Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 3 Comparison of infarct size measured from short-axis images by delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using different techniques. The arrow demonstrates the border zone, areas with partial enhancement on the edge of the infarct, which may lead to visual ambiguity in assessing the delayed hyperenhanced area. The infarcted region was delineated by the different techniques using different criteria, as shown by contours in red: 1 = visual; 2 = standard deviation (1 SD); and 3 = full-width at half-maximum (FWHM). Significant variability among segmentation methods is noted, especially related to the inclusion of the border zone on the analysis. The MRI infarct size was compared with postmortem measurements (triphenyltetrazolium chloride [TTC] pathology).





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement