Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1473-1480, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.044
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Carretero, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Carretero, O. A.

PRECLINICAL STUDIES

Role of angiotensin II type 2 receptors and kinins in the cardioprotective effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure

Yun-He Liu, MD*, Xiao-Ping Yang, MD*, Edward G. Shesely, PhD*, Steadman S. Sankey, PhD{dagger} and Oscar A. Carretero, MD*,*

* Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
{dagger} Division of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Manuscript received August 21, 2003; revised manuscript received November 13, 2003, accepted November 25, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Oscar A. Carretero, Division Head, Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan 48202-2689, USA.
ocarret1{at}hfhs.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: We studied the role of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptors and kinins in the cardioprotective effect of angiotensin II type 1 antagonists (AT1-ant) in rats with heart failure (HF) after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The AT1-ant is as effective as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in treating HF, but the mechanisms whereby AT1-ant exert their benefits on HF in vivo are more complex than previously understood.

METHODS: Brown Norway Katholiek rats (BNK), which are deficient in kinins because of a mutation in the kininogen gene, and their wild-type control (Brown Norway [BN]) underwent myocardial infarction. Two months later, they were treated for two months with: 1) vehicle; 2) AT1-ant (L158809, Merck, Rahway, New Jersey); 3) AT1-ant + AT2-ant (PD-123319, Parke Davis, Ann Arbor, Michigan); or 4) AT1-ant + kinin B2 receptor antagonist (B2-ant) (icatibant) (only BN). We measured left ventricular weight (LVW) gravimetrically, myocyte cross-sectional area (MCSA) and interstitial collagen fraction (ICF) histologically, and ejection fraction by ventriculography.

RESULTS: Development of HF was comparable in BN and BNK rats. The AT1-ant reduced LVW and MCSA and the AT2-ant blocked these effects in BN rats, but the B2-ant did not. The AT1-ant reduced LVW and MCSA in BNK rats, and this effect was reversed by the AT2-ant. In BN rats, ICF was reduced and LVEF increased by AT1-ant, and both AT2-ant and B2-ant reversed these effects. In BNK rats, the AT1-ant failed to reduce ICF, and its therapeutic effect on LVEF was significantly blunted.

CONCLUSIONS: In HF, the AT2 receptor plays an important role in the therapeutic effects of AT1-ant, and this effect may be mediated partly through kinins; however, kinins appear to play a lesser role in the antihypertrophic effect of AT1-ant.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  Ang II = angiotensin II
  AT1 = angiotensin II type 1
  AT1-ant = angiotensin II type 1 antagonist
  AT2 = angiotensin II type 2
  B2-ant = kinin B2 receptor antagonist
  B2-KO = B2 kinin receptor knockout
  BN = Brown Norway
  BNK = Brown Norway Katholiek
  EDV = end-diastolic volume
  EF = ejection fraction
  ESV = end-systolic volume
  HF = heart failure
  ICF = interstitial collagen fraction
  LV = left ventricular/ventricle
  LVW = left ventricular weight
  MBP = mean blood pressure
  MCSA = myocyte cross-sectional area
  MI = myocardial infarction
  NO = nitric oxide


Myocardial infarction (MI) induces left ventricular (LV) dilatation associated with myocyte hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis of the noninfarcted myocardium. These changes in LV geometry, referred to as remodeling after MI, contribute to the development of heart failure (HF) (1). Activation of vasoactive hormones, such as angiotensin, kinins, and nitric oxide, may be an important adaptive and/or maladaptive mechanism in the pathophysiology of HF. There is evidence that the renin–angiotensin system is activated in HF. Angiotensin II (Ang II), the key effector peptide of the renin–angiotensin system, has been implicated in the development of ventricular remodeling through its proposed growth-promoting properties, thereby stimulating myocyte hypertrophy and collagen synthesis, which lead to myocardial dysfunction. Angiotensin II receptors comprise two major subtypes, angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) and angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) (2). Most known effects of Ang II in the cardiovascular system are mediated by the AT1 receptor. It has been reported that the AT2 receptor is involved in inhibition of cellular differentiation, growth, and apoptosis and may be activated in disease states such as MI and cardiac hypertrophy (3–5). Thus, the AT2 receptor could play an important role in counterbalancing some of the effects of Ang II by antagonizing its action on the AT1 receptor. Angiotensin II type 1 antagonists (AT1-ant) have been shown to improve cardiac function and remodeling in HF in both clinical and animal studies (6,7). It has been proposed that the blockade of AT1 receptors increases Ang II, activating AT2 receptors, which leads to cardioprotection either directly or via kinins (8), although their exact physiological or pathophysiological role is not clearly defined.

Kinins, which are potent vasoactive peptides, are released from high- and low-molecular-weight kininogens by plasma and tissue kallikreins (9). Evidence suggests that a local kallikrein–kinin system exists in the heart, which enables it to synthesize and release kinins (10,11). Kinins act via two receptors, B1 and B2, and most of their effects have been attributed to the B2 receptor, although recent evidence suggests that the B1 receptor may also play an important role (12–14). Several studies have shown that during acute myocardial ischemia, release of kinins from the heart is rapidly increased. We have previously reported that blood pressure and severity of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in Brown Norway Katholiek (BNK) rats (which are deficient in kinins because of a mutation in the kininogen gene) and in B2 kinin receptor knockout (B2-KO) mice were no different than their wild-type controls (15); however, they exhibited a diminished response to ischemic preconditioning (15). We further reported that in BNK rats and in B2-KO with chronic HF due to MI, infarct size and development of HF were no different than their respective controls; however, the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were diminished in BNK rats and B2-KO mice with HF after MI (16,17). These studies suggest that although kinins may not be important in either cardiac remodeling or the pathophysiology of HF under basal conditions, in response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors they play an important role in decreasing remodeling and improving cardiac function.

In the present work, we tested the hypothesis that in rats with HF after MI, the effects of AT1-ant on cardiac remodeling and LV function are mediated in part by the AT2 receptor. Furthermore, we hypothesized that some of the effects of the AT2 receptor are mediated by kinins whereas others are not. To study the role of the AT2 and B2 receptors, we used an AT2-ant and a B2 receptor antagonist (B2-ant), respectively. To determine the role of kinins, we used kinin-deficient BNK rats, expecting that in this strain those effects of AT1-ant that are mediated by kinins via both the B1 and/or B2 receptors would be decreased or absent, whereas those effects that are mediated by activation of the AT2 receptor independently of kinins should be present.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Male BNK rats (obtained from the Department of Pharmacology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, and bred in our animal care facilities) and Brown Norway (BN) rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts), both weighing 255 to 275 g, were housed in an air-conditioned room with a 12-h light/dark cycle where they received standard laboratory rat chow (0.4% sodium) and drank tap water. They were given five to seven days to adjust to their new environment and were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital before all surgical procedures (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally). This study was approved by the Henry Ford Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Experimental HF model.   Coronary artery ligation was performed as described previously (18). Rats were intubated and ventilated with room air using a positive-pressure respirator (Model 680, Harvard, South Natick, Massachusetts). A left thoracotomy was performed via the fourth intercostal space and the lungs retracted to expose the heart. After opening the pericardium, the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated with a 7-0 silk suture near its origin; acute myocardial ischemia was deemed successful when the anterior wall of the LV became cyanotic. The lungs were inflated by increasing positive end-expiratory pressure, and the thoracotomy site was closed in layers. Another group of rats underwent sham ligation; the procedure was similar, but the suture was not tightened around the coronary artery. Our previous study showed that rats developed HF (ejection fraction [EF] 30% to 35%) by two months after a large MI (19).

Experimental protocols.   Two months after coronary ligation, BN and BNK rats were randomly divided into the following groups:

  1. Vehicle: BN (n = 11) and BNK (n = 17) were treated with vehicle (tap water) for two months.
  2. AT1-ant (L158809, Merck): BN (n = 17) and BNK (n = 17) were treated for two months with the AT1-ant (1.5 mg/kg/day) in drinking water. To calculate how much AT1-ant we should add to the water, we estimated intake at 20 ml/day.
  3. AT1-ant + AT2-ant (PD123319, Parke Davis, Ann Arbor, Michigan): BN (n = 6) and BNK (n = 5) were treated with AT1-ant + AT2-ant (10 mg/kg via mini-osmotic pump).
  4. AT1-ant + B2-ant (icatibant): BN (n = 16) with HF were treated with AT1-ant + B2-ant (100 µg/kg/day via mini-osmotic pump). We did not use the B2-ant in BNK because they are deficient in kinins.
  5. BN and BNK sham ligation: BN (n = 10) and BNK (n = 12).

Cardiac hemodynamics and ventriculography.   Rats were anesthetized and a polyethylene catheter (PE-50) inserted into the carotid artery. Mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate were measured with a P23XL pressure transducer connected to a processor (Gould Brush 220, Cleveland, Ohio). The carotid catheter was advanced into the LV and ventriculograms recorded on 35-mm cine film at 60 frames/s during injection of 0.5 ml contrast material (Reno-M-60, Squibb, New Brunswick, New Jersey). The films were projected, and the margins of the LV image traced during end-diastole and end-systole over three consecutive cardiac cycles. End-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) were determined using the area-length method (20). Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was calculated as: EF = (EDV – ESV)/EDV.

Pathological and histological examination.   After the hemodynamic and ventriculographic studies, the rats were killed and the chest opened. The heart was stopped during diastole by injecting 15% potassium chloride, and then excised and weighed and the LV sectioned transversely into four slices from apex to base. Slices were rapidly frozen in isopentane solution pre-cooled in liquid nitrogen and used for morphometric analysis of infarct size and histological examination. The histological study only involved the noninfarcted myocardium.

Determination of myocardial infarct size.   A 6-µm section from each slice was stained with Masson's trichrome. Sections from all four slices were projected onto a screen. Infarct size was determined by Gomori trichome staining and expressed as the ratio of the infarcted portion to total LV circumference (21).

Determination of myocyte cross-sectional area (MCSA) and interstitial collagen fraction (ICF).   Sections were pretreated with 3.3 U/ml neuroaminidase type V (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri), then double-stained with: 1) fluorescein-labeled peanut agglutinin (Victor Lab, Burlingame, California) to delineate MCSA and the interstitial space; and 2) rhodamine-labeled Griffonia simplicifolia lectin I to show only the capillaries. From each slice, four radially oriented microscopic fields were selected at random and photographed at a magnification of 400 times. Myocyte cross-sectional area was measured by computer-based planimetry (Jandel Scientific, Corte Madera, California), ICF was calculated as total interstitial space minus total capillary area, and MCSA and ICF from all photographs were averaged (8).

Data analysis.   All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Student's t test was used to compare mean values of the various parameters (left ventricular weight [LVW], MCSA, ICF, infarct size, MBP, LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV) among different groups, specifically, sham versus HF-vehicle, HF-vehicle versus HF-AT1-ant, HF-AT1-ant versus HF-AT1-ant + AT2-ant, and HF-AT1-ant versus HF-AT1-ant + B2-ant in BN and BNK rats. Hochberg's method for multiple comparisons was used to adjust the alpha level of significance (22). Effects of AT1-ant treatment in the two types of rats (BN and BNK) were compared using two-way analysis of variance, as were differences from HF-vehicle to HF-AT1-ant between BN and BNK. A test for interaction was used between group and strain. A significant result would indicate that the effect observed between groups is dependent upon the strain.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Of the 52 BN rats that underwent left anterior descending coronary artery ligation, 1 died after surgery, for a mortality rate of 2%. In addition, one of the BN rats in the HF-vehicle group died within three months. Of the 41 BNK rats that underwent coronary ligation, 2 of those in the HF-vehicle group died within three months after MI. No rats in the sham-ligated group died.

Infarct size.   Infarct size was similar in all groups (Table 1). All rats with coronary ligation developed a large MI, ranging from 40% to 45% of the LV circumference.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Hemodynamics, Infarct Size, and Heart Weight in BN and BNK Rats

 
Heart weight, MCSA and ICF in BN and BNK rats during the development of HF.   Left ventricular weight, MCSA, and ICF were similar in sham-ligated BN and BNK rats. Left ventricular weight, ICF, MCSA, LVEDV, and LVESV increased, and LVEF decreased similarly in the HF-vehicle group in both strains (Fig. 1). Thus, both BN and BNK rats developed similar remodeling and HF after MI.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Left ventricular weight (LVW), myocyte cross-sectional area (MCSA), interstitial collagen fraction (ICF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) four months after sham or coronary artery ligation in Brown Norway (BN) and Brown Norway Katholiek (BNK) rats. ***p < 0.001. HF = heart failure.

 
Effect of AT1-ant and B2-ant on heart weight, MCSA, and ICF in BN and BNK rats.   In BN rats, the AT1-ant significantly reduced LVW (p < 0.001 vs. HF-vehicle) and MCSA (p < 0.001 vs. HF-vehicle), while the AT2-ant reversed these effects. In BNK rats, the AT1-ant also decreased LVW (p < 0.05 vs. HF-vehicle) and MCSA (p < 0.001 vs. HF-vehicle) and, again, the AT2-ant blocked these effects (p < 0.05 vs. HF-AT1-ant) (Fig. 2). In BN rats, the B2-ant did not reverse the effect of the AT1-ant on either LVW or MCSA. Although these effects seemed less evident in BNK than in BN, the differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 3). These data on LVW and MCSA suggest that AT2 receptors play an important role in the antihypertrophic effect of AT1-ant in rats with HF and that this effect is independent of kinins.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Effect of the AT1-ant L158809 (AT1a) alone and combined with the AT2-ant PD123319 (AT2a) on LVW, MCSA, ICF, LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF in BN and BNK rats with HF after myocardial infarction. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effect of the AT1-ant L158809 (AT1a) alone and combined with the kinin B2-ant icatibant (B2) on LVW, MCSA, and ICF. Right panels show the difference in the response to AT1-ant ({Delta} from HF vehicle) between BN and BNK rats with HF after myocardial infarction. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 
In BN rats, the AT1-ant significantly decreased ICF (p < 0.01 vs. HF-vehicle), and this decrease was reversed by both AT2-ant (p < 0.001) and B2-ant (p < 0.001). In BNK rats, the AT1-ant did not significantly decrease ICF, and the AT2-ant had no effect (Fig. 2). The decrease in ICF was significantly greater in BN than in BNK rats (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the antifibrotic effect of the AT1-ant was partly mediated by kinins via the B2 receptor.

Hemodynamics and cardiac function during the development of HF.   Sham-ligated BN and BNK exhibited no significant differences in MBP, LVEDV, LVESV, or LVEF. In both HF-vehicle groups LVEDV and LVESV were increased and MBP and LVEF were decreased, but these changes were similar in both strains (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Effect of AT1-ant and B2-ant on MBP, LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF.   The AT1-ant reduced MBP in both strains (BN: p < 0.01; BNK: p < 0.001 vs. HF-vehicle). In BN rats, the AT1-ant significantly decreased EDV (p < 0.01) and ESV (p < 0.001) and increased LVEF (p < 0.001) compared with HF-vehicle, while the AT2-ant reversed these effects (Fig. 2). The B2-ant partially but significantly reversed the effect of ESV (p < 0.01) and EF (p < 0.001) and marginally reversed the effects of the AT1-ant on LVEDV (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4). In BNK rats, the AT1-ant caused a very small decrease in LVEDV (p > 0.05), and the same was true of LVEF (p > 0.05). Changes in LVESV and LVEF were much smaller in BNK than in BN rats (Fig. 4, right panel), and the AT2-ant had no effect (Fig. 2). These data suggest that the AT2 receptor participates significantly in the beneficial effects of AT1-ant, which are mediated to some extent by kinins.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Effect of the AT1a alone and combined with the kinin B2ant on LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF. Right panels show the difference in the response to AT1-ant ({Delta} from HF vehicle) in BN and BNK rats with HF after myocardial infarction. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We found that in rats genetically deficient in kininogen, the precursor of kinins, basal cardiac hemodynamics and function, as well as morphology and histology, were no different from rats with an intact kallikrein–kinin system. Kinin deficiency did not aggravate cardiac remodeling after MI; indeed, infarct size, as well as LV hypertrophy, ICF, LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF, were all similar in both kininogen-deficient BNK rats and BN rats with normal kininogen, suggesting that either kinins do not play a major role in the regulation of cardiac structure and function or that BNK rats have developed a compensatory mechanism to overcome the lack of circulating kinins. We further determined that the AT2 receptor participates in the therapeutic effects of AT1-ant because its effects were blocked by the AT2-ant. Kinins and the B2 receptor were found to participate in some but not all of the cardioprotective effects of the AT1-ant because the decreased ICF and improved LVEF, EDV, and ESV caused by the AT1-ant were blocked by the B2-ant in BN rats and entirely absent in BNK rats. Collectively, these data suggest that the beneficial cardiac effects of AT1-ant on HF are mediated at least in part by the AT2 receptor via kinins.

Our data demonstrated that the decrease in heart weight caused by AT1-ant was greater in BN than in BNK rats (BN: –60 mg/100 g body weight; BNK: –23 mg/100 g body weight; p < 0.05). Also, the AT1-ant decreased both LVW and MCSA in BNK rats; however, these changes, although statistically significant, tended to be smaller than in BN rats. Furthermore, the antihypertrophic effects observed in BN rats were blocked by the AT2-ant but not by the B2-ant. We have previously found that in Lewis rats with HF due to MI, the B2-ant did not block the antihypertrophic effect of the AT1-ant (8). Similarly, in B2-KO mice with HF after MI, we found that the AT1-ant decreased LV weight, MCSA, and LV mass, although the last of these decreases was less pronounced in B2-KO mice than in their wild-type controls. Taken together, these data suggest that most of the antihypertrophic effects of AT1-ant are not mediated by kinins.

Finally, we found that the effects of AT1-ant are independent of the reduction in blood pressure; although its effects on cardiac function and remodeling were accompanied by a reduction in MBP, the AT2-ant or kinin antagonist blocked these beneficial effects but not the changes in MBP. In BNK rats, AT1-ant decreased MBP as well but had no effect on function or cardiac remodeling. Thus, these data suggest that the cardioprotective effects of AT1-ant in HF are independent of its effect on blood pressure reduction. Collectively, the present data support the hypothesis that when the AT1 receptor is blocked, activation of the AT2 receptor contributes to the cardiac therapeutic effects of AT1-ant and, moreover, that the AT2 receptor may act via two different mechanisms, one that is mediated by kinins and another that is not (Fig. 5).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Hypothetical mechanism of action of AT1-ant in heart failure: 1) AT1-ant prevent the effect of angiotensin II on the AT1 receptor, leading to cardioprotection (preventing cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and remodeling and improving function); 2) angiotensin II activates the AT2 receptors, which act via release of kinins, and B2 and/or B1 receptors, which act via release of nitric oxide, thereby leading to anticardiac fibrosis, preventing remodeling and improving function; a) in BN rats with HF, B2-ant only blocks the B2 receptor; the B1 receptors may be activated and prevent cardiac hypertrophy; and b) in BNK rats neither B1 nor B2 receptors are activated; as circulating kinins are absent in this strain, and AT2 receptors may act directly via nitric oxide to prevent cardiac hypertrophy. Rectangular callouts (AT1-ant, AT2-ant or B2-ant) point to the receptor blockade site, and oval callouts point to two strains (BN and BNK). Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 
There is now convincing evidence that AT1-ant are effective in the treatment of HF (8,23). The mechanisms by which AT1-ant exert their beneficial effects on HF in vivo are more complex than previously understood. Clearly, AT1-ant prevent the effects of Ang II on the AT1 receptor, and this antihypertensive effect may lead to cardioprotection (24); however, evidence is accumulating that the AT2 receptor also plays an important role in the therapeutic effects of AT1-ant. AT2 receptors are expressed at low concentrations in normal cardiac myocytes but become upregulated in pathological states (3,5,25). It has been suggested that AT2-ant may counterbalance the effects of AT1-ant on cell growth and proliferation (26–28). Recently, Yang et al. (29) reported that overexpression of the cardiac AT2 receptor improves baseline LV systolic function and preserves function during remodeling after MI. We have recently shown that cardiac hemodynamic, functional, and histological phenotypes are similar between AT2 knockouts and wild-type mice under basal conditions and during the development of HF; however, the benefits of AT1-ant are attenuated in AT2-KO mice, suggesting that AT2 receptors are not essential for regulation of cardiac function and morphology, whereas they play a significant role in the therapeutic effect of AT1-ant (30). Our data from BN rats in the present study show that AT1-ant improved cardiac function and attenuated interstitial fibrosis, hypertrophy, and LV volume, while AT2-ant blocked these protective effects, indicating that AT2 receptors mediate the cardioprotective effect of AT1-ant.

Brown Norway Katholiek rats are a substrain of BN rats with a spontaneous genetic mutation that impairs transportation of kininogen out of the cells where kinins are released from high- and low-molecular-weight kininogens by plasma and tissue kininogenases such as kallikreins (9,31). Evidence suggests that a local kallikrein–kinin system exists in the heart that enables it to synthesize and release kinins (10,11,32). Kinins act via two subtypes of G-protein–coupled receptors, B1 and B2 (33). B2 receptors are constitutively expressed in most tissues and are responsible for most known effects of kinins (34); in addition, they are specifically inhibited by the B2-ant icatibant. The B1 receptor is only weakly expressed under physiological conditions but is strongly induced under pathological conditions, such as inflammation or tissue damage (35). Recent evidence suggests that the B1 receptor may also play an important role in pathological situations (12–14). In previous studies using a B2-ant or B2-KO mice, we speculated that in such cases kinins might act via the B1 receptor. However, in BNK rats neither the B1 nor B2 receptor is activated because circulating kinins are absent in this strain.

Kinins appear to play an important role in some of the therapeutic effects of the AT1-ant. The data in the present work with B2-ant and in BNK demonstrate that the effects of AT1-ant on fibrosis, LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF were blunted by the B2-ant and absent in BNK rats, suggesting that the benefits of AT1-ant are partly mediated by the AT2 receptor via kinins. In support of this hypothesis, Seyedi et al (36) showed in vitro that activation of AT2 during blockade of AT1 stimulated the release of autacoids such as prostaglandin E2 and nitric oxide (NO) either directly and/or via stimulation of kinins. Tsutsumi et al. (37) reported that in aortas from mice with overexpression of the AT2 receptor gene, Ang II caused a significant increase in kininogenase activity and cyclic guanidine monophosphate production, which was further enhanced by an AT1-ant but blocked by an AT2-ant, kinin antagonist, or NO synthase inhibitor. These findings suggest that AT2 activation stimulates kinin release, which further promotes NO/cyclic guanidine monophosphate production in a paracrine manner and thus potentiates vasodilation and regional blood flow regulation. Furthermore, we recently demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of AT1-ant on cardiac function and remodeling after MI was diminished in B2 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout mice, providing further in vivo evidence that kinins and endothelium-derived NO play an important role in the beneficial cardiac effect of AT1-ant (17,38).

In summary, using BN and BNK rats with HF after MI, we have demonstrated that the cardioprotective effect of AT1-ant is mediated by AT2 receptors, which exert their actions (antifibrosis, function, and geometry) partially through kinins. Kinins play a lesser role in the antihypertrophic effect of AT1-ant.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Merck for donating L158809 and Hoechst for donating icatibant.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by NIH grant HL28982.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Fletcher PJ, Braunwald E. Progressive ventricular remodeling in rat with myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:H1406–H1414

2. Whitebread S, Mele M, Kamber B, de Gasparo M. Preliminary biochemical characterization of two angiotensin II receptor subtypes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;163:284–291[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Nio Y, Matsubara H, Murasawa S, Kanasaki M, Inada M. Regulation of gene transcription of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:46–54[Medline]

4. Suzuki J, Matsubara H, Urakami M, Inada M. Rat angiotensin II (type 1A) receptor mRNA regulation and subtype expression in myocardial growth and hypertrophy. Circ Res. 1993;73:439–447[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Ohkubo N, Matsubara H, Nozawa Y, et al. Angiotensin type 2 receptors are reexpressed by cardiac fibroblasts from failing myopathic hamster hearts and inhibit cell growth and fibrillar collagen metabolism. Circulation. 1997;96:3954–3962[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, et al. Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE). Lancet. 1997;349:747–752[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Kim S, Yoshiyama M, Izumi Y, et al. Effects of combination of ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker on cardiac remodeling, cardiac function, and survival in rat heart failure. Circulation. 2001;103:148–154[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Liu Y-H, Yang X-P, Sharov VG, et al. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure: Role of kinins and angiotensin II type 2 receptors. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1926–1935[Medline]

9. Carretero OA, Scicli AG. The kallikrein-kinin system as a regulator of cardiovascular and renal function. Laragh JH, Brenner BM. Hypertension: Physiology, Diagnosis, and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995. p. 983–999

10. Minshall RD, Nakamura F, Becker RP, Rabito SF. Characterization of bradykinin B2 receptors in adult myocardium and neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 1995;76:773–780[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Nolly H, Carbini LA, Scicli G, Carretero OA, Scicli AG. A local kallikrein-kinin system is present in rat hearts. Hypertension. 1994;23:919–923[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Ignjatovic T, Tan F, Brovkovych V, Skidgel RA, Erdos EG. Activation of bradykinin B1 receptor by ACE inhibitors. Int Immunopharmacol. 2002;2:1787–1793[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Kintsurashvili E, Duka I, Gavras I, et al. Effects of Ang II on bradykinin receptor gene expression in cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;281:H1778–H1783[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Duka I, Kintsurashvili E, Gavras I, et al. Vasoactive potential of the B1 bradykinin receptor in normotension and hypertension. Circ Res. 2001;88:275–281[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Yang X-P, Liu Y-H, Scicli GM, Webb CR, Carretero OA. Role of kinins in the cardioprotective effect of preconditioning. Study of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in B2 kinin receptor knockout mice and kininogen-deficient rats. Hypertension. 1997;30:735–740[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Liu Y-H, Yang X-P, Mehta D, et al. Role of kinins in chronic heart failure and in the therapeutic effect of ACE inhibitors in kininogen-deficient rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H507–H514[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Yang X-P, Liu Y-H, Mehta D, et al. Diminished cardioprotective response to inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II type 1 receptor in B2 kinin receptor gene knockout mice. Circ Res. 2001;88:1072–1079[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Anversa P, Loud AV, Levicky V, Guideri G. Left ventricular failure induced by myocardial infarction. I. Myocyte hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:H876–H882

19. Liu Y-H, Yang X-P, Nass O, et al. Chronic heart failure induced by coronary artery ligation in Lewis inbred rats. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H722–H727

20. Yang SS, Bentivoglio LG, Maranhao V, Goldberg H. Cardiac volume. Yang SS. From Cardiac Catheterization Data to Hemodynamic Parameters. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis; 1978. p. 101–151

21. Pfeffer MA, Pfeffer JM, Steinberg C, Finn P. Survival after an experimental myocardial infarction: Beneficial effects of long-term therapy with captopril. Circulation. 1985;72:406–412[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med. 1990;9:811–818[Medline]

23. Krombach RS, Clair MJ, Hendrick JW, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, AT1 receptor inhibition, and combination therapy with pacing induced heart failure: Effects on left ventricular performance and regional blood flow patterns. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;38:631–645[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Burnier M. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers. Circulation. 2001;103:904–912[Free Full Text]

25. Matsubara H. Pathophysiological role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in cardiovascular and renal diseases. Circ Res. 1998;83:1182–1191[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Ichiki T, Labosky PA, Shiota C, et al. Effects on blood pressure and exploratory behaviour of mice lacking angiotensin II type 2 receptor. (letter)Nature. 1995;377:748–750[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Stoll M, Steckelings UM, Paul M, et al. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:651–657[Medline]

28. Yamada T, Horiuchi M, Dzau VJ. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:156–160[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Yang Z, Bove CM, French BA, et al. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor overexpression preserves left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;106:106–111[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Xu J, Carretero OA, Liu Y-H, et al. Role of AT2 receptors in the cardioprotective effect of AT1 antagonists in mice. Hypertension. 2002;40:244–250[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Carbini LA, Scicli AG, Carretero OA. The molecular biology of the kallikrein-kinin system: III. The human kallikrein gene family and kallikrein substrate. J Hypertens. 1993;11:893–898[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Nolly H, Carretero OA, Scicli AG. Kallikrein release by vascular tissue. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H1209–H1214

33. Regoli D, Nsa Allogho S, Rizzi A, Gobeil FJ. Bradykinin receptors and their antagonists. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;348:1–10[CrossRef][Medline]

34. Carretero OA. Kinins in the heart. Share L. Contemporary endocrinology: Hormones and the heart in health and disease. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1999. p. 137–158

35. McLean PG, Perretti M, Ahluwalia A. Kinin B1 receptors and the cardiovascular system: Regulation of expression and function. Cardiovasc Res. 2000;48:194–210[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Seyedi N, Xu X, Nasjletti A, Hintze TH. Coronary kinin generation mediates nitric oxide release after angiotensin receptor stimulation. Hypertension. 1995;26:164–170[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Tsutsumi Y, Matsubara H, Masaki H, et al. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor overexpression activates the vascular kinin system and causes vasodilation. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:925–935[Medline]

38. Liu Y-H, Xu J, Yang X-P, et al. Effect of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists on endothelial NO synthase knockout mice with heart failure. Hypertension. 2001;39:375–381




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. C. Isbell, S. Voros, Z. Yang, J. M. DiMaria, S. S. Berr, B. A. French, F. H. Epstein, S. P. Bishop, H. Wang, R. J. Roy, et al.
Interaction between bradykinin subtype 2 and angiotensin II type 2 receptors during post-MI left ventricular remodeling
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3372 - H3378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Voros, Z. Yang, C. M. Bove, W. D. Gilson, F. H. Epstein, B. A. French, S. S. Berr, S. P. Bishop, M. R. Conaway, H. Matsubara, et al.
Interaction between AT1 and AT2 receptors during postinfarction left ventricular remodeling
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): H1004 - H1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Carretero, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Carretero, O. A.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement