cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:991-997, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00919-7
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, G.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: TREATMENT OF ACUTE INFARCTION WITH PCI

Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty

Giuseppe De Luca, MD*, Harry Suryapranata, MD, PhD*,*, Felix Zijlstra, MD, PhD, FACC*, Arnoud W. J. van't Hof, MD, PhD*, Jan C. A. Hoorntje, MD, PhD*, A. T. Marcel Gosselink, MD, PhD*, Jan-Henk Dambrink, MD, PhD*, Menko-Jan de Boer, MD, PhD, FACC* ZWOLLE Myocardial Infarction Study Group

* Department of Cardiology, ISALA Klinieken, Hospital De Weezenlanden, Zwolle, Netherlands

Manuscript received April 16, 2003; revised manuscript received May 13, 2003, accepted May 21, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Harry Suryapranata, ISALA Klinieken, Hospital De Weezenlanden, Department of Cardiology, Groot Wezeland 20, 8011 JW Zwolle, Netherlands.
h.suryapranata{at}diagram-zwolle.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and one-year mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite the prognostic implications demonstrated in patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis, the impact of time-delay on prognosis in patients undergoing primary angioplasty has yet to be established.

METHODS: Our study population consisted of 1,791 patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty from 1994 to 2001. All clinical, angiographic and follow-up data were collected. Subanalyses were conducted according to patient risk profile at presentation and preprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow.

RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (5.8%) had died at one year. Symptom-onset-to-balloon time was significantly associated with the rate of postprocedural TIMI 3 flow (p = 0.012), myocardial blush grade (p = 0.033), and one-year mortality (p = 0.02). A stronger linear association between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and one-year mortality was observed in non-low-risk patients (p = 0.006) and those with preprocedural TIMI flow 0 to 1 (p = 0.013). No relationship was found between door-to-balloon time and mortality. At multivariate analysis, a symptom-onset-to-balloon time >4 h was identified as an independent predictor of one-year mortality (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, in patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty, symptom-onset-to-balloon time, but not door-to-balloon time, is related to mortality, particularly in non–low-risk patients and in the absence of preprocedural anterograde flow. Furthermore, a symptom-onset-to-balloon time >4 h was identified as independent predictor of one-year mortality.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  LDHQ48
  enzymatic infarct size from serial measurements of lactate dehydrogenase
  MBG
  myocardial blush grade
  STEMI
  >ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  TIMI
  Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction


The improvement in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) characterized by early diagnosis and treatment of the acute event, improved management of complications, and general availability of pharmacologic and mechanical therapies has significantly reduced cardiac mortality (1–5).

Although a clear relationship between mortality and time delay from symptom-onset to treatment has been demonstrated in patients with STEMI treated by thrombolysis (6–8), the impact of time delay on prognosis in patients undergoing primary angioplasty still has not been clarified (8–11). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time on mortality in a large cohort of patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From 1994 to 2001, a total of 1,791 patients with STEMI fulfilled the criteria for entry into one of the trials (Table 1) at our institution (4,12–15). Informed consent was obtained from each patient (or from their relatives in case of patient's inability) before the angiogram. Our study was approved by the institutional review board. All patients presenting within 6 h from symptom onset, or between 6 and 24 h if they had continuous symptoms and signs of ischemia (persistent or recurrent chest pain and/or persistent elevation or re-elevation of ST-segment) were included (4). All patients received aspirin (500 mg intravenously) and heparin (10,000 IU intravenously) before the procedure. Because the benefits of IIb/IIIa inhibitors has only been proved recently (16), most of our trials have been conducted without IIb/IIIa inhibitors, with <5% of patients in the current study treated with this additional therapy. All patients were on aspirin after the procedure. Therapy after stenting has changed across the study period. Patients have been treated with additional three-month warfarin therapy before 1996, and additional one-month antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine after 1996.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Characteristics of Randomized Trials Conducted at Our Institution in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, and the Number of Patients Included From Each Trial in the Current Study

 
According to the time from symptom onset to first balloon inflation (symptom-onset-to-balloon time), patients were divided into four groups (≤2 h, between 2 and 4 h, between 4 and 6 h, and >6 h). According to the time from hospitalization to first balloon inflation (door-to-balloon time), patients were divided into four groups (≤30 min, between 31 and 60 min, between 61 to 90 min, and >90 min).

The presence of one or more Thrombolysis In Myocardial infarction (TIMI) criteria (previous myocardial infarction, anterior infarction, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, sinus tachycardia, atrial flutter or fibrillation, age >70 years, rales extending upward to cover more than one-third of the lung fields, pulmonary edema, or cardiogenic shock) was used to stratify patients into "low-risk" and "non–low-risk" patients (17).

Angiographic data analysis.   All angiograms have been reviewed by two experienced investigators who were blinded to all data apart from the coronary angiogram; TIMI flow grades and myocardial blush grade (MBG) were assessed after the angioplasty procedure, as previously described (18). Residual stenosis was visually assessed. Procedural success was defined as postprocedural TIMI 3 flow and a residual stenosis <50%.

Enzymatic infarct size.   Enzymatic infarct size was calculated, as previously described, by cumulative enzyme release (LDHQ48) from serial measurements up to 48 h after symptom onset (19).

Clinical outcome.   Records of included patients who visited our outpatient clinic were reviewed. For all other patients, information was obtained from the patient's general physician or by direct telephone interview with the patient. For patients who died during follow-up, hospital records and necropsy data were reviewed. No patient was lost to follow-up.

Statistical analysis.   Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 10.0 statistical package. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD and categorical data as percentage.

Analysis of variance was used for continuous variables. The chi-square test or the Fisher exact test (in case the expected value of the variable was <5 in at least one group) was used for categorical variables. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The difference in event rates between groups during the follow-up period was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed by use of the Cox proportional hazard method. The stepwise selection of variables and estimation of significant probabilities were computed by means of maximal likelihood ratio test. The chi-square value was calculated from the log of the ratio of maximal partial likelihood functions. The additional value of each category of variables added sequentially was evaluated on the basis of the increases in the overall likelihood statistic ratio.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time were, respectively, 214 ± 189 min and 55 ± 36 min. Demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics according to symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time are reported in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. All categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, except for previous angioplasty and previous bypass surgery (Fisher exact test). An association was found between these two parameters, with age and gender. A higher incidence of anterior infarction, Killip class >1, and larger enzymatic infarct size were observed in patients with short door-to-balloon time. Symptom-onset-to-balloon time, but not door-to-balloon time, was significantly associated with the rate of postprocedural TIMI 3 flow, procedural success, and MBG 2 to 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Demographic, Clinical, and Angiographic Characteristics According to Symptom-Onset-to-Balloon Time

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Demographic, Clinical, and Angiographic Characteristics According to Door-to-Balloon Time

 
A total of 103 patients (5.8%) had died at one-year follow-up. No difference in mortality was observed among patients treated in the first (1994 to 1997) and last four years (1998 to 2001) of the study (5.9% vs. 4.2%, respectively; p = NS). No difference in mortality was observed between patients who were transferred (n = 692) or not transferred (n = 1,099) from other hospitals (6.2% vs. 5.5%, respectively, p = NS). As depicted in Figure 1, cardiac mortality was related to symptom-onset-to-balloon time (p = 0.02), but not to door-to-balloon time (Fig. 2).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Bar graphs show the relationship between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and one-year mortality, in all patients, in low- and non–low-risk patients (upper graph), and according to preprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow (lower graph).

 


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Bar graphs show the relationship between door-to-balloon time and one-year mortality, in all patients, in low- and non–low-risk patients (upper graph), and according to preprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow (lower graph).

 
Symptom-onset-to-balloon time, door-to-balloon time, and mortality in low-risk and non–low-risk patients.   The relation between symptom-onset-to-balloon time, door-to-balloon time, and mortality was also investigated in low-risk patients and non–low-risk patients. A total of 545 low-risk patients (30.4%) and 1,246 (69.6%) non–low-risk patients were identified (with a one-year mortality of 1.1% vs. 7.8%, respectively; p < 0.0001). As depicted in Fig. 1, mortality increased linearly according to symptom-onset-to-balloon time only in patients with non-low-risk characteristics (p = 0.006). As shown by Kaplan-Meier survival curves (Fig. 3), the difference in mortality among the four groups was already observed at 30 days, and persisted until one-year follow-up. No relationship was observed between door-to-balloon time and mortality either in low-risk or non–low-risk patients (Fig. 2).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to symptom-onset-to-balloon time in both low-risk (upper graph) and non–low-risk patients (lower graph).

 
Symptom-onset-to-balloon time, door-to-balloon time, and mortality according to preprocedural TIMI flow.   To investigate the impact of preprocedural TIMI flow on the prognostic role of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time, patients were classified according to preprocedural TIMI 0 to 1 flow (1,321 patients [73.8%]) and TIMI 2 to 3 flow (470 patients [26.2%]). A linear relationship between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and one-year mortality was observed only in patients with preprocedural TIMI 0 to 1 flow, but not in patients with preprocedural TIMI 2 to 3 flow (Fig. 1). The relationship between door-to-balloon time and mortality was not affected by preprocedural TIMI flow (Fig. 2).

Multivariate predictors of one-year mortality.   As shown in Table 4, a symptom-onset-to-balloon time >4 h (p < 0.05) was an independent predictor of one-year mortality, together with Killip >1, age ≥70 years, postprocedural TIMI 0 to 2 flow, anterior MI, and multivessel disease.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Predictors of One-Year Mortality at Multivariate Analysis

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The main finding of the present study is that, among patients with STEMI undergoing mechanical reperfusion, symptom-onset-to-balloon time, but not door-to-balloon time, affects one-year mortality, particularly in high-risk patients and in the absence of preprocedural TIMI 2 to 3 flow. In this study, a symptom-onset-to-balloon time >4 h has been shown to be an independent predictor of one-year mortality.

Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in STEMI.   The aim of a successful therapeutic strategy in STEMI is to restore myocardial flow as soon as possible from symptom onset. Despite the demonstrated prognostic role of time to therapy in patients with STEMI treated by thrombolysis (6–8), there is still doubt with regard to its role in patients treated with primary angioplasty (8–11).

Brodie et al. (9) observed a better outcome among patients undergoing primary angioplasty within 2 h from symptom onset, whereas a relatively stable mortality rate was observed between 2 to 12 h. These data were confirmed by Cannon et al. (11) who, in a cohort of 27,080 patients undergoing primary angioplasty, found only door-to-balloon time, but not symptom-onset-to-balloon time, to be associated with mortality.

Consistent with these data, Zijlstra et al. (8), in a recent pooled-analysis of several randomized trials comparing primary angioplasty and thrombolysis, found a direct relationship between time from symptom onset to treatment only in patients treated by thrombolysis, but not by primary angioplasty.

A major limitation of these studies is that they did not stratify patients according to the risk of death. In fact, it seems unlikely to show a prognostic role of time delay in patients at very low-risk of death.

Another limitation of these studies is that all patients were included in the analysis, without any information on preprocedural TIMI flow. Pre-angioplasty TIMI flow may significantly limit the accuracy of time from symptom-onset-to-first-balloon inflation as a parameter of total ischemia time. In fact, in those patients, total ischemia time is shorter than that from symptom-onset-to-balloon inflation.

In contrast with previous studies, we analyzed the prognostic role of symptom-onset-to-balloon time according to patient risk profile. Using TIMI criteria (17), we identified a non–low-risk population, and we found a significant relationship between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in these patients but not in low-risk patients.

We also analyzed the impact of preprocedural flow on the prognostic role of time delay, and we found a significant relationship between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with preprocedural TIMI flow 0 to 1. No relationship was found between door-to-balloon time and mortality, even if the analysis was conducted according to the patient risk profile and preprocedural TIMI flow.

In our study, a symptom-onset-to-balloon time >4 h was, together with Killip class (20), postprocedural TIMI flow (21), age (22,23), multivessel disease (24), and anterior infarction, (24) an independent predictor of one-year mortality.

Consistent with our data, Antoniucci et al. (25) found, in a population of 1,332 patients undergoing primary angioplasty, a relationship between time-delay and mortality in high-risk patients.

Several explanations may account for our findings. As demonstrated in animal models (26–28), the duration of coronary occlusion is a main determinant of infarct size. Therefore, late reperfusion is expected to result in less myocardial salvage and, conceivably, in a higher mortality rate, in comparison with early reperfusion, even when optimal mechanical reperfusion is applied. Supporting the prognostic role of early restoration of antegrade flow in STEMI, Stone et al. (24) found preprocedural TIMI 3 flow to be an independent predictor of mortality. Furthermore, a delay in reperfusion may be associated with an older, organized intracoronary thrombus, in comparison with an early reperfusion. This may result in a higher incidence of distal embolization with a lower postprocedural TIMI 3 flow and a poor myocardial perfusion (18,29). In our study, a delayed reperfusion (>4 h) was associated with a lower rate of postprocedural TIMI 3 flow and MBG 2 to 3.

Some investigators have found a relation between door-to-balloon time and outcome in multicenter studies (10,11). However, in these settings, door-to-balloon time is probably a surrogate for quality of care. This confounding mechanism does not play a role in single center studies. The absence of any relationship between door-to-balloon time and mortality in our study is also explained by the fact that this parameter represents only a part of the total ischemia time. Furthermore, we found a higher incidence of anterior infarction, Killip class >1, and larger enzymatic infarct size in patients with a shorter door-to-balloon time (<30 min). This is a consequence of our policy. In fact, quite all patients, according to a regional project, are transferred to our hospital from other hospitals of our region, or directly from home after the in-ambulance diagnosis of a large acute infarction. Thus, we try, as previously described, to keep the door-to-balloon time as short as possible, particularly in high-risk patients (30).

Study limitations.   This is an observational study of patients enrolled in randomized trials at our Institution, thus, potentially, at lower risk in comparison with patients in the daily clinical practice. Enzymatic infarct size was not available in all patients, with a potential underestimation of the impact of an early treatment on myocardial salvage.

Despite the limited use of stenting (in 50% of patients) and abciximab (in <5%) in the present study, currently available data do not show a reduction of mortality by additional use of stenting and abciximab, even with their combination (5).

The lack of an effect of door-to-balloon time may be explained by the shorter door-to-balloon time, when compared with previous reports (11).

Clinical implications.   Although primary angioplasty has been demonstrated to be superior to thrombolytic therapy (2,3), several areas for improvement still remain. Transportation to a tertiary center with angioplasty facilities has been shown to be safe and feasible (31–33). However, the potential time delay for transportation remains a major drawback to primary angioplasty.

The results of our study suggest that, in patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, all efforts should be made to shorten the time between symptom onset and mechanical reperfusion, particularly in high-risk patients.

Conclusions.   This study shows that, in patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty, symptom-onset-to-balloon time, but not door-to-balloon time, is related to mortality, particularly in high-risk patients and in the absence of preprocedural anterograde flow. Furthermore, a symptom-onset-to-balloon time >4 h was identified as an independent predictor of one-year mortality.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 1999;100:1016–1030[Free Full Text]
  2. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study group. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:673–679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JCA, de Boer MJ, et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1413–1419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Suryapranata H, van’t Hof A, Hoorntje JCA, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:2502–2505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Stone G, Grines CL, Cox AD, et al. for the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Investigators. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:957–966
  6. Fibrinolityc Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy and suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343:311–322[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Newby LK, Rutsch WR, Califf RM, et al. Time from symptom onset to treatment and outcomes after thrombolyitc therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1646–1655[Abstract]
  8. Zijlstra F, Patel A, Jones M, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with early (<2 h), intermediate (2–4 h) and late (>4 h) presentation treated by primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:550–557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Wall TC, et al. Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1312–1319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Berger PB, Ellis SG, Holmes DR, et al. Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IIb) trial. Circulation. 1999;100:14–20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cannon GP, Gibson GM, Lambrew CT, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2000;283:2941–2947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Zijlstra F, Beukema WP, van't Hof AW, et al. Randomized comparison of primary coronary angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:908–912[Abstract]
  13. van’t Hof AW, Liem AL, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F. A randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon pumping after primary coronary angioplasty in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:659–665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Liem A, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP, et al. High dose heparin as pretreatment for primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the Heparin in Early Patency (HEAP) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:600–604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. de Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van't Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1723–1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, et al. ADMIRAL Investigators. Abciximab before Direct Angioplasty and Stenting in Myocardial Infarction Regarding Acute and Long-Term Follow-up. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction N Engl J Med. 2001;344:895–903
  17. The TIMI Study Group. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II trial: the TIMI study group. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:618–627[Abstract]
  18. van’t Hof A, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Circulation. 1998;97:2302–2306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Zijlstra F, Ernst N, de Boer MJ, et al. Influence of prehospital administration of aspirin and heparin on initial patency of the infarct-related artery in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1733–1737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A, et al. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation. Circulation. 2000;102:2031–2037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Morishima I, Sone T, Okamura K, et al. Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long-term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1202–1209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Golderberg RJ, McCormick D, Gurwitz JH, et al. Age-related trends in short- and long-term survival after myocardial infarction: a 20-year population-based perspective (1975–1995). Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1311–1317[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. DeGeare VS, Stone GW, Grines L, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention (a pooled analysis of the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials). Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:30–34[Medline]
  24. Stone GW, Cox D, Garcia E, et al. Normal flow (TIMI-3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Circulation. 2001;104:624–626[Free Full Text]
  25. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:1248–1252[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Flameng W, Lesaffre E, Vanhaecke J. Determinants of infarct size in non-human primates. Basic Res Cardiol. 1990;85:392–403[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Reimer KA, Vander Heide RS, Richard VJ. Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: effects of timing and modulating factors in experimental models. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:13G–21G[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Garcia-Dorado D, Theroux P, Elizaga J, Fernandez Aviles F, Alonso J, Solares J. Myocardial infarction in the pig heart model: infarct size and duration of coronary occlusion. Cardiovasc Res. 1987;21:537–544[Medline]
  29. Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1112–1117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ. Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Zwolle approach. Semin Interv Cardiol. 1999;4:55–58[Medline]
  31. Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Hansen CJ, et al. Effect of treatment delay on outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:1243–1247[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, et al. Comparison of Angioplasty and Prehospital Thromboysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction study group. Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study. Lancet. 2002;360:825–829[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Moon JC, Kalra PR, Coats AJ. DANAMI-2: is primary angioplasty superior to thrombolysis in acute MI when the patient has to be transferred to an invasive centre? Int J Cardiol. 2002;85:199–201[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, F. Van de Werf, J. Bax, A. Betriu, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, F. Crea, V. Falk, G. Filippatos, K. Fox, K. Huber, et al.
Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology:
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2008; 29(23): 2909 - 2945.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. S. Kim, T. Y. Wang, D. Dai, A. J. Klein, E. D. Peterson, J. S. Rumsfeld, and J. C. Messenger
Association of Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery With Door-to-Balloon Time and In-Hospital Outcomes: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1665 - 1670.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. W. Stone
Angioplasty Strategies in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Part I: Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 538 - 551.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. G. Goodman, V. Menon, C. P. Cannon, G. Steg, E. M. Ohman, and R. A. Harrington
Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 708S - 775S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
H. H. Ting, E. H. Bradley, Y. Wang, J. H. Lichtman, B. K. Nallamothu, M. D. Sullivan, B. J. Gersh, V. L. Roger, J. P. Curtis, and H. M. Krumholz
Factors Associated With Longer Time From Symptom Onset to Hospital Presentation for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Arch Intern Med, May 12, 2008; 168(9): 959 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. J. Brener, D. J. Moliterno, P. E. Aylward, A. W.J. van't Hof, W. Ruzyllo, W. W. O'Neill, C. W. Hamm, C. M. Westerhout, C. B. Granger, P. W. Armstrong, et al.
Reperfusion after primary angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: predictors of success and relationship to clinical outcomes in the APEX-AMI Angiographic Study
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2008; 29(9): 1127 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J B Jones and A Docherty
Non-invasive treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction
Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2007; 83(986): 725 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. K. Nallamothu, E. H. Bradley, and H. M. Krumholz
Time to Treatment in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
N. Engl. J. Med., October 18, 2007; 357(16): 1631 - 1638.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
W. T Roberts and A. D Timmis
Patients with cardiac chest pain should call emergency services
BMJ, September 29, 2007; 335(7621): 669 - 669.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. N. Dhruva, S. I. Abdelhadi, A. Anis, W. Gluckman, D. Hom, W. Dougan, E. Kaluski, B. Haider, and M. Klapholz
ST-Segment Analysis Using Wireless Technology in Acute Myocardial Infarction (STAT-MI) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2007; 50(6): 509 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
T. Huynh, J. O'Loughlin, L. Joseph, E. Schampaert, S. Rinfret, M. Afilalo, S. Kouz, B. Cantin, M. Nguyen, M. J. Eisenberg, et al.
Delays to reperfusion therapy in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the AMI-QUEBEC Study
Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 5, 2006; 175(12): 1527 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. S. Pinto, A. J. Kirtane, B. K. Nallamothu, S. A. Murphy, D. J. Cohen, R. J. Laham, D. E. Cutlip, E. R. Bates, P. D. Frederick, D. P. Miller, et al.
Hospital Delays in Reperfusion for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Implications When Selecting a Reperfusion Strategy
Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): 2019 - 2025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P G Steg, J-P Cambou, P Goldstein, E Durand, P Sauval, Z Kadri, D Blanchard, J-M Lablanche, P Gueret, Y Cottin, et al.
Bypassing the emergency room reduces delays and mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction: the USIC 2000 registry
Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1378 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Tarantini, R. Razzolini, and S. Iliceto
Interaction Among Risk-Time and Benefit of Primary Angioplasty
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 1062 - 1062.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P. A Ratner, R. Tzianetas, A. W Tu, J. L Johnson, M. Mackay, C. E Buller, M. Rowlands, and B. Reime
Myocardial infarction symptom recognition by the lay public: the role of gender and ethnicity.
J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2006; 60(7): 606 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Ortolani, A. Marzocchi, C. Marrozzini, T. Palmerini, F. Saia, C. Serantoni, M. Aquilina, S. Silenzi, F. Baldazzi, D. Grosseto, et al.
Clinical impact of direct referral to primary percutaneous coronary intervention following pre-hospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1550 - 1557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. L. McNamara, Y. Wang, J. Herrin, J. P. Curtis, E. H. Bradley, D. J. Magid, E. D. Peterson, M. Blaney, P. D. Frederick, H. M. Krumholz, et al.
Effect of Door-to-Balloon Time on Mortality in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2180 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Kalla, G. Christ, R. Karnik, R. Malzer, G. Norman, H. Prachar, W. Schreiber, G. Unger, H. D. Glogar, A. Kaff, et al.
Implementation of Guidelines Improves the Standard of Care: The Viennese Registry on Reperfusion Strategies in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Vienna STEMI Registry)
Circulation, May 23, 2006; 113(20): 2398 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. D. Henry, J. M. Atkins, M. S. Cunningham, G. S. Francis, W. J. Groh, R. A. Hong, K. B. Kern, D. M. Larson, E. M. Ohman, J. P. Ornato, et al.
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Recommendations on Triage of Patients to Heart Attack Centers: Is it Time for a National Policy for the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1339 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
A. D. Banks and K. Dracup
Factors Associated With Prolonged Prehospital Delay of African Americans With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2006; 15(2): 149 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. L. Garvey, B. A. MacLeod, G. Sopko, M. M. Hand, and on behalf of the National Heart Attack Alert Progr
Pre-Hospital 12-Lead Electrocardiography Programs: A Call for Implementation by Emergency Medical Services Systems Providing Advanced Life Support--National Heart Attack Alert Program (NHAAP) Coordinating Committee; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); National Institutes of Health
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 485 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. R. Brodie, C. Hansen, T. D. Stuckey, S. Richter, D. S. VerSteeg, N. Gupta, W. E. Downey, and M. Pulsipher
Door-to-Balloon Time With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Impacts Late Cardiac Mortality in High-Risk Patients and Patients Presenting Early After the Onset of Symptoms
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 289 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, C. L. Grines, T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, and C. L. Grines
The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22): 3509 - 3534.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 5: Acute Coronary Syndromes
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-55 - III-72.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Thiele, L. Engelmann, K. Elsner, M. J. Kappl, W.-H. Storch, K. Rahimi, A. Hartmann, D. Pfeiffer, G. D. Kneissl, D. Schneider, et al.
Comparison of pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus conventional care with pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1956 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
F. Beygui and G. Montalescot
The use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors into new perspectives: pre-catheterization laboratory administration