Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:278-285, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00573-4
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, M.

CLINICAL RESERCH: HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY

Myocardial velocity gradient as a noninvasively determined index of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Tomoko Kato, MD*{dagger}, Akiko Noda, PhD{ddagger}, Hideo Izawa, MD, PhD§, Takao Nishizawa, MD*, Fuji Somura, MD, PhD§, Akira Yamada, MD§, Kohzo Nagata, MD, PhD§, Mitsunori Iwase, MD, PhD, FACC{ddagger}, Akimasa Nakao, MD, PhD{dagger} and Mitsuhiro Yokota, MD, PhD, FACC*,*

* Cardiovascular Division, Department of Clinical Pathophysiology, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
{dagger} Department of Surgery II, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
§ First Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
{ddagger} Nagoya University School of Health Sciences, Nagoya, Japan

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Mitsuhiro Yokota, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan.
myokota{at}med.nagoya-u.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the utility of the peak negative myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) derived from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) for evaluation of diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is characterized by impaired diastolic function with abnormal stiffness and prolonged relaxation. However, it remains difficult to evaluate these defects noninvasively.

METHODS: Both TDI and conventional echocardiography were performed in 36 patients with HCM and in 47 control subjects. Left ventricular (LV) pressure was measured simultaneously in all HCM patients and in 26 controls.

RESULTS: The peak negative MVG occurred soon after the isovolumic relaxation period during the initial phase of rapid filling (auxotonic relaxation). It was significantly smaller in HCM patients than in control subjects (2.32 ± 0.52/s vs. 4.82 ± 1.15/s, p < 0.0001); the cutoff value for differentiation between all HCM patients and 47 normal individuals was determined as 3.2/s. Both the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) (19.6 ± 6.1 mm Hg vs. 6.5 ± 1.7 mm Hg, p < 0.0001) and the time constant of LV pressure decay during isovolumic diastole (tau) (44.0 ± 6.7 ms vs. 32.1 ± 5.5 ms, p < 0.0001) were increased in HCM patients compared with controls. The peak negative MVG was negatively correlated with both LVEDP (r = –0.75, p < 0.0001) and tau (r = –0.58, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: A reduced peak negative MVG reflects both prolonged relaxation and elevated LVEDP. The peak negative MVG might thus provide a noninvasive index of diastolic function, yielding unique information about auxotonic relaxation in patients with HCM.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  dP/dt = first derivative of left ventricular pressure
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  LV = left ventricular
  LVEDP = left ventricular end-diastolic pressure
  MVG = myocardial velocity gradient
  PAWP = pulmonary artery wedge pressure
  tau = time constant of left ventricular pressure decay
  TDI = tissue Doppler imaging
  TD = tau determined by the derivative method
  T1/2 = tau determined by the pressure half-time method


Diastolic dysfunction is an important feature of the pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which is characterized by abnormal stiffness of the left ventricle and consequent impaired ventricular filling and prolonged relaxation (1). These abnormalities result in an increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), pulmonary congestion, and dyspnea, which are the most common symptoms of HCM. However, precise indexes for assessment of diastolic function in individuals with HCM have not been established. A diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction requires evidence of abnormal left ventricular (LV) relaxation and filling, diastolic distensibility, and diastolic stiffness (2). Conventional clinical evaluation of LV relaxation involves determination of the peak negative dP/dt (first derivative of left ventricular pressure) or the time constant of left ventricular pressure decay (tau). The LV diastolic distensibility and stiffness, which lead to an increased LVEDP or pulmonary venous pressure, are evaluated by assessment of the pressure-volume curve through an invasive procedure. Although Doppler echocardiography has been widely used for noninvasive assessment of diastolic function, both the reliability and the reproducibility of this approach remain controversial given that LV filling patterns are influenced by preload (3,4).

Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) allows quantitative assessment of regional wall motion and intramural myocardial velocity by detecting successive phase shifts of the ultrasound signal reflected from the myocardium throughout the cardiac cycle (5–7). The myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) derived from TDI was introduced as an ultrasound index of myocardial function that is independent of translational motion (8,9). The MVG is defined as the difference in myocardial velocity between the endocardium and the epicardium divided by myocardial wall thickness, and therefore it reflects the dynamics of myocardial thickening and thinning (8–10).

The peak negative MVG provides an accurate estimate of LV relaxation (11–13) and, unlike conventional Doppler echocardiography, appears to be relatively insensitive to the effects of preload alterations (11,12,14). However, its clinical implications and reliability as an indicator of LV diastolic function remain to be elucidated. We therefore investigated the relation between peak negative MVG and LV diastolic performance in patients with HCM.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study group.   We studied 36 patients (34 men, 2 women) with newly diagnosed nonfamilial, nonobstructive HCM, with a mean age of 54 ± 11 years (range 35 to 72 years). The diagnosis was based on conventional echocardiographic demonstration of a nondilated, hypertrophied left ventricle without evidence of LV outflow tract obstruction and in the absence of other cardiac or systemic diseases that might lead to LV hypertrophy (15); it was confirmed by cardiac catheterization, angiography, and endomyocardial biopsy. All patients were in normal sinus rhythm and had a normal LV ejection fraction as revealed by left ventriculography. The control group consisted of 47 subjects (40 men, 7 women; mean age 39 ± 18 years; range 22 to 78 years) with normal electrocardiograms (ECG) or nonspecific ST-T changes and with normal conventional echocardiograms. We excluded patients with localized asynergy revealed by conventional two-dimensional echocardiograms or left ventriculography.

In a subset of 26 age-matched controls (24 men, 2 women; mean age 52 ± 14 years; range 26 to 78 years), cardiac catheterization was performed for evaluation of atypical chest pain or discomfort. These individuals had normal left ventriculograms and did not have valvular heart disease or a >50% narrowing of the coronary arteries as revealed by coronary angiography. Therefore, they were classified as normal subjects.

All drugs were discontinued at least four days before subject evaluation. The study was approved by the appropriate institutional review committee. Subjects were informed in detail of the purpose and methods of the study, and they provided written informed consent.

Cardiac catheterization.   Subjects received 5 mg of oral diazepam before catheterization. A 6F pigtail angiographic high-fidelity micromanometer-tipped catheter (model SPC-464D, Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas) was advanced into the left ventricle through the right brachial artery for measurement of LV pressure. The micromanometer pressure was matched to the pressure of the fluid-filled lumen. A 21-gauge catheter was placed in the left brachial artery for arterial pressure measurements. To measure pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) and cardiac output, we positioned a 7F triple-lumen thermistor Swan-Ganz catheter (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Illinois) in the pulmonary artery through the right brachial vein. A PAWP transducer (model 746, Siemens Medical Systems, Solna, Sweden) was placed at the zero reference point at the midchest level. The ECGs were recorded with the Mason Liker modification of the standard 12-lead ECG. We recorded micromanometer pressure signals and ECGs simultaneously and continuously with a multichannel recorder (MR-40, TEAC, Tokyo, Japan). All subjects underwent selective coronary angiography, left ventriculography, and endomyocardial biopsy.

Standard echocardiography and TDI.   Standard echocardiography, including measurement of transmitral flow velocity indexes, was performed with a Powervision 8000 ultrasonoscope (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan), and images were recorded on 0.5-inch videotape with VHS recorders. Septal and posterior wall thickness and LV end-diastolic and -systolic dimensions were measured, and LV fractional shortening was determined from LV M-mode recordings. Echocardiographic LV mass was calculated by the area-length method as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography (16). The LV mass index was calculated by dividing the LV mass by body surface area. Peak early and late transmitral filling velocities, the deceleration time of peak early velocity, and the isovolumic relaxation time were measured from mitral inflow velocities. On completion of the standard echocardiographic measurements, TDI was performed to obtain peak negative MVG.

Two examiners who were unaware of the clinical status of the subject performed the echocardiographic analysis. Representative recordings of the ECG, LV pressure, and dP/dt together with M-mode echocardiograms and TDI for an HCM patient are shown in Figure 1.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Examples of posterior wall myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) (top), tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) M-mode images (middle), and corresponding transmitral flow velocity patterns (bottom) with electrocardiograms (ECG), phonocardiograms (PCG), tracings of left ventricular pressure (LVP), and first derivative of left ventricular pressure for a representative patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The arrow and blue line indicate the period of peak negative MVG. The peak negative MVG for this patient was –2.12/s.

 
Data analysis.   The LV pressure signals were digitized and analyzed with software developed in our laboratory and a 32-bit microcomputer system (PC-9821-ST20, NEC, Tokyo, Japan) (17). We calculated the peak positive dP/dt as an index of contractility. To evaluate LV isovolumic relaxation, we calculated tau in two different ways. The first approach was based on the direct measurement of the pressure half-time (T1/2) as described by Mirsky (18); this parameter was computed for each acquisition as the time required for the pressure at the time of peak negative dP/dt to decrease by 50% of its value. The second approach was based on that described by Raff and Glantz (19), in which tau (TD) is determined from the negative inverse slope of the relation between LV pressure and dP/dt. Pressure data from that at peak negative dP/dt to a value 5 mm Hg greater than the previous LVEDP were used for this calculation.

Calculation of MVG in M-mode TDI.   The angle of interrogation of the M-mode beam was aligned to be perpendicular to the LV posterior wall in long-axis view. Freeze-frame images of conventional gray-scale and the corresponding color-coded velocity mapping images in a bidirectional red-and-blue mode were then downloaded to a magneto-optic disk and transferred to an IBM-compatible computer for off-line analysis of myocardial velocities and gradient by custom-made software (PowerView, Toshiba Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan), as previously described (11,14,20). Velocity ranges were adjusted to maximize the sensitivity for low-velocity values while avoiding saturation of the highest velocity during diastole. Use of M-mode TDI yielded a temporal resolution of as high as 4 ms.

With M-mode TDI, endocardial and epicardial velocities were calculated within the posterior wall. The MVG was defined as the slope of a linear regression of the myocardial velocity profile along each M-mode scan line throughout the myocardium, which reflects the dynamics of wall thickening and thinning (8,9). The MVG calculations were repeated at each time point throughout the cardiac cycle. Peak negative MVG in early diastole was subsequently determined and was averaged for three consecutive beats.

Statistical analysis.   Data are presented as means ± SD. Normality was evaluated by normal distribution plots and histograms for the variable. Characteristics and hemodynamic variables were compared between groups by the Student unpaired two-tailed t test. The relations between peak negative MVG and hemodynamic variables were analyzed with the use of the Pearson correlation coefficient. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The cutoff value of the peak negative MVG for differentiation between HCM patients and 47 normal individuals was determined with the use of a receiver-operating characteristic curve. The sensitivity [true positive/(true positive + false negative)], specificity [true negative/(true negative + false positive)], and predictive accuracy [(true positive + true negative)/total group] were determined and expressed as percentages.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Age and gender distribution did not differ between patients with HCM and the subset of controls subjected to cardiac catheterization (Table 1). Variables of noninvasive and invasive parameters were normally distributed. The peak negative MVG was significantly smaller in HCM patients than in the entire control group (2.32 ± 0.52/s vs. 4.82 ± 1.15/s, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2) or in controls subjected to catheterization (Table 1). Neither LV fractional shortening, transmitral flow indexes, the deceleration time of peak early velocity, nor the isovolumic relaxation time differed significantly between patients with HCM and controls. The cutoff value of normal peak negative MVG was 3.2/s and was used to differentiate between 47 normal individuals and HCM patients, yielding sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy values of 97.2% (35 of 36 subjects), 95.7% (45 of 47 subjects), and 96.4% (80 of 83 subjects), respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Characteristics, Hemodynamic Variables, Conventional Echocardiographic Data Including Doppler Indexes, and TDI Indexes of HCM Patients and Controls Subjected to Cardiac Catheterization

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Comparison of peak negative myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients and control subjects.

 
Simultaneous recording of LV pressure and LV dP/dt by cardiac catheterization together with the M-mode TDI revealed that the period of peak negative MVG corresponded to the initial phase of rapid filling after isovolumic relaxation (Fig. 1); that is, the peak negative MVG coincided with the process of auxotonic relaxation during LV filling with variable LV pressure. Heart rate, cardiac index, and LV peak positive dP/dt did not differ significantly between HCM patients and control subjects (Table 1). The LVEDP, PAWP, and tau (both T1/2 and TD) were significantly increased in HCM patients compared with controls.

Correlation analysis with the Pearson correlation coefficient revealed that the peak negative MVG was inversely correlated with LVEDP (r = –0.75, p < 0.0001 [Fig. 3]), PAWP (r = –0.70, p < 0.0001 [Fig. 4]), and tau (T1/2, r = –0.58, p < 0.0001 [Fig. 5]; TD, r = –0.64, p < 0.0001). Evaluation of data from HCM patients alone revealed that the peak negative MVG was also significantly correlated with LVEDP (r = –0.52, p = 0.001), PAWP (r = –0.59, p < 0.0001), and tau (T1/2, r = –0.47, p = 0.003; TD, r = –0.39, p = 0.02). None of the other echocardiographic indexes, including conventional Doppler indexes, correlated significantly with hemodynamic variables.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation between peak negative myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) for all individuals subjected to cardiac catheterization (solid line; closed and open circles represent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients and controls, respectively) and for HCM patients alone (dotted line).

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Correlation between peak negative myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) for all individuals subjected to cardiac catheterization (solid line; closed and open circles represent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients and controls, respectively) and for HCM patients alone (dotted line).

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Correlation between peak negative myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) and tau determined by the derivative method (T1/2) for all individuals subjected to cardiac catheterization (solid line; closed and open circles represent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients and controls, respectively) and for HCM patients alone (dotted line).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have shown that (1) the period of peak negative MVG corresponds to the process of auxotonic relaxation during the initial phase of rapid filling associated with variable LV pressure that follows isovolumic relaxation; (2) the peak negative MVG is inversely correlated with LVEDP, PAWP, and tau; (3) the peak negative MVG is significantly reduced in patients with HCM compared with controls; and (4) the cutoff value for normal peak negative MVG was 3.2/s. Determination of peak negative MVG by the noninvasive technique of TDI thus provides an estimate of the increase in LVEDP as well as the prolongation of tau in HCM patients.

Peak negative MVG during the cardiac cycle.   Measurements of diastolic function can be divided into those that reflect the process of active relaxation and those that reflect passive stiffness. This division is somewhat arbitrary, however, given that structures and processes affecting relaxation can also result in measurable abnormalities in stiffness (21). At the chamber level, the diastolic process results in a reduction in LV pressure at a constant volume (isovolumic relaxation), which is followed by LV filling at variable LV pressures (auxotonic relaxation). Consequently, it is essential to quantify LV performance, including both active relaxation and passive stiffness, in order to assess diastolic dysfunction accurately. We now show that the period of peak negative MVG corresponds to auxotonic relaxation, the initial phase of rapid filling with variable LV pressure. The peak negative MVG is thus a novel indicator of auxotonic relaxation and may prove useful as a predictor of diastolic dysfunction characterized by increased stiffness and prolonged active relaxation.

Although LV filling does not occur during isovolumic relaxation, the process that determines the rate of decrease in pressure during isovolumic relaxation influences ventricular filling after opening of the mitral valve (22,23). For the first 30 to 40 ms after mitral valve opening, relaxation of LV wall tension causes the LV pressure to fall (24), thereby generating a pressure gradient and resulting in rapid filling. After diastasis, atrial contraction increases the atrial pressure and propels blood into the left ventricle. Therefore, LV isovolumic relaxation influences the period of auxotonic relaxation, during which the peak negative MVG occurs; this period also influences the entire LV filling performance.

Both tau and peak negative dP/dt derived from invasive techniques are well established as important clinical and research tools for evaluation of LV relaxation abnormalities (2,19,22). The peak negative dP/dt is affected by loading conditions. Although tau is not significantly influenced by preload alterations within a physiologic range (25), it is estimated from the slope of the natural logarithm of the pressure-time relation, reflecting the descending curve of LV dP/dt, and corresponds to only the first period of the isovolumic phase. The peak negative MVG reflects the auxotonic relaxation phase, which is affected by both LV active relaxation and passive stiffness. Our findings are consistent with previous observations showing that the early velocity of the mitral annulus obtained by TDI reflects PAWP, behaves as a preload-independent index of LV relaxation, and may be used to estimate LV filling pressure (26,27).

Peak negative MVG in HCM patients.   The peak negative MVG was significantly smaller in patients with HCM than in control subjects, even though systolic performance was similar in both groups. The cutoff value of the normal peak negative MVG was 3.2/s. The LVEDP and PAWP were significantly higher and tau was significantly prolonged in HCM patients compared with controls. The LVEDP, PAWP, and tau are widely used as indexes of diastolic function (2,17,18,28) and were shown to be inversely correlated with peak negative MVG in the present study. The MVG is derived from the regression line for the transmural velocity profile rather than from the endocardial and epicardial point velocity difference (8,9). The pathologic features of HCM, which include fibrosis and disarray of the myocardium resulting in diminished ventricular compliance (1,15), impaired relaxation, and increased LVEDP and PAWP, are responsible for the deterioration in the dynamics of myocardial thickening and thinning. Hence, the reduction in peak negative MVG may provide insight into the pathogenesis of HCM.

Clinical implications.   Diastolic heart failure accounts for 30% to 50% of all cases of heart failure with preserved LV systolic function, and it has become recognized as a separate clinical entity (29–31). It has thus become important to establish precise indexes for assessment of diastolic function. Peak negative MVG has previously been suggested as an indicator of LV relaxation (11–13) that is relatively independent of changes in preload (11,12,14). However, we have shown that the peak negative MVG provides information related to LV diastolic performance, including both active relaxation and passive stiffness, and thus may prove of use as a noninvasive indicator of global LV diastolic function. Serial measurements of peak negative MVG should prove valuable in the follow-up of patients with progressive diastolic dysfunction.

Study limitations.   Both the pattern and the extent of LV hypertrophy vary greatly among patients with HCM, although abnormalities of global diastolic filling are largely independent of the extent and distribution of myocardial hypertrophy (32). It remains unclear, however, whether diastolic filling varies among different regions of the left ventricle and whether it is influenced by the thickness of the septum (33). In addition, wall motion abnormalities such as asynchrony that might result from ischemic events may influence the accuracy of the determination of peak negative MVG. For patients either with regional asynergy due to ischemic events or with asymmetric hypertrophy, the evaluation of global LV diastolic abnormalities solely from the MVG of the posterior wall will provide insufficient information. Development of angle-independent, two-dimensional TDI that would allow both examination of all segments of the LV wall and comparison of regional diastolic function is awaited in the near future.

We required a sufficient number of control subjects to determine the cutoff value of peak negative MVG for differentiation between HCM patients and normal individuals with a receiver operating characteristic curve. Given that it was not ethically justified to perform invasive measurements with healthy subjects, in addition to the 26 controls who underwent cardiac catheterization, we included 21 control subjects who did not undergo this procedure in the determination of the cutoff value.

Mitral annular velocity correlates with left atrial pressure and mean PAWP, and this can be used to estimate LV filling pressure (26,27). Also, LVEDP can be evaluated from the relation of mitral A-wave duration to pulmonary vein A-wave duration (34,35). Further studies are required to compare the reliability of estimation of LVEDP or PAWP from peak negative MVG and from other noninvasive indexes, not only in patients with HCM but also more generally in individuals with diastolic dysfunction.

Conclusions.   Our results suggest that the peak negative MVG is an indicator of global LV diastolic function, reflecting the process of auxotonic relaxation, and provides information about both passive stiffness and active relaxation. It should therefore prove to be a useful index in the follow-up of patients with progressive diastolic dysfunction secondary to HCM.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Shoji Yasui for his cooperation, collection, and assembly of data.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Braunwald E. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy—continued progress. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:800–802[Medline]

2. European Study Group on Diastolic Heart Failure. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure? Eur Heart J. 1998;19:990–1003[Free Full Text]

3. Kitzman DW, Sheikh KH, Beere PA, Philips JL, Higginbotham MB. Age-related alterations of Doppler left ventricular filling indexes in normal subjects are independent of left ventricular mass, heart rate, contractility and loading conditions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1243–1250[Abstract]

4. Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ. Evaluation of diastolic filling of left ventricle in health and disease: Doppler echocardiography is the clinician’s Rosetta Stone. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:8–18[Abstract]

5. Miyatake K, Yamagishi M, Tanaka N, et al. New method for evaluating left ventricular wall motion by color-coded tissue Doppler imaging: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:717–724[Abstract]

6. Gorcsan J 3rd, Strum DP, Mandarino WA, Gulati VK, Pinsky MR. Quantitative assessment of alterations in regional left ventricular contractility with color-coded tissue Doppler echocardiography. Comparison with sonomicrometry and pressure-volume relations. Circulation. 1997;95:2423–2433[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Gorcsan J 3rd, Gulati VK, Mandarino WA, Katz WE. Color-coded measures of myocardial velocity throughout the cardiac cycle by tissue Doppler imaging to quantify regional left ventricular function. Am Heart J. 1996;131:1203–1213[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Fleming AD, Xia X, McDicken WN, Sutherland GR, Fenn L. Myocardial velocity gradients detected by Doppler imaging. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:679–688[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Uematsu M, Miyatake K, Tanaka N, et al. Myocardial velocity gradient as a new indicator of regional left ventricular contraction: detection by a two-dimensional tissue Doppler imaging technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:217–223[Abstract]

10. Uematsu M, Miyatake K. Myocardial velocity gradient assessed by a tissue Doppler imaging technique. Echocardiography. 1999;16:465–472[Medline]

11. Nagueh SF, Kopelen HA, Lim DS, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging consistently detects myocardial contraction and relaxation abnormalities, irrespective of cardiac hypertrophy, in a transgenic rabbit model of human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2000;102:1346–1350[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Oki T, Mishiro Y, Yamada H, et al. Detection of left ventricular regional relaxation abnormalities and asynchrony in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with the use of tissue Doppler imaging. Am Heart J. 2000;139:497–502[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Garcia MJ, Thomas JD, Klein AL. New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:865–875[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Shimizu Y, Uematsu M, Shimizu H, Nakamura K, Yamagishi M, Miyatake K. Peak negative myocardial velocity gradient in early diastole as a noninvasive indicator of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison with transmitral flow velocity indices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1418–1425[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Maron BJ, Epstein SE. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a discussion of nomenclature. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:1242–1244[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiogram. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358–367[Medline]

17. Izawa H, Yokota M, Takeichi Y, et al. Adrenergic control of the force-frequency and relaxation-frequency relations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1997;96:2959–2968[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Mirsky I. Assessment of diastolic function: suggested methods and future considerations. Circulation. 1984;69:836–841[Free Full Text]

19. Raff GL, Glantz SA. Volume loading slows left ventricular isovolumic relaxation rate; evidence of load-dependent relaxation in the intact dog heart. Circ Res. 1981;48:813–824[Free Full Text]

20. Derumeaux G, Ovize M, Loufoua J, Pontier G, Andre-Fouet X, Cribier A. Assessment of nonuniformity of transmural myocardial velocities by color-coded tissue Doppler imaging: characterization of normal, ischemic, and stunned myocardium. Circulation. 2000;101:1390–1395[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Zile MR, Brutsaert DL. New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: part I: diagnosis, prognosis, and measurements of diastolic function. Circulation. 2002;105:1387–1393[Free Full Text]

22. Yellin EL, Nikolic S, Frater RWM. Left ventricular filling dynamics and diastolic function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1990;30:247–271

23. Little WC. Enhanced load dependence of relaxation in heart failure: clinical implications. Circulation. 1992;85:2326–2328[Free Full Text]

24. Cheng CP, Freeman GL, Santamore WP, Constantinescu MS, Little WC. Effect of loading conditions, contractile state, and heart rate on early diastolic left ventricular filling in conscious dogs. Circ Res. 1990;66:814–823[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Varma SK, Owen RM, Smucker ML, Feldman MD. Is {tau} a preload independent measure of isovolumic relaxation? Circulation. 1989;80:1757–1765[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA, Quinones MA. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1527–1533[Abstract]

27. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000;102:1788–1794[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Takeichi T, Yokota M, Iwase M, et al. Biphasic changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during dynamic exercise in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:335–343[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Evans JC, Reiss CK, Levy D. Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1948–1955[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Cowie MR, Wood DA, Coats AJ, et al. Incidence and aetiology of heart failure: a population-based study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:421–428[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Senni M, Tribouilloy CM, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. Congestive heart failure in the community: a study of all incident cases in Olmstead County, Minnesota, in 1991. Circulation. 1998;98:2282–2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Spirito P, Maron BJ. Relation between extent of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:808–813[Abstract]

33. Losi MA, Betocchi S, Grimaldi M, Spampinato N, Chiariello M. Heterogeneity of left ventricular filling dynamics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:987–990[CrossRef][Medline]

34. Paraskevaidis IA, Tsiapras DP, Karavolias GK, Cokkinos P, Kremastinos DT. Doppler-derived left ventricular end-diastolic pressure prediction model using the combined analysis of mitral and pulmonary A waves in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular systolic function. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:720–724[CrossRef][Medline]

35. Brunazzi MC, Chirillo F, Pasqualini M, et al. Estimation of left ventricular diastolic pressures from precordial pulsed-Doppler analysis of pulmonary venous and mitral flow. Am Heart J. 1994;128:293–300[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
S. F. Nagueh, C. P. Appleton, T. C. Gillebert, P. N. Marino, J. K. Oh, O. A. Smiseth, A. D. Waggoner, F. A. Flachskampf, P. A. Pellikka, and A. Evangelisa
Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 165 - 193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. B. Geske, P. Sorajja, R. A. Nishimura, and S. R. Ommen
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Correlation With Direct Left Atrial Pressure Measurement at Cardiac Catheterization
Circulation, December 4, 2007; 116(23): 2702 - 2708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Ganame, L. Mertens, B. W. Eidem, P. Claus, J. D'hooge, L. M. Havemann, C. J. McMahon, M. A. A. Elayda, W. K. Vaughn, J. A. Towbin, et al.
Regional myocardial deformation in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: morphological and clinical correlations
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2007; 28(23): 2886 - 2894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Wang, D. S. Khoury, V. Thohan, G. Torre-Amione, and S. F. Nagueh
Global Diastolic Strain Rate for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Relaxation and Filling Pressures
Circulation, March 20, 2007; 115(11): 1376 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Nagata, K. Obata, J. Xu, S. Ichihara, A. Noda, H. Kimata, T. Kato, H. Izawa, T. Murohara, and M. Yokota
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy and Failure in Low-Aldosterone Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, April 1, 2006; 47(4): 656 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. S. Kato, A. Noda, H. Izawa, A. Yamada, K. Obata, K. Nagata, M. Iwase, T. Murohara, and M. Yokota
Discrimination of Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy From Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy on the Basis of Strain Rate Imaging by Tissue Doppler Ultrasonography
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): 3808 - 3814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. S. Maurer, D. Spevack, D. Burkhoff, and I. Kronzon
Diastolic dysfunction: Can it be diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1543 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Uematsu
Assessment of diastolic function using myocardial velocity gradient
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1724 - 1725.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, M.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement