cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1333, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.005
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mortality in systolic heart failure

Phillip L. Thornton, RPh, PhD, CGP, FASCP and Ali Ahmed, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Heart Failure Clinic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2000 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35233-0271, USA

thornph{at}auburn.edu


We read with interest the study by Johnson et al.(1). We believe that one of the key findings of this study was the relatively low rates of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker (BB) use in heart failure (HF) patients discharged from the hospital within three months, at 44.3% and 20.9%, respectively, from 1999 to 2000. Furthermore, only 11.3% of these patients received both an ACEI/ARB and a BB. The inclusion in this study of HF patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVSF), or diastolic HF, may partially account for the low rates of utilization of these medications. The current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) HF guidelines do not have a recommendation to use either ACEI/ARB or BB in patients with diastolic HF. Lack of appropriate use of ACEI/ARB and BB in HF patients with impaired LVSF or systolic HF indicates poor quality of care and is clearly associated with poor outcomes. Although there is pathophysiological rationale for use of ACEI/ARB and BB in patients with diastolic HF (2), lack of use of these drugs in diastolic HF is neither poor quality of care nor is it associated with poor outcomes. We believe that HF quality improvement programs should focus on increasing the use of ACEI and BB in patients with systolic HF, and studies of quality and outcomes of HF care should classify patients based on their LVSF. Furthermore, ARBs are not currently recommended in systolic HF unless patients have an absolute contraindication to ACEI (2). The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in its Seventh Scope of Work (2002 to 2005) identified use of ACEI, not ARB, as a quality indicator for HF care for Medicare beneficiaries (3).

We also note with interest an apparent lack of survival benefit of combined use of ACEI/ARB and BB on one-year mortality as compared to therapy with ACEI/ARB alone (1). Most large randomized controlled trials of BBs in systolic HF enrolled patients who were already receiving an ACEI. These studies showed that use of a BB resulted in an additional 35% reduction in mortality in subjects receiving both drugs compared with those receiving an ACEI alone (4). The rate of BB use in patients with systolic HF is low (5), and we are concerned that the finding of lack of survival benefit of BBs in HF as shown in the study by Johnson et al. (1) might be perceived by some clinicians as evidence that results of clinical trials do not necessarily translate into real-life patients.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Johnson D, Jin Y, Quan H, Cujec B. Beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/receptor blockers prescriptions after hospital discharge for heart failure are associated with decreased mortality in Alberta, Canada. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1438–1445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:2101–2113[Free Full Text]
  3. IPRO. Medicare National Health Care Quality Improvement Projects. Available at: http://www.ipro.org/index/pro_hcqip. Accessed on November 5, 2003
  4. Brophy JM, Joseph L, Rouleau JL. Beta-blockers in congestive heart failure. A Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:550–560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet. 2003;362:767–771[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A.

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home