cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:276-283, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.040
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunichika, H.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kunichika, H.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: PLATELET INHIBITION AND REPERFUSION

Effects of glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibition on microvascular flow after coronary reperfusion

A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study

Hideki Kunichika, MD, PhD*, Ori Ben-Yehuda, MD, FACC*, Stephane Lafitte, MD*, Naomi Kunichika, MD, PhD*, Barry Peters, MD* and Anthony N. DeMaria, MD, MACC*,*

* Division of Cardiology, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA

Manuscript received June 6, 2003; revised manuscript received August 18, 2003, accepted August 27, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Anthony N. DeMaria, Division of Cardiology, UCSD Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, California 92103-8411, USA.
ademaria{at}ucsd.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI) on microvascular flow after coronary occlusion/reperfusion using quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography (QMCE).

BACKGROUND: Platelets may play a major role in the dissociation of epicardial artery recanalization and tissue-level reperfusion, referred to as the "no-reflow phenomenon." Therefore, GPI might improve myocardial reperfusion, distinct from its effects on epicardial patency.

METHODS: Three-hour occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was followed by 3-h reperfusion in 16 open-chest dogs: 8 controls and 8 given a continuous infusion of the GPI tirofiban, starting 45 min before LAD reopening. Perfusion of the LAD bed was quantified by the rate of intensity rise (b) by QMCE; myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed by fluorescent microspheres.

RESULTS: No differences in b or MBF were observed within the risk area between the control and GPI groups at baseline or occlusion. However, b and MBF were higher in GPI dogs than in controls during reperfusion, despite similar epicardial flow (p < 0.05 at 30, 60, and 90 min; p = NS at 180 min). Infarct area size was significantly reduced in GPI dogs compared with non-treated dogs (26.9 ± 10.5% vs. 49.0 ± 11.1% of at-risk area, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: As demonstrated by QMCE, GPI improves microvascular flow and reduces the infarct area after coronary occlusion/reperfusion, independent of epicardial flow. These data demonstrate the usefulness of QMCE in assessing microvascular flow, provide novel evidence for the role of platelets in the early phase of reperfusion injury, and show that GPI is of value in preserving microvascular perfusion after coronary reperfusion.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  b = rate of signal intensity rise
  FLASH = fast low-angle shot
  GPI = glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition/inhibitor
  LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery
  MBF = myocardial blood flow
  MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography
  MI = myocardial infarction
  QMCE = quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography
  TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
  TTC = triphenyltetrazolium chloride


Reperfusion strategies have led to a substantial improvement in the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, the beneficial effect of successful restoration of epicardial coronary flow on myocardial salvage may be offset by inadequate tissue perfusion, a condition referred to as the "no-reflow phenomenon" (1–3). Myocar- dial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which can provide information on tissue-level perfusion, has demonstrated that even in the presence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3, tissue-level perfusion may still be severely reduced. Moreover, significant improvement in myocardial function has been demonstrated to occur only in the presence of MCE reflow.

The mechanism responsible for the no-reflow phenomenon is uncertain and is likely multifactorial. Due to the potential for thrombus formation and release of vasoactive substances, it has been suggested that platelets may play a major role in the dissociation of epicardial artery recanalization and tissue-level reperfusion (4). However, the role of platelets in reperfusion injury, independent of epicardial thrombosis and embolization, remains to be determined. Similarly, although data exist that inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor prevents abrupt re-occlusion after percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures and improves TIMI flow rates in acute coronary syndrome patients, the ability of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI) to enhance flow at the microvascular level after coronary reperfusion has not been determined (5,6).

We have recently shown that quantitative parameters derived from refilling curves generated from quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography (QMCE) are closely correlated to myocardial blood flow (MBF). Accordingly, QMCE enables evaluation of flow in the coronary microvasculature (7,8). In the present study, we employed QMCE to examine whether glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI) improves microvascular flow and thereby reduces infarct size in an animal model of coronary occlusion/reperfusion.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animal preparation.   The present study was approved by the University of California-San Diego, Animal Research Committee and conformed to the "Position of the American Heart Association on Research Animal Use," adopted by the Association in November 1984. Sixteen mongrel dogs (26.1 ± 1.9 kg) were anesthetized and ventilated to keep arterial blood gases and pH within normal limits. The right femoral artery and vein were cannulated for arterial pressure monitoring and contrast agent injection, respectively. The heart was exposed through a left lateral thoracotomy and suspended in a pericardial cradle. The proximal portion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was dissected free from the surrounding tissue. An atraumatic vascular clamp produced coronary occlusion of the proximal LAD.

Experimental protocol.   After a period of stabilization after instrumentation, 3-h proximal LAD occlusion was followed by 3-h reperfusion in 16 open-chest dogs: 8 controls and 8 given a continuous infusion of tirofiban (Aggrastat, Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey) at 3 µg/kg/min, starting 45 min before LAD reopening (9–11). Hemodynamic measurements, MBF, coronary flowmeter, and real-time MCE data were acquired at baseline, immediately before release of occlusion (180 min), and at 30, 60, 90, and 180 min of reperfusion.

Real-time imaging with MCE.   Echocardiography was performed with a commercial instrument (HDI 5000, Philips Ultrasound, Andover, Massachusetts) using a broadband 4- to 2-MHz transducer. Color-coded harmonic power-pulse inversion images were obtained with ultrasound transmitted at 2 MHz and received at 4 MHz in the short-axis papillary muscle view, using low-energy (mechanical index = 0.1) real-time imaging at 15 frames/s (12,13). The pulse repetition frequency was fixed at 2,500 Hz. Instrument settings were held constant for each experiment. A latex bag filled with degassed saline functioned as an acoustic interface between the heart and transducer, which was positioned to image the LAD perfusion territory. SonoVue (Bracco Inc., Geneva, Switzerland) was continuously infused at a rate of 30 ml/h by a gently agitated infusion pump. Recordings were obtained 2 min after initiating infusion to ensure that plateau intensity had been reached. The MCE refilling sequences were recorded; they consisted of high-energy (mechanical index = 0.8) fast low-angle shot (FLASH) frames to destroy microbubbles, followed by 15 cardiac cycles of refilling.

Image analysis.   The raw image data were digitally captured and analyzed off-line using HDI laboratory software (Philips Ultrasound). Perfusion of the LAD bed was quantified by fitting intensity data of end-systolic images to an exponential function: y = A (1 – ebt), where y is the signal intensity at any given time; A is the plateau signal intensity that reflects the microvascular cross-sectional area or myocardial blood volume; b is the rate of signal intensity rise (slope of curve) that reflects myocardial microbubble velocity; and t is the time after FLASH. The b parameter was used to estimate perfusion. Transmural regions of interest that encompassed the LAD perfusion territory were selected, excluding high-intensity signals from the epicardium and endocardium.

The myocardial risk area was identified as the region of unopacified myocardium by MCE during coronary occlusion. To measure the risk area size from MCE images, the area of the largest clearly demarcated myocardial opacification defect at 180 min of LAD occlusion was manually traced for the final three end-diastolic images of the 15-cycle FLASH refilling sequence (14). Also, to measure the infarct area size from MCE, the myocardial opacification defect at 180 min of reperfusion was traced for the final three end-diastolic images. The infarct area size from MCE was expressed as the percent of the area at risk.

Measurements of LAD flow and MBF.   Epicardial LAD flow was measured by a Doppler flowmeter. A transit-time flow probe connected to a digital flowmeter (series 2RB and model T201, Transonics System, Ithaca, New York) was placed snugly around the proximal LAD. Epicardial LAD flow and MBF were measured at baseline, immediately before release of occlusion (180 min), and at 30, 60, 90, and 180 min after release of occlusion by injection of fluorescent microspheres (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon) into the left atrium, while reference blood samples were withdrawn from the femoral artery. For every injection, a different fluorescent wavelength was used to allow for independent assessment of flow at the different time points. After the animal was euthanized, the heart was sliced, and the cross-sectional segment corresponding to the short-axis image was cut into 12 wedge-shaped transmural tissue pieces, each of which was divided into endocardial and epicardial segments. Transmural MBF to 12 wedge-shaped pieces was calculated as the quotient of the summed flows to the individual segments within that piece and their combined weight. The MBF to the LAD beds, defined by monastral blue dye injection, was then calculated by averaging the transmural MBF in the pieces from LAD bed.

Infarct and risk area size.   At the end of the experiment, the LAD was re-occluded, and blue dye was injected into the left atrium. With the guidance of long needles placed as markers, a left ventricular short-axis slice (6 to 8 mm thick) was cut out at the same level at which the echocardiogram was recorded. The risk area was delineated as that without blue stain. To determine the infarct area, each slice was incubated in 1.5% triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) at 37°C for 15 min, and the unstained region with TTC was planed (15). Blinded quantitative histologic analysis of the risk segment was also performed by light microscopy to look for platelets.

Statistical analysis.   Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Analyses of the data were performed in a blinded fashion. Comparisons of data among all stages were performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Comparisons of multiple linear regression data between control and GPI groups were performed using analysis of co-variance. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All experiments were completed successfully without significant hemodynamic changes or adverse events. Recordings were technically adequate to allow full measurement and analysis.

Signal intensity data provided by MCE.   Measurements of the b parameter by MCE, representing the rate of intensity rise within the risk area, are summarized in Table 1 for each group at baseline, occlusion, and after coronary reperfusion. No significant differences in b were observed between the control and GPI groups either at baseline or with occlusion. However, b was significantly reduced during occlusion, compared with baseline, in both groups. During reperfusion, b improved in both groups but was greater in GPI dogs than in controls (Fig. 1). This difference reached statistical significance at 30, 60, and 90 min but not at 180 min of reperfusion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Myocardial Contrast Echocardiographic, Myocardial Blood Flow, and Coronary Flow Data

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Time course of changes in the rate of intensity rise (b) parameter measurements by myocardial contrast echocardiography within the risk area at baseline, occlusion, and after coronary reperfusion for each control (n = 8) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) (n = 8) group. *p < 0.05 versus control group at each stage. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. R-30, R-60, R-90, and R-180 = reperfusion for 30, 60, 90, and 180 min, respectively.

 
Assessment of size of infarct area.   The percent infarct area of the total risk area derived by MCE was significantly reduced in GPI dogs compared with controls (26.9 ± 10.5% vs. 49.0 ± 11.1% of area at risk, p < 0.01). Figure 2 shows representative changes in end-systolic images after FLASH obtained after 180 min of reperfusion in GPI and control dogs. To validate MCE measurements of infarct size, the percent myocardium of the total left ventricle manifesting an opacification defect was compared with that measured by TTC at 180-min reperfusion. Measurements of the size of the MCE opacification defect closely correlated with those of the infarct area by TTC (y = 1.0x – 1.3, r = 0.94) (Fig. 3). Quantitative histologic analysis of the risk segment, including the no-reflow zones, failed to reveal platelet plugging of the microvasculature in either control or GPI dogs.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Representative end-systolic myocardial contrast echocardiography images by real-time imaging after high-energy fast low-angle shot (FLASH) transmission at 180-min reperfusion in both control and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) dogs. Arrows show an opacification defect after FLASH images. The defect size in the control group is larger than that in the GPI group.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation between the size of the infarct area by triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) and that by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) at 180-min reperfusion (control: n = 4; glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor [GPI]: n = 4). LV = left ventricle.

 
LAD flow and MBF.   Data on epicardial LAD flow by Doppler and on MBF by microspheres at baseline, 180-min LAD occlusion, and after coronary reperfusion are summarized in Table 1 for each group. The MBF data during occlusion and reperfusion are expressed as a percentage of the baseline value. During LAD occlusion, Doppler flow and MBF within the risk area were severely reduced from baseline in both groups. During reperfusion, epicardial LAD flow returned to baseline in both groups. Although MBF within the risk area continued to be reduced in the control group after reperfusion, it returned to baseline levels in the GPI dogs. Thus, no differences in risk-area MBF were observed between control and GPI groups at baseline or occlusion. However, at 30, 60, and 90 min of reperfusion, MBF in GPI dogs was significantly higher than in controls (Fig. 4). At 180 min, the difference in MBF between the GPI and control dogs was no longer statistically significant.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Time course of changes in the myocardial blood flow within the risk area at baseline, occlusion, and after coronary reperfusion for the control (n = 8) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) (n = 8) groups. *p < 0.05 versus control group at each stage. The data during occlusion and reperfusion are expressed as the mean percentage of baseline ± SD. R-30, R-60, R-90, and R-180 = reperfusion for 30, 60, 90, and 180 min, respectively.

 
Infarct size and MBF during occlusion.   The canine model has variable coronary collateral flow. Therefore, infarct size, normalized as a percentage of the area at risk, was plotted against the mean MBF of the risk area during coronary occlusion for the control and GPI groups (Fig. 5). A significant downward shift in the line of the inverse relationship was observed in the GPI-treated group (p < 0.05). This result clearly shows that GPI has a true effect to reduce infarct size.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 The relationship between infarct size at risk and mean myocardial blood flow (MBF) of risk area during coronary occlusion is illustrated for the control (n = 8) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) (n = 8) groups. Each point represents an individual dog. A significant downward shift in the line of the inverse relationship was observed in the GPI-treated group (p < 0.05).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we used QMCE, which reflects blood velocity and volume in the microcirculation, to assess the effect of tirofiban, a specific GPI (16), on tissue-level perfusion in a dog model of occlusion/reperfusion. We demonstrated enhanced microvascular flow that was independent of epicardial flow with GPI, particularly in the initial 90 min of reperfusion. Furthermore, we observed that this increased flow was associated with a reduction in infarct size. These data are the first to directly establish that GPI exerts a favorable effect on capillary perfusion after restoration of flow in epicardial vessels.

Our study also provides important evidence for the role of platelets in the early phase of reperfusion. Assessing the role of platelets in reperfusion injury is confounded clinically and, in some experimental models of MI, by the presence and possible microembolization of epicardial thrombus (17). Indeed, using labeled platelets, microembolization has been documented in a model of coronary thrombosis. Our data implicate platelets in the mechanism of reperfusion injury, even in the absence of coronary thrombosis.

Infarct vessel patency has traditionally has been viewed as the hallmark of successful reperfusion. However, increasing evidence indicates that, even in the presence of vessel patency and seemingly normal flow, up to one-third of patients do not have adequate reperfusion at the tissue level. Inadequate tissue-level perfusion has been shown to correlate with a lack of myocardial salvage. Therefore, optimal reperfusion can be redefined as restoration of both epicardial and tissue-level perfusion (18–20). This study demonstrates a role for GPI in enhancing the latter.

Previous studies have provided evidence of the beneficial effect of GPI in acute coronary syndromes. It has been shown that GPI improves the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (21,22). In the Platelet Receptor inhibition for Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) trial, the use of tirofiban was shown to reduce intracoronary thrombus and improve TIMI flow (23). In the setting of ST-segment elevation MI, GPI was shown to improve the speed and efficacy of epicardial reperfusion in combination with lytic therapy. In addition, GPI reduced the 30-day incidence of death, re-infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization in the setting of primary stenting, albeit with an increased risk of bleeding (24,25). Flow velocity in the infarct-related artery has also been shown to be improved with GPI with stenting (5).

Although the beneficial effects of GPI on the microvasculature have also been suggested, current studies have used only indirect assessment, such as improvement in coronary flow, resolution of ST-segments, and improvement in myocardial salvage, to gain insight into the effects on the microcirculation (5). The most direct evidence, to date, has been in the setting of elective percutaneous coronary intervention. In a substudy of the Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet GP IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial, Gibson et al. (26) demonstrated that coronary flow reserve was improved in the eptifibatide-treated group, compared with placebo. Myocardial blush was also assessed using a visual scale and also demonstrated improvement. The QMCE data in our study directly demonstrate that GPI enhances microcirculatory flow during reperfusion.

Mechanism of the no-reflow phenomenon.   The proposed mechanism of the no-reflow phenomenon is multifactorial. Animal and postmortem histologic studies have demonstrated varying degrees of small-vessel vasospasm, endothelial gap and bleb formation, neutrophil plugging of capillaries as well as microvascular compression from myocytes, interstitial edema, and hemorrhage after recanalization (1,27,28). Platelets have also been implicated as major contributors to the no-reflow phenomenon by inducing vascular injury and the loss of capillary autoregulation.

Platelet effects may be particularly important in the first stage of reperfusion, referred to as the "microvascular obstruction stage" (29). Additional reperfusion injury, mediated by neutrophils, free radical release, and edema formation, is thought to occur in the second stage. Platelet activation can lead to the formation of thrombi or distal microemboli, and obstructive platelet aggregates within myocardial capillaries have been observed both experimentally and clinically in reperfused ischemic tissue (30–32). Platelet degranulation has also been observed during reperfusion. Released platelet granules contain multiple vasoactive and chemotactic mediators that can compound tissue ischemia and increase neutrophil infiltration. Distal vasoconstriction due to platelet activation may mediate the deleterious influence of nonocclusive coronary thrombosis on distal tissue perfusion (33,34). After experimental ischemia/reperfusion, coronary microvessels have been demonstrated to exhibit increased vascular resistance, a finding that led to the so-called "injury-spasm hypothesis," perhaps mediated by platelets (35). Thus, several mechanisms exist by which GPI may be beneficial in the prevention of the no-reflow phenomenon.

Quantifying tissue perfusion by QMCE in response to GPI therapy.   Quantitative MCE is a novel method to assess myocardial perfusion; it can be performed repeatedly throughout the course of acute MI. Contrast microbubbles are excellent tracers of red blood cell kinetics. The method to quantify MBF velocity is based on rapid destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and subsequent assessment of the rate at which they are replenished into the myocardial microcirculation contained in the imaging field.

Our results using QMCE show that GPI improves microvascular flow and reduces infarct size after coronary occlusion/reperfusion. Importantly, the improvement in tissue-level perfusion in the GPI group compared with the control group was demonstrated, despite equivalent epicardial flow, as measured by Doppler. Presumably, the epicardial flow not transiting the microcirculation in the controls was accommodated by the extensive collateral channels known to be present in dogs. The QMCE measurements were further validated by microsphere and TTC data, with a good correlation between MBF derived by microspheres and b by QMCE.

Although the b parameter at 180 min of reperfusion was greater in GPI dogs than in controls, this difference did not reach statistical significance. These data are consistent with the concept that platelets play a greater role in the no-reflow phenomenon early after reperfusion rather than later. The late loss of a GPI effect on tissue perfusion seen in our study may have been caused by reperfusion injury, which is thought to occur after the microvascular obstruction stage (18). The use of other concomitant therapies, such as free radical scavengers and anti-adhesion molecules, may be necessary to protect the microcirculation from this late phenomenon. Although of lesser significance than the difference at earlier time points, the effect at 180 min may have been affected by our small sample size and may still be of clinical importance, as evidenced by the reduction in infarct size.

Infarct size and GPI.   The data from this study also demonstrated that GPI reduced infarct size. The favorable effects on infarct size observed with GPI might have been related to a more rapid restoration of MBF. The enhancement of early reflow by GPI may promote the delivery of blood to the risk area, thus reducing MI size, speeding healing, and decreasing infarct expansion. In the TIMI-14 trial, the improvement in perfusion of the infarct-related artery seen with additional administration of GPI was greater at 60 min than at 90 min of reperfusion, suggesting that GPI may accelerate the speed as well as enhance the extent of epicardial reperfusion (24). Our results suggest that the beneficial effects of GPI may be mediated not only by a faster recanalization of the culprit epicardial vessel but also by enhanced microvascular flow, resulting in a reduced size of MI.

Study limitations.   There are several limitations of this study. These results were obtained using a canine model, which has abundant natural collateral channels, and so may not apply to patients with more severely impaired multivessel coronary disease. Heparin and/or lytic therapy was not administered in this model, and hence the contribution of GPI in combination with these agents was not assessed. We did not measure platelet aggregation in our study animals; therefore, the exact degree of platelet inhibition that corresponds with the improvements in MBF and infarct size cannot be determined. However, the dose of tirofiban chosen has been shown to inhibit platelet aggregation in the dog by >80%, a level documented to be necessary for clinical benefit in both animal and human studies (9,36,37). Because we assessed infarct size at 3-h reperfusion, the ultimate infarct size may be larger, especially given the possibility of further non–platelet-mediated reperfusion injury. In addition, the infarct size by QMCE may change with variation of the duration of ischemia. Finally, these results were observed in a acute experimental setting, and no long-term data are available.

Conclusions.   Our study supports a role for platelets in early reperfusion injury and demonstrates a benefit of GPI on microvascular flow, even in the absence of overt coronary thrombosis. Furthermore, coronary recanalization strategies are focusing on new end points, with microvascular perfusion being particularly important. This study also demonstrates that QMCE can provide a direct approach to assessing changes in tissue perfusion in response to GPI therapy and, moreover, that it has the unique ability to delineate the myocardial and microvascular level at which these structural and physiologic changes occur after coronary reperfusion.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Peter DiBattiste, MD, and Jacquelynn Cook, PhD, of Merck Research Laboratories for their assistance and advice.


    Footnotes
 
Dr. DeMaria has received grants and been a sponsored speaker or occasional ad hoc consultant for Bracco Pharmaceuticals as well as virtually all other ultrasound contrast manufacturers. Both Drs. DeMaria and Ben-Yehuda have been sponsored speakers for Merck Inc., which provided a research grant for this study. Jonathan R. Lindner, MD, FACC, acted as the Guest Editor of this paper.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest. 1974;54:1496–1508[Medline]
  2. Ito H, Okamura A, Iwakura K, et al. Myocardial perfusion patterns related to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction perfusion grades after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996;93:1993–1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. van't Hof AWJ, Liem A, de Boer M-J, et al. Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiogram after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1997;350:615–619[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Anderson KM, Califf RM, Stone GW, et al. Long term mortality benefit with abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2059–2065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Neumann FJ, Blasini R, Schmitt C, et al. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after the placement of coronary artery stents in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;98:2695–2701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomized clinical trials. Lancet. 2002;359:189–198[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Masugata H, Peters B, Lafitte S, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:262–269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Galiuto L, DeMaria AN, del Balzo U, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion injury at the microvascular level: treatment by endothelin A-selective antagonist and evaluation by myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation. 2000;102:3111–3116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lynch JJ, Cook JJ, Sitko GR, et al. Nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 5. Antithrombotic effects of MK-0383. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;272:20–32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lo HM, Kloner RA, Braunwald E. Effect of intracoronary verapamil on infarct size in the ischemic, reperfused canine heart: critical importance of the timing of treatment. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:672–677[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Hammerman H, Kloner RA, Briggs LL, Braunwald E. Enhancement of salvage of reperfused myocardium by early beta-adrenergic blockade (timolol). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;14:1438–1443
  12. Poter TR, Li S, Jiang L, et al. Real-time visualization of myocardial perfusion and wall thickening in human beings with intravenous ultrasonographic contrast and accelerated intermittent harmonic imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:266–271[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S, et al. Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography. 1999;16:799–809[Medline]
  14. Lafitte S, Higashiyama A, Masugata H, et al. Contrast echocardiography can assess risk area and infarct size during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: experimental validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1546–1554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fishbein MC, Meerbaum S, Rit J, et al. Early phase myocardial infarct size quantification: validation of the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride tissue enzyme staining technique. Am Heart J. 1981;101:593–600[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Lele M, Sajid M, Wajih N, et al. Eptifibatide and 7E3, but not tirofiban, inhibit {alpha}vß3 integrin-mediated binding of smooth muscle cells to thrombospondin and prothrombin. Circulation. 2001;104:582–587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sakuma T, Leong-Poi H, Fisher NG, et al. Further insights into the no-reflow phenomenon after primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the role of microthromboemboli. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:15–21[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Roe MT, Ohman EM, Maas ACP, et al. Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:9–18[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the ‘no reflow’ phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996;93:223–228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kenner MD, Zajac EJ, Kondos GT, et al. Ability of the no-reflow phenomenon during an acute myocardial infarction to predict left ventricular dysfunction at one-month follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:861–868[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;344:1895–1903
  22. Giri S, Mitchel JF, Hirst JA, et al. Synergy between intracoronary stenting and abciximab in improving angiographic and clinical outcomes of primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:269–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Zhao X-Q, Theroux P, Snapinn SM, et al. Intracoronary thrombus and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with tirofiban in unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: angiographic results from the PRISM-PLUS trial (Platelet Receptor inhibition for Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and symptoms). Circulation. 1999;100:1609–1615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. de Lemos JA, Antman EM, Gibson CM, et al. Abciximab improves both epicardial flow and myocardial reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: observations from the TIMI 14 trial. Circulation. 2000;101:239–243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burchenal JE, et al. the ReoPro And Primary PTCA Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Investigators. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;98:734–741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gibson CM, Cohen DJ, Cohen EA, et al. Effect of eptifibatide on coronary flow reserve following coronary stent implantation (an ESPRIT substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:1293–1295[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Manciet LH, Poole DC, McDonagh PF, et al. Microvascular compression during myocardial ischemia: mechanistic basis for no-reflow phenomenon. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1541–1550
  28. Gavin JB, Thomson RW, Humphrey SM, et al. Changes in vascular morphology associated with the no-reflow phenomenon in ischemic myocardium. Virchows Arch. 1983;399:325–332[CrossRef]
  29. Mukherjee D, Moliterno DJ. Achieving tissue-level perfusion in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:39C–46C[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Mehta JL, Nichols WW, Mehta P. Neutrophils as potential participants in acute myocardial ischemia: relevance to reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:1309–1316[Abstract]
  31. The Epic Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:956–961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation. 2000;101:570–580[Free Full Text]
  33. Saitoh S, Onogi F, Aikawa K, et al. Multiple endothelial injury in epicardial coronary artery induces downstream microvascular spasm as well as remodeling partly via thromboxane A2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:308–315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Shen Y-T, Wiedmann RT, Lynch JJ, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor preserves coronary flow reserve during progressive coronary arteriostenosis in swine. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:2309–2315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hellstrom HR. The injury-spasm (ischemia-induced hemostatic vasoconstrictive) and vascular autoregulatory hypothesis of ischemic disease: resistance vessel-spasm hypothesis of ischemic disease. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:802–810[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Jordan RE, Wagner CL, Mascelli M, et al. Preclinical development of c7E3 Fab: mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment that inhibits platelet function by blockade of GP IIb/IIIa receptors with observations on the immunogenicity of c7E3 Fab in humans. Horton MA. Adhesion Receptors as Therapeutic Targets. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1996. p. 281–305
  37. Steinhubl SR, Talley JD, Braden GA, et al. Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study. Circulation. 2001;103:2572–2578[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior
Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time?
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 299 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Lerman, D. R. Holmes, J. Herrmann, and B. J. Gersh
Microcirculatory dysfunction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: cause, consequence, or both?
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2007; 28(7): 788 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
Y-J Yang, J-L Zhao, S-J You, Y-J Wu, Z-C Jing, W-X Yang, L Meng, Y-W Wang, and R-L Gao
Different effects of tirofiban and aspirin plus clopidogrel on myocardial no-reflow in a mini-swine model of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion
Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1131 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
O. Ben-Yehuda
Upstream/Downstream: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 538 - 540.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Bolognese, G. Falsini, F. Liistro, P. Angioli, K. Ducci, T. Taddei, R. Tarducci, F. Cosmi, S. Baldassarre, and A. Burali
Randomized Comparison of Upstream Tirofiban Versus Downstream High Bolus Dose Tirofiban or Abciximab on Tissue-Level Perfusion and Troponin Release in High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The EVEREST Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 522 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Herrmann
Peri-procedural myocardial injury: 2005 update
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2005; 26(23): 2493 - 2519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Sorajja, B. J. Gersh, C. Costantini, M. G. McLaughlin, P. Zimetbaum, D. A. Cox, E. Garcia, J. E. Tcheng, R. Mehran, A. J. Lansky, et al.
Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 667 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Weyman
The year in echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2005; 45(3): 448 - 455.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Hansen, A. Kumar, D. Wolf, K. Frankenbergerova, A. Filusch, M.-L. Gross, S. Mueller, H. Katus, and H. Kuecherer
Evaluation of cardioprotective effects of recombinant soluble P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-immunoglobulin in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 887 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. A. Kloner and S. H. Rezkalla
Cardiac protection during acute myocardial infarction: Where do we stand in 2004?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 276 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
T. Reffemann and R. A. Kloner
Microvascular Alterations After Temporary Coronary Artery Occlusion: The No-Reflow Phenomenon
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 163 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunichika, H.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kunichika, H.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home