Correction
for
Paelinck et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (7) 1109-1116.
Correction
Paelinck BP, de Roos A, Bax JJ, Bosmans JM, van Der Geest RJ, Dhondt D, Parizel PM, Vrints CJ, Lamb HJ. Feasibility of Tissue Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Pilot Study in Comparison With Tissue Doppler Imaging and Invasive Measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1109-16.
The correct e-mail address for reprint requests is: mailto:H.J.Lamb{at}lumc.nl, and the correct e-mail address for correspondence is: mailto:Bernard.Paelinck{at}uza.be.
In addition, there was an error in Figure 5 panel A (on page 1115). The correct figure and legend are printed below.
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5 (A) Correlation between magnetic resonance (MR)-measured E/A and invasive mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). Note absence of correlation (p = 0.99). (B) Correlation between posteroseptal MR-measured E/Ea and invasive PCWP (R2 = 0.65, p < 0.0001). (C) Bland-Altman plot of the difference between MR-estimated and catheter- measured PCWP. Horizontal lines show the mean difference between two methods ± 2 SDs. A = peak mitral velocity at atrial contraction; E = peak mitral velocity in early diastole; Ea = early diastolic tissue velocity.
|
|
|
