Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 2 Impact of prevalence of low ejection fraction (EF) (<40%) on the cost-effectiveness (C-E) of screening for men and women using B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) followed by echocardiography in those with a positive test. The cost-effectiveness ratio drops below $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at a prevalence over 0.5% and drops below $50,000 at a prevalence over 1%. For any given prevalence of disease the cost-effectiveness ratio is lower for women because the accuracy of BNP is slightly greater for women then men (9). Open circles = men (BNP vs. no screen); closed circles = women (BNP vs. no screen). LV = left ventricular.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement