|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:954-970, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)01065-9 © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |


Key Words: ACC/AHA Guidelines echocardiography imaging
| I. General considerations and scope |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each section has been reviewed and updated in evidence tables, and where appropriate, changes have been made in recommendations. A new section on the use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is being added to update the guidelines published by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. There are extensive revisions, especially of the sections on ischemic heart disease; congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and assessment of left ventricular (LV) function; and screening and echocardiography in the critically ill. There are new tables of evidence and extensive revisions in the ischemic heart disease evidence tables.
Because of space limitations, only those sections and evidence tables with new recommendations will be printed in this summary article. Where there are minimal changes in a recommendation grouping, such as a change from Class IIa to Class I, only that change will be printed, not the entire set of recommendations. Advances for which the clinical applications are still being investigated, such as the use of myocardial contrast agents and three-dimensional echocardiography, will not be discussed.
The original recommendations of the 1997 guideline are based on a Medline search of the English literature from 1990 to May 1995. The original search yielded more than 3000 references, which the committee reviewed. For this guideline update, literature searching was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Best Evidence, and the Cochrane Library for English-language meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 1995 through September 2001. Further searching was conducted for new clinical trials on the following topics: echocardiography in adult congenital heart disease, echocardiography for evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department, and intraoperative echocardiography. The new searches yielded more than 1000 references that were reviewed by the writing committee.
This document includes recommendations for the use of echocardiography in both adult and pediatric patients. The pediatric guidelines also include recommendations for fetal echocardiography, an increasingly important field. The guidelines include recommendations for the use of echocardiography in both specific cardiovascular disorders and the evaluation of patients with frequently observed cardiovascular symptoms and signs, common presenting complaints, or findings of dyspnea, chest discomfort, and cardiac murmur. In this way, the guidelines will provide assistance to physicians regarding the use of echocardiographic techniques in the evaluation of such common clinical problems.
The recommendations concerning the use of echocardiography follow the indication classification system (eg, Class I, II, and III) used in other American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines:
Evaluation of the clinical utility of a diagnostic test such as echocardiography is far more difficult than assessment of the efficacy of a therapeutic intervention because the diagnostic test can never have the same direct impact on patient survival or recovery. Nevertheless, a series of hierarchical criteria are generally accepted as a scale by which to judge worth (13).
Hierarchical levels of echocardiography assessment.
Because there are essentially no randomized trials assessing health outcomes for diagnostic tests, the committee has not ranked the available scientific evidence in an A, B, and C fashion (as in other ACC/AHA documents) but rather has compiled the evidence in tables. The evidence tables have been extensively revised and updated. All recommendations are thus based on either this evidence from observational studies or on the expert consensus of the committee.
The definition of echocardiography used in this document incorporates Doppler analysis, M-mode echocardiography, two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and, when indicated, TEE. Intravascular ultrasound is not considered but is reviewed in the ACC/AHA Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (1) (available at http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/percutaneous/dirIndex.htm) and the Clinical Expert Consensus Document on intravascular ultrasound (2) (available at http://www.acc.org/clinical/consensus/standards/standard12.htm). Echocardiography for evaluating the patient with cardiovascular disease for noncardiac surgery is considered in the ACC/AHA Guidelines for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery (3). The techniques of three-dimensional echocardiography are still in the developmental stages and are not considered here. New techniques that are still rapidly evolving and improvements that are purely technological in echo-Doppler instrumentation, such as color Doppler imaging and digital echocardiography, are not going to be separately discussed in the clinical recommendations addressed in this document. Tissue Doppler imaging, both pulsed and color, which detects low Doppler shift frequencies of high energy generated by the contracting myocardium and consequent wall motion, are proving very useful in evaluating systolic and diastolic myocardial function. However, these technological advances will also not be separately discussed in the clinical recommendations (4,5). Echocardiographic-contrast injections designed to assess myocardial perfusion to quantify myocardium at risk and perfusion beds also were not addressed.
These guidelines address recommendations about the frequency with which an echocardiographic study is repeated. If the frequency with which studies are repeated could be decreased without adversely affecting the quality of care, the economic savings realized would likely be significant. With a noninvasive diagnostic study and no known complications, the potential for repeating the study unnecessarily exists. It is easier to state when a repeat echocardiogram is not needed then when and how often it should be repeated, because no studies in the literature address this question. How often an echocardiogram should be done depends on the individual patient and must be left to the judgment of the physician until evidence-based data addressing this issue are available.
The ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 Guideline Update for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography includes several significant changes in the recommendations and in the supporting narrative portion. In this summary, we list the updated recommendations, as well as commentary on some of the changes. All new or revised language in recommendations appears in boldface type. Only the references supporting the new recommendations are included in this article. The reader is referred to the full-text version of the guidelines posted on the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org), American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org), and American Society for Echocardiography (www.asecho.org) World Wide Web sites for a more detailed exposition of the rationale for these changes.
| Section II-B. native valvular stenosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIb
2. Dobutamine echocardiography for the evaluation of patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis and ventricular dysfunction.
| Section II-C. native valvular regurgitation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
Class III
2. Routine repetition of echocardiography in past users of anorectic drugs with normal studies or known trivial valvular abnormalities.
| Section II-F. infective endocarditis: native valves |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
6. If TTE is equivocal, TEE evaluation of staphylococcus bacteremia without a known source.
Class IIa
1. Evaluation of persistent nonstaphylococcus bacteremia without a known source.*
Class III
1. Evaluation of transient fever without evidence of bacteremia or new murmur.
*TEE may frequently provide incremental value in addition to information obtained by TTE. The role of TEE in first-line examination awaits further study.
| Section II-G. prosthetic valves |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Section IV-A. acute ischemic syndromes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recommendations for echocardiography in risk assessment, prognosis, and assessment of therapy in acute myocardial ischemic syndromes.
Class I
4. Assessment of myocardial viability when required to define potential efficacy of revascularization.*
Class IIa
2. Moved to Class I (see above).
Class IIb
1. Assessment of late prognosis (greater than or equal to 2 years after acute myocardial infarction).
*Dobutamine stress echocardiography.
| Section IV-B. chronic ischemic heart disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
2. Exercise echocardiography for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in selected patients (those for whom ECG assessment is less reliable because of digoxin use, LVH or with more than 1 mm ST depression at rest on the baseline ECG, those with pre-excitation [Wolff-Parkinson-White] syndrome, complete left bundle-branch block) with an intermediate pretest likelihood of CAD.
Class IIa
Class IIb
1. Moved to Class IIa.
*Exercise or pharmacological stress echocardiogram.
Dobutamine stress echocardiogram.
Recommendations for echocardiography in assessment of interventions in chronic ischemic heart disease. One new Class IIa recommendation has been added.
Class IIa
1. Assessment of LV function in patients with previous myocardial infarction when needed to guide possible implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with known or suspected LV dysfunction.
Tables 1 through 6 are new tables that relate to CAD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Section V-B. regional LV function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIb
1. Re-evaluation of patients with established cardiomyopathy when there is no change in clinical status but when the results might change management.
Class III
2. Routine re-evaluation in clinically stable patients in whom no change in management is contemplated and for whom the results would not change management.
| Section IX. pulmonary disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
2. Moved to Class IIa (see below).
Class IIa
1. Pulmonary emboli and suspected clots in the right atrium or ventricle or main pulmonary artery branches.*
*TEE is indicated when TTE studies are not diagnostic.
| Section XII. arrhythmias and palpitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
2. TEE or intracardiac ultrasound guidance of radiofrequency ablative procedures.
Class IIb
3. Postoperative evaluation of patients undergoing the Maze procedure to monitor atrial function.
Recommendations for echocardiography before cardioversion.
Class IIb
2. Patients with mitral valve disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who have been on long-term anticoagulation at therapeutic levels before cardioversion unless there are other reasons for anticoagulation (eg, prior embolus or known thrombus on previous TEE).*
*TEE only.
Class III
2. Patients who have been on long-term anticoagulation at therapeutic levels and who do not have mitral valve disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy before cardioversion unless there are other reasons for anticoagulation (eg, prior embolus or known thrombus on previous TEE).*
*TEE only.
| Section XIIa. screening |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
5. First-degree relatives (parents, siblings, children) of patients with unexplained dilated cardiomyopathy in whom no etiology has been identified.
Class III
2. Routine screening echocardiogram for participation in competitive sports in patients with normal cardiovascular history, ECG, and examination.
| Section XIII. echocardiography in the critically ill |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class III
1. Suspected myocardial contusion in the hemodynamically stable patient with a normal ECG who has no abnormal cardiac/thoracic physical findings and/or lacks a mechanism of injury that suggests cardiovascular contusion.
| Section XIV. two-dimensional echocardiography in the adult patient with congenital heart disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
*TEE may be necessary to image both coronary origins in adults.
| Section XV-E. acquired cardiovascular disease in the neonate |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
Class IIa
3. Presence of a syndrome associated with a high incidence of congenital heart disease for which there are no abnormal cardiac findings and no urgency of management decisions.
Class IIb
1. Moved to Class IIa (see above).
Class III
2. Acrocyanosis with normal upper- and lower-extremity pulsed oximetry oxygen saturations.
| Section XV-F. congenital cardiovascular disease in the infant, child, and adolescent |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
Deleted: Phenotypic findings of Marfan syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
Presence of a syndrome associated with high incidence of congenital heart disease when there are no abnormal cardiac findings.
"Atypical," "nonvasodepressor" syncope without other causes.
| Section XV-G. arrhythmias/conduction disturbances |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
2. Evidence of pre-excitation on ECG with symptoms.
Class IIb
3. Examination immediately after radiofrequency ablation.
| Section XV-H. acquired cardiovascular disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
Class III
1. Routine screening echocardiogram for participation in competitive sports in patients with normal cardiovascular examination.
| Section XV-I. pediatric acquired cardiopulmonary disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
| Section XV-K. transesophageal echocardiography |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
Class IIa
1. Patients with lateral tunnel Fontan palliation.
| Section XVI. intraoperative echocardiography |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For a detailed discussion of this topic, please see the full-text version of the guidelines posted on the ACC, AHA, and American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) World Wide Web sites.
Class I