cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 1 (Bars on left) Rates of in-stent restenosis determined angiographically in two clinical trials: 1) in the randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent (RAVEL), the difference in restenosis rates at six months between patients who had a sirolimus-eluting stent and patients who had a control stent was 26.6% (p < 0.001); and 2) in the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent (SIRIUS) trial, the difference in restenosis rates at eight months between patients who had a sirolimus-eluting stent and patients who had a control stent was 32.2% (p < 0.001). (Bars in middle) In-segment restenosis rates were higher than in-stent restenosis rates (8.9% vs. 3.2%). This was related to arterial narrowing adjacent to the stented segment. (Bars on right) Rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization in two clinical trials: 1) in RAVEL, the difference in revascularization rates at 210 days between patients who had a sirolimus-eluting stent and patients who had a control stent was 13.6% (p < 0.0001); and 2) in SIRIUS, the difference in revascularization rates at 270 days between patients who had a sirolimus-eluting stent and patients who had a control stent was 12.5% (p < 0.001).





Right arrow Return to article

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home