HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klapholz, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klapholz, M.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART FAILURE

Hospitalization for heart failure in the presence of a normal left ventricular ejection fraction

Results of the New York heart failure registry

Marc Klapholz, MD^*, Matthew Maurer, MD, April M. Lowe, MS, Frank Messineo, MD, Jay S. Meisner, MD, PhD^||, Judith Mitchell, MD^¶, Jill Kalman, MD^#, Robert A. Phillips, MD, PhD^**, Richard Steingart, MD, Edward J. Brown, Jr, MD, Robert Berkowitz, MD, PhD, Robert Moskowitz, MD^||||, Anita Soni, MD^¶¶, Donna Mancini, MD, Rachel Bijou, MD, Khashayar Sehhat, MD^***, Nikita Varshneya, MD^*, Marrick Kukin, MD^**, Stuart D. Katz, MD, Lynn A. Sleeper, ScD, Thierry H. Le Jemtel, MD^*, New York Heart Failure Consortium

^* Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers, New York, New York, USA
Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA
New York Hospital, Queens, New York, USA
^|| Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
^¶ SUNY Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
^# Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
^** Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
Lincoln Hospital, Bronx, New York, USA
Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA
^|||| Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
^¶¶ Bronx Lebanon Hospital, Bronx, New York, USA
^*** Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA

Manuscript received May 27, 2003; revised manuscript received November 8, 2003, accepted November 17, 2003.

^* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Thierry H. Le Jemtel, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
lejemtel{at}aecom.yu.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion APPENDIX References

 
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a prospective multicenter registry in a large metropolitan area to define the clinical characteristics, hospital course, treatment, and factors precipitating decompensation in patients hospitalized for heart failure with a normal ejection fraction (HFNEF).

BACKGROUND: The clinical profile of patients hospitalized for HFNEF has been characterized by retrospective analyses of hospital records and state data banks, with few prospective single-center studies.

METHODS: Patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) at 24 medical centers in the New York metropolitan area and found to have a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of 50% within seven days of admission were included in this registry. Patient demographics, signs and symptoms of HF, coexisting and exacerbating cardiovascular and medical conditions, treatment, laboratory tests, procedures, and hospital outcomes data were collected. Analysis by gender and race was prespecified.

RESULTS: Of 619 patients, 73% were women, who were on average four years older than men (72.8 ± 14.1 years vs. 68.6 ± 13.8 years, p < 0.001). Black non-Hispanic patients comprised 30% of the study population. They were eight years younger than other patients (66.0 ± 14.2 years vs. 74 ± 13.5 years p < 0.001). Co-morbid conditions and their prevalence were: hypertension, 78%; increased LV mass, 82%; diabetes, 46%; and obesity, 46%. Before clinical decompensation that precipitated hospitalization, 86% of patients had chronic symptoms compatible with New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV. Factors precipitating clinical decompensation were identified in 53% of patients. In-hospital mortality was 4.2%.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for HFNEF are most often chronically incapacitated elderly women with a history of hypertension and increased LV mass. Reasons for clinical decompensation are identified in only one-half of patients.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   B-NH = black non-Hispanic   BP = blood pressure   EF = ejection fraction   GFR = glomerular filtration rate   HF = heart failure   HFNEF = heart failure with normal ejection fraction   LV = left ventricle/ventricular

Accordingly, the New York Heart Failure Consortium completed a prospective multicenter registry to characterize the clinical profile, hospital course, and treatment of patients hospitalized for congestive HF and found to have a normal LVEF.

	Methods

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion APPENDIX References

 
The New York Heart Failure consortium is composed of 24 academic and community medical centers (Appendix). Seventeen centers actively enrolled patients. The demographics of the 7 centers that did not contribute to the registry were similar to those of the 17 centers that participated. Enrollment began January 1, 1999, and ended June 30, 2001.

Study population.   Patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF and found to have a normal LVEF (50%) within seven days of admission were eligible. Both clinical and radiographic evidence were required to establish the diagnosis of HF. Clinical evidence included pulmonary rales and peripheral edema. Radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion was documented at each institution by an attending radiologist before patient enrollment. Patients hospitalized primarily for acute myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome or with a secondary diagnosis of HF were excluded from the registry. However, we retained those patients in whom an acute coronary syndrome was not clinically recognized upon presentation but diagnosed subsequently on the basis of positive cardiac enzymes or new electrocardiographic changes. Patients satisfying eligibility criteria were consecutively enrolled at each medical center. Data logs within each institution and across all institutions were repeatedly screened to ensure that patients were entered into the database only once. Institutional review board approval was obtained at all sites.

Registry design and data collection.   The registry database consisted of 153 variables that captured data on demographics, signs and symptoms of HF, presence of coexisting cardiovascular and medical conditions, medications at presentation and at discharge, laboratory tests, procedures, and hospital course. Clinical history and duration of conditions, such as hypertension and diabetes, were based on patient and physician reporting and review of the medical record. Patients were characterized as having coronary artery disease if they had a history of chronic angina, a stress test positive for ischemia, a prior myocardial infarction, coronary stenoses 50% by cardiac catheterization, or prior coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Cardiovascular or medical conditions that could precipitate hospitalization were prospectively defined. These included: severe hypertension upon presentation (systolic blood pressure [BP] >200 mm Hg); severe valvular disease (regurgitation 3+ or stenosis 1.0 cm²); uncontrolled supraventricular arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or other supraventricular tachycardia of <1 week duration or associated with a heart rate 130 beats/min); acute coronary syndrome secondarily diagnosed by positive cardiac enzymes or new electrocardiographic changes; restrictive, constrictive, or obstructive cardiomyopathies; stroke; severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma; pneumonia; sepsis; or serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dl. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was determined by pulmonary function tests or by the need for systemic steroid therapy.

Data collection and management were carried out on a secure web-based system called the Advanced Data Entry and Protocol Tracking (New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts). This system has multiple tools to immediately assess the validity and completeness of data being entered and to provide real-time feedback to individual sites on incomplete, missing, or incorrect data.

Determination of LVEF.   The LVEF was obtained by two-dimensional echocardiography or gated radionuclide ventriculography. Only patients with a normal (50%) LVEF were eligible. Echocardiograms or nuclear scans were interpreted by experienced observers without knowledge of a patient's inclusion into the registry. The EF by two-dimensional echocardiography was determined by a visual estimate based on an assessment of LV contractile function in multiple echocardiographic views. The accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimates of LVEF have been previously established (13). The EF by gated radionuclide ventriculography was calculated from the LV time-activity curve (14).

Echocardiographic analysis.   The LV internal dimensions and wall thicknesses were measured according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (15). Wall motion was assessed in the parasternal long- and short-axis views and apical two-, three-, and four-chamber views. Presence and severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation were assessed with color Doppler imaging and image-guided pulsed Doppler studies with semi-quantitative grading (16). Aortic valve area was calculated from the continuity equation and mitral valve area from pressure half-time analysis. Right ventricular systolic pressure was calculated from the measurement of tricuspid regurgitation blood flow velocity using the modified Bernoulli equation and an assumed right atrial pressure of 10 mm Hg. Cardiac mass was calculated using the Penn convention (17). Mass was indexed by height^2.7 (m), with partition values of 46.7 g/m^2.7 in women and 49.2 g/m^2.7 in men to define increased LV mass (18).

Renal function.   Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (ml/min) was calculated using a modified Cockgroft-Gault formula: GFR = (140 – age/creatinine) x (calculated weight/72) x (0.85 for female), where calculated weight (kg) = ideal weight (kg) + 0.4 x (actual weight – ideal weight) and ideal weight = 51.65 + (1.85 x [height (inches)] – 60]) for men and 48.67 + (1.65 x [height (inches) – 60]) for women (19).

Body mass index.   Body mass index was calculated as weight (kg)/height² (m). Obesity was defined by a body mass index >30 (20).

Statistical methods.   Summary statistics are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous data or median and interquartile range where indicated and percentages for categorical data. For comparisons by gender and race, Student's t test was used to compare the distributions of normally distributed variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the distributions of non-normally distributed variables determined by the examination of Q-Q plots and the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality p value. The Fisher exact test was used to compare group proportions. Differences between presentation and discharge medical regimen were assessed using McNemar's test for agreement. The signed rank test was used to assess the difference between presentation and discharge systolic and diastolic BPs. Linear regression was used to examine differences in hemodynamic and cardiac measures by race and gender adjusted for covariates that differed by race and gender. The skewed outcome measure GFR was log-transformed before linear regression analysis. Least-squares means are reported to express covariate-adjusted mean values by race and gender. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine differences by race and gender in the use of medications adjusted for covariates such as blood pressure and age.

Only p values of 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were conducted with the Statistical Analysis System Version 8.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) and S-Plus 2000 (S-Plus, Insightful Corp., Seattle, Washington) software.

	Results

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion APPENDIX References

 
Clinical characteristics and co-morbid conditions.   A total of 619 patients (mean age 71.7 ± 14.1 years, range 22 to 106 years) were enrolled. Four hundred forty-nine patients (72.5%) were women and 170 (27.5%) were men. Women were on average four years older than men: 72.8 ± 14.1 years versus 68.6 ± 13.8 years (p < 0.001). Before hospitalization, 75% of patients had chronic symptoms compatible with New York Heart Association functional class II or III, 14% of patients had chronic symptoms compatible with functional class I, and 11% had chronic symptoms with functional class IV.

The LVEF was measured by echocardiography in 96% of patients and by nuclear imaging in 4% of patients. Measurement of LVEF was obtained within three days of admission in 83% of patients and within seven days in all patients. Women and men had identical mean LVEF: 59.9 ± 7.2% and 59.7 ± 7.4%, respectively.

Patients had multiple co-morbid conditions (Table 1). Hypertension was the most common with a mean duration of 14 years (median 10.5 years; interquartile range 7 to 20 years). The BP upon presentation and prevalence of hypertension were similar in women and men. The second most common co-morbid conditions were diabetes and obesity, with a similar prevalence in the total population (46%) and between women and men. Eighty-eight percent of diabetics were treated with oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin and 10% were treated with diet alone. Their mean hemoglobin A1C was 8.2 ± 2.4%. Forty-three percent of patients had coronary artery disease. Atrial fibrillation was present in nearly one-quarter of patients.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1 Cardiovascular or medical conditions and new events precipitating hospitalization. Ranked by prevalence. *Syst. BP = systolic blood pressure upon presentation (emergency department); non-compliance = non-compliance with medication; MR/AR = mitral regurgitation/aortic regurgitation (severity scale from 1+ to 4+); ACS = acute coronary syndrome; ||baseline dialysis or creatinine >3 mg/dl; ¶Afib/Flutter/SVT= atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter/supraventricular tachycardia—<1 week duration or heart rate 130 beats/min; #COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—severe was defined by pulmonary function tests or by the need for systemic steroid therapy; **AS/MS = aortic stenosis/mitral stenosis.

Mean BPs at discharge were within normal values for both women and men: 131/71 and 134/73 mm Hg, respectively. Mean and median lengths of stay were 8.8 and 6.0 days, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 4.2%. Patients who died were significantly older than patients who survived: 78.9 ± 14.3 years versus 71.3 ± 14.1 years (p = 0.01). Gender, the presence of co-morbid conditions, or precipitating factors for hospitalization did not affect length of stay or mortality.

Medications.   Medications at presentation and at discharge are shown in Figure 2. Therapeutic adjustments during hospitalization included an absolute increase in the percentage of patients receiving diuretics by 12.8% (p < 0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors by 12.6% (p < 0.001), aldactone by 3.5% (p < 0.001), and beta-adrenergic blockers by 6.1% (p = 0.002). The percentage of patients receiving digoxin, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers remained unchanged.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2 Percentage of patients at presentation (open bars), and at discharge (solid bars) receiving diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta-blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), digoxin (DIG), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), and aldactone (ALDACT).

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3 Mean systolic (hatched bars) and diastolic (solid bars) blood pressures upon presentation (emergency department) and at discharge in the entire cohort of patients (Total) and according to racial background (Black non-Hispanic [B-NH] and Others). Blood pressure (mm Hg) upon presentation: B-NH 172 of 92, Other 155 of 81, Total 160 of 84. Blood pressure (mm Hg) on discharge: B-NH 137 of 75, Other 130 of 71, Total 132 of 72.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion APPENDIX References

 
Our registry provides a comprehensive description of the clinical characteristics, hospital course, and treatment of patients hospitalized for HFNEF. It highlights the severity of symptoms before decompensation, the high prevalence of a substantially increased LV mass, and clinical differences according to racial background. Lastly, factors that precipitate hospitalization are identifiable in only one-half of patients hospitalized for HFNEF.

Diagnosis of diastolic HF.   When LVEF is normal, HF is attributed to diastolic dysfunction and labeled diastolic HF. However, because it is difficult to noninvasively assess LV diastolic function, the criteria required to diagnose diastolic HF remain uncertain (21–23). Vasan and Levy (24) sought to strengthen the diagnosis of diastolic HF by requiring a shorter interval between the HF event and documentation of a normal LVEF. Accordingly, the diagnosis of diastolic HF was probable in 84% of our patients. Previous studies dealt with only possible diastolic HF as the interval between presentation and measurement of LV function was either not recorded or could be as long as one year (6–10,25,26). The criteria required to diagnose HF in the present registry were also more stringent than the criteria in prior reports dealing with hospitalized patients, as we required both clinical and radiographic findings to document the diagnosis of HF (6–11,25,26).

The presence of diastolic abnormalities in patients with presumed diastolic HF has recently been questioned (27). In particular, the contribution of arterial stiffening and renal dysfunction, common to the elderly, is increasingly entertained as a mechanism that might help precipitate HFNEF (28,29).

Clinical characteristics.   Nearly three-quarters of patients hospitalized for HFNEF in the New York metropolitan area are elderly women with increased LV mass and a history of hypertension. Between the ages of 65 and 74 years, women represent 56% of the population in New York State (30). The modest predominance of women in the elderly population cannot account for the high prevalence of women in the present registry. The mechanisms responsible for the prevalence of HFNEF in women are unclear. Gender affects cardiac remodeling. When confronted with pressure overload, the LV hypertrophies more and dilates less in women than men (31). A reduced rate of myocyte loss in women and transcriptional regulation by estrogens of genes implicated in cardiac hypertrophy may contribute to persistent gender related differences in cardiac remodeling (11,24,31–33).

The prevalence of coronary artery disease in our patients was similar to that of previous reports (7,11,25). In contrast, the prevalence of diabetes in our patients (46%) was greater than the range previously reported in this patient population (23% to 33%) (8,9,11,25,34). The greater prevalence of diabetes is concordant with the high prevalence of obesity noted in our patients, an observation that was also made in the Strong Heart Study (10). The association of diabetes, hypertension, and obesity in 24% of our patients suggests the possibility of a high prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in our population. (10,34–36).

Chronicity of symptoms.   Eighty-five percent of our patients had chronic overt symptoms of HF that antedated their hospitalization. Functional intolerance and moderate pulmonary hypertension most likely result from chronic elevation of LV filling pressures (37). The marginal status of our patients at baseline renders the identification of precipitating factors for hospitalization difficult, as these factors are likely to be modest in nature. The present experience is similar to that in patients with HF due to LV systolic dysfunction, where precipitating factors are often not identified but generally thought to be related to medical and dietary non-compliance (38).

Therapy.   Despite conflicting views regarding the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with diastolic HF, they were, after diuretics, the medications most often prescribed to our patients (8,39). Angiotensin II receptor blockade with losartan has been shown to substantially reduce LV hypertrophy in hypertensive patients with increased LV mass (40). Definite evidence supporting modulation of the renin-angiotensin system in patients with HF and preserved systolic function (EF >40%) awaits the results of ongoing double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials (41,42).

Racial differences.   Racial profiling in medical research needs to be interpreted with caution. Despite their significantly younger age, B-NH patients presented with more severe hypertension and worse renal function than others. Our data are consistent with the higher prevalence of end organ damage in B-NH hypertensive patients. Obesity was also particularly prevalent in B-NH women compared with other women. Despite their reported reduced efficacy in African Americans, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors tended to be prescribed at least as often in B-NH patients as in others (43).

Study limitations.   The present study has several limitations. There was no echocardiographic core laboratory to ensure uniform quality control of all imaging studies. To address the issue of validity of echocardiographic measurements, we performed a "by center analysis" of LV mass index that incorporates measures of wall thickness and chamber dimensions and is corrected for height. There were some differences in mean height-corrected LV mass by site (p = 0.04), but when examined as a threshold measure (defined as elevated LV mass >46.7 g/m^2.7 in women and >49.2 g/m^2.7 in men), the prevalence of this condition was found to be similar among all sites (p = 0.38). The measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide was not commercially available when the registry was initiated. Standard load-dependent echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic dysfunction were not collected and the technical ability to collect load-independent (tissue Doppler) parameters was not available at all sites. Last, we did not mandate that all patients undergo cardiac stress testing to unmask occult coronary disease or require serum in all patients for hemoglobin A1C1C.> determinations; we relied on physician clinical judgment. Thus, the prevalence of coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus may have been underestimated. We also recognize that when defined according to recent guidelines, the duration and prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in our patient population may be underestimated as the physiologic thresholds for establishing these diagnoses continue to be lowered.

In summary, patients hospitalized in the New York metropolitan area for HFNEF are preponderantly elderly women with a history of hypertension and increased LV mass. The chronic disability of these patients and the frequent inability to identify a factor precipitating hospitalization points to an absence of functional reserve and the need to develop aggressive treatment strategies.

	APPENDIX

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion APPENDIX References

 
For a list of the New York Heart Failure Consortium Medical Centers, please see the April 21, 2004, issue of JACC at http://www.cardiosource.com/jacc.html.

	Footnotes

 
Educational grants from Merck and GlaxoSmith-Kline pharmaceuticals supported the development of the Internet applications and statistical analyses.

	References

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion APPENDIX References

 

1. Grossman W. Diastolic dysfunction in congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1557–1564[Medline]
2. Bonow RO, Udelson JE. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a cause of congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:502–510[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Gaasch WH. Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure based on left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction. JAMA. 1994;271:1276–1280[Abstract]
4. Vasan RS, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, clinical features and prognosis of diastolic heart failure: An epidemiologic perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1565–1574[Abstract]
5. Haldeman GA, Croft JB, Giles WH, Rashidee A. Hospitalization of patients with heart failure: National hospital discharge survey, 1985 to 1995. Am Heart J. 1999;137:352–360[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Philbin EF, Rocco TA, Lindenmuth NW, Ulrich K, Jenkins PL. Systolic versus diastolic heart failure in community practice: Clinical features, outcomes, and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Am J Med. 2000;109:605–613[CrossRef][Medline]
7. McDermott MM, Feinglass J, Sy J, Gheorghiade M. Hospitalized congestive heart failure patients with preserved versus abnormal left ventricular systolic function: Clinical characteristics and drug therapy. Am J Med. 1995;99:629–635[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Dauterman KW, Go AS, Rowell R, Gebretsadik T, Gettner S, Massie BM. Congestive heart failure with preserved systolic function in a statewide sample of community hospitals. J Card Fail. 2001;7:221–228[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Senni M, Tribouilloy CM, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. Congestive heart failure in the community: A study of all incident cases in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 1991. Circulation. 1998;98:2282–2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Liu JE, et al. Congestive heart failure despite normal left ventricular systolic function in a population-based sample: The strong heart study. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1090–1096[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Pernenkil R, Vinson JM, Shah AS, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, Rich MW. Course and prognosis in patients 70 years of age with congestive heart failure and normal versus abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:216–219[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: full text. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1013201138293HFGuidelineFinal.pdf. Accessed November 2001.
13. Royen NV, Jaffe CC, Krumholz HM, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of visual echocardiographic and quantitative radionuclide left ventricular ejection fractions. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:843–850[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Ritchie JL, Bateman TM, Bonow RO, et al. Guidelines for clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging: Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (committee on radionuclide imaging), developed in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:521–547[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee of Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358–367[Medline]
16. Cooper JW, Nanda NC, Philpot EF, Fan P. Evaluation of valvular regurgitation by color Doppler. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:56–61[Medline]
17. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 1977;55:613–619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. De Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, et al. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: Assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1251–1260[Abstract]
19. Gault MH, Longrerich LL, Harnett, Wesolowski C. Predicting glomerular function from adjusted serum creatinine. Nephron 1992;62:249–56.
20. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva: WHO/NUT/NCD/98.1, June 3–5, 1997.
21. Yamamoto K, Wilson DJ, Canzanello VJ, Redfield MM. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension and preserved systolic function. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:148–155[Medline]
22. Zile MR, Gaasch WH, Carroll JD, et al. Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: Is measurement of diastolic function necessary to make the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure? Circulation. 2001;104:779–782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Zile MR, Brutsaert DL. New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure. Part I: Diagnosis, prognosis, and measurements of diastolic function. Circulation. 2002;105:1387–1393[Free Full Text]
24. Vasan RS, Levy D. Defining diastolic heart failure a call for standardized diagnostic criteria. Circulation. 2000;101:2118–2121[Free Full Text]
25. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Evans JC, Reiss CK, Levy D. Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1948–1955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. CHS Research GroupKitzman DW, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, et al. Importance of heart failure with preserved systolic function in patients 65 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:413–419[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Burkhoff D, Maurer M, Packer M. Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: Is it really a disorder of diastolic dysfunction? Circulation. 2003;107:656–658[Free Full Text]
28. Hundley WG, Kitzman DW, Morgan TM, et al. Cardiac cycle-dependent changes in aortic area and distensibility are reduced in older patients with isolated diastolic heart failure and correlate with exercise intolerance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:796–802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Kawaguchi M, Hay I, Fetics B, Kass DA. Combined ventricular systolic and arterial stiffening in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2003;107:714–720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. New York State, Statistics Year 2000, U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SFAIAN_QTP1&-geo_id=04000US36&-ds_name=D&-_lang=en&-_caller=bfri. Accessed March 6, 2004.
31. Douglas PS, Katz SE, Weinberg EO, Chen MH, Bishop SP, Lorell BH. Hypertrophic remodeling: Gender difference in the early response to left ventricular pressure overload. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1118–1125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Sugden PH, Clerk A. Akt like a woman: Gender differences in susceptibility to cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2001;88:975–977[Free Full Text]
33. Olivetti G, Giordano G, Corradi D, et al. Gender difference and aging: Effects on the human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1068–1079[Abstract]
34. Grandi AM, Zanzi P, Fachinetti A, et al. Insulin and diastolic dysfunction in lean and obese hypertensives. Hypertension. 1999;34:1208–1214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Jain A, Avendano G, Dharamsey S, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension and role of plasma glucose and insulin. Circulation. 1996;93:1396–1402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Palmieri V, Bella JN, Arnett DK, et al. Effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on left ventricular geometry and systolic function in hypertensive subjects—Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study. Circulation. 2001;103:102–107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Willens HJ, Kessler KM. Severe pulmonary hypertension associated with diastolic left ventricular dysfunction. Chest. 1993;103:1877–1882[Free Full Text]
38. Chin MH, Goldman L. Factors contributing to the hospitalization of patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:643–648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Philbin EF, Rocco TA. Use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. Am Heart J. 1997;134:188–195[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Dahlöf B, Devereux R, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE): A randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:995–1003[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Swedberg K, Pfeffer M, Granger C, et al. Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM): Rationale and design. J Card Fail. 1999;5:276–282[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Cleland JGF, Tendera M, Adams J, et al. Perindopril for elderly people with chronic heart failure: The PEP-CHF study. Eur J Heart Fail. 1999;1:211–217[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Exner DV, Dries DL, Domanski MJ, Cohn JN. Lesser response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in black as compared with white patients with left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1351–1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D. Chantler, E. G. Lakatta, and S. S. Najjar Arterial-ventricular coupling: mechanistic insights into cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1342 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. T. Emery, I. Jadavji, J. B. Choy, and R. A. Lawrance Investigating the European Society of Cardiology Diastology Guidelines in a practical scenario Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 685 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Handoko and W. J. Paulus Polishing the diastolic dysfunction measurement stick Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 575 - 577. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Chantler, V. Melenovsky, S. P. Schulman, G. Gerstenblith, L. C. Becker, L. Ferrucci, J. L. Fleg, E. G. Lakatta, and S. S. Najjar The sex-specific impact of systolic hypertension and systolic blood pressure on arterial-ventricular coupling at rest and during exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H145 - H153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. van Heerebeek, N. Hamdani, M. L. Handoko, I. Falcao-Pires, R. J. Musters, K. Kupreishvili, A. J.J. Ijsselmuiden, C. G. Schalkwijk, J. G.F. Bronzwaer, M. Diamant, et al. Diastolic Stiffness of the Failing Diabetic Heart: Importance of Fibrosis, Advanced Glycation End Products, and Myocyte Resting Tension Circulation, January 1, 2008; 117(1): 43 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Paulus, C. Tschope, J. E. Sanderson, C. Rusconi, F. A. Flachskampf, F. E. Rademakers, P. Marino, O. A. Smiseth, G. De Keulenaer, A. F. Leite-Moreira, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2539 - 2550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Melenovsky, B. A. Borlaug, B. Rosen, I. Hay, L. Ferruci, C. H. Morell, E. G. Lakatta, S. S. Najjar, and D. A. Kass Cardiovascular Features of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Versus Nonfailing Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in the Urban Baltimore Community: The Role of Atrial Remodeling/Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 198 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Borlaug, V. Melenovsky, S. D. Russell, K. Kessler, K. Pacak, L. C. Becker, and D. A. Kass Impaired Chronotropic and Vasodilator Reserves Limit Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure and a Preserved Ejection Fraction Circulation, November 14, 2006; 114(20): 2138 - 2147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Grigorian Shamagian, A Varela Roman, J M Garcia-Acuna, P Mazon Ramos, A Virgos Lamela, and J R Gonzalez-Juanatey Anaemia is associated with higher mortality among patients with heart failure with preserved systolic function Heart, June 1, 2006; 92(6): 780 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-D. Tang and S. D. Katz Anemia in Chronic Heart Failure: Prevalence, Etiology, Clinical Correlates, and Treatment Options Circulation, May 23, 2006; 113(20): 2454 - 2461. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Burgess, C. Jenkins, J. E. Sharman, and T. H. Marwick Diastolic Stress Echocardiography: Hemodynamic Validation and Clinical Significance of Estimation of Ventricular Filling Pressure With Exercise J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1891 - 1900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Klotz, I. Hay, G. Zhang, M. Maurer, J. Wang, and D. Burkhoff Development of Heart Failure in Chronic Hypertensive Dahl Rats: Focus on Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 901 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Grigorian Shamagian, J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey, A. V. Roman, J. M. G. Acuna, and A. V. Lamela The death rate among hospitalized heart failure patients with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction in the year following discharge: evolution over a 10-year period Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2005; 26(21): 2251 - 2258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Hay, J. Rich, P. Ferber, D. Burkhoff, and M. S. Maurer Role of impaired myocardial relaxation in the production of elevated left ventricular filling pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1203 - H1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Maurer, D. Spevack, D. Burkhoff, and I. Kronzon Diastolic dysfunction: Can it be diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1543 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Maurer, M. Packer, D. Burkhoff, D. L. King, M. Grieff, M. R. Zile, C. F. Baicu, W. H. Gaasch, and M. M. Redfield Diastolic Heart Failure N. Engl. J. Med., September 9, 2004; 351(11): 1143 - 1145. [Full Text] [PDF]

				What Is CHF with a Normal Ejection Fraction? Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, July 14, 2004; 2004(714): 4 - 4. [Full Text]

				I. Savelieva and A. John Camm Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: natural history and pharmacological treatment Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(s1): S5 - S19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klapholz, M.