JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1996-2002, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.029
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. P.

BIOMARKERS

Serum levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances predict cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease

A longitudinal analysis of the PREVENT study

Mary F. Walter, PhD*, Robert F. Jacob, PhD*, Barrett Jeffers, PhD{ddagger}, Mathieu M. Ghadanfar, MD{ddagger}, Gregory M. Preston, PhD§, Jan Buch, MD{ddagger} and R. Preston Mason, PhD*,{dagger},*

* Elucida Research, Beverly, Massachusetts
{dagger} Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Pfizer Inc., New York, New York
§ Pfizer Central Research, Groton, Connecticut

Manuscript received July 9, 2004; revised manuscript received August 3, 2004, accepted August 10, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. R. Preston Mason, 100 Cummings Center, Suite 135L, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915 (Email: rpmason{at}elucidaresearch.com).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to test the predictive value of an oxidative stress biomarker in 634 patients from the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT).

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress contributes to mechanisms of atherosclerosis and plaque instability. Biomarkers of oxidation, such as malondialdehyde (MDA), may represent independent indicators of risk for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS: Serum MDA levels were measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in 634 patients with documented CAD using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and spectrophotometric approaches.

RESULTS: During the three-year study, there were 51 major vascular events such as fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, 149 hospitalizations for nonfatal vascular events, and 139 patients underwent a major vascular procedure. At baseline, patients with TBARS levels in the highest quartile had a relative risk (RR) of 3.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47 to 7.42; p = 0.038) for major vascular events, RR of 4.10 (95% CI 2.55 to 6.60; p < 0.0001) for nonfatal vascular events, and RR of 3.84 (95% CI 2.56 to 5.76; p < 0.0001) for major vascular procedures. The effect of TBARS on events and procedures was also seen in a multivariate model adjusted for inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, interleukin-6), and other risk factors (age, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, and blood pressure). This analysis showed an independent effect of TBARS on major vascular events (p = 0.0149), nonfatal vascular events (p < 0.0001), major vascular procedures (p < 0.001), and all vascular events and procedures (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of TBARS were strongly predictive of cardiovascular events in patients with stable CAD, independently of traditional risk factors and inflammatory markers.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CI = confidence interval
  CRP = C-reactive protein
  HDL = high-density lipoprotein
  IL-6 = interleukin-6
  LDL = low-density lipoprotein
  MDA = malondialdehyde
  PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
  PREVENT = Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial
  QCA = quantitative coronary angiography
  RR = relative risk
  sICAM-1 = soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1
  TBARS = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances


Oxidative modification of lipids associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and cellular constituents contributes to mechanisms of atherogenesis (1–3). It has been demonstrated in previous studies that levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), often measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), are elevated in association with cardiovascular risk factors, such as cigarette smoking (4,5), hypertension (6), hyperlipidemia (7,8), and diabetes (9,10). These findings indicate that there may be predictive value for biomarkers of oxidation among patients with cardiovascular disease, as compared with traditional risk factors.

The hypothesis of the current study is that elevated levels of TBARS are associated with increased cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). This hypothesis was tested using serum samples obtained from The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT), a prospective, double-masked clinical trial. Patients in this study had documented coronary disease and were treated with either amlodipine or placebo. Treatment with amlodipine was associated with significantly fewer cases of unstable angina and coronary revascularization without a reduction in luminal loss (11). This benefit with amlodipine may be attributed to various mechanisms, as previously reviewed (12). For the biomarker analysis, serum samples were collected from 634 patients at baseline and at the end of each 12-month period during the 3-year study. The level of the MDA-thiobarbituric-acid complex was precisely measured after separation by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with spectrophotometric and fluorescence detection (13,14). The association of TBARS with clinical events and procedures was evaluated in univariate and multivariate models adjusting for inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP], soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [sICAM-1], interleukin-6 [IL-6]), and other risk factors (age, gender, lipids, body mass index, and blood pressure).


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
General design features.   PREVENT was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial of patients who had angiographic evidence of CAD (11). Men and women (30 to 80 years old) were randomized if there was angiographic evidence of one focal coronary lesion of ≥30% diameter stenosis (non-intervened and non-infarcted) and the presence of ≥1 lesion with a 5% to 20% stenosis that was not in a vessel with a ≥60% lesion. Other eligibility criteria included diastolic blood pressure of <95 mm Hg, total cholesterol of <325 mg/dl, and fasting blood glucose of <200 mg/dl. Randomization was stratified according to clinical center and history of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).

Monitoring for clinical events and adverse experiences.   The prespecified clinical events were all-cause mortality and the occurrence of major fatal/nonfatal vascular events or procedures. Death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalized heart failure, and hospitalized episodes of unstable angina were classified by an external events classification committee blinded to treatment assignment. Confirmation of unstable angina required hospitalization for typical chest pain and either evidence of myocardial ischemia (electrocardiogram or stress test evidence, or new angiographic findings of disease) or an indication that this pain was similar to that of previously documented evidence of ischemia.

Angiographic methods and outcomes.   The progression of early atherosclerotic segments was determined on the basis of a change in mean minimal diameter with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) (15,16). Atherosclerotic segments were defined as coronary segments with a diameter stenosis of ≤30% at baseline. Up to 12 coronary segments were used in the analysis of disease progression (17). Vessels that underwent a procedure at or before baseline were excluded from the analyses. The baseline and follow-up films were centrally read pairwise by a certified reader who was blinded to treatment assignment and the temporal sequencing of films.

Measurement of serum TBARS levels.   Serum samples were obtained from 634 fasting participants at the beginning of the study (baseline) and at the end of each of the three years. Samples were stored at –70°C without the addition of exogenous antioxidants before TBARS analysis. After thawing the samples, measurements of MDA in terms of TBARS were performed in duplicate in each of 2,975 samples by the method of Carbonneau et al. (18) with slight modifications. Briefly, 50 µl of 10 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added to 0.5 ml of serum and incubated at 60°C for 30 min. The sample was then acidified to pH 1.0 with 500 µl of 586 g/l perchloric acid. After centrifugation, 300 µl of supernatant was added to 50 µl of thiobarbituric acid or TBA (10 g/l in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) and heated at 100°C for 30 min. The sample was cooled and 100 µl removed for high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. The MDA that reacts with TBA in this reaction is generated from lipid hydroperoxides and potentially other biologic sources (e.g., glucose).

The MDA-thiobarbituric-acid complex was separated from other possible reactants with TBA using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on a Varian Prostar system (Varian Inc., Walnut Creek, California)coupled with a spectrophotometric detector at 532 nm and a fluorescence detector (excitation = 515 nm, emission = 553 nm) on a 150 mm x 4.6 mm Adsorbosphere (Alltech Associates Inc., Deerfield, Illinois) C18 column with 5 µm particle size. The purpose for using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography followed by quantitation with both spectrophotometry and fluorescence was to eliminate other aldehydes that react with TBA and have absorbance characteristics at 532 nm (13,14,19). The flow rate was 1 ml/min, and the mobile phase was 80% phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 5.8) with 20% methanol. A standard curve was run at the start, middle, and end of each sample set using 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane as a standard. Peak areas were determined using the Star Chromatographyworkstation (Varian Inc.).

Measurement of serum CRP, IL-6, and sICAM-1.   C-reactive protein levels were measured using the N Latex CRP mono assay (Dade Behring Inc., Deerfield, Illinois) with a detection limit of 0.21 mg/l. Samples with values below the limit of detection were recorded as <0.21 mg/l; the value 0.20 mg/l was incorporated for statistical analyses. Intra- and interassay precision for the low quality control (QC)(0.46 mg/l) had coefficient of variations (CVs)of 9.9% and 14.8%, respectively. Serum soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 levels were measured with the Parameter Human sICAM-1 Immunoassay Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota), with a range of 0 to 588 ng/ml. Intra- and interassay precision for the middle QC (282.7 ng/ml) had CVs of 9.0% and 9.5%, respectively. Interleukin-6 levels were measured using the Quantikine HS IL-6 R&D Systems kit, which had an assay range of 0.156 to 10 pg/ml. Intra- and interassay precision for the low QC (0.338 pg/ml) had CVs of 9.9% and 14.4%, respectively. All measurements were made by Esoterix Coagulation (Aurora, Colorado).

Statistical analysis.   Simple descriptive statistics were used to describe the population. For clinical outcomes, proportional hazards regression models were used to obtain hazards ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). The first proportional hazards model used baseline TBARS and treatment as covariates for each clinical outcome (major vascular events, hospitalizations for angina, coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], PTCA, and major vascular procedures). Finally, to further investigate the impact of TBARS on clinical outcomes, a proportional hazards model was performed using quartiles of baseline TBARS with the reference group being those in the lowest quartile.

Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between TBARS and coronary angiography outcomes measurements (e.g., all segments, segments stenosed ≤30%, segments stenosed <30% and ≤50%, and segments stenosed >50%) as well as TBARS and changes in patient characteristics (e.g., change in systolic blood pressure, change in diastolic blood pressure, change in high-density lipoprotein [HDL], change in LDL, and change in triglycerides). All analyses were undertaken using alpha = 0.05 and were performed using SAS Version 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The baseline patient characteristics of the study cohort are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. PREVENT: Baseline Description of Patients (n = 634)
 
Clinical events.   During the study, there were 51 major vascular events such as fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke; 149 hospitalizations for nonfatal cardiovascular events (mainly unstable angina); 139 patients also underwent a major vascular procedure, such as PTCA/CABG.

TBARS levels and clinical events.   Table 2 shows the relationship between measured baseline levels of TBARS and cardiovascular events in PREVENT. At baseline, the overall mean absolute level of TBARS was 1.49 ± 0.57 µM. Baseline levels of TBARS were associated with risk for fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction with a relative risk (RR) of 2.94 (95% CI 1.75 to 4.94), an RR of 2.58 (95% CI 1.98 to 3.37) for nonfatal cardiovascular events, and an RR of 2.14 for nonfatal vascular events (95% CI 1.61 to 2.84). The absolute levels of TBARS in patients with and without specific vascular events and procedures events were reviewed in Table 3. The significant univariate effect of TBARS seen on major vascular events, nonfatal vascular events, vascular procedure, and all vascular events and procedures is also seen in a multivariate model adjusting for inflammatory markers and known cardiovascular risk factors. Specifically, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was undertaken where the following variables were included in the analysis: TBARS, inflammatory markers (sICAM-1, IL-6, CRP), age, gender, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index. After adjusting for all of these variables, TBARS levels showed an independent effect on major vascular events (p = 0.0149), nonfatal vascular events (p < 0.0001), vascular procedure (p < 0.001), and all vascular events and procedures (p < 0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. PREVENT: Predictive Value of TBARS Serum Levels (Baseline)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. PREVENT: Comparative Mean Absolute TBARS Serum Levels With Specific Vascular Events and Procedures
 
We measured levels of inflammatory markers at baseline. The median (25th/75th percentile) levels at baseline for IL-6, sICAM-1, and hs-CRP were 2.7 pg/ml (1.7, 4.3), 2.1 ng/ml (1.7, 2.5), and 2.5 mg/l (1.2, 5.5), respectively. A significant correlation of TBARS with levels of IL-6 (p < 0.0001) was observed (correlation coefficient of 0.148). However, baseline levels of TBARS did not correlate with either CRP, an acute phase reactant (p = 0.722), or sICAM-1 (p = 0.052).

In Figure 1, it is demonstrated that participants with the highest baseline TBARS levels were at increased risk for experiencing a major vascular event (RR of 3.30; 95% CI 1.47 to 7.42), nonfatal cardiovascular event (RR of 4.10; 95% CI 2.55 to 6.60), major vascular procedure (RR of 3.29; 95% CI 2.09 to 5.15), and all vascular events and procedures (RR of 3.84; 95% CI 2.56 to 5.78). Additionally, patients in the highest quartile had an increased risk of fatal/nonfatal MI (RR of 5.07; 95% CI 1.70 to 15.06; p = 0.0035), developing angina (RR of 4.03; 95% CI 2.50 to 6.49; p < 0.0001), undergoing a CABG procedure (RR of 3.03; 95% CI 1.33 to 6.88; p < 0.0080) or PTCA (RR of 3.12; 95% CI 1.74 to 5.58; p < 0.0001), and experiencing a fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR of 5.07; 95% CI 1.70 to 15.06; p = 0.0035).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Quartile analysis of a lipid oxidation marker (malondialdehyde measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) in patients with documented coronary artery disease. CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; CHF = congestive heart failure; MI = myocardial infarction; PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; RR = relative risk.

 
In PREVENT, treatment with amlodipine was associated with a 31% reduction in the RR of a major/documented vascular event or procedure (p = 0.01). However, changes in levels of TBARS during the three-year period were not significantly different in patients on amlodipine versus placebo (n = 596; p = 0.336).

The mean absolute levels of TBARS were stable over the three-year period due to uniformity in the handling and storage of the samples. The mean absolute levels were 1.5 ± 0.6 µM, 1.4 ± 0.3 µM, 1.3 ± 0.4 µM, and 1.3 ± 0.4 µM at baseline, month 12, month 24, and month 36, respectively. By contrast, the absolute mean levels of TBARS in the highest quartiles were in the range of 3.3 to 4.1 µM, depending on the cardiovascular event category.

TBARS levels and angiographic measurements..   Changes in TBARS over the three-year study correlated poorly with angiographic outcome measurements. In all segments evaluated, there was a significant association (n = 515; p = 0.021) between angiographic determinations of lesion development and serum TBARS levels, but the correlation coefficient was 0.100. In particular, changes in TBARS levels correlated with progression of moderate coronary stenoses (>30% and ≤50%) in a significant fashion (n = 474; p = 0.024) with a correlation coefficient of 0.105, but not in minimal segments of ≤30% (n = 507; p = 0.085) or larger segments of ≥50% (n = 237; p = 0.742). The p values were calculated from the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

TBARS levels and patient characteristics.   Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances chromatography levels were strongly associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity, independently of other known risk factors, such as blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) or lipids (HDL, LDL, and triglycerides). Levels of TBARS also did not correlate with baseline demographics such as gender, history of smoking, previous angina, or a family history of myocardial infarction or sudden death. However, a patient's history of a myocardial infarction correlated significantly with baseline TBARS levels (n = 659; p < 0.035). The level of TBARS was 1.54 ± 0.61 µM (n = 309) for patients who had a history of a myocardial infarction, whereas the level was 1.45 ± 0.52 µM (n = 350) for patients without such a previous event.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The essential finding from this study was that measured levels of a lipid oxidation marker (MDA measured as TBARS) were strongly associated with cardiovascular events in the PREVENT study, including fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke, hospitalizations for nonfatal cardiovascular events (mainly unstable angina), and major vascular procedures, such as PTCA/CABG. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances chromatography levels measured during the study period were predictive of cardiovascular events independently of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), lipids (total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides), inflammatory markers (sICAM-1, IL-6, CRP), age, gender, and body mass index. A weak but significant correlation was also observed between levels of TBARS and angiographic progression of disease, especially moderate coronary stenoses (>30% and ≤50%). Although amlodipine treatment was associated with significantly fewer cardiovascular events, it did not influence TBARS levels.

To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study demonstrating an association between elevated TBARS in serum and cardiovascular risk in patients with stable CAD. Previous studies in relatively small populations had demonstrated correlations between levels of TBARS and key cardiovascular risk factors, including cigarette smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes (5,6). Markers of lipid peroxidation, including LDL oxidation, have also been associated with the development of coronary disease (20–24). In one study of 206 subjects, TBARS levels correlated with severity of disease as determined by angiography, independently of other known risk factors (total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides) (21). In another small study of 29 patients with coronary disease, use of lipid-lowering agents (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, bile sequestrant) was associated with significantly lower levels of serum TBARS in a manner that correlated strongly with endothelial function (25). Collectively, these studies support an emerging role for markers of oxidative stress in the prediction of risk for cardiovascular disease.

In this study, the serum levels of TBARS measured at baseline in these patients correlated directly with levels of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-6. Production of IL-6 from vascular cells is triggered by the proatherogenic factor, angiotensin II (26), which also stimulates reactive oxygen species involved in LDL oxidation. Cytokine production from smooth muscle cells is also stimulated directly by oxidized LDL (27). Given the interrelationships between cytokine expression, angiotensin II, and reactive oxygen species, the correlation between levels of this cytokine and TBARS may result from common early events in atherogenesis. Elevations in IL-6, in turn, lead to increased release of the acute phase reactant CRP from the liver (28), an inflammatory marker that predicts cardiovascular risk (29). The lack of an association between levels of TBARS and CRP is not well understood but may indicate only an indirect relationship between the expression of certain inflammatory markers and markers of advanced oxidative damage in these patients with stable CAD.

Oxidative modification of lipids associated with LDL and cellular constituents contribute to endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory pathways associated with atherosclerosis (1–3,30,31). The mechanism of in vivo LDL oxidation is not fully understood, but results of mass spectroscopy analyses indicate elevated levels of protein oxidation products in human atherosclerotic lesions that may be attributed to myeloperoxidase activity (32). Besides measurements of TBARS, other approaches have been used to assess oxidative stress levels, such as monoclonal antibodies against oxidized LDL, protein oxidation markers, and measurement of isoprostanes (33–35). Isoprostanes are prostaglandin-like compounds that may be formed in vivo from the free-radical-initiated peroxidation of arachidonic acid, independently of the cyclooxygenase pathway. Studies have demonstrated that these compounds are found in the plaque and associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (36,37). In vivo oxidative stress levels have been quantitated by several different methods (33,38,39).

Study limitations.   A limitation of this study was that the MDA measured in the TBARS assay may be generated, in some part, from sources other than lipid hydroperoxides associated with lipoproteins, such as glucose, bilirubin, and amino acids. Additionally, measurements were carried out with serum samples from patients, the preparation of which could theoretically lead to some MDA development. Finally, preservatives (e.g., antioxidants) were not added to the serum samples as part of the storage procedure at –70°C, and this could contribute to MDA formation over time. It should be noted, however, that the absolute mean levels of MDA were stable over the course of the three-year study.

Implications for antioxidant treatment.   The implication of these data for the role of antioxidants in the treatment of CAD is an interesting question. Although epidemiologic and laboratory animal studies indicate that low levels of antioxidants are associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, the results of large prospective antioxidant clinical trials have failed to show a benefit, as recently reviewed (40,41). Possible explanations for this paradox may be due to trial design, baseline antioxidant status of participants, dosage and source of the antioxidants, and time of intervention relative to disease progression. An additional explanation is that vitamin E does not neutralize relevant oxidants, such as those produced by myeloperoxidase (42), and/or there is reduced penetration of this natural antioxidant into the atherosclerotic plaque. This latter concept was evaluated in patients with advanced atherosclerosis after vitamin E supplementation (450 IU/day). This analysis showed that, despite a reduction in plasma markers of oxidation with vitamin E, there was no change in vitamin E content or levels of oxysterols in the plaque itself (43). This may be due to the effects of hyperlipidemia on the cholesterol content on vascular cell plasma membranes (44). This increase in membrane cholesterol content interferes with the ability of lipophilic molecules to partition into the lipid environment, as we have previously demonstrated with cardiovascular agents (45). Thus, vessel wall changes in patients with advanced atherosclerosis may attenuate the ability of tocopherol to partition into plaque and scavenge free radicals. Synthetic antioxidants with superior scavenging activity and lipophilic properties may have different effects on oxidative stress markers in the plaque and beneficially influence the course of the disease.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the PREVENT investigators and the excellent administrative assistance of Anne Marie Gregg.


    Footnotes
 
Funded by Pfizer Inc., New York, New York. Drs. Jeffers, Ghadanfar, Preston, and Buch are employees of Pfizer Inc.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Witztum JL, Berliner JA. Oxidized phospholipids and isoprostanes in atherosclerosis Curr Opin Lipidol 1998;9:441-448.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Chisolm GM, Steinberg D. The oxidative modification hypothesis of atherogenesis: an overview Free Radical Biol Med 2000;28:1815-1826.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Steinberg D. Low density lipoprotein oxidation and its pathobiological significance J Biol Chem 1997;272:20963-20966.[Free Full Text]
  4. Sanderson KJ, van Rij AM, Wade CR, et al. Lipid peroxidation of circulating low density lipoproteins with age, smoking and in peripheral vascular disease Atherosclerosis 1995;118:45-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Bridges AB, Scott NA, Parry GJ, et al. Age, sex, cigarette smoking and indices of free radical activity in healthy humans Eur J Med 1993;2:205-208.[Medline]
  6. Ghiadoni L, Magagna A, Versari D, et al. Different effect of antihypertensive drugs on conduit artery endothelial function Hypertension 2003;41:1-6.[Free Full Text]
  7. Zahavi J, Betteridge JD, Jones NA, et al. Enhanced in vivo platelet release reaction and malondialdehyde formation in patients with hyperlipidemia Am J Med 1981;70:59-64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Yalcin AS, Sabuncu N, Kilinc A, et al. Increased plasma and erythrocyte lipid peroxidation in hyperlipidemic individuals Atherosclerosis 1989;80:169-170.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Nacitarhan S, Ozben T, Tuncer N. Serum and urine malondialdehyde levels in NIDDM patients with and without hyperlipidemia Free Radical Biol Med 1995;19:893-896.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Noberasco G, Odetti P, Boeri D, et al. Malondialdehyde (MDA) level in diabetic subjects: relationship with blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin Biomed Pharmacother 1991;45:193-196.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Pitt B, Byington RP, Furberg CD, et al. Effect of amlodipine on the progression of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events Circulation 2000;102:1503-1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mason RP, Marche P, Hintze TH. Novel vascular biology of third-generation L-type calcium channel antagonists: ancillary actions of amlodipine Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:2155-2163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Templar J, Kon SP, Milligan TP, Newman DJ, Raftery MJ. Increased plasma malondialdehyde levels in glomerular disease as determined by a fully validated HPLC method Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:946-951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Li XY, Chow CK. An improved method for the measurement of malondialdehyde in biological samples Lipids 1994;29:73-75.[Medline]
  15. Mancini GB, Simon SB, McGillem MJ, LeFree MT, Friedman HZ, Vogel RA. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method Circulation 1987;75:452-460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. The NHLaBICAS Study Investigators A multicenter comparison of the effects of randomized medical and surgical treatment of mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease and a registry of consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography Circulation 1981;63(Suppl I):I1-81.[Medline]
  17. Byington RP, Miller ME, Herrington D, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) Am J Cardiol 1997;80:1087-1090.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Carbonneau MA, Peuchant E, Sess D, Canioni P, Clerc M. Free and bound malondialdehyde measured as thiobarbituric acid adduct by HPLC Clin Chem 1991;37:1423-1429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Meagher EA, Fitzgerald GA. Indices of lipid peroxidation in vivo: strengths and limitations Free Radical Biol Med 2000;28:1745-1750.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Cavalca V, Cighetti G, Bamonti F, et al. Oxidative stress and homocysteine in coronary artery disease Clin Chem 2001;47:887-892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sakuma N, Hibino T, Sato T, et al. Levels of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance in plasma from coronary artery disease patients Clin Biochem 1997;30:505-507.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Chiu HC, Jeng JR, Shieh SM. Increased oxidizability of plasma low-density lipoprotein from patients with coronary artery disease Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1225:200-208.[Medline]
  23. Ehara S, Ueda M, Naruko T, et al. Elevated levels of oxidized low density lipoprotein show a positive relationship with the severity of acute coronary syndromes Circulation 2001;103:1955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Weinbrenner T, Cladellas M, Covas MI, et al. High oxidative stress in patients with stable coronary heart disease Atherosclerosis 2003;168:99-9106.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Penny WF, Ben-Yehuda O, Kuroe K, et al. Improvement of coronary artery endothelial dysfunction with lipid-lowering therapy: heterogeneity of segmental response and correlation with plasma-oxidized low density lipoprotein J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2136-2137.[Free Full Text]
  26. Kranzhofer R, Schmidt J, Pfeiffer CAH, et al. Angiotensin induces inflammatory activation of human vascular smooth muscle cells Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:1623-1629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cushing SD, Berliner JA, Valentine AJ, et al. Minimally modified LDL induces monocyte chemotactic protein 1 in human endothelial and smooth muscle cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:5134-5138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Moshage HJ, Roelofs HM, van Pelt JF, et al. The effect of interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and its interrelationship on the synthesis of serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein in primary cultures of adult human hepatocytes Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1988;155:112-117.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, et al. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events N Engl J Med 2002;347:1557-1565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Vergani L, Hatrik S, Ricci F, et al. Effect of native and oxidized low-density lipoprotein on endothelial nitric oxide and superoxide production: key role of L-arginine availability Circulation 2000;101:1261-1266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rubanyi GM, Vanhoutte PM. Superoxide anions and hyperoxia inactivate endothelium-derived relaxing factor Am J Physiol 1986;250:H822-7.
  32. Hazen SL, Gaut JP, Crowley JR, et al. Elevated levels of protein-bound p-hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde, an amino-acid-derived aldehyde generated by myeloperoxidase, are present in human fatty streaks, intermediate lesions and advanced atherosclerotic lesions Biochemistry 2000;352:693-699.[CrossRef]
  33. Hulthe J, Fagerberg B. Circulating oxidized LDL is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis development and inflammatory cytokines (ARI study) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22:1162-1167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pratico D. F2-isoprostanes: sensitive and specific non-invasive indices of lipid peroxidatoin in vivo Atherosclerosis 1999;147:1-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Shishehbor MH, Brenna ML, Aviles RJ, et al. Statins promote potent systemic antioxidant effects through specific inflammatory pathways Circulation 2003;108:426-431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Gniwotta C, Morrow JD, Roberts LJ, et al. Prostaglandin F2-like compounds, F2-isoprostanes, are present in increased amounts in human atherosclerotic lesions Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:2975-2981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Vassalle C, Botto N, Andreassi MG, et al. Evidence for enhanced 8-isoprostane plasma levels, as index of oxidative stress in vivo, in patients with coronary artery disease Coronary Artery Dis 2003;14:213-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Yla-Herttuala S, et al. Low density lipoprotein undergoes oxidative modification in vivo Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:1372-1376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Salonen JT, Yla-Herttuala S, Yamamoto R, et al. Autoantibody against oxidised LDL and progression of carotid atherosclerosis Lancet 1992;339:883-887.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Jialal I, Devaraj S. Antioxidants and atherosclerosis: don't throw out the baby with the bath water Circulation 2003;107:926-928.[Free Full Text]
  41. Steinberg D, Witztum JL. Is the oxidative modification hypothesis relevant to human atherosclerosis? Do the antioxidant trails conducted to date refute the hypothesis? Circulation 2002;105:2107-2111.[Free Full Text]
  42. Heinecke JW. Oxidative stress: new approaches to diagnosis and prognosis in atherosclerosis Am J Cardiol 2003;9112A–6A.
  43. Micheletta F, Natoli S, Misuraca M, et al. Vitamin E supplementation in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: reversal of altered oxidative stress in plasma but not in plaque Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:136-140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Tulenko TN, Chen M, Mason PE, Mason RP. Physical effects of cholesterol on arterial smooth muscle membranes: evidence of immiscible cholesterol domains and alterations in bilayer width during atherogenesis J Lipid Res 1998;39:947-956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mason RP, Moisey DM, Shajenko L. Cholesterol alters the binding of Ca2+ channel blockers to the membrane lipid bilayer Mol Pharmacol 1992;41:315-321.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. F. Walter, R. F. Jacob, R. E. Bjork, B. Jeffers, J. Buch, Y. Mizuno, R. P. Mason, and on behalf of the PREVENT Investigators
Circulating Lipid Hydroperoxides Predict Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The PREVENT Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 25, 2008; 51(12): 1196 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. P. Mason, M. F. Walter, C. A. Day, and R. F. Jacob
Active Metabolite of Atorvastatin Inhibits Membrane Cholesterol Domain Formation by an Antioxidant Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9337 - 9345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Zalewski and C. Macphee
Role of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 in Atherosclerosis: Biology, Epidemiology, and Possible Therapeutic Target
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2005; 25(5): 923 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. P.


HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK