Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 3 Plot between the measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (X axis) and the difference between measured LVEF and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the predicted LVEF for a given end systolic stress (ESS) (Y axis). (Left) Predicted LVEF was defined by the model obtained in controls (LVEF = 87.55 – 0.38 · ESS, r = 0.75, p < 0.0001). (Right) Predicted LVEF was defined by the model obtained in cyclists (LVEF = 80.34 – 0.29 · ESS, r = 0.71, p < 0.0001). Results are shown for the 17 cyclists with both left ventricular internal diameter at end diastole >60 mm and LVEF <52% (solid circles), the remaining cyclists (n = 269) (+), and the control group (n = 52) (open squares).





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement