Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 2 (A) Correlation between maximum percent diameter stenosis by quantitative analysis of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) compared with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The Spearman correlation showed an R value of 0.76, p < 0.0001, n = 130. (B) Bland-Altman analysis of the differences of percent diameter stenosis measured by MSCT and QCA compared to the average percent diameter stenosis by the two methods. The mean difference was 1.3 ± 14.2% (central line). A total of 94% (122 of 130) of the values lie within 1.96 SDs of the mean (outer lines). A total of 92% (119 of 130) of the observations were within one qualitative stenosis score (25%) of the mean difference. There was no significant correlation between stenosis difference and stenosis severity (Spearman correlation coefficient = –0.07, p = 0.59).





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement