|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:336-342, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.048 © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |




,
,*
* Cardiovascular Division
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Second Cardiology Clinic, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
Naval Hospital, Athens, Greece
|| Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
¶ Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
Manuscript received September 2, 2004; revised manuscript received October 13, 2004, accepted October 18, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Peter G. Danias, Hygeia Hospital, 4 Erythrou Stavrou Street and Kifissias Avenue, Maroussi 15123 Greece (Email: pdanias{at}hygeia.gr; pdanias{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular complications account for considerable morbidity in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Statins decrease cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary disease, and the beneficial treatment effect is seen early, before any measurable increase in coronary artery diameter.
METHODS: A retrospective study recorded patient characteristics, past medical history, and admission medications on all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, aortic surgery, or lower extremity revascularization over a two-year period (January 1999 to December 2000) at a tertiary referral center. Recorded perioperative complication outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, ischemia, congestive heart failure, and ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring during the index hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions identified predictors of perioperative cardiac complications and medications that might confer a protective effect.
RESULTS: Complications occurred in 157 of 1,163 eligible hospitalizations and were significantly fewer in patients receiving statins (9.9%) than in those not receiving statins (16.5%, p = 0.001). The difference was mostly accounted by myocardial ischemia and congestive heart failure. After adjusting for other significant predictors of perioperative complications (age, gender, type of surgery, emergent surgery, left ventricular dysfunction, and diabetes mellitus), statins still conferred a highly significant protective effect (odds ratio 0.52, p = 0.001). The protective effect was similar across diverse patient subgroups and persisted after accounting for the likelihood of patients to have hypercholesterolemia by considering their propensity to use statins.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of statins was highly protective against perioperative cardiac complications in patients undergoing vascular surgery in this retrospective study.
| |||||||
Inhibitors of the enzyme reductase of the hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, or "statins," have been demonstrated to decrease cardiac events and increase survival in patients with hypercholesterolemia and either established CAD or at high risk for CAD (68). Statins have also been shown to decrease cardiac events in patients with CAD and moderately high or normal total or low-density lipoprotein serum cholesterol (911). Besides decreasing cardiac events, statins also decrease the risk of stroke (8,12) and improve lower extremity claudication (8,13,14). Finally, in case-control studies, statins have been associated with lower perioperative (15) and long-term (16) mortality after major noncardiac vascular surgery. The beneficial effect of statins is detected very early, long before any angiographically measurable regression of atherosclerosis (1719). The early beneficial effect in patients with atherosclerosis has been suggested to be due to stabilization of the soft lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaque and possibly improvement of endothelial function (2024).
The potential beneficial effect of statins in preventing perioperative nonfatal and fatal cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery has not been adequately assessed. We hypothesized that perioperative therapy with statins may reduce cardiac complications (death, MI, myocardial ischemia, acute congestive heart failure, and ventricular tachyarrhythmias) in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data extraction. Medical records were retrieved for all patients meeting the aforementioned inclusion criteria and regarding patient characteristics, and outcomes were extracted and recorded on standardized data forms. In particular, data were collected from the surgical admission and subsequent hospital notes, anesthetic preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative reports and medicine, cardiology, or other consultation notes. Data on demographics, past medical history, and medication use were not independently verified. Six investigators, including two attending cardiologists (G.K. and P.G.D.) and four medical residents (K.O-C., M.R.T., J.R., and C.M.) performed the data extraction. In order to validate the interobserver agreement in the data extraction process among the four medical residents who contributed, a random sample of 5% of the records was extracted independently. Data were compared with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Agreement is usually considered excellent for kappa >0.9 and very good for kappa 0.6 to 0.9. There was excellent agreement on whether patients were receiving statins or not (kappa 0.96) and very good agreement on whether they had an outcome of interest or not (kappa 0.78). There was also generally very good agreement on items of past medical history (e.g., CAD kappa 0.89, MI kappa 0.67, left ventricular dysfunction kappa 0.68) and other medication use (e.g., beta-blockers kappa 0.82), and more modest agreement on the acuity of the operation (kappa 0.51). There was no evidence that any data extractor had particularly higher discrepancy rates than the others. We should caution that effect estimates for variables with lower kappa coefficients may be less accurate than those for variables with higher kappa coefficients, because misclassification is more likely in the first group.
Outcomes. Outcomes of interest were specified a priori to include the following complications occurring during the index hospitalization (defined as the day of surgery until the day of discharge from the hospital): death; acute MI documented according to World Health Organization criteria; myocardial ischemia, defined as angina and/or characteristic electrocardiographic changes (ST-segment depression >1 mm, T-wave peaking, flattening, or inversion in the absence of electrolyte abnormalities that could be responsible for these changes); acute congestive heart failure (documented in the chart as "congestive heart failure," new rales, third heart sound, or need for a cardiology consult for dyspnea; postoperative use of diuretics alone was not considered as congestive heart failure); and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The time of onset of these complications was also recorded (days after surgery). In patients in whom multiple outcomes occurred, the most serious outcome (in order: death, MI, myocardial ischemia, congestive heart failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmia) was considered.
Other collected information. For each case, we also extracted the following information: age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, type of surgery, acuity of surgery (emergent, urgent, elective), past medical history including CAD, MI, left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia (including hypercholesterolemia), smoking habits (classified as current smoker [defined as smoking within the past five years], ex-smoker, and nonsmoker), and the use of medications at the time of surgery, including statins, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, aspirin, other antilipid agents, calcium channel blockers, and nitrates.
Statistical analysis.
The main objective was to address whether the use of statins was associated with a reduced risk of perioperative cardiac complications and whether this benefit was independent of other candidate predictors of these outcomes. We estimated that, assuming that almost half of the patients may be receiving statins, in order to have 80% power to detect a 30% reduction in the cardiac complication rate, from 15% to 10%,
1,350 hospitalizations would be required. This was roughly the number of cases expected to accumulate within a two-year period.
For each one of the parameters that we recorded, we evaluated whether there was an association with the risk of having any perioperative cardiac complication during the index hospitalization. We performed univariate logistic regressions, and parameters with p < 0.25 on univariate analysis were considered in a multivariate model using backward elimination of variables according to likelihood ratio criteria (25). In order to evaluate whether the effect of statins might differ across various subgroups, we performed subgroup analyses using as grouping factors the other parameters selected by the multivariate model. Because some patients had more than one eligible hospitalization during the study period (for more than one eligible vascular operations), we performed additional analyses limited to the first eligible hospitalization per patient.
Patients may be selected to use or not use statins based on various parameters. Thus, users and nonusers are not similar, and this is an inherent limitation of a nonrandomized study. One way to try to address this bias is by propensity analyses. Propensity analyses aim to identify which are the important parameters that are associated with statin use. A score is thus calculated that can be used in trying to adjust the estimates of statin efficacy. Here, the propensity score was estimated from multivariate logistic regression (26). We also evaluated the effect of statins, excluding propensity score quartiles where the use of statins was either negligible or almost ubiquitous. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Analyses were conducted in SPSS 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). All p values are two-tailed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There was a suggestion that the benefit pertained mostly to the incidence of ischemia and congestive heart failure, although there was no apparent reduction in the incidence of death and MI. The numbers of "hard" end points in our study was relatively small, leading to greater statistical uncertainty. Alternatively, patients not receiving statins may be more selected as to closer observation; thus, softer end points may have been better detected. The retrospective and open, nonrandomized design of our study makes it difficult to account for the potential of such bias. Nonrandomized retrospective studies sometimes yield more prominent treatment effects that are not always validated in subsequent randomized trials (30). We have tried to adjust for a large variety of candidate predictors of perioperative cardiac complications and also took propensity scoring into account. It is also unavoidable that some misclassification errors might have occurred in the data collection, but the interobserver agreement was very good or even excellent for the main variables of interest. Finally, patients with vascular disease may have several other indications for using statins. For example, our population was composed of patients with a high prevalence of CAD and hyperlipidemia; thus, it is possible that statins were actually underutilized in our cohort, as compared with standard guideline recommendations.
The mechanism through which statins confer their postulated beneficial effect perioperatively is uncertain. Statins may have antithrombotic effects unrelated to cholesterol reduction (3133) and anti-inflammatory effects through the downregulation of cytokines (21,23,34). Statins may also influence the vascular subcellular milieu to shift vasoactive factors toward vasodilation (22). Finally, in experimental models of MI and heart failure, statins normalized the sympathetic outflow and reflex regulation and attenuated left ventricular remodeling (35), whereas in humans with dilated cardiomyopathy, short-term use of statins is associated with the improvement of cardiac function and symptoms (36,37). Although one can speculate that some or all of these mechanisms may be associated with our findings of improved outcomes in patients undergoing vascular surgery, the nature of our study does not allow for a mechanistic explanation.
Data on perioperative outcomes in patients receiving statins are sparse. Poldermans et al. (15) performed a case-control study of 160 fatalities undergoing major vascular surgery at the Erasmus Center during the period 1991 to 2000. The mortality rate in the overall Erasmus cohort was much higher than the one seen in our study (5.8% vs. 0.9%). These investigators demonstrated a large survival benefit (adjusted OR 0.22) for patients who were receiving statins. Our results in a recent cohort with a much lower risk of death suggest a more conservative estimate of benefit. Another study by the same group assessing the long-term survival of patients surviving abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery (16) also showed that survival was better for patients receiving statins, in accordance with other statin data in patients with coronary and vascular disease.
In previous studies, beta-blockers have been shown to decrease the incidence of perioperative complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. The beneficial effect of beta-blockers has been demonstrated in intermediate and high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery (3,4,3840). Thus, the preoperative and perioperative use of beta-blockade in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery has become the standard of care. The magnitude of the protective effect has been such that the universal treatment of all moderate- and high-risk patients, based on clinical criteria, undergoing major noncardiac surgery has been advocated (41). The mechanisms by which beta-blockers reduce perioperative complications, including a decrease in sympathetic activation, negative inotropy and chronotropy, and a subsequent decrease in myocardial oxygen demand, and neurohumoral effects have been reported to be independent of the statin beneficial effect (16). In our study, however, we were not able to demonstrate a lower rate of complications in patients receiving beta-blockers at the time of surgery. Multiple explanations may be possible. First, there may be a selection bias. Patients with known CAD are more likely to be on beta-blockade therapy, as it is the standard of care in this group. Therefore, the beneficial effect of beta-blockers might be offset by the higher likelihood for complications in this subgroup. Second, the 95% CI of our estimates cannot exclude anywhere up to a 34% reduction in the odds of complications, primarily due to the retrospective nature of our analysis. Third, we were not aware of the duration of time that the patients were placed on beta-blockers.
The observational design of our study is a limitation. The lack of complete ascertainment of lipid values and the lack of information on the exact duration and drug dose of statins used are also limitations. However, obtaining such information in a retrospective design would be very unreliable. Furthermore, a much larger sample size would be required to investigate possible dose-response effects for the required protective dose and duration of statins or to probe into potentially differential effects of various statins; such subgroup or dose-response findings might be spurious. A randomized trial would be indicated to further validate our findings, but our results strongly suggest that statins may be an effective measure for reducing the incidence of acute cardiac complications of major noncardiac vascular surgery.
Conclusions. In a retrospective study involving over 1,100 consecutive vascular surgeries, we demonstrate that preoperative use of statins significantly decreases cardiovascular complications. Although these data do not suffice to recommend the broad use of statins to decrease cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery, our data create the impetus for a prospective evaluation.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. S. FELDMAN and D. J. BROTMAN Perioperative statins: More than lipid-lowering? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, September 1, 2008; 75(9): 654 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Parent and S. Rinfret The unresolved issues with risk stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing major vascular surgery: [Questions non resolues concernant la stratification du risque et la prise en charge des patients atteints de maladie coronarienne subissant une chirurgie vasculaire majeure] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2008; 55(8): 542 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Samson The Role of Statin Drugs in the Management of the Peripheral Vascular Patient Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, August 1, 2008; 42(4): 352 - 366. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gregoratos Current Guideline-Based Preoperative Evaluation Provides the Best Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery Circulation, June 17, 2008; 117(24): 3134 - 3144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Poldermans, S. E. Hoeks, and H. H. Feringa Pre-Operative Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Before Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 20, 2008; 51(20): 1913 - 1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. I. Paraskevas Applications of statins in cardiothoracic surgery: more than just lipid-lowering Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 377 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Mittnacht, M. Fanshawe, and S. Konstadt Anesthetic Considerations in the Patient With Valvular Heart Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2008; 12(1): 33 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. O. McFalls, H. B. Ward, T. E. Moritz, F. S. Apple, S. Goldman, G. Pierpont, G. C. Larsen, B. Hattler, K. Shunk, F. Littooy, et al. Predictors and outcomes of a perioperative myocardial infarction following elective vascular surgery in patients with documented coronary artery disease: results of the CARP trial Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 394 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thielmann, M. Neuhauser, A. Marr, B. R. Jaeger, D. Wendt, B. Schuetze, M. Kamler, P. Massoudy, R. Erbel, and H. Jakob Lipid-lowering effect of preoperative statin therapy on postoperative major adverse cardiac events after coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1143 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): e159 - e242. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e500. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Perler Should Statins Be Given Routinely Before Carotid Endarterectomy? Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 240 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bronheim Statins and the Perioperative Period Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2007; 11(3): 231 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Licker, J. Diaper, and C. Ellenberger Perioperative {beta}-Blockade: Still Not Enough for Adequate Cardioprotection! Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 278 - 279. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Le Manach, G. Godet, P. Coriat, C. Martinon, M. Bertrand, M.-H. Fleron, and B. Riou The Impact of Postoperative Discontinuation or Continuation of Chronic Statin Therapy on Cardiac Outcome After Major Vascular Surgery Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1326 - 1333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Smetana A 68-Year-Old Man With COPD Contemplating Colon Cancer Surgery JAMA, May 16, 2007; 297(19): 2121 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Howard-Alpe, J. W. Sear, and P. Foex Methods of detecting atherosclerosis in non-cardiac surgical patients; the role of biochemical markers Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2006; 97(6): 758 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Schouten, J. J Bax, and D. Poldermans Assessment of cardiac risk before non-cardiac general surgery. Heart, December 1, 2006; 92(12): 1866 - 1872. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. N. Boushra and M. Muntazar Review article: The role of statins in reducing perioperative cardiac risk: physiologic and clinical perspectives: [Le role des statines dans la reduction du risque cardiaque perioperatoire : perspectives physiologiques et cliniques]. Can J Anesth, November 1, 2006; 53(11): 1126 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Collard, S. C. Body, S. K. Shernan, S. Wang, D. T. Mangano, and Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (MCSPI Preoperative statin therapy is associated with reduced cardiac mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 392 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Auerbach and L. Goldman Assessing and Reducing the Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): 1361 - 1376. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. London Beta-Blockade in the Perioperative Period: Where Do We Stand After All the Trials? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2006; 10(1): 17 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Karthikeyan and B Bhargava Managing patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: need to shift emphasis from risk stratification to risk modification Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 17 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Futterman and L. Lemberg The Expanding Role of the HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor, The Most Widely Prescribed Drug in the World Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2005; 14(6): 555 - 558. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.J. Devereaux, L. Goldman, S. Yusuf, K. Gilbert, K. Leslie, and G. H. Guyatt Surveillance and prevention of major perioperative ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 27, 2005; 173(7): 779 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||