|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:775-780, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00829-5 © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |



* Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada
Institut de Cardiologie de Québec, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
|| Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
¶ Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Manuscript received December 4, 2002; revised manuscript received March 4, 2003, accepted March 12, 2003.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Kwan-Leung Chan, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7.
kchan{at}ottawaheart.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Embolism is a major complication of IE, and studies in animal models have shown that platelet inhibition with aspirin can lead to more rapid vegetation resolution and a lower rate of embolic events.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin treatment (325 mg/day) for four weeks in patients with IE to test the hypothesis that the addition of aspirin would reduce the incidence of clinical systemic embolic events. Patients with perivalvular abscess were excluded. Serial cerebral computed tomograms and transesophageal echocardiograms were obtained in a subset of patients.
RESULTS: During the four-year study period, 115 patients were enrolled: 60 assigned to aspirin and 55 assigned to placebo. Embolic events occurred in 17 patients (28.3%) on aspirin and 11 patients (20.0%) on placebo, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 3.86, p = 0.29). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of bleeding in the patients taking aspirin versus placebo (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.86, p = 0.075). Development of new intracranial lesions was similar in both groups. Aspirin had no effect on vegetation resolution and valvular dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: In endocarditis patients already receiving antibiotic treatment, the addition of aspirin does not appear to reduce the risk of embolic events and is likely associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Aspirin is not indicated in the early management of patients with IE.
| ||||||||
Platelets are an integral component of the vegetation that is a hallmark of endocarditis (1214). Recent studies in animal models suggest that aspirin may lead to more rapid resolution of vegetation, thus reducing the embolic rate (14,15). A favorable effect of aspirin on clinical outcome was also suggested by a small observational study (16). The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of aspirin on the frequency of embolic events in patients who had native or prosthetic valve endocarditis but no evidence of perivalvular abscess.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were eligible to participate in the study if they fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of endocarditis, which were similar but not identical to the Duke criteria (17). The diagnosis of endocarditis required the presence of two of the following three criteria: 1) multiple positive blood cultures (at least two sets) with no known extracardiac source; 2) echocardiographic evidence of vegetation, defined as a localized, mobile mass contiguous with a valve leaflet or prosthetic valve; and 3) at least two of the following clinical findings: fever, new or changing heart murmur, pre-existing heart disease, and microvascular phenomena. Patients between 16 and 80 years of age with native valve or prosthetic valve endocarditis were eligible. Exclusion criteria included patients with isolated right-sided endocarditis, echocardiographic evidence of perivalvular abscess (defined as an abnormal echolucent mass within the perivalvular tissue), probable surgical intervention within 7 days, current use of aspirin, recent or actively evolving stroke, history of gastrointestinal bleeding or active peptic ulcer disease within the past 12 months, history of a bleeding diathesis, allergic or intolerance to aspirin, and inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
Randomization procedure. Computer-generated, stratified (i.e., native vs. prosthetic valve and study center) randomization was completed using the SAS RANNOR module (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). The randomization ratio was in a 1:1 allocation, with a small block size. Adequate allocation concealment was achieved through opaque, sealed, sequentially numbered envelopes containing participant assignment at each recruitment site.
This study was reviewed and approved by the research ethics committee of all of the participating centers, and written, informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Blinding. The treating physicians as well as investigators were blinded to patient assignment. Aspirin and placebo tablets were identical in appearance. They were manufactured and donated by Merck Frosst Canada and Company (Kirkland, Quebec). The investigators could request unblinding (if knowledge of drug assignment was believed to be important to patient management) by telephoning the coordinating center at a specified phone number that was manned 24 h/day. During the conduct of the study, there were two instances of unblinding. Both occurred in patients who developed intracranial hemorrhage and were being evaluated for surgical drainage of the hematoma.
Intervention and outcomes. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either aspirin (325 mg/day) or placebo for a total duration of four weeks to test the hypothesis that aspirin can reduce the risk of embolism in patients with endocarditis by enhancing vegetation resolution (14,15). In patients with mechanical prosthetic valves, anticoagulation therapy was continued (18). The patients were seen at least twice weekly throughout their entire hospitalization. In the setting of early discharge with home intravenous antibiotic therapy, the patients were brought back for follow-up at the completion of antibiotic therapy. At each visit, a history was taken and physical examination performed to specifically look for evidence of thromboembolic events. Predefined criteria for cerebrovascular and peripheral embolism were used (see subsequent text). In patients with a suspected neurologic event, an assessment by a neurologist was requested, and a computed tomogram of the brain was performed when clinically indicated. All patients were encouraged but not required to have a baseline cerebral computed tomogram and a follow-up study at the completion of antibiotic therapy, usually four to six weeks after the baseline study. Transthoracic echocardiograms were obtained in all patients at baseline and again at the completion of antibiotic therapy. Transesophageal echocardiographic studies were encouraged but, again, not required for participation in the study. The maximum widths, lengths, and areas of the vegetations were measured off-line (19), and the valvular regurgitation was graded from 0 (no regurgitation) to 4 (severe regurgitation) (20,21).
The primary outcome was clinical embolic events involving the brain or other organs. Clinical evidence of stroke was defined as a new neurologic deficit persisting for longer than 24 h and an absence of intracerebral hemorrhage or tumor on computed tomography. Because it is difficult to definitively differentiate an embolic stroke from a nonembolic stroke, all new strokes were considered a primary outcome event for the purpose of the study. Vascular phenomena, such as cutaneous microinfarctions, were not included. Similarly, metastatic abscesses were also not considered as embolic events. The cerebral emboli on computed tomography were defined as an infarction within the territory of a cerebral artery or multiple areas of infarction. Another important outcome was cerebral hemorrhage. A cerebral hemorrhage was diagnosed as a well-defined area of high density with irregular boundaries.
Secondary outcome events included subclinical strokes detected by cerebral computed tomography, death, major or minor bleeding, valve surgery, and echocardiographic progression of valvular involvement. Major bleeding was defined as: 1) intracranial bleeding; 2) overt bleeding resulting in a decrease in hemoglobin
20 g/l or requiring blood transfusion; and 3) bleeding into a confined space, which can cause severe morbidity, such as pericardial hematoma or paraspinal hematoma. A minor hemorrhage was defined as all other overt bleeding episodes with a drop in hemoglobin <20 g/l. Bruising or oozing at the intravenous sites alone would not be qualified as minor bleeding.
Sample size. The clinical embolic rate in the placebo group was estimated to be 26%, based on our own pilot data and other published reports (47,22). We estimated that aspirin would reduce the embolic rate by 8.58% (33% relative reduction). To observe this difference, 184 participants had to be randomized to each intervention group (type I error rate of 5% [two-sided]; type II error rate of 20%). The trial was designed and statistically powered to incorporate an interim analysis performed by a Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. In view of the low enrollment, an interim analysis was not performed. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee was informed of all major adverse events, such as cerebral hemorrhage.
Data analysis. An intention-to-treat approach was used to analyze the data. Odds ratios (ORs) and measures of precision (i.e., 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were computed on all primary and secondary outcome data (23). Statistically significant intervention differences were considered at the 5% level (two-sided). Descriptive statistics were generated for each intervention group. Differences in clinical embolic event rates and cerebral hemorrhage between the two intervention groups were assessed using contingency table analyses. A preliminary examination of each valve stratum, using the Mantel-Haenzel approach, revealed no statistical differences in any outcome (all p values >0.5). Secondary outcomes were evaluated in a similar manner, using the chi-square or Student t test, depending on the scale of measurement.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although circulating factors, such as antiphospholipid antibodies and coagulation factors, may play a role (26,27), vegetation detected by echocardiography remains the most consistent risk factor for the development of embolic events (4). Vegetation is made up of an aggregation of fibrin and platelets (1214). The effects of antiplatelet agents such as sulfinpyrazone, ticlopidine, and aspirin in experimental endocarditis are generally favorable (1215,2830). Whether some of the agents such as aspirin possess an antibacterial effect in addition to their antiplatelet actions remains controversial (2931). Taha et al. (16) reported that aspirin prevented vegetation growth and reduced the risk of cerebral emboli in a small study of nine patients. The findings of these studies were the basis for undertaking the present study, which is the first randomized, controlled trial to assess the effect of aspirin in patients with endocarditis. A recent study by Kupferwasser et al. (14) showed that aspirin reduced vegetation size and renal embolic lesions without an increase in major bleeding in a rabbit model of staphylococcal endocarditis, further underscoring the need for a prospective study in this regard. We excluded unstable patients, including those with perivalvular abscess, because they would have an increased likelihood of requiring surgical intervention (11,12), and aspirin use may exacerbate perioperative bleeding.
The embolic rate in this trial is similar to the rates found in other studies (47,24,25). No difference in embolic events was observed between patients taking aspirin and those on placebo. Similar proportions of patients in both treatment groups had serial cerebral computed tomograms, and again, no differences were found between the two treatment groups in terms of intracerebral abnormalities. We did not encounter clinical embolic events in other organ systems, such as the kidneys or spleen, although routine radiologic assessment to look for embolization in these organs was not performed.
Furthermore, we were unable to demonstrate any significant effect of aspirin on the number and size of the vegetations, although there was a significant reduction in vegetation size after antibiotic treatment for four weeks in both groups. There was also no salutary effect of aspirin on valvular dysfunction.
Patients with endocarditis are prone to the development of cerebral hemorrhage, which can have multiple mechanisms, with the majority due to septic arteritis and hemorrhagic transformation of embolic infarction rather than mycotic aneurysm (32). Anticoagulation treatment with warfarin has been reported to increase the risk of cerebral hemorrhage and is not associated with a reduction in embolic events (3235). Our findings showed that antiplatelet treatment with aspirin also likely increased the risk of major or minor bleeding. The effect of aspirin on the frequency of cerebral hemorrhage alone could not be adequately addressed because of the small number of events.
We included both native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis in this trial because patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis have a high embolic rate, despite continuation of anticoagulation (18), and the risk of excessive bleeding associated with the combined use of anticoagulants and aspirin in patients with mechanical heart valves has been reported to be quite modest (36,37). The increased risk of bleeding with aspirin was observed in patients with native and prosthetic valve endocarditis. The sample size does not allow an assessment of the differential effects of aspirin in native versus prosthetic valve endocarditis.
This study only assessed the effect of aspirin during the acute phase of endocarditis, and the long-term effect on outcomes was not determined. We believe this is appropriate, as embolic events occurred almost exclusively early in the course of the disease (5). The average duration from symptom onset to presentation was about one month, and this may explain why most of the embolic events occurred early during hospitalization (5). Whether the use of aspirin shortly after symptom onset may have different effects remains to be determined. It is plausible that aspirin may have a salutary effect if used earlier in the course of the disease. The manifestations of endocarditis are protean, and prompt diagnosis is difficult. Most patients with endocarditis are unlikely to be diagnosed and treated significantly earlier than the patients in this trial.
It may be argued that an optimal dose of aspirin may not have been used in this trial, but an optimal aspirin dose has not been established for this disease or other conditions (38). The trend for an increased risk of bleeding in our patients taking aspirin suggests that a higher dose is not advisable. A lower dose may reduce the risk of bleeding, but it is doubtful that it will have a beneficial effect on embolic events, because a lower dose would be less effective in reducing platelet fibrin aggregation (14).
Study limitations. Our study reached 31% (n = 115) of its target sample size (n = 369). It is possible that our results reflect a type II error (i.e., having insufficient statistical power to observe the hypothesized 8.58% aspirin benefit of reducing embolic events) (39). However, our results indicate that the frequency of embolic events, similar to the size we thought to be clinically meaningful, is in the opposite direction than anticipated. As such, we believe that it is very unlikely that a daily intake of 325 mg aspirin will be more effective than placebo in preventing embolism in patients with IE. These estimations also suggest that the embolic rates could be similar in both intervention groups. The lack of a salutary effect of aspirin in these patients was collaborated by the observations regarding the cerebral abnormalities on computed tomograms and vegetation resolution on serial transesophageal echocardiograms, which were similar between the treatment groups.
Conclusions. In stable patients with endocarditis without perivalvular abscess, the addition of aspirin (325 mg) to antibiotic treatment does not appear to reduce the embolic risk, but may increase the risk of bleeding. Aspirin also does not reduce the development of cerebral lesions nor enhance vegetation resolution. Thus, aspirin is not indicated in the early management of patients with IE.Appendix
| APPENDIX |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. N. Salem, P. T. O'Gara, C. Madias, and S. G. Pauker Valvular and Structural Heart Disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 593S - 629S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Sy, C. Chawantanpipat, D. R. Richmond, and L. Kritharides Thrombocytopenia and mortality in infective endocarditis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 6, 2008; 51(18): 1824 - 1825. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B D Prendergast The changing face of infective endocarditis Heart, July 1, 2006; 92(7): 879 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Baddour, W. R. Wilson, A. S. Bayer, V. G. Fowler Jr, A. F. Bolger, M. E. Levison, P. Ferrieri, M. A. Gerber, L. Y. Tani, M. H. Gewitz, et al. Infective Endocarditis: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: Endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America Circulation, June 14, 2005; 111(23): e394 - e434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Peters Infective Endocarditis Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, May 1, 2005; 21(3): 192 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Rahimtoola The year in valvular heart disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 111 - 122. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Connolly, A. Choudhury, R. C. Davis, and G. Y. H. Lip A randomized trial of aspirin on the risk of embolic events in patients with infective endocarditis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2004; 43(6): 1134 - 1135. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |