Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:602-610, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.039
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Driest, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Driest, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, M. J.

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Comprehensive analysis of the beta-myosin heavy chain gene in 389 unrelated patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Sara L. Van Driest, BA*, Michele A. Jaeger, BA*, Steve R. Ommen, MD, FACC{dagger}, Melissa L. Will, BS*, Bernard J. Gersh, MD, FACC{dagger}, A. Jamil Tajik, MD, FACC{dagger}{ddagger} and Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD, FACC*{dagger}{ddagger},*

* Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{dagger} Department of Internal Medicine/Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{ddagger} Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine/Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Manuscript received November 4, 2003; revised manuscript received March 18, 2004, accepted April 13, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Michael J. Ackerman, Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Guggenheim 501, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
ackerman.michael{at}mayo.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence and phenotype of beta-myosin heavy chain gene MYH7 mutations in a large cohort of unrelated patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a heterogeneous cardiac disease. MYH7 mutations are one of the most common genetic causes of HCM and have been associated with severe hypertrophy, young age of diagnosis, and high risk of sudden cardiac death. However, these clinical findings from large, family studies have not been confirmed in a large unrelated cohort.

METHODS: Deoxyribonucleic (DNA) samples obtained from 389 HCM outpatients seen at this tertiary referral center were analyzed for mutations, using polymerase chain reaction, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, and DNA sequencing for all 38 protein-coding exons of MYH7. Clinical data were extracted from patient records blinded to patient genotype.

RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (15%) harbored 40 different mutations in MYH7. Compared with HCM patients without MYH7 mutations, HCM patients with MYH7 were younger at diagnosis (32.9 vs. 42.7 years, p = 0.0002), had more hypertrophy (left ventricular wall thickness of 24.2 vs. 21.1 mm, p = 0.0009), and more frequently underwent myectomy (60% vs. 38%, p = 0.002). The HCM patients with MYH7 mutations more often had a family history of HCM (43% vs. 29%, p = 0.006), but there was no difference in family history of sudden death (16% vs. 14%, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, HCM patients with MYH7 were diagnosed at a younger age and had more hypertrophy, but they had no greater frequency of sudden death among first-degree relatives. Although these associations may prove useful for targeted gene screening, caution should be exercised in terms of using pathogenic status in risk stratification.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  DHPLC = denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography
  HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  LVWT = left ventricular wall thickness
  MYH7 = beta-myosin heavy chain gene
  PCR = polymerase chain reaction
  SCD = sudden cardiac death
  SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex genetic disease that affects 1 in 500 persons and is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in youth (1–3). Prognosis and treatment decisions are difficult because of the extreme heterogeneity associated with HCM (4,5). The severity of the disease varies from a life-long asymptomatic course to chronic, progressive heart failure or SCD at a young age. Mutations associated with HCM are scattered throughout sarcomeric genes, with mutations in the gene encoding the beta-myosin heavy chain (MYH7), representing one of the most common genetic causes of HCM (2,6,7). It is estimated that ~30% of all cases of HCM are due specifically to MYH7 mutations (8–10). Over 80 missense mutations have been identified in the globular head and neck domains of MYH7, encoded by exons 3 through 23, in HCM individuals (11). Greater disease penetrance, more severe hypertrophy, and high risk of SCD have been associated with mutations in MYH7 versus other sarcomeric genes (12).

These estimations of mutation frequency and genotype-phenotype correlations are based on pioneering linkage studies that, by necessity, selected patient groups with extensive family pedigrees (13,14). Recently, the first molecular genetic investigation of a sizeable cohort of unrelated individuals with HCM (n = 197) was reported (15). MYH7 mutations were identified in 25% of these HCM patients and were the most common cause of "malignant" HCM. However, of the 40 families with a known prognosis, only 10 (25%) had experienced a "malignant" course. Further investigation of larger cohorts having robust clinical data is necessary to elucidate the scope and significance of mutations in MYH7. We determined the spectrum, prevalence, and phenotype of MYH7 mutations through comprehensive mutational analysis of 389 unrelated patients seen at our HCM Clinic. Mindful of the potential for referral bias, patients were also compared across two groups: regional patients (from Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa) and non-regional patients.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Clinical characterization of unrelated HCM cases.   Informed, written consent was obtained in accordance with study protocols approved by the Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board. Blood samples were obtained from 389 unrelated study participants (age at diagnosis 41.3 ± 19 years, 215 males) seen at the Mayo Medical Center's HCM Outpatient Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, between April 1997 and December 2001, and confirmed to have unequivocal and unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy. All clinical variables were extracted from patient records blinded to patient genotype and maintained in a customized database for the HCM Clinic. Standard assessment of a family history excluded relatedness between study participants through three degrees (i.e., first degree = offspring or sibling; second degree = grandchild, niece, or nephew; third degree = great grandchild, cousin, and so on). When related individuals were identified within the cohort (n = 45), only the first individual who presented to this institution was included.

Mutational analysis.   Purgene deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction kits (Gentra, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) were used to obtain patient genomic DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes. Using forward and reverse primers designed in our laboratory, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for amplification of the genomic DNA (Table 1). Each DNA sample was analyzed for mutations in each of the 38 protein-coding exons of MYH7. Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) methods were optimized for detection of sequence variations in each amplicon by the Transgenomic WAVE system (Omaha, Nebraska) (Table 1). Patient samples with abnormal DHPLC elution profiles were sequenced by automated dye terminator cycle sequencing using an ABI Prism 377 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). Normal and abnormal chromatograms were compared to determine if sequence variations were present. All candidate mutations were confirmed by amplification from stock DNA samples and direct sequencing to exclude the possibility of random PCR-induced mutations or sample contamination. To exclude novel nonsynonymous variants as common polymorphisms, DNA samples (Coriell Cell Repositories, Camden, New Jersey) from 100 African-American and 100 Caucasian control subjects were analyzed. Standard nomenclature was employed for annotation at the protein level (16).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Polymerase Chain Reaction Primer Sequences, Cycling Methods, and DHPLC Temperatures

 
Statistical analysis.   Differences between continuous variables were assessed using the unpaired t test. Chi-square analysis was used to analyze nominal variables. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Table 2 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the entire cohort of unrelated HCM patients. At presentation to the Mayo Clinic, 216 (56%) of the 389 patients had cardiac symptoms. Approximately one-third (31%) had a family history of HCM involving a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, or offspring), and 14% had a family history of unexplained SCD involving a first-degree relative. The mean maximal left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) was 21.6 ± 6 mm. Of the 389 patients, 161 underwent a surgical myectomy (41%) and 60 had a cardioverter-defibrillator implanted (15%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Clinical Characteristics of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patient Cohort

 
The patient population comprised 125 patients from the regional area (Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin residents) and 264 non-regional patients (Table 2). The patients from the three-state region had significantly less left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (39 ± 40 mm Hg vs. 50 ± 43 mm Hg, p = 0.02) and, hence, were less likely to have required a surgical myectomy (28% vs. 48%, p < 0.01) than the non-regional patients. For other parameters studied, including family history of HCM or SCD, age at presentation, and LVWT, there was no significant difference between the regional and non-regional populations.

From this cohort of 389 HCM patients, 58 (15%) harbored MYH7 mutations, with over half (33 of 58) possessing a unique mutation (Table 3). Compared with HCM patients without MYH7 mutations, those with MYH7 were younger at the time of diagnosis (32.9 vs. 42.7 years, p = 0.0002), had more hypertrophy (LVWT of 24.1 vs. 21.1 mm, p = 0.0009), and more frequently had undergone a myectomy (60% vs. 38%, p = 0.002). There was also a higher frequency of a positive family history of HCM involving a first-degree relative (43% vs. 29%, p = 0.006). However, there was no difference in family history of SCD between patients with MYH7 mutations (16%) and those without MYH7 mutations (14%, p = NS).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Clinical Characteristics of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients With the MYH7 Gene

 
We previously analyzed this cohort of 389 patients for mutations in the thin-filament genes (troponin T, troponin I, alpha-tropomyosin, and cardiac actin) (17). Compared with the 18 patients with thin-filament mutations, HCM patients with MYH7 had more hypertrophy (LVWT of 24.1 ± 8 mm vs. 19.8 ± 6 mm, p = 0.049) and a higher incidence of surgical myectomy (60% vs. 32%, p = 0.02). In all other variables, including age at diagnosis, there were no statistically significant differences between HCM patients having either MYH7 (thick filament) or thin-filament genes (data not shown).

When patients with MYH7 mutations from the regional subset were compared with the non-regional subset, there was no significant difference in any variable studied, including percentage with cardiac symptoms, LVWT, peak gradient, and previous myectomy (Table 3).

Figure 1 depicts the spectrum of the mutations along the length of MYH7. Forty different mutations in MYH7 were identified. Nearly two-thirds (25 [63%] of 40) of these were novel, and none of these novel mutations were present in 400 reference alleles derived from 100 white and 100 black subjects. Of the 40 mutations, 39 were missense mutations. The single exception was one patient with an in-frame deletion of a lysine residue at position 847 (K847del).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Distribution of mutations in the MYH7 gene. In the schematic diagram, vertical lines symbolize the exons of the gene and unfilled vertical lines represent untranslated regions. Mutations identified in this cohort are identified above the exons. * = a novel, not previously published mutation. For mutations found in more than one individual in the cohort, the mutation frequency is indicated in parentheses. All previously reported exonic mutations not found in this cohort are identified below the exons (11).

 
In searching for MYH7 mutations, specific mutations previously ascribed as "malignant" or "benign" were identified. Three of 389 patients (<1%) had a "malignant" mutation: R403Q, R453C, and G716R (9,12,18–20). All three individuals were diagnosed with HCM at a young age (3 months, 16 years, and 24 years). However, there were 78 additional patients diagnosed before age 25 years, who did not host one of these particular mutations. In addition, the patient with R453C-MYH7 also had a second mutation involving TNNT2.

Overall, 7 (1.8%) of 389 patients had a previously published "benign" MYH7 mutation: 3 with R719Q and 4 with L908V (9,21,22). All seven individuals had severe disease, with five of seven having undergone septal myectomies, five requiring beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker therapy, four having a positive family history of SCD, and one receiving an orthotopic heart transplant as a teenager for end-stage HCM with severe restrictive hemodynamics. As a group, the average age at diagnosis was 24 ± 17 years (range 3 months to 44 years), with four of the seven cases being <30 years old at diagnosis. One patient with the R719Q mutation had a second mutation in MYH7, perhaps accounting in part for the discrepancy between the "benign" mutation and the patient's clinical course.

Among the 58 HCM patients with MYH7, two harbored multiple mutations. One patient had two MYH7 mutations: R719Q and T1513S. This 28-year-old female was diagnosed at age 13 years. She experienced syncopal events at age 12 and 19 years. At age 25, she developed symptoms of fatigue and exertional dyspnea, which were treated with beta-blocker therapy. At age 26, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was placed as primary prevention for SCD partly because of a family history of SCD involving four relatives: her mother (age 36 years), maternal cousin (age 15 years), maternal grandmother (age 28 years), and maternal great-grandmother.

In a second patient, a novel intronic G–1>A substitution preceding exon 12 of troponin T is present, as well as the R453C-MYH7 mutation. Tissue analysis demonstrates that the TNNT2 mutation causes alternative splicing, resulting in an in-frame deletion of Q191 at the protein level (data not shown). This patient was diagnosed during infancy after evaluation of a murmur and underwent myectomy at age 11 years for severe hypertrophy (38 mm septum). An ICD was placed after an episode of ventricular tachycardia two months later.

Of the 40 mutations, 33 (83%) occurred just once within the cohort. The majority of HCM patients with MYH7 had alterations within the functional head and neck domains encoded by exons 3 through 23, but 12 (21%) of 58 patients had mutations affecting the rod portion (exons 24 through 40) of the protein. However, there was no difference in phenotype detected between the subset of patients with rod mutations and those with head and neck mutations (data not shown).

Recent data have suggested that mutations altering the charge of amino acids within critical functional domains are associated with a more severe disease phenotype than neutral substitutions (non-charge changing) or those altering residues outside of critical domains (23). In this cohort, a comparison between patients with mutations affecting any functional domain of the MYH7 protein (as assigned by [23,24]) and those patients with mutations occurring outside these functional domains revealed no statistically significant difference in any variable (data not shown). Patients with charge-changing MYH7 mutations had a trend toward a younger age at diagnosis (28.2 ± 18 years vs. 37.2 ± 17 years, p = 0.058) than patients with neutral substitutions. Within the subset of patients harboring mutations in a functional domain, those with charge-changing substitutions were not statistically different from those with neutral substitutions for any clinical variable. However, patients with charge-changing mutations in a functional domain were significantly younger at diagnosis than those patients with neutral substitutions outside a functional domain (20.7 ± 17 years vs. 38.6 ± 18 years, p = 0.018).

In addition to the 40 mutations identified, 21 silent polymorphisms were identified, and two nonsynonymous polymorphisms (S1491C and K1919N) were present in both patient samples and the reference alleles (Table 4). Twenty-six sequence variants were defined in the intronic sequences flanking the exons. Overall, sequence variations were identified in 33 of the 38 amplicons analyzed, and of the 5 exons where no variants were found, 4 have no previously published HCM-causing mutations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Polymorphisms Identified

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Phenotype of MYH7-HCM.   This study represents a comprehensive analysis of the entire protein-coding region of MYH7 in the largest cohort of unrelated HCM patients (n = 389) published to date. Here, at a tertiary referral center specializing in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of HCM, 15% of HCM patients harbored a MYH7 mutation. The subset of HCM patients with MYH7 mutations was younger at diagnosis and had more hypertrophy than HCM patients without MYH7 mutations. The HCM patients with MYH7 also had a higher frequency of a family history of HCM in a first-degree relative, consistent with increased penetrance. However, these patients had no higher incidence of SCD events in first-degree relatives. Therefore, our data support the conventional wisdom that patients with MYH7 mutations are more likely to manifest the disease (penetrance) and confirm the key observation that patients with MYH7 mutations appear more susceptible to greater hypertrophy than the rest of a genetically heterogeneous cohort (8,12). More importantly, however, we were unable to demonstrate that individuals with MYH7-HCM were more vulnerable to sudden death than those patients with any other pathogenic basis for their HCM.

Consistent with our previous findings regarding "malignant" and "benign" MYH7 mutations, patients with "malignant" mutations were diagnosed at a young age but were not otherwise different from the cohort (20). Patients with "benign" mutations had significant manifestations of disease, including a young age at diagnosis and a family history of SCD (22). These data indicate that the prognostic value of any particular mutation, as determined by disease presentation in an unrelated family, may not be an accurate guide for risk assessment.

Importantly, the design of this study differs from previous genotype-phenotype correlations in that we included only one member from each affected family. This study design, using a large cohort of genetically independent patients, is necessary to determine whether the insights provided by previous studies of large pedigrees can be applied to individual patients in the clinician's office. Our data indicate that MYH7 mutations are associated with greater hypertrophy and younger age at diagnosis, which may assist in targeted gene screening. Identification of the pathogenic mutation will aid in preclinical diagnosis and genetic counseling; however, the MYH7 mutation status should not be considered a primary risk factor for SCD.

Analysis of the tertiary referral center cohort.   This cohort of 389 unrelated patients represents a biased sample of the population of patients with HCM. Because these patients were recruited from a tertiary referral center with known expertise in the surgical management of HCM, patients with significant obstruction and symptomatic presentation are over-represented, as evidenced by the comparison of regional versus non-regional patient subsets.

However, the frequency of MYH7 mutations identified in these subsets was not significantly different (16% in regional and 14% in non-regional), and there was no significant difference in any clinical parameter studied between the regional and non-regional patients who had an identifiable mutation in the MYH7 gene. Therefore, the frequency of mutations and clinical correlations identified herein cannot be attributed solely to a referral bias in this patient population.

Prevalence of thick-filament HCM.   Previous reports have speculated that ~30% of all HCM cases are due to mutations in MYH7, the largest of 10 HCM-associated genes encoding the thick and thin filaments of the sarcomere (10). Previously, a study examining MYH7 in 36 unrelated Finnish patients determined that only 2 patients (5.6%) had MYH7 mutations (25). In contrast, a recent comprehensive analysis of 197 unrelated patients from France revealed that 25% had MYH7 mutations (15). Here, in the largest published cohort, we found that 15% of patients harbored mutations in MYH7.

The accuracy of this estimate of MYH7 mutation frequency in HCM is dependent on several issues. Foremost is the sensitivity of our mutation detection platform—DHPLC. It is possible that additional MYH7 mutations eluded detection. However, the published sensitivity for DHPLC has been established in multiple applications at >95%, and sensitivity of 100% has been reported for HCM mutation screening (26–29). In our own quality-control experiments of our optimization methods and DHPLC sensitivity using direct sequencing as a gold standard, our mutation detection sensitivity was found to be 100% (data not shown). Therefore, it is unlikely that mutations were missed.

Second, it is possible that mutations identified represent rare polymorphisms and are not pathogenic for HCM. It is for this reason that both the Caucasian reference alleles, which are ethnically matched for the vast majority of our cohort, and the African-American reference alleles, which have been observed to have greater diversity of polymorphisms, were both utilized. In addition, the MYH7 protein has only two variable amino acid residues identified to date (including one identified herein), despite rigorous study of the gene since its discovery in 1990 as the sentinel genetic cause of HCM. Therefore, it is most likely that the mutations identified are indeed pathogenic.

Finally, if clinical evaluation of relatedness failed to discern distantly related individuals, founder effects may skew the reported mutation frequency from the true mutation rate. However, given that 83% of the identified MYH7 mutations occurred only once in the cohort, the effects would be negligible.

Spectrum of mutations in the thick filament.   It has been suggested that because the globular head and neck regions of the MYH7 protein directly affect motor function, mutations will be clustered within these domains, encoded by exons 3 through 23 (14,24). The head contains the actin and adenosine triphosphate-binding regions that are responsible for the force generation properties of myosin. The neck bends as the globular head is displaced throughout the power stroke. Over 80 missense mutations have been previously identified in exons 3 through 23, which encode for the head and neck domains (11). In our cohort, 79% of the HCM patients with MYH7 had mutations residing in the head and neck domains.

There have been only eight mutations previously reported in the rod portion of MYH7 (encoded by exons 24 through 40) (15,30), but these mutations were reported to account for up to 20% of MYH7-HCM (30). In this study, we report 9 mutations (8 novel) affecting the rod domain in 12 patients. Provided these mutations prove to be pathogenic for HCM, rod mutations account for one-fifth of our HCM patients with MYH7 mutations. Given that the rod portion of MYH7 has been less well characterized than the head domain, with respect to nonpathogenic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), it is possible that these mutations in the rod represent irrelevant SNPs, disease modifiers, or SNPs linked to mutations in a neighboring gene. All but the last may be determined by future linkage studies of the affected families. In discerning SNPs linked to the true genetic substrates for disease, high-throughput sequence analysis of even larger cohorts of healthy individuals will provide additional data on the prevalence and spectrum of nonpathogenic MYH7 variants. Interestingly, however, the patients with putative rod-domain mutations presented with a clinical phenotype indistinguishable from those with mutations involving the head and neck of MYH7. Therefore, genetic testing of MYH7 should include analysis of exons 24 through 40 that encode the rod domain.

Our analysis identified two mutational "hot spots." Nine (~15%) of the 58 HCM patients with MYH7 harbored mutations at amino acid 663 (exon 18), and 4 (~7%) of 58 had mutations at amino acid 1377 (exon 30). Although previously published as HCM-causing mutations (15), 400 reference alleles were analyzed to exclude these variants as common polymorphisms present in the unaffected population. The previously published L908V mutation was also identified in four unrelated patients.

Diversity of thick-filament mutations.   Prior to this study, there were 95 cited MYH7 mutations (11). In this study, 40 different mutations were identified, 25 (63%) of which were novel. Thirty-three (83%) of the 40 mutations had a single incidence within the cohort. This substantial degree of novelty and uniqueness further supports the genetic heterogeneity of HCM and has implications for the future of genetic testing as a diagnostic tool. Using current technology, it will be difficult and prohibitively expensive to screen for HCM-causing mutations as a clinical test because of the overall low occurrence of sarcomeric mutations and the high incidence of novel and unique mutations. In addition, compilation of sufficient (statistically significant) HCM phenotype data for unrelated individuals with the same pathogenic mutation for meaningful risk stratification may not be achievable in this highly diverse disease. By grouping mutations by functional domain and effect on amino acid charge, a method previously reported to discern statistically significant differences in phenotype (25), some statistically significant variables did emerge. Future analysis of even larger patient groups may determine that mutation location in the protein and the effect on charge can assist in the prediction of clinical severity among unrelated patients.

Compound heterogeneity in HCM.   Of the 58 patients identified with thick-filament HCM, two were found to have multiple sarcomeric mutations, and each has experienced a severe clinical course. These two cases with multiple mutations highlight the potential for compound heterozygosity, heterozygous synergism, and/or genetic disease modifiers in HCM. Specifically, the incidence of multiple sarcomeric mutations in HCM patients may be higher than would be estimated by analysis of the current literature, as comprehensive screening of sarcomeric genes in large cohorts of patients has only recently become technically feasible. Interestingly, each of these patients harbors a mutation previously characterized as "benign" or "malignant" based on family studies (20,22). For these specific patients, their status as carriers of multiple mutations may outweigh any prognostic effect of their "benign" or "malignant" mutation.

In one analysis of 197 patients with HCM for mutations in nine genes, six families (3%) were identified as having multiple mutations (15). As in this study, more rigorous analysis of these families is required to determine the role of each individual mutation and the effect of multiple sarcomeric defects. The effects of multiple mutations on disease severity may contribute to the variability seen within families and in unrelated individuals sharing the identical pathogenic mutation.

Conclusions.   The results of this study suggest that some of the findings from previous linkage studies may not apply to the population of patients seen in clinical practice, although the previous findings of more severe hypertrophy, younger age at diagnosis, and greater disease penetrance are supported by these data from an unrelated cohort. The frequency of MYH7 mutations in the population of patients with HCM may be lower than previously suggested. Importantly, MYH7 mutations conferred no increased incidence of SCD compared with HCM due to other genetic causes. The clinical utility and applications of genetic analysis in HCM must continue to be explored to determine the place of pathogenomics in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of HCM.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are indebted to the HCM patients for their participation in this study. We thank Dr. Rick Nishimura, director of Mayo's HCM Clinic, for his critical reading of the manuscript, as well as Mr. Doug Kocer, Nurse Coordinator for the HCM Clinic. We appreciate the technical assistance provided by David J. Tester and Sonja Eichmuller.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by a Mayo Foundation Clinic Research (Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota) award to Dr. Ackerman, a Clinical Scientist Development Award from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health (HD42569), Bethesda, Maryland.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults: Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the coronary artery risk development in (young) adults (cardia) study. Circulation. 1995;92:785–789[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:1308–1320[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Maron BJ, Carney KP, Lever HM, et al. Relationship of race to sudden cardiac death in competitive athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:974–980[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Arad M, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Phenotypic diversity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2499–2506[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Cannon RO, Leon MB, Epstein SE. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Interrelations of clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, and therapy. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:780–789[Medline]

6. Spirito P, Seidman CE, McKenna WJ, Maron BJ. The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:775–785[Free Full Text]

7. Seidman JG, Seidman C. The genetic basis for cardiomyopathy: From mutation identification to mechanistic paradigms. Cell. 2001;104:557–567[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Burch M, Blair E. The inheritance of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Pediatr Cardiol. 1999;20:313–316[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Roberts R, Sigwart U. New concepts in hypertrophic cardiomyopathies, part I. Circulation. 2001;104:2113–2116[Free Full Text]

10. Seidman CE, Seidman JG. Molecular genetic studies of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Basic Res Cardiol. 1998;93:13–16

11. The FHC Mutation Database, ANGIS 2001. Available at: http://morgan.angis.su.oz.au/Databases/Heart/dbsearch.html. Accessed March 16, 2004.

12. Marian AJ, Roberts R. Molecular genetic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Genetic markers for sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:88–99[Medline]

13. Fananapazir L, Dalakas MC, Cyran F, Cohn G, Epstein ND. Missense mutations in the beta-myosin heavy-chain gene cause central core disease in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:3993–3997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Watkins H, Rosenzweig A, Hwang DS, et al. Characteristics and prognostic implications of myosin missense mutations in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1108–1114[Abstract]

15. Richard P, Charron P, Carrier L, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a molecular diagnosis strategy. Circulation. 2003;107:2227–2232[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Antonarakis SENomenclature Working Group. Recommendations for a nomenclature system for human gene mutations. Hum Mutat. 1998;11:1–3[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Van Driest SV, Ellsworth EG, Ommen SR, Tajik AJ, Gersh BJ, Ackerman MJ. Prevalence and spectrum of thin filament mutations in an outpatient referral population with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2003;108:445–451[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Towbin JA. Molecular genetic basis of sudden cardiac death. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2001;10:283–295[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Hwang T, Lee W, Kimura A, et al. Early expression of a malignant phenotype of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with a Gly716Arg myosin heavy chain mutation in a Korean family. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1509–1513[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Ackerman MJ, Van Driest SV, Ommen SR, et al. Prevalence and age-dependence of malignant mutations in the beta-myosin heavy chain and troponin T gene in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A comprehensive outpatient perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:2042–2048[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Consevage MW, Salada GC, Baylen BG, Ladda RL, Rogan PK. A new missense mutation, Arg719Gln, in the beta-cardiac heavy chain myosin gene of patients with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:1025–1026[Free Full Text]

22. Van Driest SV, Ackerman MJ, Ommen SR, et al. Prevalence and severity of ‘benign’ mutations in the beta myosin heavy chain, cardiac troponin-T, and alpha tropomyosin genes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2002;106:3085–3090[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Woo A, Rakowski H, Liew JC, et al. Mutations of the beta myosin heavy chain gene in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Critical functional sites determine prognosis. Heart. 2003;89:1179–1185[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Rayment I, Holden HM, Sellers JR, Fananapazir L, Epstien ND. Structural interpretation of the mutations in the beta-cardiac myosin that have been implicated in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:3864–3868[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Jaaskelainen P, Soranta M, Miettinen R, et al. The cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain gene is not the predominant gene for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the Finnish population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1709–1716[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Xiao W, Oefner P. Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: A review. Hum Mutat. 2001;17:439–474[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Schollen E, Martens K, Geuzens E, Matthijs G. DHPLC analysis as a platform for molecular diagnosis of congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG). Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10:643–648[CrossRef][Medline]

28. Young J, Barker M, Fraser L, et al. Mutation searching in colorectal cancer studies: Experience with a denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography system for exon-by-exon scanning of tumour suppressor genes. Pathology. 2002;34:529–533[Medline]

29. Mogensen J, Bahl A, Kubo T, Elanko N, Taylor R, McKenna WJ. Comparison of fluorescent SSCP and denaturing HPLC analysis with direct sequencing for mutation screening in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Med Genet. 2003;40:1–5[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Blair E, Redwood C, de Jesus Oliveira M, et al. Mutations of the light meromyosin domain of the beta-myosin heavy chain rod in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2002;90:263–269[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
M. Michels, O. I.I. Soliman, M. J. Kofflard, Y. M. Hoedemaekers, D. Dooijes, D. Majoor-Krakauer, and F. J. ten Cate
Diastolic abnormalities as the first feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in Dutch myosin-binding protein C founder mutations.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2009; 2(1): 58 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
M. Penicka, P. Gregor, R. Kerekes, D. Marek, K. Curila, J. Krupicka, and for the Candesartan use in Hypertrophic And Non-ob
The Effects of Candesartan on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Function in Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Pilot, Randomized Study
J. Mol. Diagn., January 1, 2009; 11(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. M. Jacques, N. Briceno, A. E. Messer, C. E. Gallon, S. Jalilzadeh, E. Garcia, G. Kikonda-Kanda, J. Goddard, S. E. Harding, H. Watkins, et al.
The molecular phenotype of human cardiac myosin associated with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2008; 79(3): 481 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
I. Olivotto, F. Girolami, M. J. Ackerman, S. Nistri, J. M. Bos, E. Zachara, S. R. Ommen, J. L. Theis, R. A. Vaubel, F. Re, et al.
Myofilament Protein Gene Mutation Screening and Outcome of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2008; 83(6): 630 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. Morita, H. L. Rehm, A. Menesses, B. McDonough, A. E. Roberts, R. Kucherlapati, J. A. Towbin, J.G. Seidman, and C. E. Seidman
Shared Genetic Causes of Cardiac Hypertrophy in Children and Adults
N. Engl. J. Med., May 1, 2008; 358(18): 1899 - 1908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Revera, L. van der Merwe, M. Heradien, A. Goosen, V. A. Corfield, P. A. Brink, and J. C. Moolman-Smook
Troponin T and {beta}-myosin mutations have distinct cardiac functional effects in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients without hypertrophy
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2008; 77(4): 687 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. Medin, M. Hermida-Prieto, L. Monserrat, R. Laredo, J. C. Rodriguez-Rey, X. Fernandez, and A. Castro-Beiras
Mutational screening of phospholamban gene in hypertrophic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and functional study of the PLN -42 C>G mutation
Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 37 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Richard, E. Villard, P. Charron, and R. Isnard
The Genetic Bases of Cardiomyopathies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 27, 2006; 48(9_Suppl_A): A79 - A89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. Binder, S. R. Ommen, B. J. Gersh, S. L. Van Driest, A. J. Tajik, R. A. Nishimura, and M. J. Ackerman
Echocardiography-Guided Genetic Testing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Septal Morphological Features Predict the Presence of Myofilament Mutations
Mayo Clin. Proc., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 459 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. J. Perkins, S. L. Van Driest, E. G. Ellsworth, M. L. Will, B. J. Gersh, S. R. Ommen, and M. J. Ackerman
Gene-specific modifying effects of pro-LVH polymorphisms involving the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system among 389 unrelated patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2005; 26(22): 2457 - 2462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. J. Ackerman, S. L. Van Driest, and M. Bos
Are Longitudinal, Natural History Studies the Next Step in Genotype-Phenotype Translational Genomics in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2005; 46(9): 1744 - 1746.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
S. L. Van Driest, S. R. Ommen, A. J. Tajik, B. J. Gersh, and M. J. Ackerman
Yield of Genetic Testing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2005; 80(6): 739 - 744.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
S. L. Van Driest, S. R. Ommen, A. J. Tajik, B. J. Gersh, and M. J. Ackerman
Sarcomeric Genotyping in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mayo Clin. Proc., April 1, 2005; 80(4): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. L. Van Driest, V. C. Vasile, S. R. Ommen, M. L. Will, A. J. Tajik, B. J. Gersh, and M. J. Ackerman
Myosin binding protein C mutations and compound heterozygosity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1903 - 1910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Driest, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Driest, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, M. J.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement