation on the electrocardiogram should be viewed as an independent risk factor for sudden cardiac death.
| ||||||||
We investigated whether prolongation of the QTc interval is an independent risk factor for sudden cardiac death in a population of older adults.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Information on smoking was obtained during the home interview of the Rotterdam Study. During the research center visit, non-fasting blood samples were obtained, serum total cholesterol was determined by an enzymatic procedure, and high-density lipoprotein was measured similarly after precipitation of the nonhigh-density lipoprotein fraction (20). Body mass index was computed as weight divided by height squared. Hypertension was defined as the use of antihypertensive medication for high blood pressure, or a systolic blood pressure
160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure
100 mm Hg (21). Diabetes mellitus was defined as the use of blood glucose-lowering medication and/or non-fasting or post-load serum glucose level of
11.1 mmol/l (22). A history of myocardial infarction was assessed by self-report checked with records from general practitioners or cardiologists and/or electrocardiographic evidence. All reported myocardial infarctions were verified, and assessment has been described in detail earlier (23). Assessment of heart failure has also been described in detail earlier. Briefly, prevalent cases were assessed by screening all medical records for at least two signs and symptoms suggestive of heart failure or use of medication for heart failure and review of all hospital discharge letters. Cases of incident heart failure were obtained by continuous monitoring (24,25). The ankle-arm index (AAI) is the ratio of systolic blood pressure at the ankle to systolic blood pressure in the arm (26).
The Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam approved the study.
Outcomes assessment. Participants in the Rotterdam Study are continuously monitored for major events, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, and death. Information on vital status is obtained from municipal health authorities in Rotterdam and general practitioners. In case of a fatal event, general practitioners filled in a questionnaire relating to the circumstances of the death, including time since first symptoms until death, most likely cause of death, and time and place of death. Subsequently, research assistants gathered information about these events at the general practitioners offices. Questionnaires and a copy of the medical records were used to assess whether death could be classified as sudden cardiac death using the most recent definition: natural death attributable to cardiac causes, heralded by abrupt loss of consciousness, within one hour after onset of acute symptoms, or an unwitnessed, unexpected death of someone seen in a stable medical condition <24 h previously with no evidence of a non-cardiac cause (2,3). If death was witnessed and occurred within one hour after the start of symptoms, we assumed it to be a sudden cardiac death, without additional review of medical records. In case of an unwitnessed death, evidence of cardiac causes was searched for, using all available information. Two research physicians coded all events independently according to the International Classification of Diseases-10th edition (sudden cardiac death: I.46 [27]). In case of disagreement, consensus was sought. Finally, a cardiologist, whose judgment was considered decisive, reviewed all events.
ECG interpretation and measurement.
A 10-s 12-lead resting ECG (on average, 8 to 10 beats) was recorded with an ACTA electrocardiograph (ESAOTE, Florence, Italy) at a sampling frequency of 500 Hz and stored digitally. All ECGs were processed by the Modular ECG Analysis System (MEANS) to obtain ECG measurements. The MEANS determines common onsets and offsets for all 12 leads together on one representative averaged beat, with the use of template matching techniques, and has been evaluated extensively (2830). The MEANS program determines the QT interval from the start of the QRS complex until the end of the T-wave. To adjust for heart rate, the Bazett formula (QTc = QT/
RR) was used (31).
The most recent European regulatory guideline document, based on the opinion of an ad-hoc expert group, was used to categorize QTc prolongation into three gender-specific categories. For women, the cutoff points were
450 ms (normal), 451 to 470 ms (borderline), and >470 ms (prolonged), and for men
430 ms (normal), 431 to 450 ms (borderline), and >450 ms (prolonged) (32). In addition, we used different QTc thresholds varying from 440 to 470 ms, based on literature (4,5,710,12,13,18,33,34).
Digitally stored ECGs of 6,134 participants (86% of the participants who visited the research center) were available at the first visit. At the second visit, 4,415 (70%) digitally stored ECGs were available. Missing ECGs were mainly attributable to temporary technical problems with ECG recording. The diagnosis of left bundle branch block (LBBB) was based on established criteria (35).
Statistical analysis.
Differences in baseline characteristics between participants with normal (male,
430 ms; female,
450 ms), borderline (male, 431 to 450 ms; female, 451 to 470 ms), and abnormal (male,
451 ms; female,
471 ms) QTc interval prolongation were examined with analysis of covariance. The hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the association between prolonged QTc interval and sudden cardiac death was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards analysis. The QTc interval at the time of the first visit was taken as the independent variable. For those participants who also had a second ECG at the follow-up visit, the results of follow-up QTc interval measurements were included in the analyses. All information concerning co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, heart failure) was also updated at that time. Potential confounders were included in the multivariate model: age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, heart failure, AAI. Because the Bazett formula tends to undercorrect for lower heart rates and overcorrect for higher heart rates, we also included heart rate in the model. Sensitivity analyses were performed using different QTc cutoff points. Because LBBB can cause secondary repolarization changes and atrial fibrillation can cause difficulties in measuring the QT interval, analyses also were performed after exclusion of patients with LBBB and atrial fibrillation at baseline. We also assessed the risk of sudden cardiac death in participants with at least one cardiovascular risk factor at baseline. We added interaction terms of QTc with age, hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, and heart failure in the model. Finally, we calculated the attributable risk percent as: (HR 1/HR x 100) (36).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results of several epidemiologic studies evaluating total and cardiovascular mortality in relation to QTc prolongation have yielded conflicting results (4,712,18,38), and only a few specifically addressed sudden cardiac death (5,8). In patients referred for Holter monitoring, a QTc interval of more than 440 ms doubled the risk of sudden cardiac death (5). In the Zutphen study, QTc prolongation of 420 ms or more was associated with a three-fold increased risk of sudden cardiac death (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 8.9) in elderly men (ages 65 to 85 years), but not in men ages 40 to 60 years (8). The Framingham study failed to show an association of baseline QTc prolongation with total mortality, sudden death, or coronary mortality (9). The Cardiovascular Health Study, on the other hand, showed an association between a QTc interval of >450 ms and total mortality, and in the Strong Heart Study, a QTc interval of
460 ms was associated with a two-fold increased risk of cardiac and total mortality (12). In the Rotterdam Study, we previously found that QTc prolongation (>440 ms) was associated with an increased risk of total and cardiovascular mortality (7). In this study, however, shorter follow-up and one baseline ECG were used, and the relationship with sudden cardiac death was not specifically evaluated. The risk of sudden cardiac death in the present study was higher in the younger population. This may be partly explained by depletion of susceptible patients at an older age. The proportion of sudden cardiac deaths attributable to a prolonged QTc interval is larger in the younger age category. The absolute risk of sudden cardiac death, however, increases with age (39,40).
The strength of our study lies in the fact that data were available on a large group of patients. The relatively long follow-up period enabled us to take advantage of the fact that a large part of the participants underwent two ECGs. There was little loss to follow-up and detailed information on cardiovascular risk factors. Conflicting results in earlier studies may be partly explained by differences in definition of sudden cardiac death, differences in populations, classification of QTc prolongation, or use of general rather than gender-specific QTc cutoff points. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use gender-specific classification based on a European guideline in a population-based study (32). In addition, in all studies QTc prolongation was based on one baseline ECG and related to outcomes that usually occurred many years later.
Nevertheless, our study also has some limitations. First, we cannot exclude that misclassification of outcomes occurred. We were, however, able to take advantage of the fact that in most cases complete information regarding the facts surrounding death was available, including a detailed questionnaire and in many cases the time between start of symptoms and death. Second, misclassification of exposure may have occurred because we related sudden cardiac death to QTc prolongation measured before the event, and the QTc interval could have changed in the meantime. Finally, our study population consisted of patients aged 55 years and older. Whether our findings also apply to other age groups requires further study.
In conclusion, the results of our study show that abnormal QTc prolongation on the ECG should be viewed as an independent risk factor for sudden cardiac death. Two-thirds of the cases of sudden cardiac death are associated with an abnormal prolongation of the QTc interval.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. van Noord, W. M van der Deure, M. C J M Sturkenboom, S. M J M Straus, A. Hofman, T. J Visser, J. A Kors, J. C M Witteman, and B. H C. Stricker High free thyroxine levels are associated with QTc prolongation in males J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 253 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Due-Andersen, T. Hoi-Hansen, C. E. Larroude, N. V. Olsen, J. K. Kanters, F. Boomsma, U. Pedersen-Bjergaard, and B. Thorsteinsson Cardiac repolarization during hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: impact of basal renin-angiotensin system activity Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 860 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Zemrak and G. A. Kenna Association of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs with Q-T interval prolongation Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2008; 65(11): 1029 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Camilleri, R. Kerstens, A. Rykx, and L. Vandeplassche A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prucalopride for Severe Chronic Constipation N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2344 - 2354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Lehtinen, C. Newton-Cheh, J. T. Ziegler, C. D. Langefeld, B. I. Freedman, K. R. Daniel, D. M. Herrington, and D. W. Bowden Association of NOS1AP Genetic Variants With QT Interval Duration in Families From the Diabetes Heart Study Diabetes, April 1, 2008; 57(4): 1108 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Due-Andersen, T. Hoi-Hansen, N. V. Olsen, C. E. Larroude, J. K. Kanters, F. Boomsma, U. Pedersen-Bjergaard, and B. Thorsteinsson Cardiac repolarization during hypoglycaemia and hypoxaemia in healthy males: impact of renin-angiotensin system activity Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 219 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Albert, E. G. Nam, E. B. Rimm, H. W. Jin, R. J. Hajjar, D. J. Hunter, C. A. MacRae, and P. T. Ellinor Cardiac Sodium Channel Gene Variants and Sudden Cardiac Death in Women Circulation, January 1, 2008; 117(1): 16 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Newton-Cheh, C.-Y. Guo, M. G. Larson, S. L. Musone, A. Surti, A. L. Camargo, J. A. Drake, E. J. Benjamin, D. Levy, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, et al. Common Genetic Variation in KCNH2 Is Associated With QT Interval Duration: The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, September 4, 2007; 116(10): 1128 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-J. L.H.J. Aarnoudse, C. Newton-Cheh, P. I.W. de Bakker, S. M.J.M. Straus, J. A. Kors, A. Hofman, A. G. Uitterlinden, J. C.M. Witteman, and B. H.C. Stricker Common NOS1AP Variants Are Associated With a Prolonged QTc Interval in the Rotterdam Study Circulation, July 3, 2007; 116(1): 10 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 509 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M.J.M. Straus, J. A. Kors, and B. H.Ch. Stricker Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1474 - 1474. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lehmann Prolonged QTc Interval and Sudden Cardiac Death in Older Adults J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1473 - 1474. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Bondy, I. Ceniceros, P. L. Van, V. K. Bakalov, and D. R. Rosing Prolonged Rate-Corrected QT Interval and Other Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Girls With Turner Syndrome Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): e1220 - e1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Stern Electrocardiogram: Still the Cardiologist's Best Friend Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): e753 - e756. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Moss QTc Prolongation and Sudden Cardiac Death: The Association Is in the Detail J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 368 - 369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |