|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:742-748, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.023 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |














* Sections of Cardiology and Cardiac Electrophysiology, Self Regional Healthcare, Greenwood, South Carolina, USA
Cardiology, Houston, Texas, USA
Cardiac Electrophysiology, Houston, Texas, USA
Biostatistics and Epidemiology, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital/Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas., USA
Manuscript received June 25, 2002; revised manuscript received October 25, 2002, accepted November 13, 2003.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Rollo P. Villareal, 1132 Spring Street, Greenwood, South Carolina 29646, USA.
rollovillareal{at}yahoo.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia seen following CABG.
METHODS: The Texas Heart Institute Cardiovascular Research Database was used to identify all patients that developed AF after isolated initial CABG from January 1993 to December 1999 (n = 994). This population was compared with patients who underwent CABG during the same period but did not develop AF (n = 5,481). In-hospital end points were adjusted using logistic regression models to account for baseline differences. Long-term survival was evaluated using a retrospective cohort design, where Cox proportional hazards methods were used to adjust for baseline differences, and with case-matched populations (n = 390, 195 per arm).
RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 16% of the population. Postoperative AF was associated with greater in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, p = 0.0001), more strokes (OR 2.02, p = 0.001), prolonged hospital stays (14 vs. 10 days, p < 0.0001), and a reduced incidence of myocardial infarction (OR 0.62, p = 0.01). At four to five years, survival was worse in patients who developed postoperative AF (74% vs. 87%, p < 0.0001 in the retrospective cohort; 80% vs. 93%, p = 0.003 in the case-matched population). On multivariate analysis, postoperative AF was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (adjusted OR 1.5, p < 0.001 in the retrospective cohort; OR 3.4, p = 0.0018 in the case-matched population).
CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of AF following CABG identifies a subset of patients who have a reduced survival probability following CABG. The impact of various strategies, such as antiarrhythmics and warfarin, aimed at reducing AF and its complications deserves further study.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Case-matched substudy
The case-match study population was derived by matching the AF and no-AF populations derived from the retrospective cohort for as many variables as possible, with emphasis on matching predictors of mortality and postoperative complications associated with early mortality. This was done to reduce the impact of early mortality and highlight longer term differences.
Study design and end points.
The study design is depicted in Figure 1. The two populations were compared for the in-hospital end points of early death (
30 days), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and LOS using a retrospective cohort design. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to statistically adjust for differences in baseline differences and confounding variables. Long-term mortality was then evaluated simultaneously using two parallel methods: a retrospective cohort design, where Cox proportional hazards methods were used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidities, and case-matching methods. Follow-up was obtained using the THI Cardiovascular Research database in conjunction with the state's vital statistics system.
|
3x the upper limits of normal, or by new Q waves on follow-up electrocardiograms. Statistical analysis. Baseline characteristics are presented as mean values with standard deviation or as percentage of total patients with available data in each group. Pearson's chi-square test for discrete variables and Student t test continuous variables were used for comparisons. The SAS Vax/VMS Version 6.09 (SAS Institute, North Carolina) was used for analysis. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models utilizing a forward stepwise variable selection process were developed to determine which clinical and angiographic variables were associated with early and late mortality, respectively. After stepwise models were developed for predicting mortality using patient risk factors, the presence or absence of AF (AF or no-AF, coded as 1 and 0, respectively) was then added to the models to determine if survival was dependent on the presence or absence of AF while controlling for significant patient risk factors. The exponential of the coefficient of this variable is the hazard ratio for AF:no-AF. This hazard (or odds) ratio is the ratio of mortality of the AF to no-AF population at any given point in time, controlling for differences in patient covariates or risk factors.
In comparing the long-term survival of each of the patient subgroups, a different model was used for each group using Cox proportional hazards models that retain only the significant predictors of survival. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the hazard ratios were calculated to test for significant differences in survival between AF and no-AF. Logarithms of the ratios and their CIs were then computed so that intervals on either side of 1 would have values that were comparable.
To measure survival differences in percentages rather than in relative terms for each patient subgroup, a Cox proportional hazards model for the subgroup was used to construct adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the AF and the no-AF patients. The adjusted survivals were calculated from the Cox models fixing the coefficients for the other covariates at their means and varying the coefficient for the procedure. The resulting two curves were plotted for each subgroup for comparison.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Patients who developed AF were older, more often hypertensive, had COPD, non-coronary vascular disease, CHF, and more severe underlying CAD. They were also more likely to have had an IABP placed and longer cardiopulmonary bypass times. Conversely, they were less likely to be obese or hypercholesterolemic. There was no difference in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus or prior MI. Multivariate predictors for the occurrence of postoperative AF were age >65 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% CI 2.06 to 2.74, p < 0.0001), COPD (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.47, p = 0.004), PVD (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.81, p < 0.0001), and preprocedure use of an IABP (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.32, p = 0.0005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In more recent studies, postoperative AF has been associated with a two- to fourfold increased risk of stroke at 30 days, a 4- to 5-day increase in hospital LOS, and an increase in the cost of care on the order of approximately $10,000 per patient (5,6,8,1217). To our knowledge, only four studies have described an association between postoperative AF and mortality, two of which were in non-CABG populations (4,1820). Krowka et al. (18) and von Knorring et al. (19) reported early mortality rates of 22% and 17%, respectively, in patients who developed postoperative tachyarrhythmias after undergoing pneumonectomy for a primary pulmonary pathology. Stamou et al. (20) described significantly greater in-hospital mortality (3% vs. 1%) in a population of 206 patients who developed AF following minimally invasive CABG. In the only study that has looked beyond early outcomes, Almassi et al. (4) described both an increase in early (5.95% vs. 2.95%) and late mortality (9.4% vs. 4.2%). Follow-up, however, was only for six months.
Our study is consistent with the literature in that we report similar predictors for the development of AF, an increased incidence of stroke, and a prolongation of hospital stay. But more importantly, our study provides strong evidence that postoperative AF is associated with an increased early and late mortality risk. This association persists after adjustment for known confounding variables such as MI, CHF, prior stroke, TIA, CVD, PVD, COPD, diabetes, and advanced age. Although most of the death associated with AF occurred early in the postoperative period, the association with late mortality remained statistically significant after exclusion of early mortality and was further strengthened by consistent findings in a simultaneous case-matched population. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival curves in both study populations with a mean of four and up to six years of follow-up were diverging, suggesting that clinical recognition of this once thought temporary or isolated event identifies an ongoing or persistent effect.
The mechanisms by which postoperative AF is associated with mortality are speculative. In the short term, hemodynamic compromise and CHF directly as a result of the loss of atrial transport function may certainly contribute. In the long term, mechanistic and causal links are more difficult to establish. Possibilities include the development of CHF with its attendant mortality risk, the occurrence of disabling stroke or other embolic catastrophes, and adverse drug effects, such as proarrhythmia with antiarrhythmic drugs or hemorrhage with anticoagulants. Unfortunately, it is currently unknown whether patients who have postoperative AF also tend to develop left ventricular dysfunction, chronic or persistent AF, an increased long-term stroke risk, or even require additional pharmacotherapeutics. Although Loubani et al. (21) reported a 50% persistence of AF at discharge and 39% at six months, these data were obtained from a small number of patients (83 patients with postoperative AF). This dearth of knowledge is confounded by the fact that the mode and immediate cause of death in this particular population is also unknown.
An important paradigm that must be considered is that it is not postoperative AF per se that causes an increased mortality, but rather postoperative AF is a marker for other conditions with a propensity for mortality, such as CHF, left ventricular dysfunction, advanced age, and other comorbidities. Stated differently, patients with AF are just sicker. Patients who developed AF were older and with more comorbidities. Although this statement is appealing, our study shows that the converse is true. Using statistical methods identical to those used in the Framingham study and other large population-based studies that have delineated risk factors for disease processes, we have shown that postoperative AF is independently associated with a reduced survival. This predictive power of AF persists even after statistical adjustment for confounding variables and comorbid conditions. In order to exclude the possibility that postoperative AF may occur in association with preterminal events and is thus not causally related, comparisons were performed censoring in-hospital mortality. The association between postoperative AF and reduced survival remained and the ongoing effect was highlighted by continual divergence of survival curves. Furthermore, the case-control comparison that reduces the effect of comorbidities upon subsequent differences in survival produced consistent results.
Our data also show a reduction in the incidence of postoperative MI and suggest improved survival in patients discharged on antiarrhythmic therapy. The possible reasons for a reduced incidence of postoperative MI, which differs from that reported in the literature, include an increased likelihood of receiving beta-blockade and anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, as well as the possibility of random error. On subset analysis, the findings of improved survival with use of an IMA, aspirin, or beta-blockers, and reduced survival with CHF, poor functional class, and more severe vascular disease are consistent with the literature. However, the most intriguing finding on subset analysis is the survival benefit in patients discharged on any antiarrhythmic therapy. In the THI cardiovascular research database, antiarrhythmic therapy is coded if patients are discharged on any of the class I or III agents by the Vaughan-Williams classification. Although a 32% relative risk reduction in mortality is noteworthy and suggests benefit with these agents, this finding must be viewed with caution. This was obtained in a retrospective nonrandomized population. The exact identity of the antiarrhythmic agent used is unknown, nor can it be ascertained whether the antiarrhythmic was prescribed for the postoperative AF. Nonetheless, this exciting observation suggests that perhaps some therapy is available that may improve outcomes in postoperative AF patients.
This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the fact that it comes from a single center. Although our query was designed to include all cases of postoperative AF, the prevalence of postoperative AF was 16%, which is significantly lower than other reports. This low prevalence may be attributed to, at least in part, the exclusion of patients with valvular disease and those with prior AF. However, we must acknowledge the possibility that AF may have been underreported and only severe, persistent cases of postoperative AF were included, thereby biasing the data to exaggerate the mortality difference. Our data do not permit us differentiate between early- or late-occurring AF or ascertain the duration of AF, factors likely to have prognostic significance. Moreover, we have insufficient data to make meaningful conclusions on the impact of antiarrhythmics or anticoagulants on mortality. The effects of treatment on outcomes are difficult to delineate in a longitudinal observational study because sicker patients are more likely to be treated. Furthermore, we do not have data on the immediate cause of death. Because of limited resources, we were only able to track deaths in Texas residents. Autopsy data were not available and the cause of death listed in the field was not believed to be sufficiently accurate to identify cardiac death. Thus, all-cause mortality was used. As such, the mechanisms of postoperative AF-associated mortality remain at best speculative. Finally, the limitations of the methodology must also be acknowledged. Although we have attempted to adjust for a plethora of variables, we acknowledge that unmeasured factors can influence outcomes. In defense of the method, studies that have utilized large observational databases have yielded information that were consistent with, and at times predicted, the results of randomized trials. Although our data did not permit us to address the questions of post-discharge management, long-term or recurrent stroke, AF, rehospitalization, freedom from symptoms or repeat revascularization, the follow-up data for our sole end point, death, is irrefutable. In spite of these limitations, our investigation supports the contention that postoperative AF is associated with excess mortality, which persists after adjustment for coexisting comorbid conditions.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Kapoor Combination Prophylactic Therapy for Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 29, 2008; 52(5): 397 - 397. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Keller and L. Lemberg The Importance of Vitamin C in the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2008; 17(3): 270 - 272. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Asbach, M. Olschewski, T. S. Faber, M. Zehender, C. Bode, and M. Brunner Mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation has significantly decreased during the last three decades: 35 years of follow-up in 1627 pacemaker patients Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 391 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Buszman, S. R. Kiesz, A. Bochenek, E. Peszek-Przybyla, I. Szkrobka, M. Debinski, B. Bialkowska, D. Dudek, A. Gruszka, A. Zurakowski, et al. Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 538 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Albert, N. Halevy, and E. M. Antman Preoperative Evaluation for Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 261 - 280. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Durham and J. P. Gold Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 535 - 548. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kalavrouziotis, K. J. Buth, and I. S. Ali The Impact of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation on In-hospital Mortality Following Cardiac Surgery Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 833 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Guler, C. Ozkara, H. Dulger, V. Kutay, M. Sahin, E. Erbilen, and H. A. Gumrukcuoglu Do Cardiac Neuropeptides Play a Role in the Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Bypass Surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 532 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dunning, T. Treasure, M. Versteegh, S. A.M. Nashef, and on behalf of the EACTS Audit and Guidelines Commit Guidelines on the prevention and management of de novo atrial fibrillation after cardiac and thoracic surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 30(6): 852 - 872. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Burgess, M. J. Kilborn, and A. C. Keech Interventions for prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation and its complications after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2006; 27(23): 2846 - 2857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Bagshaw, P. D. Galbraith, L. B. Mitchell, R. Sauve, D. V. Exner, and W. A. Ghali Prophylactic Amiodarone for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1927 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Writing Committee Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 651 - 745. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): e149 - e246. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): e257 - e354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kollar, S. D. Lick, K. N. Vasquez, and V. R. Conti Relationship of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: When is Anticoagulation Indicated? Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 515 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Hogue Jr, C. A. Palin, R. Kailasam, J. S. Lawton, A. Nassief, V. G. Davila-Roman, B. Thomas, and R. Damiano C-reactive protein levels and atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery in women. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 97 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mariscalco, K. G. Engstrom, S. Ferrarese, G. Cozzi, V. D. Bruno, F. Sessa, and A. Sala Relationship between atrial histopathology and atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1364 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Lentine, M. A. Schnitzler, K. C. Abbott, L. Li, H. Xiao, T. E. Burroughs, S. K. Takemoto, L. M. Willoughby, J. A. Gavard, and D. C. Brennan Incidence, Predictors, and Associated Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation after Kidney Transplantation Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 1(2): 288 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zacharias, T. A. Schwann, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Obesity and Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery Circulation, November 22, 2005; 112(21): 3247 - 3255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Aasbo, A. T. Lawrence, K. Krishnan, M. H. Kim, and R. G. Trohman Amiodarone Prophylaxis Reduces Major Cardiovascular Morbidity and Length of Stay after Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis Ann Intern Med, September 6, 2005; 143(5): 327 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zimetbaum An Argument for Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, June 14, 2005; 111(23): 3150 - 3156. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Habib, A. Zacharias, T. A. Schwann, and C. J. Riordan Excess long-term mortality in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 21, 2004; 44(12): 2415 - 2415. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Villareal, V.-V. Lee, M. Elayda, J. M. Wilson, and A. Massumi Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 21, 2004; 44(12): 2415 - 2416. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dunning, D. V. Nagarajan, M. Amanullah, and S. M. Nouraei What is the optimal anticoagulation management of patients post-cardiac surgery who go into atrial fibrillation? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2004; 3(3): 503 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Engoren Is a Charge a Cost If Nobody Pays It? Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 662 - 664. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levy and W. B. Kannel Postoperative atrial fibrillation and mortality: do the risks merit changes in clinical practice? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 749 - 751. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||