|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:446-450, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.032 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |

,*


* Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Manuscript received February 5, 2003; revised manuscript received March 25, 2004, accepted April 6, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Megan Sherwood, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia.
megans{at}chw.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Aorticoleft ventricular tunnel is a rare congenital anomaly. Neonatal surgery has been advocated in all due to long-term concern of valvar aortic regurgitation (AR).
METHODS: We identified 11 patients from 1963 to August 2002. Clinical, echocardiographic, catheterization, and surgical details were reviewed.
RESULTS: Eight of 11 patients presented at less than six months old (six with congestive heart failure) and three later with a murmur, all with clinical evidence of AR. Associated lesions, most commonly aortic valve and coronary artery anomalies, were present in 45%. Catheter occlusion was considered but not performed in five. Spontaneous occlusion was documented in one. Ten had surgery (nine in our institution), seven with direct suture and two by patch closure of the aortic end of the AVLT. At follow-up (median, 5 years; 1 month to 35 years), all were asymptomatic; three had residual ALVT (one moderate, two small/trivial), with at most mild AR.
CONCLUSIONS: Aorticoleft ventricular tunnel is a rare cardiac malformation with a good post-operative long-term outcome. Associated lesions occurred in 45%. Catheterization should be reserved for patients with unclear non-invasive findings or transcatheter closure. We recommend surgery for most patients. We report spontaneous closure in one patient, prompting consideration of conservative follow-up in rare small, asymptomatic AVLT.
| ||||||||||||||
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biplane angiography was available throughout this period. Diagnostic echocardiography was available for the past two decades. Two-dimensional, spectral Doppler and color Doppler imaging were performed as available. Aorticoleft ventricular tunnel anatomy and aorta to LV flow, based on color jet width at the narrowest point (mild <2 mm, moderate 2 to 4 mm, or severe >4 mm), diastolic flow reversal in the descending aorta (severe), and LV M-mode measurement (diastolic dimension Z score: 2 to 3 moderate, >3 severe), were recorded.
Approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Children's Hospital Boston.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Treatment. Ten of 11 patients underwent surgery, nine in our institution, at median age 12 months (1 day to 24.4 years) (Table 2). The ALVT was clearly visible as an out-pouching in the anterior aspect of the aortic wall. The orifice was located above the right sinus of Valsalva or directly above the right-left commissure, close to the RCA ostium if present. The AVLT opened into the LV immediately below the right coronary cusp.
|
Spontaneous closure, confirmed echocardiographically, occurred in one asymptomatic patient. At presentation with critical AoV and subaortic stenosis, the AVLT was mistaken echocardiographically and angiographically for valvar AR. Successful balloon aortic valvuloplasty was performed. The subaortic gradient resolved without intervention. At AVLT diagnosis, the LV end measured 2 mm, with mild-moderate regurgitation and normal LV dimensions. Tunnel anatomy was similar to other patients, but smaller, with less regurgitation. Conservative management pending possible further AoV interventions was undertaken. No further intervention has been required. Between age 2 and 3 years, the tunnel spontaneously closed.
Follow-up. Our nine surgical patients have been followed for 1 month to 35 years, median 5 years (Table 3). All are asymptomatic. Residual ALVT were excluded echocardiographically in five of eight patients, including one spontaneous closure. Residual ALVT was seen in three patients (trivial/small [two patients], moderate [one patient]). Additionally, residual ALVT was excluded angiographically six years post-operatively in one, and the other has no clinical evidence of residual shunt eight years after surgery. Coil occlusion of the moderate residual ALVT is planned.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical/diagnosis. Aorticoleft ventricular tunnel is extremely rare (0.001% patients with congenital heart disease [10]). There were 9 patients with AVLT among 17,381 patients (0.0005%) catheterized in 35 years at our institution. As previously reported, we found a male predominance (6,11), often early presentation with CHF (6,11,12), and a significant incidence (45%) of associated cardiac defects (6,11,13,14). All our patients with associated defects had AoV (27%) and/or coronary artery (27%) anomalies.
The AVLT anatomy in our patients was similar to that previously described (7). Aorticoleft ventricular tunnel can be diagnosed by transthoracic (5,15,16), transesophageal (17), and fetal (12) echocardiography and by magnetic resonance imaging (16). A significant amount of "aortic regurgitation" in infants should raise the possibility of this lesion (14). In the apical four-chamber view, the tunnel and valvar AR jets may be superimposed. Clinical findings, regurgitant jet width, LV dilation, and retrograde flow in the descending aorta are useful in assessing the severity of tunnel regurgitation. In our view, transesophageal echocardiography is helpful during surgery and interventional catheterization.
Management. Surgical closure has been recommended at the time of diagnosis, including asymptomatic patients (3,5,6,11,12), due to inadequacy of medical management (6,11,13), risk of developing severe AR in patients repaired later (2,3), and satisfactory surgical results in neonates and infants (12,18). We support this approach, but would consider close medical follow-up of small, asymptomatic ALVT, as we have documented spontaneous closure in one such patient.
Surgical closure techniques have included combinations of suture or patch closure of the aortic orifice of the ALVT, obliteration of the tunnel, and occlusion of the ventricular orifice, all with comparable long-term survival (6,11). There has been concern about possible AoV leaflet distortion after direct suture closure of the aortic orifice compared with patch closure (13). Some investigators have favored patch closure in neonates and infants (12) and those with a larger aortic orifice (11), to avoid valvar distortion. However, seven of nine of our patients had suture closure of the aortic end and, at follow-up, valvar AR was, at most, mild.
Valvar AR is a major long-term concern, requiring valve replacement in up to half of reported patients (2,3,8). Aortic regurgitation may be secondary to turbulence-related damage to the leaflets or progressive aneurysmal dilation of the aortic root in patients surgically repaired at an older age (18), lack of support of the right aortic sinus (2,6), concomitant congenital AoV abnormalities, or iatrogenic surgical distortion of the valve (6). In our surgically repaired patients, including four operated on in infancy, AR is, at most, mild at follow-up. However, continued long-term follow-up is essential.
Successful percutaneous closure of an ALVT has been reported (19). We considered device closure in five patients, but desisted due to significant distensibility of the tunnel and/or proximity to the AoV leaflets and annulus or RCA ostium.
Conclusions. Aorticoleft ventricular tunnel is a rare cardiac malformation with a good long-term outcome after surgery. Most patients present early in life with CHF and many have associated lesions. The diagnosis should be considered in infants with clinical signs of AR. Echocardiography can identify the ALVT and associated lesions. Catheterization should be reserved for patients with unclear non-invasive findings or transcatheter closure. We recommend surgery soon after diagnosis in symptomatic patients. Long-term review for AR is essential. Conservative management may be considered in rare, asymptomatic, small AVLT as we observed spontaneous closure in one such patient.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ono, H. Goerler, D. Boethig, and T. Breymann Surgical repair of aortico-left ventricular tunnel arising from the left aortic sinus Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2008; 7(3): 510 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Mitropoulos, H. Laks, M. A. Kanakis, and D. Levi Aorto-left ventricular tunnel: an alternative surgical approach. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 1113 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Siepe, S. Dittrich, F. Beyersdorf, and C. Schlensak Aortic atresia with aortico-left ventricular tunnel mimicking severe aortic incompetence in utero. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 845 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |