Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:1799-1802, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.053 (Published online 18 October 2005).
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.07.053v1
46/10/1799    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thum, T.
Right arrow Articles by Anker, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thum, T.
Right arrow Articles by Anker, S. D.

VIEWPOINT

The Dying Stem Cell Hypothesis

Immune Modulation as a Novel Mechanism for Progenitor Cell Therapy in Cardiac Muscle

Thomas Thum, MD*,{dagger},*, Johann Bauersachs, MD{dagger}, Philip A. Poole-Wilson, MD, FRCP*, Hans-Dieter Volk, MD, PhD{ddagger} and Stefan D. Anker, MD, PhD*,§,*

* Department of Clinical Cardiology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany
{ddagger} Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
§ Applied Cachexia Research, Department of Cardiology, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany

Manuscript received June 3, 2005; revised manuscript received July 1, 2005, accepted July 12, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Thomas Thum, Julius-Maximilians University, Cardiology, Josef-Schneider Str. 2, Würzburg, Bavaria 97080, Germany. (Email: thum_t{at}klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de).

* Prof. Stefan Anker, National Heart and Lung Institute, Department of Clinical Cardiology, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, United Kingdom. (Email: s.anker{at}imperial.ac.uk).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 The dying stem cell...
 Support of the hypothesis
 Implications of the hypothesis
 Testing the hypothesis
 References
 
Stem cell transplantation after myocardial infarction has been claimed to restore cardiac function, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. A minority of transplanted cells become adherent in heart tissue and contribute to neovascularization, whereas many donor cells die from apoptosis. We propose that apoptosis of transplanted cells modulates local tissue reactions. Apoptotic cells impact on immune reactivity by down-regulating innate and adaptive immunity, deactivating macrophages and dendritic cells, and stimulating regulatory T cells. This leads to reduced scar formation, repressed myocardial apoptosis, and improved cardiac outcome.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AMI = acute myocardial infarction
  IL = interleukin
  PS = phosphatidylserine
  TGF = transforming growth factor
  TLR = Toll-like receptor


Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often leads to congestive heart failure and is one of the most frequent causes of hospital stays in developed countries (1). Despite pharmacological treatment and mechanical revascularization techniques, there is no effective therapy to replace infarcted myocardium. Transplantation of autologous stem cells isolated from peripheral blood or bone marrow into the site of cardiac ischemia has been claimed to improve cardiac function (reviewed in von Harsdorf et al. [2]). It is not known whether such benefit is mediated by the transplanted cells themselves, recruitment of resident cardiac stem cells (3), or by activation of, as yet, unidentified paracrine or immunologic mechanisms. The low number of transplanted cells detectable in heart tissue makes a direct mechanism unlikely.

Acute immune activation plays a role in most acute clinical manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis, and AMI is associated with local and systemic inflammation (4,5). After AMI, inflammatory cytokines contribute to myocardial apoptosis, necrosis, and scar formation, leading to the development of heart failure (6). In humans, apoptosis after myocardial infarction occurs mainly in the border zones or even in the remote areas of ischemia (7,8); however, necrosis is the predominant mode of cell death in the infarcted myocardium and might be primarily responsible for triggering the inflammatory response (9).

In previous clinical trials, in the context of AMI, stem cells from peripheral blood or whole bone marrow were isolated from patients and were either injected into the coronary vessel of the infarct area (2,10,11) or directly into the ischemic heart muscle (2,12). The viability of cells before injection was in the range of 75% to 95% (2,10–12), which means that a proportion of injected cells were already apoptotic or necrotic at the time of injection (or transplantation). A further proportion of healthy injected living cells likely become apoptotic within heart tissue because of exposure to various proapoptotic or cytotoxic factors in an ischemic environment (13).

Apoptotic cells are able to regulate local immune reactions, and the effect is amplified after AMI (4,14). The effects of exogenous transplanted apoptotic cells into areas of AMI on immunity, neovascularization, and cardiac outcome are unknown.


    The dying stem cell hypothesis
 Top
 Abstract
 The dying stem cell...
 Support of the hypothesis
 Implications of the hypothesis
 Testing the hypothesis
 References
 
We propose that improved cardiac function after application of stem cells to patients with AMI can be explained by the modulation of local immune reactions in response to apoptosis of transplanted cells (Fig. 1).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 (A) Immune pathophysiology of myocardial injury. Ischemic injury damages parenchymal cells, resulting in exposition of heat-shock proteins (HSPs) that trigger tissue-resident macrophages and immature dendritic cells (DCs) via Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) activation. Activated macrophages release several inflammatory cytokines, further amplifying tissue injury, whereas immature DCs undergo maturation and migration to secondary lymphoid tissues. After DC–T-cell interaction, HSP-specific T cells undergo clonal expansion and effector–T-cell differentiation. Homing of these cells to the injured tissue further amplifies local inflammation. (B) Apoptotic cells interact with the immune pathophysiology of myocardial injury. Transplanted, ex vivo, induced apoptotic cells or cells undergoing in vivo massive apoptosis inhibit macrophages and DCs via interaction of their surface phosphatidylserine with the respective receptors (PS-R) on the immune cells. As a result, local release of anti-inflammatory cytokines like transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and interleukin (IL)-10 rises (14,20), maturation and migration of DCs and T helper type 1 (Th1) activation is inhibited (16,17), and activation of regulatory T cells (Treg) is enhanced (18). Consequently, less myocardial inflammation is observed, resulting in less myocardial apoptosis and scar formation as well as enhanced angiogenesis.

 
Delivery of "danger" signals via Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation plays a key role in activating both innate (activation of phagocytes) and adaptive (activation of antigen-presenting cells, particularly dendritic cells) immunity (15). It is well established that microbial products, like endotoxin, bacterial CpG-rich deoxyribonucleic acid, viral ribonucleic acid, among others, trigger a broad set of TLRs. Endogenous ligands (e.g., heat-shock proteins) are released by stressed and necrotic cells after ischemia/reperfusion injury and stimulate, particularly, TLR-4, resulting in local inflammation. In addition, tissue-resident immature antigen-presenting cells are triggered, via TLR-4, to mature and migrate to secondary lymphoid organs, where they stimulate the clonal expansion and differentiation of effector T cells (16). Homing of activated T cells into the injured tissue further amplifies local inflammation (Fig. 1A). In contrast to stressed and necrotic cells, apoptotic cells inhibit inflammation, as detailed in Figure 1B (17,18). Recognition of apoptotic cells by professional phagocytes (macrophages and dendritic cells) requires exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS), a phospholipid normally limited to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane bilayer, on the surface of the apoptotic cell and ligation by the PS receptor of the phagocyte (Fig. 1). Apoptotic cell ingestion by macrophages induces expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. The increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages phagocytosing apoptotic cells might suppress synthesis of pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, IL-1-beta, and IL-6) in the infarcted heart, resulting in accelerated resolution of the inflammatory response. Apoptotic cells are also recognized by immature dendritic cells, which are present in all tissues, including heart (16,19). This might additionally lead to enhanced tissue-specific production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and down-regulation of inflammatory mediators, as detailed in Figure 1.

A variety of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, enhance scar formation after AMI (6). Apoptotic transplanted cells could change, at least in part, the immune status of the infarcted myocardium from inflammation to an anti-inflammatory state (20). Recruited inflammatory cells also undergo apoptotic cell death, and their phagocytic elimination might play a role in resolution of inflammation by promoting secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as TGF-beta or IL-10 (21). Apoptosis occurs mainly at the border zones of ischemia after myocardial infarction (7,8); injection of cells directly to the site of ischemia would significantly increase the amount of cells that, in turn, could become apoptotic. Such modulation of the local inflammatory response might suppress inflammatory injury, prevent expansion of the inflammatory infiltrate, and might, in part, explain the beneficial effects of cell transplantation in patients with AMI. In contrast, transplantation of a significant amount of necrotic cells would lead to an acceleration of inflammation in the infarcted heart. This problem could further be exaggerated when dead or necrotic cells enter or are transplanted to adjacent normal myocardium. This must be avoided in future clinical trials, and testing cells for necrosis should be a prerequisite before transplantation.


    Support of the hypothesis
 Top
 Abstract
 The dying stem cell...
 Support of the hypothesis
 Implications of the hypothesis
 Testing the hypothesis
 References
 
Autologous blood exposed ex vivo to oxidative stress to induce cell apoptosis and administered intramuscularly decreases the production of inflammatory mediators, increases anti-inflammatory cytokines, and decreases cellular injury (22–24). Immune modulation therapy has been shown to be safe and led to significantly improved vascular endothelial function in the first human trials in peripheral arterial disease (23). In a pilot study in patients with advanced chronic heart failure, immune modulation therapy significantly reduced risk of death and hospitalization (25). Pre-treatment of spontaneously hypertensive rats with apoptotic cells reduced severe renal ischemia reperfusion injury (26). Direct instillation of apoptotic cells enhanced the resolution of acute inflammation in the lung (27). In this study, apoptotic cells with externally exposed PS induced TGF-beta1 secretion, resulting in an accelerated resolution of inflammation. This in vivo study nicely demonstrates the proposed concept of anti-inflammatory actions of apoptotic cells.


    Implications of the hypothesis
 Top
 Abstract
 The dying stem cell...
 Support of the hypothesis
 Implications of the hypothesis
 Testing the hypothesis
 References
 
If our hypothesis was true, the cell type of stem cells transplanted to the infarcted myocardium would play only a minor role for improved cardiac function. The local immune responses to implanted cells might be of greater importance. Anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective signaling mechanisms, in response to transplanted apoptotic cells or cells becoming apoptotic soon after transplantation, might explain the advantageous cardiac outcome after stem cell or bone marrow transplantation after AMI. Transplantation to areas of infarction of any cells (e.g., blood leukocytes) triggered ex vivo to undergo apoptosis could lead to a better cardiac outcome.

If the beneficial effects of progenitor cell therapy are due to PS-mediated deactivation of macrophages and dendritic cells, drugs that engage the PS receptors might accelerate resolution of inflammation, decreasing injury in the infarcted myocardium. That would negate the need to transplant cells at all.

The hypothesis might be applicable to any cell transplantation therapy that applies cells to immunologically active tissue.


    Testing the hypothesis
 Top
 Abstract
 The dying stem cell...
 Support of the hypothesis
 Implications of the hypothesis
 Testing the hypothesis
 References
 
We suggest transplanting apoptotic progenitor cells after modification by ex vivo exposure to specific physicochemical stressors, including oxygen, ultraviolet light, and elevated temperature into areas of ischemia in an animal model of AMI. For comparison, healthy endothelial progenitor cells and ex vivo stressed autologous whole blood should be used to investigate whether the beneficial effects can also be detected with cells other than progenitor cells. The cardiac function and outcome should be measured in the different treatment groups over time. Mechanistically, the use of inhibitory antibodies against potentially involved anti-inflammatory mediators, such as the cytokines TGF-beta or IL-10, could help to gain in-depth molecular insight into the suppression of inflammation by apoptosis.


    Footnotes
 
Dr. Thum is supported by the Ernst und Berta Grimmke-Stiftung. Dr. Bauersachs is supported by the IZKF Würzburg (D22). Dr. Anker is supported by a Vanderville fellowship and a donation from Dr. Bailey. The Department of Clinical Cardiology (Imperial College London) is supported by the British Heart Foundation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 The dying stem cell...
 Support of the hypothesis
 Implications of the hypothesis
 Testing the hypothesis
 References
 
1. Cohn JN, Bristow MR, Chien KR, et al. Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel on Heart Failure Research Circulation 1997;95:766-770.[Free Full Text]

2. von Harsdorf R, Poole-Wilson PA, Dietz R. Regenerative capacity of the myocardiumimplications for treatment of heart failure. Lancet 2004;363:1306-1313.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3. Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B. Myocyte renewal and ventricular remodelling Nature 2002;415:240-243.[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Neumann FJ, Ott I, Gawaz M, et al. Cardiac release of cytokines and inflammatory responses in acute myocardial infarction Circulation 1995;92:748-755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease N Engl J Med 1999;340:115-126.[Free Full Text]

6. Frangogiannis NG, Smith CW, Entman ML. The inflammatory response in myocardial infarction Cardiovasc Res 2002;53:31-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Saraste A, Pulkki K, Kallajoki M, Henriksen K, Parvinen M, Voipio-Pulkki LM. Apoptosis in human acute myocardial infarction Circulation 1997;95:320-323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Olivetti G, Quaini F, Sala R, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in humans is associated with activation of programmed myocyte cell death in the surviving portion of the heart J Mol Cell Cardiol 1996;28:2005-2016.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9. Krijnen PA, Nijmeijer R, Meijer CJ, Visser CA, Hack CE, Niessen HW. Apoptosis in myocardial ischemia and infarction J Clin Pathol 2002;55:801-811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Lotz J, et al. Intracoronary autologous bone-marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarctionthe BOOST randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2004;364:141-148.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

11. Schachinger V, Assmus B, Britten MB, et al. Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarctionfinal one-year results of the TOPCARE-AMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1690-1699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Stamm C, Westphal B, Kleine HD, et al. Autologous bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration Lancet 2003;361:45-46.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

13. Geng YJ. Molecular mechanisms for cardiovascular stem cell apoptosis and growth in the hearts with atherosclerotic coronary disease and ischemic heart failure Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;1010:687-697.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

14. Voll RE, Herrmann M, Roth EA, Stach C, Kalden JR, Girkontaite I. Immunosuppressive effects of apoptotic cells Nature 1997;390:350-351.[CrossRef][Medline]

15. Frantz S, Vincent KA, Feron O, Kelly RA. Innate immunity and angiogenesis Circ Res 2005;96:15-26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Gallucci S, Lolkema M, Matzinger P. Natural adjuvantsendogenous activators of dendritic cells. Nat Med 1999;5:1249-1255.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

17. Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Schuler G, Knop J, Enk AH. Induction of interleukin 10-producing, nonproliferating CD4(+) T cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic cells J Exp Med 2000;192:1213-1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Read S, Powrie F. CD4(+) regulatory T cells Curr Opin Immunol 2001;13:644-649.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

19. Austyn JM, Hankins DF, Larsen CP, Morris PJ, Rao AS, Roake JA. Isolation and characterization of dendritic cells from mouse heart and kidney J Immunol 1994;152:2401-2410.[Abstract]

20. Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Konowal A, Freed PW, Westcott JY, Henson PM. Macrophages that have ingested apoptotic cells in vitro inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production through autocrine/paracrine mechanisms involving TGF-beta, PGE2, and PAF J Clin Invest 1998;101:890-898.[Web of Science][Medline]

21. Maderna P, Godson C. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and the resolution of inflammation Biochim Biophys Acta 2003;1639:141-151.[Medline]

22. Babaei S, Stewart DJ, Picard P, Monge JC. Effects of VasoCare therapy on the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis Atherosclerosis 2002;162:45-53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

23. Edvinsson LI, Edvinsson ML, Angus Deveber G. Vasogen’s immune modulation therapy (IMT) improves postischemic foot skin blood flow and transcutaneous pO(2) recovery rates in patients with advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease Int Angiol 2003;22:141-147.[Web of Science][Medline]

24. Bolton AE. Biologic effects and basic science of a novel immune-modulation therapy Am J Cardiol 2005;95(Suppl):24C-29C.[Web of Science][Medline]

25. Torre-Amione G, Sestier F, Radovancevic B, Young J. Effects of a novel immune modulation therapy in patients with advanced chronic heart failureresults of a randomized, controlled, phase II trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1181-1186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Tremblay J, Chen H, Peng J, et al. Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat is prevented by a novel immune modulation therapy Transplantation 2002;74:1425-1433.[Web of Science][Medline]

27. Huynh ML, Fadok VA, Henson PM. Phosphatidylserine-dependent ingestion of apoptotic cells promotes TGF-beta1 secretion and the resolution of inflammation J Clin Invest 2002;109:41-50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. Gianella, U. Guerrini, M. Tilenni, L. Sironi, G. Milano, E. Nobili, S. Vaga, M. C. Capogrossi, E. Tremoli, and M. Pesce
Magnetic resonance imaging of human endothelial progenitors reveals opposite effects on vascular and muscle regeneration into ischaemic tissues
Cardiovasc Res, October 31, 2009; (2009) cvp325v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C.-K. Sun, F.-Y. Lee, J.-J. Sheu, C.-M. Yuen, S. Chua, S.-Y. Chung, H.-T. Chai, Y.-T. Chen, Y.-H. Kao, L.-T. Chang, et al.
Early Combined Treatment with Cilostazol and Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells Markedly Attenuates Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2009; 330(3): 718 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
R. L Kao, W. Browder, and C. Li
Cellular Cardiomyoplasty: What Have We Learned?
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, January 1, 2009; 17(1): 89 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Sun, S.-H. Li, S.-M. Liu, J. Wu, R. D. Weisel, Y.-F. Zhuo, T. M. Yau, R.-K. Li, and S. S. Fazel
Improvement in cardiac function after bone marrow cell thearpy is associated with an increase in myocardial inflammation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): H43 - H50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. W. Stone
Angioplasty Strategies in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Part II: Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy, Integrated Treatment Recommendations, and Future Directions
Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 552 - 566.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Chachques, J. C. Trainini, N. Lago, M. Cortes-Morichetti, O. Schussler, and A. Carpentier
Myocardial Assistance by Grafting a New Bioartificial Upgraded Myocardium (MAGNUM Trial): Clinical Feasibility Study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 901 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. Zeng, Q. Hu, X. Wang, A. Mansoor, J. Lee, J. Feygin, G. Zhang, P. Suntharalingam, S. Boozer, A. Mhashilkar, et al.
Bioenergetic and Functional Consequences of Bone Marrow-Derived Multipotent Progenitor Cell Transplantation in Hearts With Postinfarction Left Ventricular Remodeling
Circulation, April 10, 2007; 115(14): 1866 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. Thum, D. Fraccarollo, S. Thum, M. Schultheiss, A. Daiber, P. Wenzel, T. Munzel, G. Ertl, and J. Bauersachs
Differential Effects of Organic Nitrates on Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Determined by Oxidative Stress
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2007; 27(4): 748 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
U. Dirnagl, J. Klehmet, J. S. Braun, H. Harms, C. Meisel, T. Ziemssen, K. Prass, and A. Meisel
Stroke-Induced Immunodepression: Experimental Evidence and Clinical Relevance
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 770 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. Lunde, S. Solheim, S. Aakhus, H. Arnesen, M. Abdelnoor, T. Egeland, K. Endresen, A. Ilebekk, A. Mangschau, J. G. Fjeld, et al.
Intracoronary injection of mononuclear bone marrow cells in acute myocardial infarction.
N. Engl. J. Med., September 21, 2006; 355(12): 1199 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. J. Gavira, M. Perez-Ilzarbe, G. Abizanda, A. Garcia-Rodriguez, J. Orbe, J. A. Paramo, M. Belzunce, G. Rabago, J. Barba, J. Herreros, et al.
A comparison between percutaneous and surgical transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in a swine model of chronic myocardial infarction
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2006; 71(4): 744 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Torella, G. M. Ellison, and S. Dellegrottaglie
Testing Regeneration of Human Myocardium Without Knowing the Identity and the Number of Effective Bone Marrow Cells Transplanted: Are the Results Meaningful?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 417 - 417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Leor, L. Rozen, A. Zuloff-Shani, M. S. Feinberg, Y. Amsalem, I. M. Barbash, E. Kachel, R. Holbova, Y. Mardor, D. Daniels, et al.
Ex Vivo Activated Human Macrophages Improve Healing, Remodeling, and Function of the Infarcted Heart
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-94 - I-100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.07.053v1
46/10/1799    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thum, T.
Right arrow Articles by Anker, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thum, T.
Right arrow Articles by Anker, S. D.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement