Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:1071-1077, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00088-3
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biondi-Zoccai, G. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Biasucci, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biondi-Zoccai, G. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Biasucci, L. M.

REVIEW ARTICLE

Atherothrombosis, inflammation, and diabetes

Giuseppe G. L. Biondi-Zoccai, MD*, Antonio Abbate, MD*, Giovanna Liuzzo, MD* and Luigi M. Biasucci, MD, FACC*,*

* Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

Manuscript received August 15, 2002; revised manuscript received October 31, 2002, accepted November 19, 2002.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Luigi M. Biasucci, Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
lmbiasucci{at}virgilio.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Diabetes...
 Inflammatory markers,diabetes...
 References
 
Diabetes represents a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in developed countries, and atherothrombosis accounts for most deaths among diabetics. Recent evidence has reliably shown the relevant etiopathogenetic role of inflammation in atherothrombotic disease. This review summarizes and discusses the possible synergistic effects of diabetes and inflammation in promoting atherothrombosis and its complications, as well as potential avenues for diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic benefits in the modulation of inflammatory mechanisms in diabetic atherothrombotic disease.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AGEP = advanced glycation end products
  CRP = C-reactive protein
  HDL = high-density lipoprotein
  ICAM-1 = intercellular adhesion molecule-1
  I-kappa-B = NF-kappa-B–inhibiting protein
  IL = interleukin
  LDL = low-density lipoprotein
  NF-kappa-B = nuclear factor-kappa-B
  NO = nitric oxide
  PAI-1 = plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
  PPAR = peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
  TNF-alpha = tumor necrosis factor-alpha
  VCAM-1 = vascular cell adhesion molecule-1


Diabetes mellitus has been recognized as an independent major cardiovascular risk factor since the publication of the first large-scale epidemiologic investigations in the 1970s (1). There are over 100 million people worldwide with diabetes (5% to 8% of overall population), and this number is likely to increase significantly in the near future. According to data from clinical studies, most diabetics die of cardiovascular disease, and atherothrombosis accounts for about 8 of 10 of all diabetic deaths (2). Diabetes mellitus, in the absence of previous cardiovascular disease, may confer a risk of adverse cardiovascular events similar to that faced by nondiabetic individuals who have already had a previous myocardial infarction, thus representing a "coronary risk equivalent" and, therefore, diabetic patients should join secondary prevention programs, regardless of their cardiovascular history (3,4). Moreover, diabetic patients, constituting about 15% to 20% of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, are at considerably increased risk of excess morbidity and mortality, as compared with nondiabetic patients, as diabetics’ risk of adverse events is twice that of nondiabetics, even in the most recent experimental or observational clinical studies.

Diabetes and related metabolic diseases, such as hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and central obesity, are recognized as major contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, recent and compelling evidence has shown the significant and independent role of systemic and coronary inflammation in the initiation, progression, and precipitation of atherothrombosis superimposed on traditional risk factors (5). Given the increasing prevalence of diabetes and dysmetabolic syndrome, the diffuse atherosclerotic burden of diabetics, the possible synergistic effect of diabetes and inflammation in atherosclerosis, as well as the potential for a preventive and therapeutic benefit in the modulation of inflammation in diabetics, this review covers the basic epidemiologic and pathophysiologic aspects underlying these two disease processes (Fig. 1).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the initiation of subclinical atherosclerosis and progression to atherosclerotic clinical events in diabetic patients include infection, inflammation, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and thrombosis. AGE = advanced glycation end products; CRP = C-reactive protein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HTN = hypertension; IL-6 = interleukin-6; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; PAI-1 = plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; SAA = serum amyloid A protein; TF = tissue factor; TG = triglycerides; tPA = tissue-type plasminogen activator.

 

    Diabetes mellitus,atherothrombosis, and inflammation
 Top
 Abstract
 Diabetes...
 Inflammatory markers,diabetes...
 References
 
The pathophysiologic process of atherosclerosis has been schematically summarized in several steps, each of them characterized by significant involvement of humoral and cellular inflammatory elements (5). Pathologic, angiographic, and other in vivo studies have shown that diabetes favors diffuse and accelerated progression of atherosclerosis (6). Diabetic plaques are also more commonly complicated and at greater risk of subsequent complications. Moreover, diabetics who die suddenly show an increased number of fissured atherosclerotic plaques, as compared with nondiabetics (7). In fact, the results of angioscopic examination show that diabetic patients with unstable angina have a higher incidence of plaque ulceration and intracoronary thrombus formation than nondiabetic patients, and diabetic plaques usually have a greater lipid core burden and a richer inflammatory component and are more commonly complicated by overlying thrombosis (8).

Genetic abnormalities.   Several genetic abnormalities in glycemic metabolism have been associated with the development of diabetes, diabetic complications, or aspects of the dysmetabolic syndrome. All of these derangements could be also involved in atherogenesis. Transcription factors, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and -gamma, are now being intensively studied. Whereas PPAR-alpha primarily stimulates the beta-oxidative degradation of fatty acids, PPAR-gamma promotes lipid storage by regulating adipocyte differentiation. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha is the molecular target of lipid-lowering drugs such as fibrates, and PPAR-gamma interacts with insulin-sensitizer drugs such as thiazolidinediones, and they may significantly modulate atherogenicity and inflammation. In particular, mutations in the PPAR-gamma gene have recently been shown to be associated with diabetes, glucose intolerance, and hypertension (9).

The role of transcription factors in homeostasis and disease is quite complex and still unclear, owing to the heterogenicity, cell specificity, and pleiotropy of their effects. However, substantial evidence has shown that PPARs often interact intracellularly with another transcription factor, nuclear factor-kappa-B (NF-kappa-B), whose activities are mainly proinflammatory and proliferative. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha–deficient mice show a prolonged systemic acute-phase response and a local innate and immune inflammatory reaction to common noxious stimuli, whereas PPAR-alpha activation appears to decrease vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expression by activated endothelial cells, thereby switching off the proatherogenic-activated endothelium (10). Moreover, PPAR-alpha selectively downregulates human aortic smooth muscle cell secreting and proliferating activities (11). In particular, ligands of this transcription factor inhibit interleukin (IL)-1–induced production of IL-6 and prostaglandin and expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in endothelial cells. In hyperlipidemic patients, fenofibrate-dependent PPAR-alpha activation decreases levels of IL-6, fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein (CRP) (11). On the other hand, thiazolidinedione-activated PPARs inhibit both the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells. In endothelial cells, the PPAR agonist troglitazone markedly attenuates tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)–induced expression of VCAM-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), whereas apolipoprotein E-deficient mice treated with troglitazone show reduced monocyte/macrophage homing to atherosclerotic plaques (12). Finally, the combined activation of PPAR-alpha and -gamma appears to decrease CRP-mediated production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by human endothelial cells, an effect similar to that achieved by simvastatin. Moreover, type 2 diabetic patients treated with troglitazone have increased levels of NF-kappa-B–inhibiting protein (I-kappa-B) and reduced NF-kappa-B activity, as well as systemic levels of reactive oxygen species, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and CRP (13). Accordingly, the human promoter polymorphism 174 G/C of the IL-6 gene has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension (14).

Dyslipidemic abnormalities.   Diabetics usually show decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Diabetes is most often associated with smaller, denser LDL that is more susceptible to oxidation and thus has greater atherogenicity (5). Even if diabetic patients with good glycemic control may have LDL levels similar to or slightly lower than those of nondiabetic individuals, fasting and postprandial levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, especially very-low-density lipoprotein, are higher and those of HDL are lower than those of nondiabetics (15). In addition, glycation of LDL and other lipoproteins is quite common in diabetes, thus making the lipoproteins of diabetic patients more susceptible to oxidation and more atherogenic. Finally, several clinical studies have shown the benefit of lipid-lowering strategies in diabetics, even in cases of modestly increased or normal cholesterol levels, and these benefits are often greater than those found in nondiabetic patients (16).

Oxidative stress.   Diabetics have decreased antioxidant activity and increased oxidative burden (17), and hyperglycemia increases the production of reactive oxygen species. These may shift the oxidant-antioxidant balance toward nonenzymatic oxidation of lipoproteins, thus contributing to atherogenic processes. It has also been hypothesized that reactive carbonyl groups may overwhelm the antioxidant mechanism of diabetic patients, leaving them unprotected to common oxidative stressors such as smoking.

Advanced glycation end products (AGEP).   Diabetic hyperglycemia characteristically leads to nonenzymatic glycation of common macromolecules, as usually assessed through hemoglobin A1c (18). Nonenzymatic macromolecular glycation leads to the production of biomacromolecular aggregates known as AGEP. Glycated molecules as well as AGEP have been implicated in LDL modification, accumulation, and inflammatory activation. Oxidation of AGEP seems to play an important and perhaps primary role in initiating and amplifying lipid oxidation, thus contributing to the atherogenic profile of diabetics (19). Macromolecular glycated complexes increase arterial intimal noncellular growth and may involve proteins, nucleic acids, and lipid structures. The formation of complex and less degradable macromolecular aggregates and the impairment of scavenger cells cause quantitative imbalances in lipid levels and abnormal vascular clearance of proatherosclerotic lipids (20). Specific receptors for AGEP have been described, and their modulation has shown antiatherosclerotic effects in mice, whereas in normal rabbits, AGEP induces endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression and promotes atheroma formation (21).

Prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic abnormalities.   Diabetes has several prothrombotic effects possibly involved in the initiation of atherosclerotic plaque, its progression, and complication. Diabetic rats show increased platelet adhesiveness and aggregability after common platelet-activating stimuli, such as adenosine and collagen (22). Platelet dysfunction is probably due in part to increased catabolism of arachidonic acid and increased production of thromboxanes. Diabetes is also associated with increased levels of fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, factor VII, factor VIII, platelet factor 4, and PAI-1 levels. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha dysfunction or decreased activity seems to play a role in hyperfibrinogenemia (11), and fibrates may determine a reduction in fibrinogen levels through PPAR-alpha activation. Diabetic and hyperinsulinemic patients typically exhibit increased production of PAI-1 from visceral abdominal adipocytes. Finally, it is likely that elevated levels of tissue factor and PAI-1 and reduced levels of tissue-type plasminogen activator are associated with increased IL-6 production from adipocytes (according to the hypothesis of obesity as an inflammatory disease).

Dysmetabolic syndrome.   The concept of dysmetabolic syndrome (metabolic syndrome X or insulin resistance syndrome) stands at the crossroads of hyperglycemia, overt type 2 diabetes mellitus, inflammation, and atherosclerosis (Fig. 2) (23). It is defined as a condition characterized at least in part by one or more of the following: glucose intolerance, relative hyperinsulinemia, peripheral insulin resistance, visceral or abdominal obesity, increased serum triglyceride concentrations, hyperuricemia, microalbuminuria, hypertension, and endothelial dysfunction. All of these entities have in common the same final effect of hyperinsulinemia, low-grade inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction. However, diabetes and the dysmetabolic syndrome seem to have both an independent detrimental effect on cardiovascular outcomes, as shown by studies that adjusted for insulin levels, diabetic status, and glycemic control (24). Hyperinsulinemia is also an independent and significant risk factor for coronary heart disease development in apparently healthy subjects. The overwhelming prevalence of this syndrome has prompted the proposal of the so-called "thrifty gene hypothesis," according to which in relatively early times, the ability to store fat may have conferred survival advantage, thus enriching ethnic groups of genes facilitating fat storage without negative feedback control (25). Several pathophysiologic mechanisms have been proposed, including abnormalities in leptin gene expression, decreased activity of PPAR-alpha, and primary inflammatory or infective processes. Nonetheless, the concept of the dysmetabolic syndrome has re-emphasized the metabolic and inflammatory role of adipocytes. In fact, among the several cellular elements involved in vascular inflammation, adipocytes merit great interest, as dysfunction in lipid metabolism is characteristic of diabetes, and as adipocytes have recently been shown able to produce IL-6 and TNF-alpha (26).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Reciprocal interplay between inflammation and diabetes mellitus in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis, with emphasis on both the role of inflammation in the development of overt diabetes mellitus and the proinflammatory action of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. Potential or established modulating agents are shown by dashed arrows. ACEi = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB = angiotensin receptor blockers; PPAR = peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor.

 
Role of inflammation in development of diabetes mellitus.   Although it is plausible to accept diabetes as a trigger for vascular inflammation, the converse is also true, as substantial evidence has shown that low-grade inflammation is an important pathogenetic determinant of type 2 diabetes. In the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study, increased CRP levels significantly predicted the risk of later developing type 2 diabetes, and this risk was independent of body mass index, fasting triglyceride or glucose levels, or statin use (27). Moreover, a high white blood cell count was an independent predictor of a worsening insulin action and the development of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians (28), as well as in U.S. adult women (29). Increased levels of other markers of inflammation, such as sialic and orosomucoid acid, are also associated with the later occurrence of diabetes (30).

More recently, an abundance of clinical evidence has confirmed the pathogenetic role of inflammation in the onset of diabetes, showing that anti-inflammatory agents, such as statins (31), PPAR agonists (32), and other drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (33), may prevent or delay the onset of diabetes in high-risk subjects. Trials are currently underway to further validate this exciting hypothesis.

Role of nitric oxide (NO) in inflammation.   Nitric oxide has several pleiotropic functions in the vascular milieu, beyond its well-known vasodilating capabilities. In vitro, NO selectively inhibits IL-1–induced VCAM-1 expression on endothelial cells. This inhibition is paralleled by reduced monocyte adhesion to endothelial monolayers. Nitric oxide also decreases the endothelial expression of other leukocyte adhesion molecules (E-selectin and, to a lesser extent, ICAM-1) and secretable cytokines (IL-6 and -8). Molecular assays indicate that NO represses VCAM-1 gene transcription, in part by inhibiting NF-kappa-B (34). The expression of macrophage colony-stimulating factor in endothelial cells, an important regulating factor of macrophage-derived foam cells in atherosclerotic lesions, as induced by oxidized LDL or TNF-alpha, is significantly downregulated by NO through inhibition of NF-kappa-B (35). The precise mechanisms of NO-mediated NF-kappa-B inhibition are probably the induction and stabilization of I-kappa-B-alpha.

Role of cytokines and infectious agents.   Experimental observations have demonstrated the central mechanistic relevance of several cytokines and chemokines networks in atherosclerotic processes (5). In this regard, diabetes, insulin resistance, and glucose intolerance all seem to have important modulating effects, with global proatherosclerotic activity. At least partly as a consequence of hyperglycemia and imbalances in insulin homeostasis, diabetes commonly induces abnormalities in the expression and activity of various cytokines and vasoactive peptides, such as TNF-alpha, IL-6, angiotensin II, and endothelin-1 (36). Serum levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, and several adhesion molecules are significant predictors of future cardiovascular events in healthy subjects as well as diabetics, and in diabetic patients, increased VCAM-1 levels are independently associated with cardiovascular mortality (37). Interleukin-1 and TNF-alpha are produced by inflammatory cells in the atherosclerotic plaque and induce the release of IL-6 from several cell types, including smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, circulating IL-6 stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, activation of which is associated with central obesity, hypertension, and insulin resistance (38). Thus, it is intriguing that overweight and obese individuals have increased serum levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and leptin. Actually, it has been recently shown that IL-6 levels decrease in obese women after significant weight loss (39).

Hyperglycemic patients demonstrate a significant production of AGEP, which are specifically recognized by inflammatory cells in atherosclerotic plaque, and induce the release of inflammatory cytokines. These mediators stimulate endothelial and smooth muscle proliferation, endothelial activation, and collagen overproduction, thus contributing to plaque growth and progression. C-reactive protein, a nonspecific marker of inflammation that also has a direct inflammatory activity in atherosclerosis, has been associated for a decade with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease as well as in healthy subjects (40,41). Interestingly, levels of CRP are higher in diabetics than in nondiabetics. Although elevated CRP levels in diabetics may depend on adipocyte activation or dysfunction, an additional hypothesis is that elevation of CRP might be associated with a low-grade inflammatory response driven by invading pathogens, as infections are very common in diabetics (42). The role of infectious agents in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis might indeed be greater in diabetics than in nondiabetics, given the increased pathogen burden and decreased defense mechanisms of the former. Among the putative organisms, possible culprits include Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus (43). Diabetes may affect several steps of the host-infectious organism interaction. Poor glycemic control may lead to excessive AGEP production, vascular inflammation, and increased endothelial permeability, thus permitting bacterial or viral infiltration and infection of fatty streaks and, later, atheromatous plaques. Moreover, micro-organisms may contain molecules capable of eliciting host dysimmune responses through molecular mimicry (44). This may occur more often in an individual with greater global inflammatory burden and reactivity, as well as inflammatory dysfunction, such as in a diabetic.

Individuals infected with multiple pathogens such as herpes viruses, cytomegalovirus, Helicobacter pylori, and hepatitis A virus have higher CRP levels and the greatest relative risk of coronary artery disease. Thus, pathogens might contribute to the atherosclerotic process by promoting inflammatory responses, whereas infection may promote vessel wall injury initiated by oxidized lipids, smoking-derived oxidants, hypertensive shear, glycooxidized molecules, or a combination of these factors.

Among the putative cytokines involved in atherosclerosis, IL-6 appears to link local and systemic inflammation and the hepatic acute-phase response, acting as a messenger molecule, causing rises in CRP, serum amyloid A protein, and fibrinogen, as well as a decrease in albumin. Notwithstanding the role of inflammation in diabetic atherosclerosis, there is a strong and suggestive association between typical characteristics of insulin resistance and chronic low-grade inflammation. For instance, in nondiabetic subjects, levels of CRP and concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-alpha are related to obesity. Moreover, CRP concentrations are related to insulin resistance, as calculated from the homeostasis assessment model, blood pressure, HDL, and triglycerides, and to markers of endothelial dysfunction. Similar conclusions have been reached, even by the assessment of noncoronary atherosclerosis, as CRP levels are partially associated with dysmetabolic syndrome markers and, together with them, predict carotid artery atherosclerosis (45). These data seem to indicate that adipose tissue is an important determinant of a low-level, chronic inflammatory state, as reflected by levels of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and CRP, thus supporting the hypothesis that such a low-level, chronic inflammatory state may induce insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction and, therefore, link the latter phenomena with obesity and cardiovascular disease (46).


    Inflammatory markers,diabetes mellitus, and risk prediction
 Top
 Abstract
 Diabetes...
 Inflammatory markers,diabetes...
 References
 
A decade ago, elevated systemic markers of inflammation were found for the first time to predict adverse events in patients with severe unstable angina (40). Since then, the concept of predicting cardiac events by means of plasma markers has been proposed and, at the same time, challenged in several studies in both primary and secondary prevention. These data suggest an important independent prognostic value of CRP in predicting adverse outcomes in the short- and long-term follow-up of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes and also in apparently healthy individuals (47,48).

In consideration of the overlap between inflammatory status and diabetic derangements, some authors have also looked at the association between these two conditions. Among 917 patients with acute coronary syndromes, diabetes and admission CRP levels were both independent predictors of long-term outcome (49). Other prospective studies considering CRP levels have confirmed the prognostic role of diabetic status (50,51). However, although the FRagmin during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC) cohort has shown that diabetes plays a prognostic role independent of CRP levels (49), several other smaller studies have shown that diabetes acts as a significant predictor on univariate but not multivariate analysis. Interestingly, in some series, the presence of diabetes was associated, independent of the prognosis, with elevated CRP levels (50,52), whereas in other studies, the two parameters appeared to be independent (53,54). After percutaneous coronary interventions, the baseline CRP level was shown to be a predictor of events (including target vessel revascularization), independent of diabetic status (a condition associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence after revascularization procedures) (55–58).

Primary prevention studies among apparently healthy men (41) and women (59) have shown significant cardiac risk prediction by means of elevated CRP levels. In these data, no correlation between CRP levels and diabetes was described, and although diabetes was shown to be significantly associated with increased cardiac risk, CRP levels were still independent markers of prognosis. The MONItoring trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease (MONICA) Augsburg cohort study was the first study to evaluate the prospective value of CRP levels in primary prevention (60). Many baseline clinical variables, including a history of diabetes, were found to be associated with higher CRP levels, and during follow-up, CRP remained an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events. The independent prognostic role of CRP has also been reported in patients with peripheral artery disease (61).

In conclusion, these data appear to demonstrate that CRP levels predict cardiac risk independent of diabetic status. However, the fact that diabetics tend to have higher CRP levels and that, in some clinical studies, diabetes still remained a significant independent predictor suggests that inflammation and metabolic derangements may represent two different aspects of the same process and thus both could be considered as independent predictors of cardiac risk. To the best of our knowledge, no study to date has thoroughly looked at the prognostic value of CRP between diabetics and nondiabetics separately. Therefore, these conclusions need further confirmation. In addition, the relative role of cytokines (IL-6, TNF-alpha), oxidized LDL, fibrinogen, and other markers of risk prediction require further investigation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Diabetes...
 Inflammatory markers,diabetes...
 References
 
1. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241:2035–2038[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Gu K, Cowie CC, Harris MI. Mortality in adults with and without diabetes in a national cohort of the U.S. population, 1971–1993. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1138–1145[Abstract]

3. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229–234[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Marso SP. Optimizing the diabetic formulary: beyond aspirin and insulin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:652–661[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115–126[Free Full Text]

6. Dortimer AC, Shenoy PN, Shiroff RA, et al. Diffuse coronary artery disease in diabetic patients: fact or fiction? Circulation. 1978;57:133–136[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Davies MJ. The pathological basis of angina pectoris. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989;3(Suppl 1):249–255

8. Moreno PR, Murcia AM, Palacios IF, et al. Coronary composition and macrophage infiltration in atherectomy specimens from patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2000;102:2180–2184[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Barroso I, Gurnell M, Crowley VE, et al. Dominant negative mutations in human PPAR-gamma associated with severe insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Nature. 1999;402:880–883[Medline]

10. Marx N, Sukhova GK, Collins T, Libby P, Plutzky J. PPAR-alpha activators inhibit cytokine-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in human endothelial cells. Circulation. 1999;99:3125–3131[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Staels B, Koenig W, Habib A, et al. Activation of human aortic smooth-muscle cells is inhibited by PPAR-alpha but not by PPAR-gamma activators. Nature. 1998;393:790–793[CrossRef][Medline]

12. Pasceri V, Wu HD, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Modulation of vascular inflammation in vitro and in vivo by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activators. Circulation. 2000;101:235–238[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Aljada A, Garg R, Ghanim H, et al. Nuclear factor-kappa-B suppressive and inhibitor-kappa-B stimulatory effects of troglitazone in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence of an anti-inflammatory action? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3250–3256[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Humphries SE, Luong LA, Ogg MS, Hawe E, Miller GJ. The interleukin-6–174 G/C promoter polymorphism is associated with risk of coronary heart disease and systolic blood pressure in healthy men. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2243–2252[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Syvanne M, Taskinen M-R. Lipids and lipoproteins as coronary risk factors in non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1997;350(Suppl I):20–23[CrossRef]

16. The Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. The MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7–22[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Baynes JW, Thorpe SR. Role of oxidative stress in diabetic complications: a new perspective on an old paradigm. Diabetes. 1999;48:1–9[Abstract]

18. Brownlee M. Negative consequences of glycation. Metabolism. 2000;49:9–13[Medline]

19. Bucala R, Makita Z, Koschinsky T, Cerami A, Vlassara H. Lipid advanced glycosylation: pathway for lipid oxidation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:6434–6438[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Stitt AW, Bucala R, Vlassara H. Atherogenesis and advanced glycation: promotion, progression, and prevention. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1997;811:115–127[Medline]

21. Vlassara H, Fuh H, Donnelly T, Cybulsky M. Advanced glycation endproducts promote adhesion molecule (VCAM-1, ICAM-1) expression and atheroma formation in normal rabbits. Mol Med. 1995;1:447–456[Medline]

22. Winocour PD, Kinlough-Rathbone RL, Mustard JF. Pathways responsible for platelet hypersensitivity in rats with diabetes. II. Spontaneous diabetes in BB Wistar rats. J Lab Clin Med. 1986;107:154–158[Medline]

23. Reaven GM, Lithell H, Landsberg L. Hypertension and associated metabolic abnormalities—the role of insulin resistance and the sympathoadrenal system. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:374–382[Free Full Text]

24. Fontbonne A, Charles MA, Thibult N, et al. Hyperinsulinaemia as a predictor of coronary heart disease mortality in a healthy population: the Paris Prospective Study, 15-year follow-up. Diabetologia. 1991;34:356–361[CrossRef][Medline]

25. Lindeman RD, Romero LJ, Hundley R, et al. Prevalences of type 2 diabetes, the insulin resistance syndrome, and coronary heart disease in an elderly, biethnic population. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:959–966[Abstract]

26. Mohamed-Ali V, Goodrick S, Bulmer K, et al. Production of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors by human subcutaneous adipose tissue in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:E971–975

27. Freeman DJ, Norrie J, Caslake MJ, et al. C-reactive protein is an independent predictor of risk for the development of diabetes in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Diabetes. 2002;51:1596–1600[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Vozarova B, Weyer C, Lindsay RS, Pratley RE, Bogardus C, Tataranni PA. High white blood cell count is associated with a worsening of insulin sensitivity and predicts the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51:455–461[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Ford ES. Leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and diabetes incidence in a national sample of U.S. adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:57–64[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Sharrett AR, et al. Markers of inflammation and prediction of diabetes mellitus in adults (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study): a cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1649–1652[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Freeman DJ, Norrie J, Sattar N, et al. Pravastatin and the development of diabetes mellitus: evidence for a protective treatment effect in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Circulation. 2001;103:357–362[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK, et al. Preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk Hispanic women. Diabetes. 2002;51:2796–2803[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. The Heart Outcome Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145–153[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. De Caterina R, Libby P, Peng HB, et al. Nitric oxide decreases cytokine-induced endothelial activation. Nitric oxide selectively reduces endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:60–68[Medline]

35. Peng HB, Rajavashisth TB, Libby P, Liao JK. Nitric oxide inhibits macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene transcription in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:17050–17055[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Kroder G, Bossenmaier B, Kellerer M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and hyperglycemia-induced insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1471–1477[Medline]

37. Jager A, van Hinsbergh VW, Kostense PJ, et al. Increased levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 are associated with risk of cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn study. Diabetes. 2000;49:485–491[Abstract]

38. Yudkin JS, Kumari M, Humphries SE, Mohamed-Ali V. Inflammation, obesity, stress and coronary heart disease: is interleukin-6 the link? Atherosclerosis. 2000;148:209–214[CrossRef][Medline]

39. Bastard JP, Jardel C, Bruckert E, et al. Elevated levels of interleukin-6 are reduced in serum and subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese women after weight loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3338–3342[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:417–424[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, et al. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:973–979[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Danesh J, Collins R, Peto R. Chronic infections and coronary heart disease: is there a link? Lancet. 1997;350:430–436[CrossRef][Medline]

43. Libby P, Egan D, Skarlatos S. Roles of infectious agents in atherosclerosis and restenosis: an assessment of the evidence and need for future research. Circulation. 1997;96:4095–4103[Free Full Text]

44. Mayr M, Metzler B, Kiechl S, et al. Endothelial cytotoxicity mediated by serum antibodies to heat shock proteins of Escherichia coli and Chlamydia pneumoniae: immune reactions to heat shock proteins as a possible link between infection and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1999;99:1560–1566[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Blackburn R, Giral P, Bruckert E, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein constitutes an independent predictor of advanced carotid plaques in dyslipidemic subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1962–1968[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Yudkin JS, Stehouwer CD, Emeis JJ, Coppack SW. C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: associations with obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction—a potential role for cytokines originating from adipose tissue? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:972–978[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Grillo RL, et al. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein at discharge in patients with unstable angina predict recurrent instability. Circulation. 1999;99:855–860[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Mendall MA, Strachan DP, Butland BK, et al. C-reactive protein: relation to total mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular risk factors in men. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1584–1590[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. FRagmin during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC) Study GroupLindahl B, Toss H, Siegbahn A, Venge P, Wallentin L. Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1139–1147[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Ferreiros ER, Boissonnet CP, Pizarro R, et al. Independent prognostic value of elevated C-reactive protein in unstable angina. Circulation. 1999;100:1958–1963[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Angiolillo DJ, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, Abbate A, Crea F. C-reactive protein may have a different prognostic value in diabetics and non-diabetics with unstable angina. (abstr)Eur Heart J. 2002;23(Suppl):171

52. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Antman EM, et al. C-reactive protein is a potent predictor of mortality independently of and in combination with troponin T in acute coronary syndromes: a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-11A substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1460–1465[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study GroupHaverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. Lancet. 1997;349:462–466[CrossRef][Medline]

54. Chimeric 7E3 AntiPlateleT in Unstable angina REfractory to standard treatment (CAPTURE) InvestigatorsHeeschen C, Hamm CW, Bruemmer J, Simoons ML. Predictive value of C-reactive protein and troponin T in patients with unstable angina: a comparative analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1535–1542[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Bhatt DL, Chew DP, Robbins MA, et al. Elevated baseline CRP levels predict death or MI in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. (abstr)J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(Suppl):648A

56. Buffon A, Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, et al. Preprocedural serum levels of C-reactive protein predict early complications and late restenosis after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1512–1521[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Mueller C, Buettner HJ, Hodgson JM, et al. Inflammation and long-term mortality after non–ST elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with a very early invasive strategy in 1042 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2002;105:1412–1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Patti G, Di Sciascio G, D’Ambrosio A, Dicuonso G, Abbate A, Dobrina A. Prognostic value of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:372–376[CrossRef][Medline]

59. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:836–843[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Koenig W, Sund M, Frohlich M, et al. C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men: results from the MONItoring trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease (MONICA) Augsburg cohort study, 1984 to 1992. Circulation. 1999;99:237–242[Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Rossi E, Biasucci LM, Citterio F, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction and angina in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease: predictive role of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2002;105:800–803[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. M. McDermott and D. M. Lloyd-Jones
The role of biomarkers and genetics in peripheral arterial disease.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 29, 2009; 54(14): 1228 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K R Bainey, Y Fu, C B Granger, C W Hamm, D R Holmes Jr, W W O'Neill, R Seabra-Gomes, M E Pfisterer, F Van de Werf, P W Armstrong, et al.
Benefit of angiographic spontaneous reperfusion in STEMI: does it extend to diabetic patients?
Heart, August 15, 2009; 95(16): 1331 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
R Mizuno, S Fujimoto, Y Saito, and S Nakamura
Depressed recovery of subendocardial perfusion in persistent heart failure after complete revascularisation in diabetic patients with hibernating myocardium
Heart, May 1, 2009; 95(10): 830 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. B. M. Reddy, K. V. Ramana, S. Srivastava, A. Bhatnagar, and S. K. Srivastava
Aldose Reductase Regulates High Glucose-Induced Ectodomain Shedding of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-{alpha} via Protein Kinase C-{delta} and TNF-{alpha} Converting Enzyme in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Endocrinology, January 1, 2009; 150(1): 63 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Kamalesh, J. Shen, and G. J. Eckert
Long Term Postischemic Stroke Mortality in Diabetes: A Veteran Cohort Analysis
Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): 2727 - 2731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Feit, S. V. Manoukian, R. Ebrahimi, C. V. Pollack, E. M. Ohman, M. J. Attubato, R. Mehran, and G. W. Stone
Safety and Efficacy of Bivalirudin Monotherapy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1645 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
W. Otter, M. Winter, W. Doering, E. Standl, and O. Schnell
C-Reactive Protein in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2007; 30(12): 3080 - 3082.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Razmara, P. Hjemdahl, M. Yngen, C.-G. Ostenson, N. H. Wallen, and N. Li
Food Intake Enhances Thromboxane Receptor-Mediated Platelet Activation in Type 2 Diabetic Patients but Not in Healthy Subjects
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2007; 30(1): 138 - 140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Lenzen, L. Ryden, J. Ohrvik, M. Bartnik, K. Malmberg, W. Scholte op Reimer, M. L. Simoons, and on behalf of the Euro Heart Survey Investigators
Diabetes known or newly detected, but not impaired glucose regulation, has a negative influence on 1-year outcome in patients with coronary artery disease: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on diabetes and the heart
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2006; 27(24): 2969 - 2974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, M. Lotrionte, P. Agostoni, A. Abbate, M. Fusaro, F. Burzotta, L. Testa, I. Sheiban, and G. Sangiorgi
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50 279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2006; 27(22): 2667 - 2674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
M. Yngen, A. Norhammar, P. Hjemdahl, and N H. Wallen
Effects of improved metabolic control on platelet reactivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus following coronary angioplasty
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, May 1, 2006; 3(1): 52 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
D. J. Angiolillo, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, E. Bernardo, C. Ramirez, M. Sabate, P. Jimenez-Quevedo, R. Hernandez, R. Moreno, J. Escaned, F. Alfonso, et al.
Clopidogrel Withdrawal Is Associated With Proinflammatory and Prothrombotic Effects in Patients With Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease
Diabetes, March 1, 2006; 55(3): 780 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
M. Roffi
Early invasive strategy in the diabetic patient with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_K): K19 - K22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Abbate and G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai
The difficult task of glycaemic control in diabetics with acute coronary syndromes: finding the way to normoglycaemia avoiding both hyper- and hypoglycaemia
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2005; 26(13): 1245 - 1248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. S. Gurm, I. J. Sarembock, D. J. Kereiakes, J. J. Young, R. A. Harrington, N. Kleiman, F. Feit, K. Wolski, J. A. Bittl, R. Wilcox, et al.
Use of Bivalirudin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: An Analysis From the Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 1932 - 1938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Hung, B. M. McQuillan, C. M. L. Chapman, P. L. Thompson, and J. P. Beilby
Elevated Interleukin-18 Levels Are Associated With the Metabolic Syndrome Independent of Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1268 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Prasad, G. W. Stone, T. D. Stuckey, C. O. Costantini, P. J. Zimetbaum, M. McLaughlin, R. Mehran, E. Garcia, J. E. Tcheng, D. A. Cox, et al.
Impact of diabetes mellitus on myocardial perfusion after primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 15, 2005; 45(4): 508 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
S. P Marso, J. W Murphy, J. A House, D. M Safley, and W. S Harris
Metabolic syndrome-mediated inflammation following elective percutaneous coronary intervention
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, February 1, 2005; 2(1): 31 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
T. T. Fung, M. Schulze, J. E. Manson, W. C. Willett, and F. B. Hu
Dietary Patterns, Meat Intake, and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women
Arch Intern Med, November 8, 2004; 164(20): 2235 - 2240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
L. M. Biasucci and G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai
Preprocedural C-Reactive Protein for Risk Prediction Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A European Perspective
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2004; 50(9): 1492 - 1494.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. L. Price, P. S. Sharp, M. E. North, S. J. Rainbow, and S. C. Knight
Advanced Glycation End Products Modulate the Maturation and Function of Peripheral Blood Dendritic Cells
Diabetes, June 1, 2004; 53(6): 1452 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P L Sanchez, J L Morinigo, P Pabon, F Martin, I Piedra, I F Palacios, and C Martin-Luengo
Prognostic relations between inflammatory markers and mortality in diabetic patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 264 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Roffi and E. J. Topol
Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2004; 25(3): 190 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Luciani, G. Nasso, M. Gaudino, A. Abbate, F. Glieca, F. Alessandrini, F. Girola, F. Santarelli, and G. Possati
Coronary artery bypass grafting in Type II diabetic patients: a comparison between insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent patients at short- and mid-term follow-up
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1149 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biondi-Zoccai, G. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Biasucci, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biondi-Zoccai, G. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Biasucci, L. M.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement