Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:1779-1781, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.005 (Published online 8 October 2005).
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.08.005v1
46/9/1779    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K.

CORRESPONDENCE: RESEARCH CORRESPONDENCE

Noninvasive Measurement of Cardiac Output During Exercise by Inert Gas Rebreathing Technique: A New Tool for Heart Failure Evaluation

Piergiuseppe Agostoni, MD, PhD*, Gaia Cattadori, MD, Anna Apostolo, MD, Mauro Contini, MD, Pietro Palermo, MD, Giancarlo Marenzi, MD and Karlman Wasserman, MD, PhD

* Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Istituto di Cardiologia, Università di Milano, via Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy (Email: piergiuseppe.agostoni{at}ccfm.it).


To the Editor: In heart failure (HF), measurement of cardiac output (CO) during exercise is important to define severity of the disease (1). Simultaneous measurements of oxygen consumption (VO2) and CO during exercise allow calculation of arterio-venous oxygen difference [C(a-v)O2] (2), and, plotting these three variables together, to discriminate exercise limitations due to altered left ventricle pump function from those due to other causes, including muscle enzyme deficiency and deconditioning.

The ideal method for determining CO during exercise should be non-invasive. Inert gas rebreathing (R) with continuous analysis of respired gases is a reliable, safe, and inexpensive method for noninvasive measurements of pulmonary blood flow (PBF), which is equivalent to CO in the absence of shunts.

This study was undertaken in HF patients to assess reliability and repeatability of CO measured during exercise by R using a new device with photoacoustic analyzer instead of mass-spectrometer. We compared CO measurements by R with CO by direct Fick (F) method and thermodilution (T) method. Using the data obtained noninvasively, we constructed the CO/C(a-v)O2/VO2 plot to determine the pathway leading to exercise intolerance in HF patients.

Twenty chronic HF patients (18 males and 2 females, age 53 ± 12 years, New York Heart Association functional class I in 3 cases, class II in 16 cases and class III in 1 case, sinus rhythm 17 cases, atrial fibrillation 3 cases) in stable clinical condition participated in the study. All subjects provided written informed consent to the study.

The direct Fick method (F): CO = VO2/C(a-v)O2. We used the mean of the VO2 recorded in the last 2 min of each step. The C(a-v)O2 was calculated from blood samples collected simultaneously from pulmonary and systemic arteries and immediately measured.

For the thermodilution method (T), we injected five times at each exercise step 10 ml of iced saline via a 7-F thermodilution Swan Ganz catheter into the right atrium. Reported CO data are the mean of the three closest measurements.

For the inert gas rebreathing method (R), we used N2O (blood soluble gas) and SF6 (blood insoluble gas), with concentrations, enriched with O2, of 0.5% and 0.1%, respectively (3) (Innocor, Innovision A/S, Odense, Denmark). Tidal volume was progressively increased in the closed circuit to match the physiologic increase. Use of SF6 allowed us to measure the volume of lungs, valve and rebreathing bag. N2O concentration decreases during the rebreathing maneuver, with a rate proportional to PBF. Three to four respiratory cycles were needed to obtain N2O washout. Absence of pulmonary shunt was defined as arterial O2 saturation >98% (blood samples obtained from the arterial line). In the absence of pulmonary shunt, PBF = CO. In the presence of shunt PBF = CO + shunt flow (see Appendix).

The first CPET was performed on a cycle ergometer, work rate was increased in a ramp pattern selected to achieve peak exercise in 10 min. As for the second and third CPET, gas exchange and R systems were in series. Four-minute step increments equal to one-quarter of the peak exercise workload were used. In the second CPET CO was measured by R. In the third CPET, CO was measured by R, T, and F. We measured CO by T, R, and F, always in that order, at rest, and after the second minute of each workload step.

Patients had moderate HF (peak VO2 = 16.6 ± 2.9 ml/min/kg, ejection fraction 40 ± 9% by echocardiography). The mean workload increment for each step in the second and third CPET, was 25 ± 7 W. Table 1 reports hemodynamic parameters, heart rate, VO2, ventilation, tidal volume, hemoglobin, arterial hemoglobin O2 saturation, CO measurements obtained with T, F, and R, and shunt flow at each step of the third CPET. A significant functional shunt (oxyhemoglobin saturation <98%) was frequently detected. Repeatability of PBF measurements by R was assessed by comparing the results of CPET 2 and 3 (Table 1). The coefficient of variation was 10.8%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Hemodynamic, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test, Pulmonary Blood Flow, and Cardiac Output Measurements by Direct Fick, Thermodilution, and Inert Gas Rebreathing
 
We performed 95 simultaneous CO measurements by the 3 techniques. CO by T versus F was: COT = 1.1425 x COF – 1.358; R = 0.9465; R versus F was: COR = 0.9504 x COF + 0.5366; R = 0.9482; R versus T was: COR = 0.779 x COT + 2.1037; R = 0.9382. C(a-v)O2 can be estimated from measured VO2 and CO by R. The estimated C(a-v)O2 was highly correlated to the measured value: C(a-v)O2 estimated = 0.9326 x C(a-v)O2 measured + 0.5598; R = 0.9040. The Bland-Altman plot confirmed the good agreement among the three techniques. No statistical differences were observed between CO measurements by any technique nor between estimated versus measured C(a-v)O2.

In Figure 1 CO is plotted versus C(a-v)O2. The solid lines are isoVO2 lines. Full symbols are data from F (measured VO2, measured C(a-v)O2 and calculated CO); open symbols are data from R (measured CO, measured VO2, and estimated C(a-v)O2).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cardiac output versus arterio-venous oxygen difference [C(a-v)O2]; solid lines are isoVO2 lines. Solid symbols = data obtained from Fick method; open symbols = data from the inert gas rebreathing technique.

 
It is important to measure CO during exercise in HF. Indeed, a relevant number of patients have a good prognosis, despite low peak VO2, if CO increase during exercise is preserved. At present, no data regarding the use of CO response to exercise as a tool to assess patients’ follow-up are available. This is due to the invasive nature of CO determination during exercise.

The R, T and F CO measurements provided similar results, signifying that both PBF measurements and shunt estimation are reliable. These results were obtained in patients with moderate HF. Stringer et al. (2) reported the CO/C(a-v)O2/VO2 plot of both healthy and HF subjects. For a given VO2, HF patients have a lower CO and a greater C(a-v)O2, when compared to normal subjects. This plot should differentiate among those patients who have muscle deconditioning from those who are more fit. This is important for the selection of the most appropriate patients for intensive cardiac rehabilitation programs. Indeed, the reduced CO response to exercise may not be the sole limitation to physical activity in heart failure patients. The present study shows that this plot can be noninvasively built because the estimation of C(a-v)O2 by R-CO and VO2 measurements appear to give reliable values for C(a-v)O2.

In conclusion, CO in HF can be measured during exercise by R. These measurements are repeatable and agree closely with those from F and T. We showed that C(a-v)O2 can be estimated and the CO/C(a-v)O2/VO2 plot can be built using measurements obtained noninvasively.

Shunt Flow Calculation.  

{05017924.si1}(a)

{05017924.si2}(b)

{05017924.si3}(c)
Rearranging equation b gives:

{05017924.si4}
Inserting into equation c gives:

{05017924.si5}
or

{05017924.si6}(d)
Insertion of equation d in equation a gives us the shunt flow equation:

{05017924.si7}
VO2, CO, PBF, CaO2 and CvO2 were directly measured, while CcO2 was estimated by assuming pulmonary capillary O2 saturation = 98% and using hemoglobin values obtained from the arterial blood samples.


    Footnotes
 
Please note: This paper was sponsored by a Centro Cardiologico Monzino Research Grant.


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. Metra M, Faggiano P, D’Aloia A, et al. Use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing with hemodynamic monitoring in the prognostic assessment of ambulatorial patients with chronic heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:943-950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Stringer WW, Hansen JE, Wasserman K. Cardiac output estimated noninvasively from oxygen uptake during exercise J Appl Physiol 1997;82:908-912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Kallay MC, Hyde RW, Smith RJ, Rothbard RL, Schreiner BF. Cardiac output by rebreathing in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases J Appl Physiol 1987;63:201-210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Stahlberg, M. Damgaard, P. Norsk, A. Gabrielsen, A. Sahlen, C. Linde, and F. Braunschweig
Cardiac output response to changes of the atrioventricular delay in different body positions and during exercise in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy
Europace, July 4, 2009; (2009) eup173v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Hager, S. Fratz, and J. Hess
Effect of sildenafil on haemodynamic response to exercise and exercise capacity in Fontan patients
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2009; 30(4): 507 - 508.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Heart FailHome page
C. C. Lang, P. Karlin, J. Haythe, T. K. Lim, and D. M. Mancini
Peak Cardiac Power Output, Measured Noninvasively, Is a Powerful Predictor of Outcome in Chronic Heart Failure
Circ Heart Fail, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. M. C. Kemps, E. J. M. Thijssen, G. Schep, B. T. H. M. Sleutjes, W. R. De Vries, A. R. Hoogeveen, P. F. F. Wijn, and P. A. F. M. Doevendans
Evaluation of two methods for continuous cardiac output assessment during exercise in chronic heart failure patients
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1822 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Giardini, A. Balducci, S. Specchia, G. Gargiulo, M. Bonvicini, and F. M. Picchio
Effect of sildenafil on haemodynamic response to exercise and exercise capacity in Fontan patients
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2008; 29(13): 1681 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Agostoni, A. Apostolo, and R. K. Albert
Mechanisms of Periodic Breathing During Exercise in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J.-P. Schmid, M. Noveanu, C. Morger, R. Gaillet, M. Capoferri, M. Anderegg, and H. Saner
Influence of water immersion, water gymnastics and swimming on cardiac output in patients with heart failure
Heart, June 1, 2007; 93(6): 722 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Agostoni, M. Bussotti, G. Cattadori, E. Margutti, M. Contini, M. Muratori, G. Marenzi, and C. Fiorentini
Gas diffusion and alveolar-capillary unit in chronic heart failure
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2006; 27(21): 2538 - 2543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.08.005v1
46/9/1779    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement