CLINICAL RESEARCH: PLATELETS AND STENT THROMBOSIS
Triple Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting
Impact on Stent Thrombosis
Seung-Whan Lee, MD,
Seong-Wook Park, MD, PhD, FACC*,
Myeong-Ki Hong, MD, PhD,
Young-Hak Kim, MD, PhD,
Bong-Ki Lee, MD,
Jong-Min Song, MD, PhD,
Ki Hoon Han, MD, PhD,
Cheol Whan Lee, MD, PhD,
Duk-Hyun Kang, MD, PhD,
Jae-Kwan Song, MD, PhD, FACC,
Jae-Joong Kim, MD, PhD and
Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, FACC
Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Manuscript received April 17, 2005;
revised manuscript received July 19, 2005,
accepted July 25, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Seong-Wook Park, Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea. (Email: swpark{at}amc.seoul.kr).
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine and cilostazol after coronary stenting.
BACKGROUND: Triple antiplatelet therapy might have beneficial effect to prevent thrombotic complications in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
METHODS: Patients undergoing successful coronary stenting were divided into dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine, group I, n = 1,597) and triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine plus cilostazol, group II, n = 1,415) groups. The primary end point included death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis within 30 days. The secondary end point was side effects of study drugs, including major bleeding, vascular complication, hepatic dysfunction, and hematological complications.
RESULTS: Multi-vessel stenting and the use of long stents were more prevalent in group II than in group I. The primary end point was 0.8% in group I and 0.3% in group II (p = 0.085). Stent thrombosis within 30 days was significantly lower in group II (n = 1, 0.1%) than in group I (n = 9, 0.5%; p = 0.024). The independent predictors of stent thrombosis were primary stenting (odds ratio [OR] 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 30.8, p = 0.003) and triple therapy (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.015 to 0.98, p = 0.048). The overall adverse drug effects, including major bleeding, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, were no different between two groups (1.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.104).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the dual antiplatelet regimen, triple antiplatelet therapy seemed to be more effective in preventing thrombotic complications after stenting without an increased risk of side effects. Triple antiplatelet therapy might be safely applied in patients or lesions with a high risk of stent thrombosis.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ADP = adenosine diphosphate | | AMI = acute myocardial infarction | | CI = confidence interval | | MACE = major adverse cardiac event | | OR = odds ratio |
|
Cilostazol is a potent oral antiplatelet agent with a rapid onset of action that selectively inhibits phosphodiesterase III, a mechanism different from adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists (1,2). Previous studies have suggested that cilostazol has similar antiplatelet effects as ticlopidine (3) or clopidogrel (4). Adding cilostazol to aspirin and clopidogrel regimen was shown to provide additional suppression of the expression of P-selectin, a marker of platelet activation, in 76.6% of study population, suggesting synergistic or additive antiplatelet effects (5). From these theoretical, experimental, and clinical backgrounds, we assumed that triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, ADP-receptor antagonists, and cilostazol might have a beneficial effect on the prevention of thrombotic complications following coronary stenting. Therefore, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy of aspirin, clopidogrel (or ticlopidine), and cilostazol compared with dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (or ticlopidine) in patients undergoing successful coronary artery stenting.
|
Methods
|
|---|
Study patients.
From April 1998 to October 2003, 3,012 consecutive patients who underwent successful coronary stenting were eligible for this study. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic coronary artery disease or documented myocardial ischemia, by treadmill exercise test or thallium single-photon emission computerized tomography and angiographic evidence of  50% diameter stenosis or primary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and postprocedure Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3. The criteria for exclusion were a contraindication to antiplatelet agents, severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction  30%), left main coronary artery stenosis, known bleeding disorders, thrombocytopenia (<150 x 109/l), severe hepatic or renal dysfunction (serum creatinine 2 mg/dl), administration of oral anticoagulants, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and other antiplatelet agents, and patients who underwent drug-eluting stenting. All eligible patients who underwent successful coronary stenting were divided into two groups: a dual group (aspirin plus clopidogrel [n = 868] or ticlopidine [n = 729], group I, n = 1,597), and a triple therapy group (aspirin plus cilostazol plus clopidogrel [n = 502] or ticlopidine [n = 913], group II, n = 1,415). Aspirin and clopidogrel (or ticlopidine) were started at least 2 days before stenting in patients who underwent elective stenting (n = 2,536). In case of unplanned stenting, a loading dose of each antiplatelet agent was administrated immediately after stenting (n = 476). The loading/maintenance dose for each antiplatelet agent was 300 mg/75 mg q.d. for clopidogrel, 500 mg/250 mg b.i.d. for ticlopidine, and 200 mg/100 mg b.i.d. for cilostazol. Aspirin was given 200 mg once a day.
Stent implantation procedure.
Stents were deployed with standard techniques. During procedure, patients received heparin to maintain the activated clotting time 250 s. Heparin was not continued after coronary stenting except for the patients with ST-segment elevation AMI. In case of primary stenting, heparin was continuously infused for two days after the procedure.
Quantitative coronary angiography analysis.
Two experienced angiographers who were unaware of the study goal analyzed the angiographic results with an on-line quantitative angiographic analysis system (ANCOR V2.0, Siemens, Germany). Percent diameter stenosis, minimal lumen diameter, and reference diameter before and after stenting were measured during diastole after intracoronary nitroglycerin administration.
Clinical follow-up and events.
All patients were seen as outpatients 1 month after discharge. Complete blood count and blood biochemistry, including liver and renal function tests, were performed before and 1 month after the procedure. The primary end point was the incidence of primary cardiac events, defined as stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization within one month. The secondary end points included peripheral vascular complications, major bleeding, and any adverse events (neutropenia <1.5 x 109/l, thrombocytopenia <100 x 109/l, skin rash, liver dysfunction, and gastrointestinal trouble). Acute stent thrombosis was defined as thrombotic stent closure within 24 h after stent deployment, and subacute stent thrombosis was defined as thrombotic stent closure 24 h after the procedure. Myocardial infarction was diagnosed when creatine kinase-MB was elevated more than three-fold.
Statistical analysis.
Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Data are expressed as mean ± SD for continuous variables, and frequencies, for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared by the unpaired Student t test and categorical variables by chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Multi-variable logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors for stent thrombosis. A two-sided p value <0.05 was required for statistical significance.
|
Results
|
|---|
Baseline characteristics.
There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline clinical characteristics except a higher prevalence of hypertension in group I versus group II (Table 1).
Angiographic and procedural characteristics.
The patients in group II had more unfavorable anatomical and procedural characteristics than those in group I (Table 2). A long stent 30 mm was more frequently deployed in group II, and the number of implanted stents per patient was also higher in group II than in group I.
Primary end point at one month.
A complete 30-day follow-up was available for all eligible patients. The primary end point of stent thrombosis or MACE was 0.8% in group I and 0.3% in group II (p = 0.085). The incidence of stent thrombosis was significantly lower in group II than in group I (0.5% in group I vs. 0.1% in group II, p = 0.024) (Table 3). Acute stent thrombosis occurred in three patients, whereas subacute stent thrombosis occurred in seven patients, with a mean time of occurrence of 5.9 ± 9.1 days after the procedure. Of all ten patients with stent thrombosis, three (all from group I) had undergone primary stenting for AMI, whereas the other seven (six in group I and one in group II) had undergone elective stenting (Table 3). Eight patients died during the 30-day follow-up period: five (four cardiac deaths and one noncardiac death) in group I and three cardiac deaths in group II.
Secondary end point at one month.
Twenty-one patients (11 in group I and 10 in group II) experienced major bleeding requiring transfusion (Table 4). The secondary end point of the occurrence of adverse events was similar in both groups (28 patients [1.8%] in group I vs. 37 patients [2.6%] in group I; p = 0.140). The incidence of adverse side effects requiring termination of medication was similar in both groups, 11 patients (0.7%) in group I vs. 7 patients (0.5%) in group II (p = 0.490). These side effects resolved after drug withdrawal and supportive care.
Predictors of stent thrombosis.
All clinical and angiographic variables with p < 0.2 in univariate analysis were tested. On the multi-variable analysis, the independent predictors of stent thrombosis were primary stenting in the setting of AMI (odds ratio [OR] 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 30.8, p = 0.003) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.015 to 0.98, p = 0.048).
|
Discussion
|
|---|
This study demonstrates that triple antiplatelet therapy seems to be more effective in preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stenting, without an increased risk of side effects compared with the dual antiplatelet regimen.
The incidence of MACE was lower in the triple therapy group (0.8% in group I and 0.3% in group II, p = 0.085), although it did not reach to a statistically significant level. Triple antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the incidence of stent thrombosis when compared with dual therapy. Triple therapy was an independent predictor of stent thrombosis by multi-variable analysis (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.015 to 0.98, p = 0.048). The incidence of stent thrombosis (1 of 1,415, 0.1%) in the triple group is also much lower than the anecdotal reports of 0.4% to 2.0% in previous studies with dual antiplatelet therapy (6,7). These results might provide the rationale for using triple antiplatelet therapy in patients or lesions with a high-risk of stent thrombosis.
The incidence of stent thrombosis was significantly higher in patients who underwent primary stenting for AMI (3 of 157, 1.9%) than in patients without primary stenting (7 of 2,855, 0.2%; p = 0.013). A high incidence of stent thrombosis in primary stenting was also shown in a previous randomized trial (4). Moreover, in the current study, primary stenting for AMI was found to be one of the independent predictors for stent thrombosis. The high probability of stent thrombosis in AMI has been suggested in studies showing that even a large loading dose (600 mg) of clopidogrel did not inhibit aggregation and degranulation of platelets by thrombin-related activating peptides (25 µmol/l) in an environment of high thrombin activity (8) and that marked increased platelet reactivity was observed in patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (9). Considering these results, it would be a reasonable approach to add other potent antiplatelet agents to aspirin and ADP receptor antagonists after coronary stenting in patients with a high thrombin burden or high risk of stent thrombosis.
The exact mechanism of beneficial effects of triple antiplatelet therapy remains uncertain. Previous studies reported that elevated cyclic adenosine monophosphate, either by inhibiting ADP-induced inhibition of adenylate cyclase by ADP-receptor antagonist or inhibiting phosphodiesterase III by cilostazol, inhibited platelet aggregation and P-selectin release induced by thrombin, ADP, and thromboxane A2 (10,11). A marker of platelet activation, P-selectin is expressed exclusively by platelet activation, promotes fibrin deposition, and leads to the accumulation of leucocytes in areas of vascular injury and arterial thrombogenesis (12). A recent report demonstrated that adding cilostazol to aspirin and clopidogrel regimen reduced platelet activation below the level achieved by aspirin and clopidogrel via additional suppression of P-selectin expression (5). The incidence of poor suppression of P-selectin expression by clopidogrel ranged from 29% to 100% (13,14). These previous reports support the enhanced antiplatelet effects of triple regimen. Furthermore, like ADP-receptor antagonist, cilostazol significantly inhibited platelet aggregation induced by ADP and other agonists, which suggests the possibility of a synergistic or additive effect for inhibition of platelet aggregation in response to ADP and other agonists (15).
The clinical benefit of triple therapy might be offset by an associated increase in major bleeding. The rate of major bleeding, however, was similar between the two groups. This result might be partially explained by a previous study showing that, compared with clopidogrel, cilostazol had similarly effective antiplatelet action without a significant increase in bleeding time (15). The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was also similar between the two groups. Therefore, cilostazol might be safely added to the conventional dual antiplatelet regimen after coronary stenting in patients with high risk for stent thrombosis.
A few limitations need to be addressed. First, definitive statements may not be made regarding efficacy or application of the results, directly to patients or lesions with a high risk of stent thrombosis, because of the non-randomized nature of the retrospective evaluation. Second, despite the apparently large sample size, this study was underpowered to prove meaningful differences in MACE between two groups. Third, the study drugs were administered with an open-label, making bias possible. Prospective randomized trials should be done to confirm the effects of the triple antiplatelet regimen in patients or lesions with high risk of stent thrombosis. Finally, the beneficial effects of the triple antiplatelet regimen in bare metal stenting may not be extrapolated to drug-eluting stenting. It would be worth evaluating the efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stenting, particularly in patients or lesions with a high risk of stent thrombosis.
|
Footnotes
|
|---|
This work was partly supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Seoul, Korea, and a grant of the Korea Health 21 R & D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea (0412-CR02-0704-0001).
|
References
|
|---|
1. Tanaka T, Ishikawa T, Hagiwara M, Onoda K, Itoh H, Hidaka H. Effects of cilostazol, a selective cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, on the contraction of vascular smooth muscle Pharmacology 1988;36:313-320.[Web of Science][Medline]
2. Kunishima T, Musha H, Eto F, et al. A randomized trial of aspirin versus cilostazol therapy after successful coronary stent implantation Clin Ther 1997;19:1058-1066.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Park SW, Lee CW, Kim HS, et al. Comparison of cilostazol versus ticlopidine therapy after stent implantation Am J Cardiol 1999;84:511-514.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Lee SW, Park SW, Hong MK, et al. Comparison of cilostazol and clopidogrel after successful coronary stenting Am J Cardiol 2005;95:859-862.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
5. Ahn JC, Song WH, Kwon JA, et al. Effects of cilostazol on platelet activation in coronary stenting patients who already treated with aspirin and clopidogrel Korean J Intern Med 2004;19:230-236.[Medline]
6. Müller C, Buttner HJ, Petersen J, Roskamm H. A randomized comparison of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin after the placement of coronary artery stents Circulation 2000;101:590-593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Cheneau E, Leborgne L, Mintz GS, et al. Predictors of subacute stent thrombosisresults of a systematic intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2003;108:43-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Müller I, Seyfarth M, Rüdiger S, et al. Effect of a high loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement Heart 2001;85:92-93.[Free Full Text]
9. Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Ott I, Schiessler A, Schömig A. Platelet function in acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty Circulation 1996;93:229-237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Ryningen A, Jensen BO, Holmsen H. Elevation of cyclic AMP decreases phosphoinositide turnover and inhibits thrombin-induced secretion in human platelets Biochem Biophys Acta 1998;1394:235-248.[Medline]
11. Defreyn G, Gachet C, Savi P, Driot F, Cazenave JP, Maffrand JP. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel (SR 25990C) selectively neutralize ADP inhibition of PGE1-activated platelet adenylate cyclase in rats and rabbits Thromb Haemost 1991;65:186-190.[Web of Science][Medline]
12. Yokpyama S, Ikeda H, Haramaki N, Yasukawa H, Murohara T, Imaizumi T. Platelet P-selectin plays an important role in arterial thrombogenesis by forming large stable platelet-leukocyte aggregates J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1280-1286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Gawaz M, Seyfarth M, Müller I, et al. Comparison of effects of clopidogrel versus ticlopidine on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement Am J Cardiol 2001;87:332-336.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, O’Connor CM. Clopidogrel for coronary stentingresponse variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003;107:2908-2913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kim JS, Lee KS, Kim YI, Tamai Y, Nakahata R, Takami H. A randomized crossover comparative study of aspirin, cilostazol and clopidogrel in normal controlsanalysis with quantitative bleeding time and platelet aggregation test. J Clin Neurosci 2004;11:600-602.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
G. Montalescot, D. Brieger, K. A. Eagle, F. A. Anderson Jr, G. FitzGerald, M. S. Lee, Ph. G. Steg, A. Avezum, S. G. Goodman, J. M. Gore, et al.
Unprotected left main revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Eur. Heart J.,
October 1, 2009;
30(19):
2308 - 2317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Chen, D. Hou, L. Pendyala, J. A. Goudevenos, and N. G. Kounis
Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis: The Kounis Hypersensitivity-Associated Acute Coronary Syndrome Revisited
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
July 1, 2009;
2(7):
583 - 593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-Y. Chen, S.-W. Rha, Y.-J. Li, K. L. Poddar, Z. Jin, Y. Minami, L. Wang, E. J. Kim, C. G. Park, H. S. Seo, et al.
Triple Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Circulation,
June 30, 2009;
119(25):
3207 - 3214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Prasad and D. R Holmes
Update on dual antiplatelet therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention
Heart,
June 1, 2009;
95(11):
861 - 865.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. H. Jeong, S.-W. Lee, B.-R. Choi, I.-S. Kim, M.-K. Seo, C. H. Kwak, J.-Y. Hwang, and S.-W. Park
Randomized Comparison of Adjunctive Cilostazol Versus High Maintenance Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With High Post-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Results of the ACCEL-RESISTANCE (Adjunctive Cilostazol Versus High Maintenance Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Clopidogrel Resistance) Randomized Study.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 31, 2009;
53(13):
1101 - 1109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-J. Park and Y.-H. Kim
Current Status of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents in Asia
Circulation,
December 16, 2008;
118(25):
2730 - 2737.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K. Chhatriwalla and D. L. Bhatt
Should dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents be continued for more than 1 year?: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stents Should Be Continued for More Than One Year and Preferably Indefinitely
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
December 1, 2008;
1(3):
217 - 225.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Angiolillo, P. Capranzano, S. Goto, M. Aslam, B. Desai, R. K. Charlton, Y. Suzuki, L. C. Box, S. B. Shoemaker, M. M. Zenni, et al.
A randomized study assessing the impact of cilostazol on platelet function profiles in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy: results of the OPTIMUS-2 study
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2008;
29(18):
2202 - 2211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Chesebro
Diabetic atherothrombosis: helpful adjunctive therapy
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2008;
29(18):
2191 - 2192.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Blanc, J. Almendral, M. Brignole, M. Fatemi, K. Gjesdal, E. Gonzalez-Torrecilla, P. Kulakowski, G. Y.H. Lip, D. Shah, C. Wolpert, et al.
Consensus document on antithrombotic therapy in the setting of electrophysiological procedures
Europace,
May 1, 2008;
10(5):
513 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Kereiakes and P. A. Gurbel
Peri-Procedural Platelet Function and Platelet Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
April 1, 2008;
1(2):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Windecker and B. Meier
Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis
Circulation,
October 23, 2007;
116(17):
1952 - 1965.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Jaffe and B. H. Strauss
Late and Very Late Thrombosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: Evolving Concepts and Perspectives
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 10, 2007;
50(2):
119 - 127.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Holmes Jr, D. J. Kereiakes, W. K. Laskey, A. Colombo, S. G. Ellis, T. D. Henry, J. J. Popma, P. W.J.C. Serruys, T. Kimura, D. O. Williams, et al.
Thrombosis and Drug-Eluting Stents: An Objective Appraisal
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 10, 2007;
50(2):
109 - 118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Moliterno and C. L. Campbell
Unraveling Questions Surrounding Clopidogrel Resistance and Stent Thrombosis: One Less Snag
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 19, 2007;
49(24):
2318 - 2319.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Buonamici, R. Marcucci, A. Migliorini, G. F. Gensini, A. Santini, R. Paniccia, G. Moschi, A. M. Gori, R. Abbate, and D. Antoniucci
Impact of Platelet Reactivity After Clopidogrel Administration on Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 19, 2007;
49(24):
2312 - 2317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Topakian, K. Nussbaumer, J. Trenkler, F. T. Aichner, J.-H. Buhk, A. Wellmer, and M. Knauth
Late in-stent thrombosis following carotid angioplasty and stenting
Neurology,
January 30, 2007;
68(5):
392 - 393.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-Y. Brichon, P. Boitet, A. Dujon, J. Mouroux, C. Peillon, M. Riquet, J.-F. Velly, and H.-B. Ris
Perioperative in-stent thrombosis after lung resection performed within 3 months of coronary stenting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
November 1, 2006;
30(5):
793 - 796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 18, 2006;
47(8):
1689 - 1706.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Stenting Antiplatelet Therapy: Further Insights
Journal Watch Cardiology,
December 16, 2005;
2005(1216):
4 - 4.
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
Top
Abstract
Methods