|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:1002-1005, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.068
(Published online 20 September 2005). © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |



* Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
Highlands Consulting Inc., San Jose, California.
Manuscript received August 16, 2004; revised manuscript received May 25, 2005, accepted May 31, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Peter J. Fitzgerald, Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3554, Stanford, California 94305-5637. (Email: ivus{at}crci.stanford.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Late-acquired ISA has been reported in bare-metal stents (BMS) and brachytherapy and recently in drug-eluting stents. However, the characteristics of late ISA in SES have not been clarified.
METHODS: From the SIRIUS trial, a randomized, multicenter study comparing SES and BMS, serial qualitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS; at stent implantation and eight-month follow-up) was available in 141 patients (BMS: n = 61; SES: n = 80). The IVUS images were reviewed for the presence of ISA.
RESULTS: Incomplete stent apposition at follow-up was observed in 19 patients (BMS: n = 6 [9.8%]; SES: n = 13 [16.3%]; p = NS). Among these, 12 had ISA after intervention and at follow-up (persistent ISA). Late-acquired ISA was seen in the remaining seven cases, all from the SES group (BMS: n = 0; SES: n = 7 [8.7%]; p < 0.05). In late-acquired ISA, there was an increase in external elastic membrane area (after intervention: 16.2 ± 2.7 m2; follow-up: 18.9 ± 3.6 mm2; p < 0.05). The location of stent-vessel wall separation was primarily at the stent edges in persistent ISA cases, whereas late-acquired ISA in SES occurred mostly in the mid portion of the stent. There were no negative clinical events reported for any ISA cases at 12-month clinical follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Late ISA was observed in 8.7% of patients after SES implantation. There were no negative clinical events associated with this IVUS finding at 12-month clinical follow-up; however, careful long-term follow-up will be necessary.
| |||||||||
Drug-eluting stents, as well as intravascular brachytherapy, target several mechanisms to decrease proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, which contribute to the restenotic process. However, intravascular brachytherapy was later associated with a considerably high incidence of late thrombosis, complicating the clinical outcomes (7,8). Through the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), several unusual observations, including unhealed stent edge dissections and incomplete stent apposition (ISA), were made after brachytherapy (9,10). This unusual IVUS finding has received much attention, given the concern that ISA could possibly contribute to one of the factors related to thrombosis (8,11). To date, the incidence of incomplete apposition in DES, however, has not been well investigated. Thus, the aim of our study was to identify the frequency of ISA in sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and clarify its findings and clinical sequelae.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15 mm and
30 mm in length and vessels
2.5 mm and
3.5 mm in diameter were included. Multiple stent use was allowed as needed at the operators discretion. Two types of stent length (8 and 18 mm) were available for both groups, with diameter line-ups of 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mm. Protocols were approved by the local human subjects committee in all participating institutions, and all patients gave written, informed consent. IVUS imaging and analysis. After administration of intracoronary nitroglycerin, IVUS images were acquired using commercially available imaging systems with automated transducer pullback (0.5 mm/s). The IVUS images were interpreted at an independent core laboratory (Stanford Cardiovascular Core Analysis Laboratory) blinded to the treatment protocols.
Qualitative analysis involved review of all IVUS tapes for the presence of ISA. Incomplete stent apposition was defined as one or more stent struts clearly separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in a vessel segment not associated with any side branches. Resolved ISA was defined as ISA observed at baseline but not at follow-up. Persistent ISA was defined as ISA observed both at baseline and follow-up. Late-acquired ISA was defined as ISA observed at follow-up but not at baseline. Typical IVUS images of late-acquired ISA are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
The adjudication of the opinions was based on the consensus of three independent analysts (J. A., Y. H., and S. S.).
|
|
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). Continuous data are presented as the mean value ± SD, and categorical data are presented as frequencies. Continuous variables between persistent ISA and late-acquired ISA were compared by use of the unpaired Student t test; otherwise, the paired Student t test was used for comparing continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square statistics or the Fisher exact test. The Fisher exact test was used if there was an expected cell value <5. Significance was assumed at a value of p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism of late-acquired ISA in SES was mainly focal positive vessel remodeling, as previously reported in BMS (14,15). In three ISA segments, there was an increase >20% in vessel area. The plaque area was not significantly different between post-intervention and follow-up, which suggests that plaque regression (9), as seen with intravascular brachytherapy, is not the primary reason for late-acquired ISA in SES. Incomplete stent apposition was mainly observed on the relatively disease-free side of the vessel wall (78%), which lends further support to this theory. More injury to the vasoelastic normal wall, coupled with a drug that may delay the healing process, could contribute to this phenomenon.
The frequency of ISA per patient was quite similar in both single and multiple stent cases. In addition, late-acquired ISA was not seen originating from stent overlap. Thus, late-acquired ISA may not be a dose-dependent event of sirolimus. From our patient subset, multiple stenting did not seem to predispose vessel wall separation from stent struts; however, studies involving a larger patient population may be necessary to confirm this observation.
Previous reports demonstrated ISA at the edges of the stent in intravascular brachytherapy (16), as well as ISA after BMS implantation (13). In the present study, late-acquired ISA in SES largely occurred in the mid portion of the stent. The location within the stent, distinct from previous reports, characterizes late-acquired ISA with SES, in agreement with the results of the RAVEL trial. The different locations of ISA indicate involvement of different biologic processes in the focal positive remodeling and subsequent development of ISA in SES. It is intriguing to note that there is relatively less efficacy of neointimal suppression at the edges in SES (17). This asymmetric distribution of neointimal tissue within the stent may be associated with the location of late-acquired ISA with SES. Late-acquired ISA may occur due to profound localized inhibition of neointimal formation in disease-free segments of the vessel, delaying early reparative events that usually enable the vessel wall to incorporate a stent. Flow dynamics in these segments may also favor positive remodeling of the artery at sites of delayed neointimal formation, resulting in late-acquired ISA.
Incomplete stent apposition at the stent edges provides an exit for both inward and outward blood flow. On the other hand, there is a hypothetical concern that non-apposed segments in the middle of the stent may produce a different blood flow property with its cul-de-sac formation. Despite findings of either persistent or late-acquired ISA, no negative clinical events were associated with these cases at 12-month clinical follow-up. The three-year data from RAVEL trial also fail to show any increase in adverse cardiac events, despite the high incidence of incomplete apposition at follow-up (18). It is still unclear whether this particular IVUS finding may relate to future adverse events. We have yet to elucidate the natural history of this unusual IVUS finding. However, in view of the increased incidence of late-acquired ISA in SES, careful long-term follow-up is warranted.
Study limitations. First, this study is based on a relatively small number of late-acquired ISA cases, raising the possibility of selection bias. Second, IVUS is unable to identify neointima <100 µm in thickness and acellular proteinaceous material; thus, we are not able to evaluate re-endothelialization surrounding the stent struts. Third, there is a lack of evidence on clinical sequelae related to this particular morphologic IVUS finding.
Conclusions. Serial IVUS analysis from the SIRIUS trial found an 8.7% incidence of late ISA after SES implantation, with late ISA being observed primarily in the middle of the stent. Despite freedom from clinical events, careful long-term follow-up may be necessary, especially in a case environment that may have variable antiplatelet therapy.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Honda and P. J. Fitzgerald Frontiers in Intravascular Imaging Technologies Circulation, April 15, 2008; 117(15): 2024 - 2037. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. van der Hoeven, S.-S. Liem, J. Dijkstra, S. C. Bergheanu, H. Putter, M. L. Antoni, D. E. Atsma, M. Bootsma, K. Zeppenfeld, J. W. Jukema, et al. Stent Malapposition After Sirolimus-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Acute and 9-Month Intravascular Ultrasound Results of the MISSION! Intervention Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 192 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colombo and A. Latib Late incomplete stent apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: a true risk factor or "an innocent bystander"? Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 253 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Hoffmann, M-C Morice, J W Moses, P J Fitzgerald, L Mauri, G Breithardt, J Schofer, P W Serruys, H-P Stoll, and M B Leon Impact of late incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 4-year clinical events: intravascular ultrasound analysis from the multicentre, randomised, RAVEL, E-SIRIUS and SIRIUS trials Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 322 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. van der Hoeven, S.-S. Liem, J. W. Jukema, N. Suraphakdee, H. Putter, J. Dijkstra, D. E. Atsma, M. Bootsma, K. Zeppenfeld, P. V. Oemrawsingh, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 9-month angiographic and intravascular ultrasound results and 12-month clinical outcome results from the MISSION! Intervention Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 12, 2008; 51(6): 618 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Aoki, A. Kirtane, M. B. Leon, and G. Dangas Coronary Artery Aneurysms After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 14 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Romagnoli, G. M. Sangiorgi, J. Cosgrave, E. Guillet, and A. Colombo Drug-Eluting Stenting: The Case for Post-Dilation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 22 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Doyle, C. S. Rihal, C. J. O'Sullivan, R. J. Lennon, H. J. Wiste, M. Bell, J. Bresnahan, and D. R. Holmes Jr Outcomes of Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis During Extended Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Bare-Metal Coronary Stents Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2391 - 2398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker and B. Meier Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): 1952 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-K. Hong, G. S. Mintz, C. W. Lee, D.-W. Park, S.-W. Lee, Y.-H. Kim, D.-H. Kang, S.-S. Cheong, J.-K. Song, J.-J. Kim, et al. Impact of Late Drug-Eluting Stent Malapposition on 3-Year Clinical Events J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 9, 2007; 50(15): 1515 - 1516. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jaffe and B. H. Strauss Late and Very Late Thrombosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: Evolving Concepts and Perspectives J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 10, 2007; 50(2): 119 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Weissman, S. G. Ellis, E. Grube, K. D. Dawkins, J. D. Greenberg, T. Mann, L. A. Cannon, P. A. Cambier, S. Fernandez, G. S. Mintz, et al. Effect of the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent on vascular tissue responses: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound integrated analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2007; 28(13): 1574 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Siqueira, A. A. Abizaid, J. d. R. Costa, F. Feres, L. A. Mattos, R. Staico, A. A. Abizaid, L. F. Tanajura, A. Chaves, M. Centemero, et al. Late incomplete apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence and potential for adverse clinical outcomes Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2007; 28(11): 1304 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Mintz What to Do About Late Incomplete Stent Apposition? Circulation, May 8, 2007; 115(18): 2379 - 2381. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cook, P. Wenaweser, M. Togni, M. Billinger, C. Morger, C. Seiler, R. Vogel, O. Hess, B. Meier, and S. Windecker Incomplete Stent Apposition and Very Late Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Circulation, May 8, 2007; 115(18): 2426 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Matsumoto, J. Shite, T. Shinke, H. Otake, Y. Tanino, D. Ogasawara, T. Sawada, O. L. Paredes, K.-i. Hirata, and M. Yokoyama Neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents at 6-month follow-up: evaluated by optical coherence tomography Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2007; 28(8): 961 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Kandzari, M. B. Leon, J. J. Popma, P. J. Fitzgerald, C. O'Shaughnessy, M. W. Ball, M. Turco, R. J. Applegate, P. A. Gurbel, M. G. Midei, et al. Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Native Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 19, 2006; 48(12): 2440 - 2447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kimmelstiel Multislice Computed Tomography After Left Main Drug-Eluting Stenting: Are We Putting the CarT Before the Horse? Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): 616 - 619. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Mintz and N. J. Weissman Intravascular Ultrasound in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 421 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jimenez-Quevedo, M. Sabate, D. J. Angiolillo, M. A. Costa, F. Alfonso, J. A. Gomez-Hospital, R. Hernandez-Antolin, C. Banuelos, J. Goicolea, F. Fernandez-Aviles, et al. Vascular Effects of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients: Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Results of the Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2172 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The Year in Interventional Cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1689 - 1706. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |