JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:188-191, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.052
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puchalski, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tani, L. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puchalski, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tani, L. Y.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Follow-up of aortic coarctation repair in neonates

Michael D. Puchalski, MD*,*, Richard V. Williams, MD*, John A. Hawkins, MD*, L. LuAnn Minich, MD* and Lloyd Y. Tani, MD*

* Primary Children's Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Manuscript received October 13, 2003; revised manuscript received December 17, 2003, accepted January 19, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Michael D. Puchalski, University of Utah, Primary Children's Medical Center, 100 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, USA.
pcmpucha{at}ihc.com


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to assess the growth of left heart (LH) structures, to evaluate midterm outcomes, and to define echocardiographic parameters predictive of increased risk of re-intervention in patients born with aortic coarctation and hypoplasia of LH structures that underwent neonatal coarctation repair.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal coarctation is often associated with hypoplasia of LH structures. Although previous studies have shown that coarctation repair can be performed with good results in these neonates, there are little data regarding growth of the LH structures or outcomes in these patients.

METHODS: Patients with isolated coarctation and at least one hypoplastic LH valve (mitral or aortic Z-score <–2) who underwent a neonatal coarctation repair were identified. Clinic charts and the latest echocardiograms were reviewed.

RESULTS: All 55 patients were alive and well, and no patient had clinical evidence of mitral stenosis. Three patients (5%) required re-intervention. Thirty-eight patients had echocardiograms that demonstrated normal left ventricular (LV) size and function with a follow-up duration of 73 ± 19 months (range 3 to 9 years). Both mitral and aortic annulus Z-scores increased significantly: –3.1 ± 1.5 to –0.5 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001) and –3.5 ± 1.9 to 0.7 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001), respectively. Nine patients (24%) developed LV outflow tract obstruction by echocardiographic criteria.

CONCLUSIONS: After neonatal coarctation repair with associated LH hypoplasia, LH structures increase substantially in size, and clinical outcomes are excellent at midterm follow-up. Despite initial annular hypoplasia, the need for intervention for mitral or aortic/subaortic stenosis is uncommon.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  LH = left heart
  LV = left ventricle/ventricular

Aortic coarctation is often associated with hypoplasia of other left heart (LH) structures including the mitral valve, left ventricle (LV), and aortic valve (1). When these structures are hypoplastic, determining the adequacy of the LH for supporting the systemic circulation is critical for deciding on the best treatment option. If the LH is too small to support the systemic circulation, the patient should undergo surgical palliation for a single ventricle or heart transplantation, thus eliminating the possibility of a biventricular repair. Extensive investigation has been done to determine the adequacy of LV size for a biventricular repair in patients with critical aortic stenosis (2–5), but few studies have focused on LH hypoplasia in patients with aortic coarctation. Previous studies have shown that neonates with coarctation and LH hypoplasia can undergo successful coarctation repair and that the sizes of LH structures are not predictive of successful immediate or short-term outcome (6–8). Despite this, other investigators have found age at surgery and aortic arch hypoplasia to be risk factors for recoarctation (9,10), but these reports fail to account for other factors that influence hemodynamics and affect long-term outcome. This study was undertaken to assess growth of the LH structures, to evaluate midterm outcomes, and to define echocardiographic parameters predictive of increased risk of re-intervention in patients born with aortic coarctation and hypoplasia of LH structures who underwent neonatal coarctation repair.


   Materials and methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients studied.   All patients studied were recruited from the original cohort in the Tani et al. study (6). The following were the criteria for inclusion at presentation:

The medical records were reviewed for current patient age, body surface area, date of surgery, follow-up duration, outcomes, need for re-intervention, and most recent echocardiogram. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Utah School of Medicine approved this study.

Echocardiography.   Two-dimensional, M-mode, and Doppler echocardiography were performed using an Acuson 128 XP or Sequoia (Acuson, Mountain View, California), or a Hewlett-Packard Sonos 5500 system (Agilent, Andover, Massachusetts) with images recorded on 0.5-inch videotape. In the original study, the dimensions of the aortic valve, aortic root, mitral valve, and transverse arch were measured. The LV end-diastolic area and dimension, LV ejection fraction and shortening fraction, long-axis ratio, and Rhodes score (2) were calculated. For this study, the most recent echocardiogram was reviewed and optimal images were selected for offline measurements using previously described techniques (11). The dimensions of the aortic valve annulus, aortic root, and the mitral valve annulus (antero-posterior diameter) were measured from the parasternal long-axis view. M-mode measurements of LV end-diastolic dimension and LV shortening fraction were obtained from the parasternal short-axis view. The lateral dimension of the mitral valve annulus and the LV ejection fraction (Simpson's method) were measured from the apical window. Z-scores were calculated using formulas that compared the measured cardiac structure with normal values for a given body size (12). A structure was defined as being hypoplastic if the Z-score was <–2.0. The transverse arch was measured between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery from suprasternal notch or high parasternal images.

Statistical methods.   Paired t tests were used to compare Z-scores before and after coarctation repair. Unpaired t tests were used to determine if echocardiographic parameters were associated with the need for re-intervention. A chi-square test was used to determine if a size cut-off was predictive of the need for re-intervention. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was inferred when p was < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Patients.   Of the 63 patients in the original study, 55 (87%) had clinical data available, and 38 patients (60%) had a recent follow-up echocardiogram. The remaining eight patients were lost to follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 73 ± 19 months (range 3 to 9 years).

Echocardiographic data.   For the group of 38 patients who had follow-up echocardiographic data, all 38 had normal LV end-diastolic dimensions (37 ± 4 mm), shortening fractions (39 ± 6%), and ejection fractions (65 ± 5%). In all 38 patients, both mitral (Fig. 1) and aortic (Fig. 2) Z-scores increased significantly. Of the 29 patients (76%) who had mitral valves that were hypoplastic at birth (Z-score <–2), only 6 (16%) remained hypoplastic at follow-up (p < 0.001). Of the 31 patients (82%) who had aortic valve hypoplasia at birth, only 2 (5%) remained hypoplastic at follow-up (p < 0.001).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1 Initial and follow-up mitral valve Z-scores.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2 Initial and follow-up aortic valve Z-scores.

 
Outcomes and re-intervention.   All 55 patients with available data were alive, and none was converted to single-ventricle physiology. Eleven patients (20%) required re-intervention: three (5%) for subaortic membrane resection, two (4%) for balloon aortic valvuloplasty (both with previous subaortic membrane resection), and nine (16%) for balloon dilation or surgery for recoarctation (one patient required all three procedures). Mitral valve Z-scores, aortic valve Z-scores, and transverse arch diameter at presentation were not different between patients requiring and those not requiring re-intervention (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Initial Left Heart Structure Size Versus Need for Re-Intervention

 
Of the 38 patients who had echocardiograms, 9 (24%) developed LV outflow tract obstruction, including 6 (16%) with isolated subaortic stenosis, 3 (8%) with isolated valvar aortic stenosis, and 2 (5%) with both. Although not clinically apparent, one patient had mild echocardiographic evidence of mitral stenosis (13).


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Despite significant annular hypoplasia at presentation, the aortic and mitral valves of neonates undergoing aortic coarctation repair showed significant increases in their Z-scores on follow-up. In addition, midterm outcomes were excellent, and the need for re-intervention was uncommon.

Previous studies have suggested the possibility of postnatal growth of LH structures (2,8,14). Krauser et al. (15) studied infants with aortic coarctation and found that LV size appeared small preoperatively for two reasons: 1) compression of the LV by the dilated, pressure-loaded right ventricle; and 2) underfilling of the LV because of atrial-level left-to-right shunting. In an effort to determine the importance of preoperative hypoplasia of the LH structures, this study focused on the Z-scores of the diameters of the aortic and mitral valves and demonstrated a significant increase for both valves.

Several studies have shown that biventricular repair is possible with an aortic or mitral valve orifice diameter >2 standard deviations below normal. These studies, however, focused on early survival (6,7). Our study expanded on these data by showing that midterm survival and outcomes were excellent. All patients were alive, and none was converted to single-ventricle physiology, indicating the importance of considering growth potential in addition to other factors when determining the adequacy of the LV to support the systemic circulation.

Annular hypoplasia at presentation also failed to predict significant postoperative mitral, aortic, or subaortic stenosis. In fact, re-intervention for aortic/subaortic stenosis was uncommon. These findings conflict with the previous report of Levine et al. (1) in several important ways. They found 101 patients <3 months of age who presented with aortic coarctation and had a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. Their conclusion was that a mitral valve Z-score <–2 was associated with increased risk for obstruction at any level within the LH excluding recoarctation (up to 80% by 5 years). Our data showed that despite an average mitral valve Z-score of –3 at presentation, only nine patients (24%) subsequently developed aortic or subaortic stenosis with a mean follow-up of six years. Second, 17% of their patients developed LV outflow obstruction requiring re-intervention, compared with 5% in our series. Finally, Levine et al. (1) reported 11 patients (11%) who developed mitral stenosis, with 6 (6%) requiring intervention, whereas only 1 patient (2%) in our series developed echocardiographic mitral stenosis that was not clinically apparent. The reason for the differences in our findings is unknown, but this difference cannot be explained by the duration of follow-up, as it was almost four years longer in our study group.

The incidence of recoarctation in our study (16%) is similar to previous studies reporting recoarctation in 9% to 23% of patients (9,16–19). However, unlike previous studies (16), a transverse arch diameter of <3.5 mm did not significantly predict the need for re-intervention.

Study limitations.   This study is limited by the retrospective design. A few patients (13%) were lost to follow-up. An additional 17 patients did not have follow-up echocardiograms, limiting the size of the sample used for assessing the growth of the mitral and aortic valves. However, the lack of a recent follow-up echocardiogram would suggest that the cardiologist felt these patients were clinically well and that a follow-up echocardiogram was not warranted.

Conclusions.   After neonatal coarctation repair with associated LH hypoplasia, LH structures increase substantially in size, and clinical outcomes are excellent at midterm follow-up. Despite initial annular hypoplasia, the need for intervention for mitral or aortic/subaortic stenosis is uncommon.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Levine JC, Sanders SP, Colan SD, Jonas RA, Spevak PJ. The risk of having additional obstructive lesions in neonatal coarctation of the aorta. Cardiol Young. 2001;11:44–53[Medline]
  2. Rhodes LA, Colan SD, Perry SB, Jonas RA, Sanders SP. Predictors of survival in neonates with critical aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1991;84:2325–2335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Latson LA, Cheatham JP, Gutgesell HP. Relation of the echocardiographic estimate of left ventricular size to mortality in infants with severe left ventricular outflow obstruction. Am J Cardiol. 1981;48:887–891[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Parsons MK, Moreau GA, Graham TP Jr., Johns JA, Boucek RJ Jr.. Echocardiographic estimation of critical left ventricular size in infants with isolated aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1049–1055[Abstract]
  5. Hammon JW Jr., Lupinetti FM, Maples MD, et al. Predictors of operative mortality in critical valvular aortic stenosis presenting in infancy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45:537–540[Abstract]
  6. Tani LY, Minich LL, Hawkins JA, et al. Spectrum and influence of hypoplasia of the left heart in neonatal aortic coarctation. Cardiol Young. 2000;10:90–97[Medline]
  7. Tchervenkov CI, Tahta SA, Jutras LC, Beland MJ. Biventricular repair in neonates with hypoplastic left heart complex. Ann Thoracic Surg. 1998;66:1350–1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Alboliras ET, Mavroudis C, Pahl E, Gidding SS, Backer CL, Rocchini AP. Left ventricular growth in selected hypoplastic left ventricles: Outcome after repair of coarctation of aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:549–555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Conte S, Lacour-Gayet F, Serraf A, et al. Surgical management of neonatal coarctation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:663–674 discussion 674–5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kron IL, Flanagan TL, Rheuban KS, et al. Incidence and risk of reintervention after coarctation repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:920–925 discussion 925–6[Abstract]
  11. Phoon CK, Silverman NH. Conditions with right ventricular pressure and volume overload, and a small left ventricle: "hypoplastic" left ventricle or simply a squashed ventricle? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1547–1553[Abstract]
  12. Daubeney PE, Blackstone EH, Weintraub RG, Slavik Z, Scanlon J, Webber SA. Relationship of the dimension of cardiac structures to body size: An echocardiographic study in normal infants and children. Cardiol Young. 1999;9:402–410[Medline]
  13. Niederle P, Feuereisl R, Suchan V, et al. The importance of quantitative Doppler in assessment of mitral stenosis. Cor Vasa. 1986;28:451–457[Medline]
  14. Minich LL, Tani LY, Hawkins JA, Shaddy RE. Possibility of postnatal left ventricular growth in selected infants with non-apex-forming left ventricles. Am Heart J. 1997;133:570–574[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Krauser DG, Rutkowski M, Phoon CK. Left ventricular volume after correction of isolated aortic coarctation in neonates. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:904–907[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. McElhinney DB, Yang SG, Hogarty AN, et al. Recurrent arch obstruction after repair of isolated coarctation of the aorta in neonates and young infants: Is low weight a risk factor? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:883–890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Quaegebeur JM, Jonas RA, Weinberg AD, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW. Outcomes in seriously ill neonates with coarctation of the aorta. A multi-institutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108:841–851 discussion 852–4[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Zehr KJ, Gillinov AM, Redmond JM, et al. Repair of coarctation of the aorta in neonates and infants: A thirty-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:33–41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Korbmacher B, Krogmann ON, Rammos S, et al. Repair of critical aortic coarctation in neonatal age. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002;43:1–6[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. P. Graham Jr
The Year in Congenital Heart Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1887 - 1899.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. F. Corno
Borderline left ventricle
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puchalski, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tani, L. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puchalski, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tani, L. Y.

HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK