Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:1732, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.050
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Keefe, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O’Keefe, J. H., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

CORRESPONDENCE: LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply

James H. O’Keefe, Jr, MD*, Loren Cordain, PhD, William H. Harris, PhD, Richard M. Moe, MD, PhD and Robert Vogel, MD

* Mid America Heart Institute, Cardiovascular Consultants, 4330 Wornall Road, Suite 2000, Kansas City, MO 64111 (Email: jhokeefe{at}cc-pc.com).


We thank Dr. Clendenning for his interest in our study (1). Dr. Clendenning’s suggestion that the systematic treatment of his patients to a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol target of 2.0 mmol/l (77 mg/dl) over the past four years has markedly reduced cardiovascular event rate in his practice is fascinating and consistent with the hypothesis of our study. Several other physicians have communicated similar experiences to us that provide anecdotal support for the concept that the optimal LDL range for patients at risk for cardiovascular event is 50 to 70 mg/dl. One solo practitioner cardiologist from Idaho who has employed a similar strategy targeting the LDL to <70 mg/dl as part of a multimodal risk-factor intervention recently decided to stop performing percutaneous coronary interventions because he believed his volume of procedures has dropped too low to maintain adequate skills.

Aggressive LDL lowering has been shown to improve prognosis even in patients without coronary heart disease (CHD) who have average LDL levels at baseline, but who have CHD risks such as hypertension (2), diabetes (3), or low HDL cholesterol levels (4). This accumulating evidence suggests that achieving these lower LDL targets will improve CHD prognosis for many of our patients.


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. O’Keefe JH, Cordain L, Harris WH, Moe RM, Vogel R. Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl. Lower is better and physiologically normal J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2142-2146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, et al. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA)a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1149-1158.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial Lancet 2004;364:685-696.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

4. Gotto AM, Whitney E, Stein EA, et al. Application of the National Cholesterol Education Program and joint European treatment criteria and clinical benefit in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) Eur Heart J 2000;21:1627-1633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article

The Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein Is 50 to 70 mg/dl
Robert Clendenning
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005 45: 1732. [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Keefe, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O’Keefe, J. H., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement