|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:1716-1722, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.060 © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |



* Section of Preventive Medicine & Epidemiology, Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Community Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Department of Cardiovascular Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
|| Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
¶ Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Fairview-University Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
# Division of Biostatistics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
Manuscript received October 29, 2004; revised manuscript received December 16, 2004, accepted January 11, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Luc Djoussé, Boston University School of Medicine, Room B-612, 715 Albany Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02118 (Email: ldjousse{at}bu.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Higher intake of fish omega-3 fatty acids and plant omega-3 such as alpha-linolenic acid is associated with lower risk of myocardial infarction. While long-chain omega-3 can inhibit ventricular arrhythmia, it is not known whether alpha-linolenic acid influences ventricular repolarization.
METHODS: We studied 3,642 subjects from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart study who were free of myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy, pacemaker, and with QRS <120 ms. We used the 95th percentile of the gender-specific distribution of QTrr and JTrr to define abnormally prolonged repolarization. Within each gender, we created age- and energy-adjusted tertiles of linolenic acid and used regression models for analyses.
RESULTS: Mean age was 50 years, and average intake of total linolenic acid was 0.74 g/day. There was an inverse association between consumption of linolenic acid and QTrr and JTrr (p for trend 0.001 and 0.0005, respectively). From the lowest (reference) to the highest gender-, age-, and energy-adjusted tertile of linolenic acid, multivariable adjusted odds ratios for prolonged QTrr were 1.0, 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.96), and 0.59 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.77), respectively (p for trend 0.0003). Corresponding values for JTrr were 1.0, 0.73 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.03), and 0.59 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.87), respectively (p for trend 0.009). Exclusion of subjects taking drugs known to influence QT did not influence this association.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher intake of dietary linolenic acid might be associated with a reduced risk of abnormally prolonged repolarization in men and women.
| ||||||||||||
We used data collected on 3,642 Caucasian participants of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Family Heart study to assess whether dietary consumption of higher amounts of total linolenic acid (alpha- and gamma-form) was associated with QTrr and JTrr. In addition, we evaluated whether such association was modified by the ratio of linoleic-to-linolenic fatty acid.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dietary assessment. We used a staff-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (19) to obtain data on dietary linolenic acid and other nutrients. The reproducibility and validity of this food frequency questionnaire have been described previously (20). Nutrients were obtained by multiplying the frequency of consumption of an item by the nutrient content of specified portions. Composition values for total linolenic acid and other nutrients were obtained from the Harvard University Food Composition Database derived from U.S. Department of Agriculture sources (21) and manufacturer information.
ECG methodology. All ECGs in the study were recorded using strictly standardized methods for ECG acquisition and processing. These methods have been described previously (22). Briefly, during the clinic visit, standard 12-lead ECGs were recorded using MAC-PC electrocardiographs (Marquette Electronics, Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin), and 10-s records were digitized using a sampling rate of 250 samples/s per lead. All QT measurements were visually verified, and occasional errors were corrected using interactive graphics terminals. The QT and JT intervals were rate-adjusted as a linear function of the RR interval using the algorithms described by Rautaharju et al. (15): QTrr = QT 185·(60/heart rate 1) + [6 ms in men] and JTrr = JT 176·(60/heart rate 1) + [14 ms in men], where JT = QT QRS. This method of adjustment eliminates the strong residual correlation between the adjusted QT and heart rate observed repeatedly for the Bazetts QTc (2325).
Other variables. Resting blood pressure was measured three times on sitting participants after a 5-min rest using a random zero sphygmomanometer by trained technicians. Information on cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, education, and level of physical activity during the previous year was obtained by interview. Diabetes mellitus was present if a subject was taking hypoglycemic agents, or if a physician had told him/her that he/she has diabetes mellitus, or if fasting glucose levels were above 7.0 mmol/l. Prevalent CAD was assessed by self-reported history of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft. Use of digoxin, diuretic, antiarrhythmic drugs, and other prescription drugs were assessed through medication inventory.
Statistical analyses. Because higher energy intake is associated with higher linolenic acid and energy intake and dietary patterns differ between men and women and by age, we created gender-, age-, and energy-specific tertiles of linolenic acid. Within each gender, we created four-year age groups (seven categories) and quintiles of energy intake. Then, within each of the 35 groups, we created tertiles of linolenic acid (referred to as gender-, age-, and energy-specific tertiles of linolenic acid). To estimate adjusted mean values of QTrr and JTrr, we used generalized estimating equations to account for familial clustering and confounding factors. The minimal adjusted model controlled for age, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and serum potassium. The full model also controlled for diabetes mellitus, exercise, class Ia and class III antiarrhythmic drugs, and other drugs known to prolong QT intervals or increase the risk of Torsades de Pointes (i.e., antipsychotic, antimalarial, macrolide antibiotics, opiate agonist, and so on). Further adjustment for center, education, diuretic use, risk group (random vs. high-risk group), long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, and waist-hip ratio did not alter the results (data not shown). We also used the 95th percentile of the gender-specific distribution of QTrr (446.9 for men and 455.0 for women) and JTrr (359.0 for men and 363.7 for women) to define abnormal QTrr and abnormal JTrr and used a generalized estimating equation to compute the prevalence odds ratios. In addition, we used linolenic acid as a continuous variable and related it to QTrr and JTrr. We conducted sensitivity analyses by: 1) excluding subjects who were using digoxin or antiarrhythmic drugs; and 2) using subjects previously excluded in the initial analyses. Because linoleic and linolenic acids are competitive substrate for desaturase, we assessed whether the linoleic/linolenic ratio modified the association through: 1) stratified analyses using gender-specific median values of linolenic acid to create two groups; and 2) including main effects and product term in the regression model. Alpha level was set at 0.05, and all analyses were completed using windows SAS version 5.1.2, release 8.02 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity analyses. Exclusion of subjects currently receiving digoxin and/or antiarrhytmic drugs did not change the results. From the lowest to the highest tertile of linolenic acid, multivariable adjusted odds ratios for prolonged repolarization using QTrr in the combined data set were 1.0 (reference), 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.98), and 0.61 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.82), respectively (p for trend 0.0012). Corresponding values were 1.0, 0.64 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.91), and 0.53 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.80), respectively, using JTrr (p for trend 0.003). In a sample (n = 4,504) that included subjects excluded in the initial analyses (i.e., prevalent CAD, left ventricular hypertrophy, and so on), the observed association persisted (i.e., p for trend 0.0017 using QTrr to define abnormal repolarization), and further adjustment for left ventricular hypertrophy, T-negativity, ST-segment depression/elevation did not change the results.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
n-3 fatty acids and arrhythmia. While epidemiologic studies have shown the beneficial effects of linolenic acid on fatal and nonfatal CAD (15), triglycerides (8), and carotid wall thickness (26), no data are available on the effects of linolenic acid on myocardial repolarization in humans. Evidence of beneficial effects of EPA and DHA on ventricular arrhythmia has been shown in animal models and in humans. Infusion of EPA (12,13), DHA (12,13), and alpha-linolenic acid (12) in dogs was associated with a significant reduction in ventricular fibrillation. Rats fed with a tuna fish oil diet had a significantly lower incidence rate and severity of arrhythmias and lower risk of ventricular fibrillation compared with rats on a diet enriched with sunflower oil (27). In a study of monkeys, fish oil was associated with significantly raised ventricular fibrillation threshold (33.3 mA) compared with sunflower oil (14.3 mA) after a 16-week intervention (28). Siscovick et al. (29) demonstrated that, compared with no intake of dietary EPA and DHA, monthly intake of 5.5 g of n-3 fatty acid was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of primary cardiac arrest in 334 patients. In a randomized control trial, a diet rich in EPA and DHA was associated with a 48% decrease in ventricular premature complexes compared to only 25% reduction in the placebo group (sunflower oil) after 16 weeks of intervention (30). Nevertheless, little is known about the relation between dietary linolenic acid and ventricular repolarization or arrhythmia. The only evidence showing antiarrhythmic effects of alpha-linolenic acid has been provided from animal study. In a dog model of cardiac sudden death, alpha-linolenic acid infusion prevented fatal ventricular fibrillation in six of eight dogs (12), an effect similar to infusion of DHA or EPA in the same study. To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the relation between dietary linolenic acid and heart-rate-adjusted QT or JT intervals.
Physiologic mechanisms. Modification of the eicosanoid system by dietary fatty acids is one of the suggested mechanisms by which EPA and DHA protect against ventricular arrhythmia. The Western diet is rich in linoleic acid, which is a precursor of arachidonic acid (AA); AA is metabolized to generate (n-2) series of prostanoids such as thromboxane A2 and leukotrienes. Alpha-linolenic acid is a precursor of prostaglandin I3 (a vasodilator) and thromboxane A3, which is less active (9). A limited amount of linolenic acid is converted to EPA in vivo; EPA competes with AA as a substrate for cyclooxygenase, thus inhibiting the production of thromboxane A2 that causes vasoconstrictor and platelet aggregation. A reduced ratio of AA/EPA favors the production of (n-3) series of prostanoids and less thromboxane A2 and, thus, reduces the risk of ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest (31). Another possible mechanism is the modulation of L-type calcium channels in the sarcolemma of cardiac myocytes by DHA (32). However, additional research is needed to elucidate biologic mechanisms underlying antiarrhythmic effects of n-3 fatty acids.
Other investigators have suggested that a diet rich in n-3 fatty acids (such as linolenic acid) could suppress plasma levels of metabolites of linoleic acid such as thromboxane A2, which stimulates vasoconstriction and platelet aggregation (33). This has been the basis to favor a lower ratio of linoleic-to-linolenic acid (below 6). In the present study, the association between linolenic acid and QT intervals was not modified by the ratio of linoleic-to-linolenic acid.
Study limitations. In the present study, nutrients were derived from a food frequency questionnaire that has been shown to underestimate energy intake when compared with the doubly-labeled water technique (34). Therefore, our estimate of daily intake of linolenic acid and other nutrients might have been biased. We did not have data separately on alpha- and gamma-linolenic acid. In addition, the cross-sectional design of our study limits our ability to infer causality between linolenic acid intake and QT/JT. However, the large sample size, the availability of data on several risk factors, the wide range of age and linolenic acid, the consistency of our findings with other published reports, and the multicenter design are strengths of our study.
In conclusion, our data suggest that higher consumption of dietary linolenic acid is associated with a reduced risk of prolonged repolarization in both men and women. While this might be one of the underlying mechanisms by which dietary linolenic acid decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease, future studies are needed to confirm our findings.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Chrysohoou, D. B Panagiotakos, C. Pitsavos, J. Skoumas, X. Krinos, Y. Chloptsios, V. Nikolaou, and C. Stefanadis Long-term fish consumption is associated with protection against arrhythmia in healthy persons in a Mediterranean region--the ATTICA study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1385 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Ander, C. Hurtado, C. S. Raposo, T. G. Maddaford, J. F. Deniset, L. V. Hryshko, G. N. Pierce, and A. Lukas Differential sensitivities of the NCX1.1 and NCX1.3 isoforms of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger to {alpha}-linolenic acid Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2007; 73(2): 395 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mozaffarian, R. J. Prineas, P. K. Stein, and D. S. Siscovick Dietary Fish and n-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Cardiac Electrocardiographic Parameters in Humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 478 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L Breslow n-3 Fatty acids and cardiovascular disease Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): S1477 - 1482S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Albert, K. Oh, W. Whang, J. E. Manson, C. U. Chae, M. J. Stampfer, W. C. Willett, and F. B. Hu Dietary {alpha}-Linolenic Acid Intake and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death and Coronary Heart Disease Circulation, November 22, 2005; 112(21): 3232 - 3238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |