JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:401-409, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00713-7
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, G.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Kowey, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yan, G.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Kowey, P. R.

REVIEW ARTICLE

Ventricular repolarization components on the electrocardiogram

Cellular basis and clinical significance

Gan-Xin Yan, MD, PhD*,*, Ramarao S. Lankipalli, MD*, James F. Burke, MD, FACC*, Simone Musco, MD* and Peter R. Kowey, MD, FACC*

* Main Line Health Heart Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA

Manuscript received December 18, 2002; accepted April 30, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gan-Xin Yan, Main Line Health Heart Center, 100 Lancaster Avenue, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096, USA.
yanganxin{at}cs.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 J (Osborn) wave
 The ST-segment
 T-wave and QT interval
 U-wave
 Summary
 References
 
Ventricular repolarization components on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) include J (Osborn) waves, ST-segments, and T- and U-waves, which dynamically change in morphology under various pathophysiologic conditions and play an important role in the development of ventricular arrhythmias. Our primary objective in this review is to identify the ionic and cellular basis for ventricular repolarization components on the body surface ECG under normal and pathologic conditions, including a discussion of their clinical significance. A specific attempt to combine typical clinical ECG tracings with transmembrane electrical recordings is made to illustrate their logical linkage. A transmural voltage gradient during initial ventricular repolarization, which results from the presence of a prominent transient outward K+ current (Ito)-mediated action potential (AP) notch in the epicardium, but not endocardium, manifests as a J-wave on the ECG. The J-wave is associated with the early repolarization syndrome and Brugada syndrome. ST-segment elevation, as seen in Brugada syndrome and acute myocardial ischemia, cannot be fully explained by using the classic concept of an "injury current" that flows from injured to uninjured myocardium. Rather, ST-segment elevation may be largely secondary to a loss of the AP dome in the epicardium, but not endocardium. The T-wave is a symbol of transmural dispersion of repolarization. The R-on-T phenomenon (an extrasystole originating on the T-wave of a preceding ventricular beat) is probably due to transmural propagation of phase 2 re-entry or phase 2 early afterdepolarization that could potentially initiate polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AP
  action potential
  APD
  action potential duration
  EAD
  early afterdepolarization
  ICa
  L-type calcium current
  IKr
  rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium current
  IKs
  slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current
  INa
  inward sodium current
  Ito
  transient outward K+ current
  LQTS
  long QT syndrome
  TDR
  transmural dispersion of repolarization
  VF
  ventricular fibrillation
  VT
  ventricular tachycardia


The electrocardiogram (ECG) is widely used in clinical practice to detect cardiac arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, myocardial ischemia, electrolyte or metabolic disturbances, structural changes of the myocardium, and drug effects. However, the correlation between cellular events and the various components on the surface ECG is not well established, despite the fact that ECG recording has been used in clinical practice for over a century (1). The ECG waveforms are known to depend on the properties of transmembrane action potentials (APs) of atrial and ventricular myocytes, the spread of excitation, and the characteristics of the volume conductor. Among them, transmembrane AP as an electromotive generator clearly plays a central role. Therefore, the ECG recording of a normal cardiac cycle is composed of two basic processes: depolarization and repolarization. Ventricular depolarization (activation) is depicted by the QRS complex, whereas ventricular repolarization is defined by the interval from the beginning of the QRS complex to the end of the T- or U-wave. On the surface ECG, ventricular repolarization components include the J-wave, ST-segment, and T- and U-waves. Recent progress in the basic and clinical research of electrical heterogeneity across the ventricular wall has provided exciting insights into the ionic and cellular basis for ventricular repolarization components. This review attempts to summarize our state of knowledge of ventricular repolarization components and their clinical significance.


    J (Osborn) wave
 Top
 Abstract
 J (Osborn) wave
 The ST-segment
 T-wave and QT interval
 U-wave
 Summary
 References
 
The J-wave is a deflection following the QRS complex (2). Also referred to as the Osborn wave because of Osborn’s landmark description in the early 1950s (3), a prominent J-wave is often associated with hypothermia and hypercalcemia (2,4). However, a distinct J-wave on the ECG is also commonly observed in people with the early repolarization syndrome and those with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia and Brugada syndrome (5–8).

In the early 1990s, Antzelevitch et al. (9) proposed a potential difference between the epicardium and endocardium during ventricular repolarization phases 1 and 2 as the cellular basis for the J-wave. The ventricular epicardium commonly displays APs with a prominent transient outward K+ current (Ito)-mediated notch (spike and dome). The absence of a prominent AP notch in the endocardium is the consequence of a much smaller Ito. An Ito-mediated AP notch in the epicardium, but not endocardium, may produce a transmural voltage gradient during early ventricular repolarization that could manifest as a J-wave or J-point elevation on the ECG. Direct evidence in support of this hypothesis was recently obtained in an arterially perfused canine ventricular wedge preparation (4). As shown in Figure 1, the size of the J-wave is closely correlated to the Ito-mediated AP notch in the epicardium. Therefore, factors that influence Ito or its counter (inward) currents in phases 1 and 2 (e.g., hypothermia and heart rate [4,6]) could modify the size and morphology of the J-wave.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cellular basis for the J-wave. (A) A prominent J-wave in lead II was recorded from a healthy, young Asian male. (B) Simultaneous recording of transmembrane action potentials (APs) from epicardial (Epi) and endocardial (Endo) regions and a transmural electrocardiogram (ECG) in an arterially perfused canine ventricular wedge preparation. An Ito-mediated AP notch in the epicardium, but not endocardium, was associated with a J-wave. A premature stimulus (S1 – S2 = 300 ms) caused a parallel decrease in the amplitude of the epicardial AP notch and J-wave. Modified from Yan and Antzelevitch (4), with permission.

 
Although a higher incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) has long been observed in hypothermic patients with prominent J-waves (2), the importance of a prominent J-wave in arrhythmogenesis was not recognized until recently, when Brugada syndrome, a clinically malignant entity, was identified (7,8,10,11). As Brugada syndrome is also associated with ST-segment elevation, it will be discussed in detail in the following section.


    The ST-segment
 Top
 Abstract
 J (Osborn) wave
 The ST-segment
 T-wave and QT interval
 U-wave
 Summary
 References
 
The ST-segment is the portion of the ECG that lies between the end of the QRS complex and the beginning of the T-wave. Normally, the ST-segment stays at the same level as the T-P segment. Two changes in the ST-segment are considered clinically important: ST-segment displacement and a change in ST-segment morphology. ST-segment displacement, either upward (elevation) or downward (depression) of more than 1 mm from baseline, is abnormal.

Possible mechanisms responsible for ST-segment elevation.   The classic concept for ST-segment elevation is the so-called "injury current" theory, explained as current flow from the injured myocardium, where the cells are partially depolarized, to the uninjured myocardium (12). In animal experiments, however, the injury current measured by using a direct-current coupled amplifier, causes TP-(or TQ) segment depression rather than ST-segment elevation (13,14). In clinical practice, however, the ECG signals are input to an ECG recorder with a high-pass (low-cutoff) filter in order to avoid direct current drift. Under this condition, the TP depression is transformed to apparent "ST-segment elevation" (Fig. 2A). The low-frequency cutoff in the clinical ECG machines may reduce the amplitude of ST-segment elevation resulting from the injury current. More importantly, the ST-segment elevation caused by the injury current alone would theoretically not be associated with any change in the ST-segment morphology (Fig. 2A). All of these indicate that the injury current is not a sole contributor to clinically observed ST-segment elevation.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Possible mechanisms responsible for ST-segment elevation. (A) The concept of "injury current." The "injury zone" in the epicardium, with a reduction in resting membrane potential, produces an injury current during the resting phase that should result in TQ depression instead of ST-segment elevation. (B) The concept of "loss of action potential (AP) dome or plateau amplitude." A difference in the AP plateau amplitude generates a transmural voltage gradient that could manifest as ST-segment displacement.

 
It is more problematic to use the concept of injury current to explain ST-segment displacement in nonischemic or structurally normal hearts, as in the early repolarization syndrome and Brugada syndrome, conditions in which no "injured zone" is identified. Because the ST-segment corresponds temporally to the AP plateau phase, the difference in plateau potentials within the ventricles could produce true ST-segment elevation. As illustrated in Figure 2B, the depression or loss of the AP dome in the epicardium, but not endocardium, would result in a transmural voltage gradient during repolarization that could manifest as ST-segment elevation. This mechanism likely underlies ST-segment elevation in Brugada syndrome and early repolarization syndrome and perhaps also contributes importantly to that observed in acute myocardial ischemia (11,15,16).

The early repolarization syndrome.   The early repolarization syndrome is characterized by a distinct J-wave and ST-segment elevation predominantly in the left precordial leads. The early repolarization syndrome is a benign ECG phenomenon (6). ST-segment elevation in this syndrome is thought to be due to depression (partial loss) of the Ito-mediated AP dome in the left ventricular epicardium (15). This is supported by clinical observations that heart rate and autonomic tone, which influence Ito, L-type calcium current (ICa), and perhaps inward sodium current (INa), modify ST-segment elevation in the early repolarization syndrome (6). However, the exact ionic basis for this clinical entity remains unknown.

Brugada syndrome.   Brugada syndrome is associated with polymorphic VT and VF, which result in recurrent syncope and sudden cardiac death (10,17). Despite its malignant features, Brugada syndrome shares many ECG manifestations with the early repolarization syndrome. The ECG of the patient with Brugada syndrome is characterized by a normal QT interval and ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads (V1 through V3) or inferior leads (II, III, and aVF) in the absence of myocardial ischemia or defined structural heart disease (7,10,17). Although observed worldwide, it is more common in Asian males. Similar to what is seen in the early repolarization syndrome, ST-segment elevation in Brugada patients is significantly influenced by heart rate and autonomic tone, as well (7,18).

A net outward shift of currents at phases 1 and 2 of the right ventricular epicardial AP, which results in depression or loss of the AP dome, is responsible for ST-segment elevation in Brugada syndrome (11). The fate of the epicardial AP dome, under conditions of a net outward shift of currents, partial loss (depression), or complete loss, is largely dependent on the intrinsic Ito size (15). When Ito is prominent, as in the right ventricular epicardium (19–21), the outward shift of currents accentuates the Ito-mediated AP notch in the epicardium to a more negative potential, so that ICa fails to activate and the AP dome fails to develop, leading to all-or-none repolarization. All-or-none repolarization can result in marked AP abbreviation by 40% to 70% (i.e., complete loss of AP dome) (11,19). In contrast, when Ito is weaker, as in the left ventricular epicardium, the outward shift of currents may only cause dome depression, with a minimal change in AP duration (APD). ST-segment elevation due to complete loss of the epicardial AP dome is coved on the ECG, as seen in Brugada syndrome (11,22). ST-segment elevation due to AP dome depression in the epicardium, but not endocardium, is usually upward concave or saddleback-like, as observed in the early repolarization syndrome. A defect in the sodium channel due to a gene mutation in SCN5A is linked with Brugada syndrome (23). This provides the rationale for the use of sodium channel blockers, which increase an outward shift of currents at phases 1 and 2 by inhibition of INa, to unmask the concealed form of Brugada syndrome (24).

Complete loss of the epicardial AP dome may not be uniform—that is, a loss of the dome may occur at some sites but not others, due to an intrinsic difference in Ito and/or a regional difference in pathophysiologic alterations. Propagation of the AP dome from sites at which it is maintained to sites at which it is lost causes local re-excitation via phase 2 re-entry, leading to the development of a closely coupled extrasystole (Fig. 3). An increase in transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), also present under this condition, facilitates transmural propagation of the extrasystole and provides a substrate for the development of polymorphic VT and VF (Fig. 3) (11).



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The mechanism responsible for J-wave–related arrhythmogenesis. (A) Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in a patient with prominent J-waves. Reprinted from Aizawa et al. (5), with permission. (B) Polymorphic VT initiated by phase 2 re-entry in a canine right ventricular wedge in the presence of 2.5 µmol/l pinacidil. The action potentials (APs) were simultaneously recorded from two epicardial sites (Epi 1 and Epi 2) and one endocardial (Endo) site. A loss of the AP dome in Epi 1, but not in Epi 2, led to phase 2 re-entry capable of initiating polymorphic VT.

 

    T-wave and QT interval
 Top
 Abstract
 J (Osborn) wave
 The ST-segment
 T-wave and QT interval
 U-wave
 Summary
 References
 
The concordance of QRS polarity with the T-wave suggests that normal ventricular electrical recovery, in contrast to ventricular activation, is from the epicardium to endocardium (25), a process representing heterogeneous ventricular repolarization. It is now generally accepted that the ventricular myocardium is not uniform, but rather composed of at least three electrophysiologically distinct cell types: epicardial, endocardial, and M cells residing at the deep subendocardium (26,27). Epicardial, endocardial, and M cells differ primarily from each other by their repolarization properties. The hallmark of M cells is their tendency to have their APs prolonged disproportionately to the epicardium or endocardium during bradycardia or in the presence of APD-prolonging drugs. Hence, these cells are thought to play an important role in delayed ventricular repolarization, as in long QT syndrome (LQTS).

The ionic basis for the features of M cells that distinguish them from the epicardium and endocardium includes the presence of a smaller slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKs) but a larger late INa (28,29). On the other hand, rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr), the ionic target by most APD-prolonging agents, is similar in density across the ventricular wall. Therefore, the difference in the IKs:IKr ratio among three transmural cell types plays an important role in TDR (28,30). Any factors that alter the IKs:IKr ratio could result in abnormal ventricular repolarization. It has been demonstrated that the mutations of genes that encode IKs and IKr account for most forms of congenital LQTS (31).

Cellular basis for the genesis of an upright T-wave.   The temporal relationship between transmembrane APs simultaneously recorded from the canine epicardium, M region, and endocardium and the ECG T-wave was first demonstrated in an arterially perfused ventricular wedge preparation (Fig. 4). Separation of the epicardial AP from that of M cells during the plateau phase marks the beginning of the upright T-wave. Under normal conditions, the separation is so gradual that the beginning of the T-wave is difficult to determine. As shown in Figure 4, repolarization of the M cells is temporally aligned with the end of the T-wave (Tend), whereas repolarization of the epicardium is coincident with the peak of the T-wave (Tpeak). Repolarization of Purkinje fibers usually outlasts that of M cells but fails to generate a wave on the ECG in the canine heart, probably due to their small mass (32).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Cellular basis for the T-wave. (A) The electrocardiogram (ECG) tracings were recorded in patients with various serum potassium concentrations. A pathologic U-wave was seen under hypokalemia, whereas a tall and upright T-wave was associated with hyperkalemia. (B) Simultaneous recording of action potentials (APs) from epicardial (Epi) and M cells or endocardial cells (Endo), together with a transmural ECG under various extracellular potassium concentrations. Extracellular potassium primarily influenced the AP phase 3 slope (repolarization rate); hyperkalemia accelerated phase 3 repolarization, whereas hypokalemia reduced it. The alteration of AP phase 3 slopes and their interplay among different myocardial layers determined the T-wave morphologies under various extracellular potassium concentrations. A pathologic U-wave was present with hypokalemia. Reprinted from Yan et al. (32), with permission.

 
The temporal relationship between cellular electrical activities and the T-wave remains constant under wide ranges of conditions, including hypokalemia and hyperkalemia (Fig. 4). Hyperkalemia produces a steeper slope of AP phase 3, leading to an increase in the transmural voltage gradient. This gives rise to a tall and upright T-wave. The mechanism underlying a change in the T-wave under hypokalemia is more complicated. A pathologic U-wave is often observed. In contrast to hyperkalemia, the AP phase 3 slope during hypokalemia is attenuated, giving rise to small, opposing voltage gradients that cross over, producing a low-amplitude T-wave and the so-called "U" wave (Fig. 4B) (32). Under this condition, full repolarization of the epicardium marks the peak of this pathologic U-wave, whereas repolarization of both the endocardial and M cells contributes importantly to the descending limb. The apparent T-U complex is, in fact, a T-wave whose ascending limb is interrupted. The forces that give rise to the pathologic U-wave in hypokalemia are similar to those underlying the T-wave. Therefore, a pathologic U-wave is likely a second component of a bifid or notched T-wave. This clarification is important in two respects. First, the "QT" interval that most clinicians try to measure under hypokalemia encompasses the time from the beginning of the QRS to the end of the first component of the T-wave. This interval may be equal to or shorter than the QT interval under normal conditions (33). The true QT interval should therefore include the pathologic U-wave under hypokalemia. Second, the mechanisms responsible for the pathologic U-waves are likely different from those underlying a physiologic U-wave.

The Tpeak-end interval that encompasses the terminal portion of the T-wave closely represents TDR (Fig. 4). This is probably the reason why the terminal portion of the T-wave is "vulnerable," so that an electrical impulse interrupting it (i.e., the R-on-T phenomenon, as shown in Figs. 3 and 5) could potentially produce functional transmural re-entry, leading to the development of polymorphic VT and VF (34–37). The Tpeak-end interval, as an index of TDR, has been proved to be clinically useful in assessing arrhythmic risk (36,38–40).



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 The mechanism responsible for the initiation of torsade de pointes (TdP). (A) An R-on-T extrasystole initiated an episode of torsade de pointes in a patient with a prolonged QT interval who was receiving sotalol. (B) Transmembrane action potentials (APs) from the epicardium (Epi) and endocardium (Endo) were simultaneously recorded together with a transmural electrocardiogram (ECG) in an arterially perfused rabbit left ventricle. dl-sotalol, an IKr blocker, markedly prolonged the QT interval and induced phase 2 early afterdepolarization (EAD) in the endocardium. The phase 2 EADs, in turn, produced R-on-T extrasystoles capable of initiating torsade de pointes. Reprinted from Yan et al. (35), with permission.

 
Long QT syndrome.   Both the congenital and acquired forms of LQTS represent pathophysiologic states characterized by the appearance of a long QT interval on the ECG, notched T-waves, U-waves, and an atypical polymorphic VT known as torsade de pointes (31,39,41).

Genetic analysis has identified at least five forms of congenital LQTS caused by gene mutations located on chromosomes 3, 7, 11, and 21, which are responsible for defects in INa (SCN5A/LQT3), IKr (HERG/LQT2 and MiRP1/LQT6), and IKs (KVLQT1/LQT1 and MinK/LQT5) (31). The long QT syndrome can be acquired due to the use of drugs, serum electrolyte disturbances, ventricular hypertrophy, and myocardial ischemia (42,43). The mechanisms underlying drug-induced LQTS involve either the inhibition of outward currents (IKr and/or IKs) or the enhancement of the inward current (late INa). However, most agents that cause clinical torsade de pointes target IKr. Preferential APD prolongation of M cells is thought to underlie QT prolongation, the phenotypic appearance of abnormal T-waves, the pathologic U-wave, and the development of torsade de pointes (32).

It is generally accepted that a focal activity initiates the onset of torsade de pointes, whereas functional re-entry is responsible for its maintenance (32,35,44). Disproportional AP prolongation of M cells in response to APD-prolonging agents, low extracellular potassium, and bradycardia can result in a marked increase in TDR that serves as a reentrant substrate. The focal activity is derived from phase 2 early afterdepolarization (EAD) and its transmural propagation, as shown in Figure 5 (35,42).

T-wave alternans.   T-wave alternans, defined as a beat-to-beat change in T-wave morphology, amplitude, and/or polarity, usually heralds the onset of ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death in patients who have various pathophysiologic conditions (45,46). T-wave alternans is invariably associated with an alternate change in the QT and Tpeak-end intervals (42,46).

Recent studies have demonstrated that T-wave alternans is the ECG manifestation of a beat-to-beat change in TDR (42,47). In T-wave alternans associated with ventricular hypertrophy and failure, the endocardium or subendocardium displays a significantly alternate change in APD (42), a phenomenon that may be secondary to intracellular calcium alteration in the presence of a robust sarcoplasmic reticulum function (48). Phase 2 EAD may be generated from the endocardium or subendocardium during a beat with a longer APD, leading to polymorphic VT (42).


    U-wave
 Top
 Abstract
 J (Osborn) wave
 The ST-segment
 T-wave and QT interval
 U-wave
 Summary
 References
 
A physiologic U-wave in the presence of a normal serum potassium concentration is defined as a small deflection following the T-wave. Its height is generally less than one-fourth of the T-wave height. The T-U junction is usually situated at or close to the isoelectric line, but it may be deviated positively or negatively (49). On the other hand, a pathologic U-wave under hypokalemia is usually similar to or larger than the T-wave, and the T-U junction is often above or below the isoelectric line.

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the genesis of the U-wave, which represents the last repolarization component of the ventricles (49). The likely sources responsible for the physiologic U-wave include EAD of the ventricular myocardium or delayed repolarization of the Purkinje network. However, experimental data have shown that EAD generated from the endocardium or subendocardium fails to inscribe a U-wave on the ECG (35). M cells, due to their delayed repolarization properties and voluminous mass within the ventricle, were initially thought to be the cellular basis of the physiologic U-wave (9). As discussed in the previous section, M cells electrically coupled with the endocardium and epicardium play a determining role in the genesis of the T-wave and pathologic U-wave. The hypothesis that the Purkinje network is responsible for the physiologic U-wave seems most plausible, as repolarization of subendocardial Purkinje fibers is temporally aligned with the expected appearance of the U-wave on the ECG (50). However, direct experimental evidence supporting this hypothesis is still lacking.


    Summary
 Top
 Abstract
 J (Osborn) wave
 The ST-segment
 T-wave and QT interval
 U-wave
 Summary
 References
 
Inscription of the J (Osborn) wave, ST-segment displacement, and the T-wave on the ECG is the consequence of electrical heterogeneities among the ventricular epicardium, M cells, and endocardium during ventricular repolarization. The transmural voltage gradient secondary to the difference in the Ito-mediated AP notch between the epicardium and endocardium underlies the genesis of the J-wave. Moreover, exaggeration of this gradient has been linked to the development of polymorphic VT and VF in Brugada syndrome and acute myocardial ischemia. The ST-segment can deviate upward (elevation) or downward (depression) by either of the following two cellular mechanisms, or both: 1) an injury current due to a difference in resting membrane potentials between injured and uninjured myocardium; and 2) a voltage gradient generated by a difference in AP plateau amplitudes. Intrinsically different repolarization properties among the epicardium, M cells, and endocardium, as well as their interplay, are responsible for various morphologies of the T-wave and pathologic U-wave. The T-wave is a symbol of TDR. The Tpeak-end interval as an index of TDR is clinically useful in assessing arrhythmic risk in LQTS.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by the American Heart Association, the W. W. Smith Charitable Trust, the Fourjay Foundation, the Adolph and Rose Levis Foundation, and the Sharpe Foundation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 J (Osborn) wave
 The ST-segment
 T-wave and QT interval
 U-wave
 Summary
 References
 

  1. Einthoven W. Ueber die form des menschlichen electrocardiogramms. Archfd Ges Physiol. 1895;60:101–123[CrossRef]
  2. Gussak I, Bjerregaard P, Egan TM, Chaitman BR. ECG phenomenon called the J-wave: history, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. J Electrocardiol. 1995;28:49–58[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Osborn JJ. Experimental hypothermia: respiratory and blood pH changes in relation to cardiac function. Am J Physiol. 1953;175:389–398[Free Full Text]
  4. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the electrocardiographic J-wave. Circulation. 1996;93:372–379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Aizawa Y, Tamura M, Chinushi M, et al. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and bradycardia-dependent intraventricular block. Am Heart J. 1993;126:1473–1474[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Gussak I, Antzelevitch C. Early repolarization syndrome: clinical characteristics and possible cellular and ionic mechanisms. J Electrocardiol. 2000;33:299–309[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kalla H, Yan GX, Marinchak R. Ventricular fibrillation in a patient with prominent J (Osborn) waves and ST-segment elevation in the inferior electrocardiographic leads: a Brugada syndrome variant? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:95–98[Medline]
  8. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX. Cellular and ionic mechanisms responsible for the Brugada syndrome. J Electrocardiol. 2000;33(Suppl):33–39
  9. Antzelevitch C, Sicouri S, Litovsky SH, et al. Heterogeneity within the ventricular wall: electrophysiology and pharmacology of epicardial, endocardial and M cells. Circ Res. 1991;69:1427–1449[Free Full Text]
  10. Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST-segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome: a multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1391–1396[Abstract]
  11. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the Brugada syndrome and other mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis associated with ST-segment elevation. Circulation. 1999;100:1660–1666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fisch C. Electrocardiography. Braunwald E. Heart Disease. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co; 1997. p. 108–152
  13. Vincent GM, Abildskov JA, Burgess MJ. Mechanisms of ischemic ST-segment displacement: evaluation by direct current recordings. Circulation. 1977;56:559–566[Free Full Text]
  14. Kleber AG, Janse MJ, Van Capelle FJL, Durrer D. Mechanism and time course of S-T and T-Q segment changes during acute regional myocardial ischemia in the pig heart determined by extracellular and intracellular recordings. Circ Res. 1978;42:603–613[Free Full Text]
  15. Yan GX, Kowey PR. ST-segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: from the Brugada syndrome to acute myocardial ischemia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:1330–1332[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Lankipalli RS, Joshi A, Yan GX, Wu Y, Liu T, Kowey PR. Phase 2 re-entry initiates the onset of ventricular fibrillation during early acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2002;106(Suppl II):II646 (abstr)
  17. Nademanee K, Veerakul G, Nimmannit S, et al. Arrhythmogenic marker for the sudden unexplained death syndrome in Thai men. Circulation. 1997;96:2595–2600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Miyazaki T, Mitamura H, Miyoshi S, Soejima K, Aizawa Y, Ogawa S. Autonomic and antiarrhythmic drug modulation of ST-segment elevation in patients with Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1061–1070[Abstract]
  19. Di Diego JM, Sun ZQ, Antzelevitch C. Ito and action potential notch are smaller in left vs. right canine ventricular epicardium. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H548–H561
  20. Yan GX, Wu Y, Liu T, et al. Cellular basis for the early repolarization syndrome: a comparison with the Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:II18 (abstr)
  21. Di Diego JM, Cordeiro JM, Goodrow RJ, et al. Ionic and cellular basis for the predominance of the Brugada syndrome phenotype in males. Circulation. 2002;106:2004–2011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Atarashi H, Ogawa S, Harumi K, et al. the Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Investigators. Characteristics of patients with right bundle branch block and ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:581–583[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Chen Q, Kirsch GE, Zhang D, et al. Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Nature. 1998;392:293–296[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Brugada R, Brugada J, Antzelevitch C, et al. Sodium channel blockers identify risk for sudden death in patients with ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block but structurally normal hearts. Circulation. 2000;101:510–515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Burgess MJ. Relation of ventricular repolarization to electrocardiographic T-wave form and arrhythmia vulnerability. Am J Physiol. 1979;236:H391–H402
  26. Sicouri S, Antzelevitch C. A subpopulation of cells with unique electrophysiological properties in the deep subepicardium of the canine ventricle: the M cell. Circ Res. 1991;68:1729–1741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Yan GX, Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C. The characteristics and distribution of M cells in arterially-perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations. Circulation. 1998;98:1921–1927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Antzelevitch C, Shimizu M, Yan GX, et al. The M cell: its contribution to the ECG and to normal and abnormal electrical function of the heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:1124–1152[Medline]
  29. Zygmunt AC, Eddlestone GT, Thomas GP, Nesterenko VV, Antzelevitch C. Larger late sodium conductance in M cells contributes to electrical heterogeneity in canine ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;281:H689–H697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Viswanathan PC, Rudy Y. Cellular arrhythmogenic effects of congenital and acquired long-QT syndrome in the heterogeneous myocardium. Circulation. 2000;101:1192–1198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Chiang CE, Roden DM. The long QT syndromes: genetic basis and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1–12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the normal T-wave and the electrocardiographic manifestations of the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 1998;98:1928–1936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Surawicz B. Contributions of cellular electrophysiology to the understanding of the electrocardiogram. Experientia. 1987;43:1061–1068[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX, Shimizu W, Burashnikov A. Electrical hetereogeneity, the ECG, and cardiac arrhythmias. Zipes DP, Jalife J. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1999. p. 222–238
  35. Yan GX, Wu Y, Liu T, Wang J, Marinchak RA, Kowey PR. Phase 2 early afterdepolarization as a trigger of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in acquired long-QT syndrome: direct evidence from intracellular recordings in the intact left ventricular wall. Circulation. 2001;103:2851–2856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Medina-Ravell VA, Lankipalli RS, Yan GX, et al. Effect of epicardial or biventricular pacing to prolong QT interval and increase transmural dispersion of repolarization: does resynchronization therapy pose a risk for patients predisposed to long QT or torsade de pointes? Circulation. 2003;107:740–746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Yan GX, Martin J. Electrocardiographic T-wave: a symbol of transmural dispersion of repolarization in the ventricles. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14:639–40
  38. Lubinski A, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Wnuk-Wojnar AM, et al. The terminal portion of the T-wave: a new electrocardiographic marker of risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:1957–1959[Medline]
  39. Yan GX, Kowey PR, Lankipalli RS. Current concepts in the management of long QT syndrome. Expert Opin Ther Patents. 2002;12:633–643[CrossRef]
  40. Takenaka K, Ai T, Shimizu W, et al. Exercise stress test amplifies genotype-phenotype correlation in the LQT1 and LQT2 forms of the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2003;107:838–844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Schwartz PJ, Locati EH, Napolitano C, Priori SG. The long QT syndrome. Zipes DP, Jalife J. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1995. p. 788–811
  42. Yan GX, Rials SJ, Wu Y, et al. Ventricular hypertrophy amplifies transmural repolarization dispersion and induces early afterdepolarization. Am J Physiol. 2001;281:H1968–H1975
  43. Halkin A, Roth A, Lurie I, Fish R, Belhassen B, Viskin S. Pause-dependent torsade de pointes following acute myocardial infarction: a variant of the acquired long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1168–1174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. El-Sherif N, Chinushi M, Caref EB, Restivo M. Electrophysiological mechanism of the characteristic electrocardiographic morphology of torsade de pointes tachyarrhythmias in the long-QT syndrome: detailed analysis of ventricular tridimensional activation patterns. Circulation. 1997;96:4392–4399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hohnloser SH. Macroscopic T-wave alternans as a harbinger of sudden death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:625[Medline]
  46. Costantini O, Drabek C, Rosenbaum DS. Can sudden cardiac death be predicted from the T-wave of the ECG? A critical examination of T-wave alternans and QT interval dispersion. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:1407–1416[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Chinushi M, Kozhevnikov D, Caref EB, Restivo M, El-Sherif N. Mechanism of discordant T-wave alternans in the in vivo heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14:632–8
  48. Boyden PA, Ter Keurs HE. Reverse excitation-contraction coupling: Ca2+ ions as initiators of arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001;12:382–385[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Surawicz B. U-wave: facts, hypotheses, misconceptions, and misnomers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:1117–1128[Medline]
  50. Hurst JW. Naming of the waves in the ECG, with a brief account of their genesis. Circulation. 1998;98:1937–1942[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Kligfield and M. S. Lauer
Exercise Electrocardiogram Testing: Beyond the ST Segment
Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): 2070 - 2082.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. Bai, X. Y. Yang, Y. Song, L. Lin, J. G. Lu, C. K. Ching, J. Pu, R. Kam, L. F. Hsu, C. T. Zhang, et al.
Impact of left ventricular epicardial and biventricular pacing on ventricular repolarization in normal-heart individuals and patients with congestive heart failure.
Europace, November 1, 2006; 8(11): 1002 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Pollard, W. M. Smith, and R. C. Barr
Feasibility of cardiac microimpedance measurement using multisite interstitial stimulation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2402 - H2411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G.-X. Yan, A. Joshi, D. Guo, T. Hlaing, J. Martin, X. Xu, and P. R. Kowey
Phase 2 Reentry as a Trigger to Initiate Ventricular Fibrillation During Early Acute Myocardial Ischemia
Circulation, August 31, 2004; 110(9): 1036 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Gaita, C. Giustetto, F. Bianchi, R. Schimpf, M. Haissaguerre, L. Calo, R. Brugada, C. Antzelevitch, M. Borggrefe, and C. Wolpert
Short QT syndrome: pharmacological treatment
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1494 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Ako, Y. Honda, P. J. Fitzgerald, I. A. Andrianakis, E. D. Papadomichelakis, A. N. Kotanidou, T. O. Cheng, E. Fossum, K. Nils-Einar, A. Mangschau, et al.
Conditions Associated with ST-Segment Elevation
N. Engl. J. Med., March 11, 2004; 350(11): 1152 - 1155.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, G.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Kowey, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yan, G.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Kowey, P. R.


HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK