Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:823-830, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00832-5
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elhendy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pellikka, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elhendy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pellikka, P. A.

CLINICAL STUDY

Prognostic significance of impairment of heart rate response to exercise

Impact of left ventricular function and myocardial ischemia

Abdou Elhendy, MD, PhD*, Douglas W. Mahoney, MSc{dagger}, Bijoy K. Khandheria, MD, FACC*, Kelli Burger, BSc{dagger} and Patricia A. Pellikka, MD, FACC*,*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{dagger} Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Manuscript received September 11, 2002; revised manuscript received May 8, 2003, accepted May 13, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Patricia A. Pellikka, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
pellikka.patricia{at}mayo.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this research was to study the association between heart rate (HR) response to exercise and the risk of death and myocardial infarction (MI) after adjustment for left ventricular (LV) function and myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Chronotropic incompetence during exercise testing is associated with increased mortality. It is unknown whether LV dysfunction or ischemia accounts for this.

METHODS: We studied 3,221 patients (age 59 ± 12 years; 1,701 men) who underwent treadmill exercise echocardiography. We considered two markers of chronotropic incompetence: 1) failure to achieve 85% of the maximal predicted HR, and 2) low (<0.8) chronotropic index. The independent association between HR response and end points was evaluated by an adjusted risk (AR) model, which included clinical parameters, ejection fraction, and the severity of ischemic wall motion abnormalities.

RESULTS: Target HR was not achieved in 495 (15%) patients. Low chronotropic index was observed in 793 (25%) patients. There were 129 deaths (41 cardiac) during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Myocardial infarction occurred in 65 patients. Low chronotropic index was associated with cardiac death (AR, 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 2.04; p = 0.002) and MI (AR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.69; p = 0.007). Failure to achieve 85% of maximal predicted HR was associated with increased mortality (AR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.22; p = 0.04) and cardiac death (AR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.17; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS: Impaired chronotropic response to exercise is associated with increased mortality and cardiac events even after adjusting for LV function and the severity of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AR
  adjusted risk
  CAD
  coronary artery disease
  CI
  confidence interval
  ECG
  electrocardiographic/electrocardiogram
  HR
  heart rate
  LV
  left ventricular
  METS
  metabolic equivalents
  MI
  myocardial infarction
  WMSI
  wall motion score index


Chronotropic incompetence during an exercise stress test has been associated with increased mortality (1–7). Many mechanisms for this association have been suggested such as advanced age, a higher prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular (LV) dilation, modulation of autonomic tone, sinus or atrioventricular node dysfunction, and ischemia (8–12). Previous studies have shown that the increased mortality associated with chronotropic incompetence is persistent after adjusting for risk factors and ST-segment changes with exercise (9). Chronotropic incompetence is associated with LV dysfunction and myocardial ischemia (9–12). Left ventricular function and myocardial ischemia have been shown to be predictive of cardiac events. Therefore, it is not known whether the increased mortality in patients with chronotropic incompetence is persistent after adjustment for the severity of these abnormalities.

Risk stratification of patients with known or suspected CAD by an exercise stress imaging test requires careful recognition of the independent prognostic significance of exercise hemodynamic parameters as well as the extent of functional abnormalities. Exercise echocardiography is a well-established technique for the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of CAD. This technique allows evaluation of resting LV function and the extent of myocardial ischemia manifested as exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities (13–16). The aim of this study was to determine whether chronotropic incompetence is predictive of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), after adjustment for the severity of LV dysfunction and the extent of myocardial ischemia with exercise echocardiography.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients.   Patients underwent a symptom-limited exercise echocardiography test, using the standard Bruce protocol at Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota, between January 1990 to December 1995. Exclusion criteria were refusal to participate in research (145 patients), poor imaging quality (257 patients), beta-blocker therapy (1,201 patients), previous revascularization (622 patients), exercise-induced arrhythmias necessitating termination of the exercise stress test (31 patients), left bundle branch block (131 patients), atrial fibrillation (5 patients), and significant valvular heart disease (125 patients). Selection criteria were met in 3,362 patients. Follow-up was available in 3,221 (96%); these patients constituted the study population. The Institutional Review Board of the Mayo Foundation approved the study.

Exercise echocardiography protocol.   Patients underwent symptom-limited treadmill exercise testing according to the Bruce protocol. Workload was expressed in metabolic equivalents (METS). Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were obtained from the parasternal and apical windows at rest and immediately after exercise. Both digitized and videotape-recorded images were used for interpretation of the studies (17). Ejection fraction at rest was measured using a previously validated modification of the method of Quinones et al. (18) or by visual estimation (19). Assessment of ejection fraction using this method has been validated in our laboratory (16). Regional wall motion was assessed semiquantitatively by an experienced echocardiographer, blinded to clinical information and unaware of the purpose of this study. Wall motion at rest and with exercise was scored 1 through 5 (1 = normal) according to a 16-segment model (20). Wall motion score index (WMSI) was determined at rest and peak exercise as the sum of the segmental scores divided by the number of visualized segments. The development of new or worsening wall motion was considered indicative of myocardial ischemia. A wall motion abnormality present at rest and unchanged with exercise was classified as "fixed." Exercise echocardiography results were defined as abnormal if there was ischemia or fixed wall motion abnormalities (21). The exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) was considered positive for ischemia if there was horizontal or down-sloping ST-segment depression of ≥1 mm at 80 ms after the J point, nondiagnostic if the baseline ST-segment was abnormal, and negative for ischemia in the absence of these criteria.

Chronotropic incompetence.   Chronotropic incompetence was assessed as failure to achieve 85% of the age-predicted heart rate (HR). The age-predicted maximum HR was determined as 220 – the patient's age. Because of the possible confounding effects of age, physical fitness, and resting HR on this method, chronotropic response was also assessed by calculating the ratio of HR reserve expended to metabolic reserve expended at peak exercise as previously described (9,10). For any given stage of exercise, the percent metabolic reserve expended is:

In an analogous fashion, the percent HR reserve expended is:

In a group of healthy adults, the ratio of percent HR reserve expended to percent metabolic reserve expended during exercise was approximately one (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 1.3). Thus, chronotropic incompetence can be defined as a percent HR reserve expended to percent metabolic reserve expended ratio of <0.8; this will be referred to as a low chronotropic index. We considered the ratio of HR reserve expended to metabolic reserve expended at peak exercise, when, by definition, the proportion of metabolic reserve expended has a value of one. Using this approach, the chronotropic index was based entirely on directly measured variables, namely resting HR, peak HR, and age (22,23) Chronotropic index <0.8 was considered indicative of chronotropic incompetence (9,10).

Follow-up and end points.   Follow-up was obtained by mailed questionnaires and scripted telephone interviews. Events were verified by contacting the patients' primary physician and reviewing medical records and death certificates. The end points considered were total mortality and hard cardiac events defined as nonfatal MI and cardiac death. Sudden unexpected death occurring without another explanation was included as cardiac death. Myocardial infarction was defined according to usual clinical, ECG, and enzymatic criteria. Coronary revascularization procedures during the follow-up period were also noted. Patients who underwent revascularization were censored at the time of revascularization for the end point of hard cardiac events. For analysis of all-cause mortality, patients were not censored if they had revascularization or MI before death.

Statistical analysis.   Continuous variables were reported as mean ± SD, and comparisons between groups were based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables are summarized as percentages, and group comparisons were based on the chi-square test. Survival free of the end point of interest was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable association of clinical and exercise echocardiographic variables with the end points were assessed in the Cox proportional hazards framework. Variables were selected in a stepwise forward selection manner with entry and retention set at a significance level of 0.05. The results of these analyses were summarized as risk ratios with corresponding 95% CI. To assess the association between exercise HR parameters and outcome, independent of other clinical and echocardiographic parameters, a two-step modeling approach was used. In the first step, clinical, exercise stress variables (excluding the HR parameters), and echocardiographic parameters were fit in a multivariate analysis model. In the next step, exercise HR parameters were added to the model to obtain adjusted risk (AR) ratios and to evaluate potential interaction effects between HR parameters with variables obtained in the first step. The proportional hazards assumptions were evaluated using previously described methods (24) and were not rejected for the variables in the final modeling step. All analyses were performed using SAS Version 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The mean age was 59 ± 12 years (range 20 to 88 years). There were 1,701 (53%) men. A total of 187 (6%) patients had previous MI. Hypertension was present in 1,203 (37%) patients, hypercholesterolemia in 1,679 (52%) patients, and 1,567 (49%) patients were smokers. Reasons for termination of the exercise stress test were fatigue in 2,001 (62%) patients, dyspnea in 884 (27%) patients, angina in 123 (4%) patients, ST-segment changes in 65 (2%) patients, and leg distress in 300 (9%) patients.

Hemodynamic response.   A total of 495 (15%) patients failed to achieve the target HR, and 793 (25%) patients had a low chronotropic index. The mean percentage of the age-predicted maximum HR that was achieved was 96 ± 11%, and the mean chronotropic index was 0.93 ± 0.23. Table 1 demonstrates clinical data in patients that did and did not reach 85% of the age-predicted HR. Hemodynamic data are presented in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Clinical Features of Patients That Did and Did Not Reach 85% of the Age-Predicted Maximum HR

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Exercise Stress Test and Echocardiographic Data of Patients That Did and Did Not Reach 85% of the Age-Predicted Maximum HR

 
Echocardiographic data.   Resting wall motion abnormalities were detected in 760 (24%) patients. Ischemia (new or worsening wall motion abnormalities with exercise) was detected in 789 (25%) patients. Of these patients, 388 (49%) had resting wall motion abnormalities as well. The exercise echocardiogram was considered abnormal (rest and/or exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities) in 1,161 (36%) patients. Echocardiographic data in patients that did and did not reach 85% of the age-predicted HR are shown in Table 2. Among patients with ischemia by exercise echocardiography, ischemic ECG changes were detected in 77 of 168 (46%) patients with chronotropic incompetence and 225 of 621 (36%) patients without chronotropic incompetence.

Association of HR response with wall motion abnormalities.   In a multivariate analysis model of clinical variables, parameters independently associated with a larger percentage of ischemic segments were age (p = 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p =0.006), prior MI (p = 0.0001), and the chronotropic index (p = 0.002). Parameters independently associated with a larger percentage of segments with abnormal wall motion at rest were age (p = 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (p =0.006), hypertension (p =0.009), prior MI (p = 0.0001), and chronotropic index (p = 0.01).

Follow-up.   A total of 129 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Deaths were from cardiac causes in 41 (32%) patients; 174 patients underwent myocardial revascularization before other events. Revascularization was more frequently performed in patients who did not achieve 85% of the age-predicted HR (13% vs. 4%, p = 0.001). Sixty-five patients had MI during follow-up. Among these patients, 21 underwent revascularization before the occurrence of MI. There were a total of 80 hard cardiac events (cardiac death or MI) without intervening revascularization.

Both total mortality and hard cardiac events occurred more frequently in patients who did not achieve 85% of the age-predicted HR. This difference was evident in the presence and absence of exercise wall motion abnormalities (Figs. 1 and 2).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier survival curves in patients who did and did not reach 85% of the target heart rate (HR), with a normal and an abnormal exercise echocardiogram. (A) Hard cardiac events. (B) All-cause mortality. MI = myocardial infarction.

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves in patients with and without chronotropic index <0.8, with a normal and an abnormal exercise echocardiogram. (A) Hard cardiac events. (B) All-cause mortality. MI = myocardial infarction.

 
Independent predictors of outcome.   In the first step of the multivariate analysis model, before consideration of chronotropic response variables, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were age (chi-square = 7.8, p = 0.005), male gender (chi-square = 11.3, p = 0.0008), workload (chi-square = 29.6, p = 0.0001), and exercise WMSI (chi-square = 20.3, p = 0.0001). Independent predictors of hard cardiac events were age (chi-square = 3.3, p = 0.07), male gender (chi-square = 2.8, p = 0.09), smoking (chi-square = 7.7, p = 0.006), history of MI (chi-square = 7.1, p = 0.008), workload (chi-square = 6.3, p = 0.01), resting ejection fraction (chi-square = 14.2, p = 0.0002), difference between exercise and rest WMSI (chi-square = 5.7, p = 0.02). When hard cardiac events were studied by type, independent predictors of cardiac death were history of MI (chi-square = 4.6, p = 0.03), workload (chi-square = 11, p = 0.0009), resting ejection fraction (chi-square = 6.4, p = 0.01), and the presence of exercise wall motion abnormalities in multivessel distribution (chi-square = 6.7, p = 0.01). Independent predictors of nonfatal MI were age (chi-square = 13, p = 0.0002), smoking (chi-square = 7, p = 0.008), history of MI (chi-square = 7, p = 0.0006), and exercise WMSI (chi-square = 7, p = 0.008).

Table 3 demonstrates the absolute risk and the AR of mortality, cardiac death, and MI associated with various measures of chronotropic incompetence. Parameters considered in the AR model for each end point were those that were independent predictors of that particular end point. This analysis represents the second step in the multivariate analysis. One or more of the parameters of the chronotropic response to exercise was incremental to clinical, exercise test, and echocardiographic parameters in the prediction of each end point of interest. We found no significant interactions between each of the parameters of chronotropic incompetence with the variables in the first step or with calcium channel blocker therapy with regard to prediction of hard cardiac events.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Association of Various Measures of Chronotropic Response to Exercise With the End Points of All-Cause Mortality, Cardiac Death, and Myocardial Infarction Before (Relative Risk) and After (Adjusted Risk) Correction for Confounding Variables

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we assessed the independent prognostic significance of impairment of HR response to exercise in 3,221 patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent a symptom-limited exercise stress echocardiogram. We considered two measures of chronotropic incompetence: inability to achieve 85% of the maximal HR predicted for age or a chronotropic index <0.8. A total of 15% of patients failed to achieve the target HR, and 25% had a low chronotropic index. Chronotropic incompetence was associated with the major risk factors of CAD and with a higher prevalence and severity of resting LV dysfunction and myocardial ischemia, demonstrated as transient wall motion abnormalities. The association between chronotropic incompetence and the severity of resting and exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities persisted after controlling for other clinical risk factors and exercise ECG parameters.

Association of chronotropic incompetence with prognosis.   During a median follow-up period of 3.2 years, there were 129 deaths, of which 41 were due to cardiac causes. Myocardial infarction occurred in 65 patients. Patients with chronotropic incompetence had a higher incidence of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and nonfatal MI. The risk of death and MI associated with chronotropic incompetence persisted after controlling for clinical characteristics, exercise tolerance, the severity of LV dysfunction at rest, and the extent of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. In a multivariate model, predictors of all-cause mortality were an older age, male gender, lower workload, and exercise WMSI. The addition of parameters of HR response to that model demonstrated that failure to achieve 85% of the predicted HR imposed a significant risk of death, additional to those identified by clinical, stress test, and echocardiographic parameters. When cardiac death was studied as a separate end point, independent predictors were age, male gender, smoking, workload, resting ejection fraction, and the presence of wall motion abnormalities in multivessel distribution. A lower chronotropic index and a low exercise HR were predictive of the occurrence of cardiac death and MI after adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic parameters.

The use of 85% of predicted HR was superior to chronotropic index as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality; chronotropic index was superior in predicting cardiac events. Therefore, these parameters should be considered to provide complementary information.

Patients with chronotropic incompetence were more frequently treated with calcium channel blockers, which might have an effect on HR response to exercise. However, the association between chronotropic incompetence and the risk of death and MI persisted after controlling for clinical parameters, including medications.

Contribution of myocardial ischemia.   Chronotropic incompetence has been associated with a higher prevalence of reversible perfusion abnormalities in patients undergoing exercise thallium-201 imaging as reported by Lauer et al. (9). In these patients, chronotropic incompetence predicted mortality independent of the association with reversible abnormalities. However, the impact of the severity of myocardial ischemia and of resting LV function was not investigated. Because patients with the most severe perfusion abnormalities are known to have the worst prognosis (25), it cannot be determined from the previous studies whether the increased risk associated with chronotropic incompetence was related to its association with the severity of myocardial ischemia.

A comprehensive risk assessment of patients undergoing stress-imaging techniques requires accurate evaluation of the extent and severity of inducible abnormalities as well as the total extent of fixed and inducible abnormalities (25). Therefore, additional risk assessment using other stress testing parameters should include variables that provide incremental prognostic information after accounting for the extent and severity of inducible abnormalities. In this study, we demonstrated that patients with chronotropic incompetence had a higher prevalence and severity of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. The difference between rest and exercise WMSI was an independent variable associated with increased cardiac event rate. However, in the multivariate analysis, chronotropic incompetence was associated with adverse outcome after adjustment for the severity of myocardial ischemia. Among patients with an abnormal exercise echocardiogram, impaired chronotropic response to exercise stratified the patients into high and low/intermediate risk groups. Therefore, the chronotropic response to exercise identifies patients in whom an abnormal exercise echocardiogram is an indicator of poor outcome.

One explanation for the association of chronotropic incompetence with adverse outcome after controlling for the presence and severity of myocardial ischemia is that some patients with CAD fail to demonstrate ischemia or have underestimation of extent of ischemia because of the low exercise HR. Low exercise HR may limit the sensitivity of the exercise echocardiogram.

Myocardial function and exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities.   The independent association between chronotropic incompetence and mortality after adjustment for resting ejection fraction has not been previously reported. Lauer et al. (10) studied 231 patients who underwent exercise echocardiography and were followed for a mean of 41 months. The composite end point of death, nonfatal MI, unstable angina, and late myocardial revascularization occurred in 41 patients. Chronotropic incompetence was predictive of an adverse cardiovascular prognosis after adjusting for the presence of myocardial ischemia. The numbers of patients and events in their study were too small to demonstrate an association with the end point of death and nonfatal MI. Additionally, the impact of the severity of resting LV dysfunction and the extent of myocardial ischemia were not studied.

Study limitations.   This study reports an intermediate-term follow-up after exercise echocardiography. Although the study demonstrated an independent association between HR response to exercise and outcome, it is not known whether this association is maintained at a longer term follow-up.

Clinical implications and conclusions.   Impaired chronotropic response to exercise is associated with an increased risk of mortality and MI among patients with known or suspected CAD. This risk is persistent after adjusting for resting ejection fraction and the severity of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Therefore, interpretation of the results of an exercise stress echocardiogram should include the evaluation of the HR response to exercise, in addition to the severity of resting and exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities, as all these parameters have independent prognostic value.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Camm AJ, Fei L. Chronotropic incompetence, part II: clinical implications. Clin Cardiol. 1996;19:503–508[Medline]

2. Lauer MS, Okin PM, Larson MG, Evans JC, Levy D. Impaired heart rate response to graded exercise: prognostic implications of chronotropic incompetence in the Framingham Heart study. Circulation. 1996;93:1520–1526[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Ellestad MH. Chronotropic incompetence: the implication of heart rate response to exercise (compensatory parasympathetic hyperactivity?). Circulation. 1996;93:1485–1487[Free Full Text]

4. Brenner SJ, Pashkow FJ, Harvey SA, et al. Chronotropic response to exercise predicts angiographic severity in patients with suspected or stable coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1228–1232[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Ellestad MH, Wan MK. Predictive implications of stress testing: follow-up of 2700 subjects after maximum treadmill stress testing. Circulation. 1975;51:363–369[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Weins RD, Lafia P, Marder CM, Evans RG, Kennedy HL. Chronotropic incompetence in clinical exercise testing. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:74–78[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Lauer MS, Pashkow FJ, Larson MG, Levy D. Association of cigarette smoking with chronotropic incompetence and prognosis in the Framingham Heart study. Circulation. 1997;96:897–903[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Camm AJ, Fei L. Chronotropic incompetence, part I: normal regulation of the heart rate. Clin Cardiol. 1996;19:424–428[Medline]

9. Lauer MS, Francis GS, Okin PM, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Marwick TH. Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality. JAMA. 1999;281:524–529[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Lauer MS, Mehta R, Pashkow FJ, Okin PM, Lee K, Marwick TH. Association of chronotropic incompetence with echocardiographic ischemia and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1280–1286[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Dresing TJ, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Marwick TH, Lauer MS. Usefulness of impaired chronotropic response to exercise as a predictor of mortality, independent of the severity of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:602–609[CrossRef][Medline]

12. Lauer MS, Larson MG, Evans JC, Levy D. Association of left ventricular dilatation and hypertrophy with chronotropic incompetence in the Framingham Heart study. Am Heart J. 1999;137:903–909[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA. 1998;280:913–920[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Pellikka PA. Stress echocardiography in the evaluation of chest pain and accuracy in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997;39:523–532[CrossRef][Medline]

15. Marcovitz PA. Prognostic issues in stress echocardiography. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997;39:533–542[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Arruda AM, Das MK, Roger VL, Klarich KW, Mahoney DW, Pellikka PA. Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in 2,632 patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1036–1041[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Attenhofer CH, Pellikka PA, Oh JK, et al. Is review of videotape necessary after review of digitized cine-loop images in stress echocardiography? A prospective study in 306 patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10:179–184[CrossRef][Medline]

18. Dujardin KS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Rossi A, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular remodeling: are left ventricular diameters suitable tools? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1534–1541[Abstract]

19. Stamm RB, Carabello BA, Mayers DL, Martin RP. Two-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: prospective analysis of what constitutes an adequate determination. Am Heart J. 1982;104:136–144[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantification of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358–367[Medline]

21. Armstrong WF, Pellikka PA, Ryan T, Crouse L, Zoghbi WA. Stress echocardiography: recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography: Stress Echocardiography Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:97–104[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Wilkoff BL, Miller RE. Exercise testing for chronotropic assessment. Cardiol Clin. 1992;10:705–717[Medline]

23. Fletcher GF, Balady G, Froelicher VF, Hartley LH, Haskell WL, Pollock ML. Exercise standards: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Writing Group. Circulation. 1995;91:580–586

24. Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–526[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:57–62[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Palatini
Exercise testing in asymptomatic subjects: from diagnostic test to prognostic tool?
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2008; 29(15): 1803 - 1806.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Ugur-Altun, A. Altun, S. Guldiken, E. Tatli, M. Kara, and A. Tugrul
Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Middle-Aged Asymptomatic Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Turkish Population
Angiology, November 1, 2007; 58(5): 535 - 542.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. F. E. Praet and L. J. C. van Loon
Optimizing the therapeutic benefits of exercise in Type 2 diabetes
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1113 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N. Anand, B. W. McCrindle, C. C. Chiu, R. M. Hamilton, J. A. Kirsh, E. A. Stephenson, and G. J. Gross
Chronotropic incompetence in young patients with late postoperative atrial flutter: a case-control study
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2006; 27(17): 2069 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P-H Huang, H-B Leu, J-W Chen, T-C Wu, T-M Lu, Y-A Ding, and S-J Lin
Comparison of endothelial vasodilator function, inflammatory markers, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with or without chronotropic incompetence to exercise test
Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(5): 609 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. De Sutter, N. Van de Veire, and I. Elegeert
Chronotropic incompetence: are the carotid arteries to blame?
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 897 - 898.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K K A Witte, J G F Cleland, and A L Clark
Chronic heart failure, chronotropic incompetence, and the effects of {beta} blockade
Heart, April 1, 2006; 92(4): 481 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. S. Lauer
Chronotropic incompetence: Ready for prime time
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 431 - 432.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elhendy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pellikka, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elhendy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pellikka, P. A.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement