JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:930-937, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)03012-7
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paolo Rossi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pessina, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paolo Rossi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pessina, A. C.

CLINICAL STUDY: POLYMORPHISMS AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

The T-786C endothelial nitric oxide synthase genotype is a novel risk factor for coronary artery disease in Caucasian patients of the GENICA study

Gian Paolo Rossi, MD, FACC, FAHA{dagger},*, Maurizio Cesari, MD{dagger}, Mario Zanchetta, MD*, Stefania Colonna, MD{dagger}, Giuseppe Maiolino, MD{dagger}, Luigi Pedon, MD*, Martina Cavallin, BiolD{dagger}, Pietro Maiolino, MD* and Achille C. Pessina, MD, PhD{dagger}

* Servizio di Emodinamica and Divisione di Cardiologia Ospedale di Cittadella, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
{dagger} Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinica Medica 4, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

Manuscript received March 13, 2002; revised manuscript received October 7, 2002, accepted November 22, 2002.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Prof. Gian Paolo Rossi, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinica Medica 4 University Hospital, via Giustiniani, 2, 35126 Padova, Italy.
gianpaolo.rossi{at}unipd.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association of polymorphisms in the promoter region and exon 7 endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene with coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction foretells cardiovascular events and can be genetically determined.

METHODS: We genotyped for the promoter (T-786C) and exon 7 (Glu298Asp, G894T) polymorphisms in 1,225 subjects; 1,106 were consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography and 119 control subjects without any cardiovascular risk factors. Genotyping was performed with melting curve analysis of polymerase chain reaction products from allele-specific acceptor and donor probes that were 5'- and 3'-end labeled with LCRed640 and fluorescein, respectively; CAD was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. We performed multiple logistic regression analysis for the effect of the T-786C, the missense Glu298Asp variant, and other coronary risk factors on two- and three-vessel CAD.

RESULTS: The overall genotype distribution of T-786C (CC = 17.7%, CT = 40.4%, and TT = 41.9%) and Glu298Asp (GG = 43.3%, GT = 37.0%, and TT = 19.7%) was consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The regression analysis showed that the T-786C, but not the missense Glu298Asp variant, significantly predicted CAD, independent of other risk factors. Compared with TT homozygous, subjects carrying the C allele had a significant (p = 0.002) increase in the odds ratio of harboring two- or three-vessel CAD of 1.672 (95% confidence interval, 1.062 to 2.527). A subgroup analysis confirmed this effect of the T-786C polymorphism in men (p = 0.007), cigarette smokers (p = 0.001), subjects older than 60 years of age (p = 0.007), with hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.011), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.006), and overweight or with obesity (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS: The C allele at the T-786C endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphism is associated with a higher risk of multivessel CAD in Caucasians.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD
  coronary artery disease
  CV
  cardiovascular
  eNOS
  endothelial nitric oxide synthase
  GENICA
  Genetic and ENvironmental Factors in Coronary Atherosclerosis study
  HDL
  high-density lipoprotein
  LDL
  low-density lipoprotein
  MI
  myocardial infarction
  NO
  nitric oxide


Coronary artery disease (CAD), the leading cause of mortality in Western countries (1), is a highly prevalent heterogeneous disease that is genetically determined, albeit in a complex fashion. Genetic mechanisms are deemed to increase susceptibility to CAD and may account for a sub- stantial proportion of CAD variance, but, despite intensive investigation, their identification has not been accomplished thus far (2). This task proved to be unduly difficult for several reasons, including the fact that the clinical identification of the phenotype CAD can be inaccurate without undertaking coronary angiography. The latter is invasive, costly, inconvenient to the patients, and carries a small, but not negligible, risk of complications (3); therefore, it was not widely used in large studies. Instead, cardiovascular (CV) events, including myocardial infarction (MI), and sudden death, angina, need of coronary artery bypass surgery and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and evidence for myocardial ischemia at noninvasive tests, were used as surrogates of CAD based on the assumption that they could mirror the presence of CAD. These crude phenotype definitions might well account for the negative or conflicting results that were accomplished.

An impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation (4) has been consistently reported in conditions that are associated with accelerated atherosclerosis, such as arterial hypertension, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, hyperhomocyst(e)inemia, and aging (5,6). Furthermore, a blunted endothelium-dependent vasodilation was found to predict CV events independently of the common risk factors (7) and, therefore, might be a precursor of CAD.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a major mediator of endothelium-dependent vasodilation made in endothelial cells from L-arginine through the action of the homodimeric enzyme endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). In addition to its key role in the regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure (8,9), NO is thought to be involved in atherogenesis (8,10,11), development of heart failure, and congenital septal defects and vascular remodeling, as shown by data in mice lacking the eNOS gene (10,12). In fact, NO blunts the activity of the nuclear factor-kappaB family of transcription factors (13,14) and, thereby, can prevent the endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and inflammatory cytokines, which are instrumental for the triggering of atherogenesis (15). Accordingly, a genetically determined impaired availability of NO might be a major risk factor for development of CAD.

The eNOS gene (16) is expressionally and functionally regulated through multiple regulatory steps (14,17) and entails several polymorphisms (18), some of which bear functional consequences. Therefore, this gene is a likely candidate for impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and CAD. Some eNOS gene polymorphisms have indeed been linked to CV phenotypes and events (19–28), and two of them to coronary spasm (23,29). Of the latter, the T-786C is located in the promoter region, which is the most important for the regulation of the transcription rate of the eNOS gene (29). The mutant C allele implies a blunted transcription rate and was found to be far more common in Japanese patients with vasospastic angina than in controls (29); furthermore, we recently reported that this allele was associated with a blunted forearm vasodilation in response to acetylcholine in hypertensive patients (30).

Another eNOS polymorphism, the GAG to GAT substitution in exon 7, results in the replacement of glutamate by aspartate (Glu298Asp, G894T), which might impair the function of eNOS by causing a tight turn of the alpha-helix (23), as suggested by some studies (31–34).

As both polymorphisms were found to be associated with an altered coronary vasomotor reactivity and with an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation (29,30), we hypothesized that they might play a role for the triggering of atherogenesis and CAD occurrence. However, only limited and conflicting results were available so far to support this hypothesis. No association of the T-786C polymorphism with CV events (35) and of the Glu298Asp polymorphism with MI was seen in Caucasians (36). However, both these studies relied on CV events and not on coronary angiography for the assessment of CAD.

Thus, within the Genetic and ENvironmental factors In Coronary Atherosclerosis (GENICA) study, a large prospective investigation of the genetic determinants of CAD, which was performed in consecutive Caucasian patients undergoing coronary angiography, we sought to determine if the T-786C and the Glu298Asp polymorphisms predicted multivessel CAD.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The criteria for enrollment of the patients and controls in the GENICA study were previously reported (37). In brief, consecutive Caucasian patients of both genders consecutively referred to the Division of Cardiology of the Cittadella General Hospital for coronary angiography for investigation of chest pain and/or suspected CAD were enrolled between 1999 and 2001. The Medical Ethics Committee of our university approved the study protocol, and a written consent after explanation of the aims and details of the study was obtained from each participant. The refusal to participate in this study was the only exclusion criterion. Two groups served as controls: group 1 entailed patients in whom significant (e.g., stenosis ≥50%) CAD was eventually ruled out by coronary angiography; group 2 comprised 119 consecutive healthy normotensive blood donors enrolled at the local blood bank during the same period. In these latter subjects, it was unethical to perform coronary angiography to rule out the presence of asymptomatic CAD. Therefore, the following inclusion criteria were used: negative family history of CAD, MI, and stroke; nonsmoking status; absence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, diabetes mellitus, all defined as specified in the following text. Based on available data from epidemiologic and family studies, a cohort fulfilling these criteria is expected to have a very low prevalence of asymptomatic CAD.

Demographic and clinical measurements.   A standard questionnaire was used to carefully ascertain medical history in all participants (transient ischemic attack, stroke, angina, MI, coronary artery bypass, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, renal failure, peripheral artery disease, and history of vascular surgical interventions), smoking habits, presence/absence of hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and current medications. Body mass index was calculated as weight/height2 (kg/m2). Patients were classified into three groups: current smokers, nonsmokers, and ex-smokers (who had stopped smoking for at least one year). Diabetes mellitus (type I or II) was defined as a previous diagnosis of the disease, history of antidiabetic medications, or plasma fasting levels of glucose ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) on at least two occasions. Impaired glucose tolerance was defined as plasma fasting levels of glucose ranging between 110 to 126 mg/dl (6.1 to 6.9 mmol/l) (38). Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol ≥100 mg/dl according to the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for patients with CAD (39); hypertriglyceridemia was defined as plasma fasting levels ≥134 mg/dl, that is, higher than the 95th percentile value of our group 1 control subjects. Blood pressure was measured by mercury sphygmomanometer using Korotkoff phase V for diastolic, according to the World Health Organization guidelines. Hypertension was defined as systolic pressure ≥140 mm Hg, and/or diastolic pressure ≥90 mm Hg (40), or use of any antihypertensive agents.

Coronary angiography.   Angiography was carried out and evaluated by experienced cardiologists who were blinded to patients’ genotype. The severity of CAD was determined by the number of significantly stenosed coronary arteries (41). Patients were classified as follows: code 1 = normal vessels; code 2 = <50% stenosis; code 3, 4, and 5 = stenosis ≥50% in one, two, or three major coronary arteries, respectively.

Laboratory measurements.   Each patient was studied between 8:30 and 12:00 A.M. Before coronary angiography, blood samples were taken from the femoral artery and were immediately put on ice and centrifuged at 3,000x g (at 4°C for 10 min). Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, glycemia, sodium, potassium, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine levels were measured with conventional methods.

Extraction of deoxyribonucleic acid and eNOS genotyping.   The blood was stored at –20°C until deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted using a commercially available kit (DNA Blood Extraction Fast KIT, Analitica Srl., Padova, Italy). Details of the methodology used for genotyping at each polymorphism, including oligonucleotides serving as amplification primers and fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes, were recently reported (30).

Statistical analysis.   One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test was used to compare quantitative variables between CAD patients and control subjects. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare the frequencies of the categorical coronary risk factors and of eNOS gene variants between the CAD and the control groups. Consistency of the genotype frequencies with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was also tested by chi-squared analysis. To identify the independent risk factors for CAD, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis for the effect of the T-786C, the missense Glu298Asp variant, and the other coronary risk factors. To this end, independent variables were coded as dummy variables as follows: age, 0 for <60 years, 1 for ≥60 years; gender, 0 for female, 1 for male; body mass index, 0 for <26 kg/m2, 1 for ≥26 kg/m2; hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and LDL cholesterol, ≥100 mg/dl, 0 for absence, 1 for presence; cigarette smoking, 0 for nonsmoker, 1 for current or ex-smoker; the T-786C, 0 for CC, 1 for CT, and 2 for TT; missense Glu298Asp variant, 0 for GG, 1 for TG, and 2 for TT (42). Because the aim of this study was to identify predictors of multivessel CAD, the dependent variable was coded as follows: 0 for normal coronary artery and for stenosis <50%; 1 for stenosis ≥50% in two or three major epicardial vessels. The forward stepwise selection (Wald criterion) was used. Odds ratios (approximating to relative risks) were calculated as a measure of the association between the eNOS genotype and the CAD phenotype, with the effect of the mutant allele C for the T-786C polymorphism assumed to be dominant (TT vs. CT and CC) or additive (TT and CT combined vs. CC). Similarly, for the Glu298Asp polymorphism, the effect of the mutant allele was investigated according to a dominant (TT and TG combined vs. GG) or additive (TT vs. GT and GG) model of inheritance. For each odds ratio, we calculated two-tailed p values and 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS 10.0 for Windows (SPSS Italy Inc., Bologna, Italy).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Demographic characteristics and eNOS genotype distribution.   Of the 1,271 patients originally recruited in the GENICA study who had complete coronary angiography data, 17% (n = 217) were found to have normal coronary arteries, and 14% (n = 178) stenosis <50%, 23% (n = 290), 24% (n = 305), and 22% (n = 281) had significant (≥50%) stenosis in one, two, or three major epicardial vessels, respectively. The eNOS polymorphism genotypes were available in 1,106 (87%) of all patients. A preliminary regression analysis on all subjects revealed a borderline significant (p = 0.034) association between the T-786C eNOS genotype and one-, two-, or three-vessel CAD. Therefore, to maximize contrast at the phenotype level, it was decided to combine two- and three-vessel CAD patients, as CAD group, and normal vessel and <50% stenosis as control group (group 1); thus, the CAD group and group 1 comprised 749 and 330 patients, respectively. Of the latter, 21% were healthy individuals, 39% had valvular heart disease, 15% had cardiomyopathy (13.7% dilated, 1.3% hypertrophic), 7% had hypertensive heart disease, and 18% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The latter diagnosis was based on resting and stress electrocardiogram and on results of stress myocardial scintigraphy that showed inducible ischemia.

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the CAD patients and of group 1 and 2 (119 subjects) controls are shown in Table 1. The CAD patients were older, had higher plasma glucose and triglycerides, and lower HDL cholesterol than control subjects. There were more males in CAD patients than in group 1 (p < 0.001), but not group 2 control subjects. Compared with both control groups, more CAD patients had diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia (both p < 0.001), hypertriglyceridemia (p < 0.001), and were smokers or ex-smokers (p < 0.0001). Compared with controls, the CAD patients more commonly reported a history of myocardial infarction (p < 0.0001), coronary artery bypass surgery (p < 0.0001), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (p < 0.0001), peripheral artery disease (p < 0.001), vascular surgery (p < 0.001), but not of transient ischemic attack or stroke.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Clinical Characteristics of the CAD Patients and the Control Subjects

 
Screening for the T-786C polymorphism and the missense Glu298Asp variant of the eNOS gene.   The overall genotype distribution of the T-786C polymorphism was CC = 17.7%, CT = 40.4%, and TT = 41.9%; the C and T allele frequency was 0.38 and 0.62, respectively. For the Glu298Asp polymorphism, the genotype distribution was GG = 43.3%, GT = 37.0%, and TT = 19.7; the G and T allele frequency was 0.62 and 0.38, respectively. The distribution of both polymorphisms agreed with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; it did not differ between CAD and control patients for the T-786C polymorphism. The frequency of the Glu298Asp genotypes did not differ between CAD patients and group 1 controls, whereas, in group 2, there was a slight excess of GG homozygous (p = 0.015). For both polymorphisms, all demographic and clinical variables did not differ between genotypes.

We investigated whether there was a linkage between the T-786C and the Glu298Asp polymorphism, by Kendall’s tau b and Spearman’s correlation analysis, and found a highly significant (p < 0.001) relationship between the two polymorphisms (Kendall’s tau b = 0.303 ± 0.025; Spearman’s correlation = 0.330 ± 0.027).

Association between T-786C, Glu298Asp, eNOS variants, and CAD.   We found with the logistic regression analysis that the T-786C polymorphism significantly predicted CAD. In Table 2 we ranked the variables that entered into the model according to the value of the Wald coefficient, which estimates the usefulness of the parameter to the model. Besides confirming that male gender, age, hypertriglyceridemia, and cigarette smoking were significant predictors of CAD, we found that the C allele also significantly predicted CAD, being as useful as cigarette smoking to this end. At variance, other "classical" CV risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and elevated LDL cholesterol, did not remain in the model and, therefore, were less useful than the C allele as predictors of CAD. Subjects carrying the C allele, either homozygous or heterozygous, had a 69.2% increased risk of having significant multivessel CAD. We observed similar results when the C allele was examined according to an additive model, that is, CC homozygous versus CT and TT (Table 2). In contrast, no effect of the Glu298Asp missense variant on CAD was detected. The association of the C allele with multivessel CAD was even stronger (p < 0.001) when the 18% of group 1 control patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy were excluded from the analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Results of Logistic Multivariate Analysis for T-786C

 
Subgroup analysis (Fig. 1) confirmed the association of the C allele with CAD also when men (p = 0.007), subjects older than 60 years of age (p = 0.007), subjects with hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.011), cigarette smokers (p = 0.001), subjects with low HDL cholesterol (p = 0.006), and overweight or with obesity (p = 0.041) were considered. When subjects with at least four such unfavorable features were considered, the odds ratio associated with the C allele further increased the relative risk (odds ratio = 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.63 to 8; p = 0.002) of having significant multivessel CAD.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Results of the logistic regression analysis in the different risk subgroups of subjects and in subjects with concurrence of at least four major risk factors (top). The squares (closed for the T-786C C allele; open for the other variables) and the lines indicate, respectively, the value of the B coefficient (an estimate of the odds ratio) and its 95% confidence interval. For the purpose of visual clarity, the reciprocal value of the B coefficient that was <1 was used. The figure shows the independent variables that remained in the model, that is, were significant predictors of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in each subgroup, ranked from bottom to top according to the value of the Wald coefficient. Notice the usefulness of T-786C polymorphism for the prediction of multivessel CAD in all subgroups. The coexistence of four major risk factors (subgroup at the top) resulted in a clear-cut increase of the odds ratio for C allele of the T-786C polymorphism, further confirming the usefulness of this endothelial nitric oxide synthase molecular variant for the prediction of multivessel CAD. HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study showed a significant association between severe CAD and the T-786C polymorphism, located in the eNOS gene promoter, independently of the most common CV risk factors. At variance, we could find no evidence for such association with the Glu298Asp polymorphism in exon 7. Thus, our results identified a genetic determinant of CAD in Caucasian individuals.

Reporter gene studies showed that the T-786C substitution in the promoter region of eNOS reduced by 50% the rate of transcription of eNOS, both under baseline conditions and in response to hypoxia (29), and was associated with decreased serum levels of nitrite/nitrate (43). These effects might depend upon the fact that a mutant allele can bind the replication protein A1, which acts as a gene repressor protein (43). The mutant C allele was found to be quite rare in healthy Japanese subjects (3%) and more common (15%) in patients with coronary spasm, thus indicating a highly significant (p < 0.0001) association with an altered coronary vasomotor responses in this ethnic group (44). We found the C allele in 38% of our cohort, which is consistent with the 37.8% recently reported in British middle-age men from primary care practices (35). Thus, this allele seems to be much more common in Caucasian than in Japanese individuals, albeit the underlying reasons remain hypothetical.

To our knowledge there was no data supporting the relevance of the T-786C polymorphism in non-Japanese populations, because no association with CAD was found in one study (35). Our results filled this gap by showing that the C allele was associated with CAD in Caucasian subjects. The logistic regression (Table 2) showed that subjects who carried the C allele exhibited a 73% increase of the risk of harboring significant multivessel coronary artery narrowing. This significant association does not imply, per se, a causal relationship; neither does it clarify the basic mechanisms. However, it is worth pointing out that, in a large series of mild-to-moderate uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients who underwent an infusion of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine into the brachial artery, the TT homozygous subjects exhibited a significantly enhanced vasodilation, as compared with CT and CC individuals (30). Thus, it would appear that, in a condition that implies enhanced oxidative stress, such as arterial hypertension, the genetic predisposition to generate less NO can become apparent and, in the long run, might be detrimental and result in susceptibility to atherogenesis.

This contention is further supported by the present subgroup analysis. We found that the concomitance of at least one major CV risk factor further enhanced the additional risk associated with the C allele and that the concurrence of multiple risk factors markedly enhanced the nefarious effects of the C allele (Fig. 1). Thus, under most conditions that imply oxidative stress, such as aging, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, male gender (lack of estrogens), and overweight or obesity, the genetic predisposition to generate less NO associated with the C allele could contribute to decreasing the bioavailability of NO and, thus, to the triggering of coronary atherogenesis.

Recent studies showed an association of the T (mutant) allele at the Glu298Asp polymorphism with human phenotypes that can be relevant for CV disease, including vascular adaptation to pregnancy (34), endothelial response to smoking and n-3 fatty acids (32), high-altitude pulmonary edema (33), and a lower mean age at end-stage renal disease in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (31). We found that frequency of the T (mutant) allele was 38%, that is, much higher than in Japanese (6.7% to 10.7% in a study [42], 9.8% to 25.6% in another study [33]), but similar to that observed in Caucasians from continental Europe (31% to 34%) (31,45), albeit lower than in U.K. patients (68.8% and 52.2% in control subjects and CAD patients, respectively) (36). We found no evidence for an association of this polymorphism with severity of CAD in agreement with earlier and more recent studies (26,35,42,45,46) but in contrast to reports of an association of the Glu298 with MI (36,42). This might not be surprising because: 1) the replacement of aspartate for glutamate is deemed to be a conservative one, and 2) recombinant eNOS Asp298 and Glu298 enzymes showed no discernible difference in the Michaelis constant (Km) or the maximum velocity (Vmax) (18). However, at variance with this latter finding, it was found that the enzymatic activity of eNOS was systematically decreased in renal artery specimens of patients harboring the T allele (31). Thus, either the functional impact of this polymorphism can differ between the renal and the coronary artery bed or this polymorphism could only act as a marker for a functional locus elsewhere in the gene, as suggested by the observation of a linkage disequilibrium with other eNOS polymorphisms (35). Of much interest, we found evidence of a significant linkage between T-786C and the Glu298Asp polymorphism, at variance with a previous report (47). Thus, available conflicting results on the association of the Glu298Asp polymorphism with CAD or CV events might be explained on the basis of a variable association of this variant with the T-786C polymorphism in different populations. However, individuals carrying the T allele (TT and TG) were found to have significantly higher pressor responses to phenylephrine than GG homozygous, thus suggesting that the T allele might increase vascular reactivity (48), possibly because the Asp298, but not the Glu298, variant of eNOS is susceptible to cleavage (49). Whatever the functional relevance of the missense Glu298Asp variant might be, our results in individuals from southern Europe, consistent with earlier studies (26,35,42), do not support the contention that Glu298Asp polymorphism is, per se, strongly associated with CAD in Caucasian patients.

This cross-sectional study comprised exclusively Caucasians, and, therefore, our findings might not apply to other ethnic groups or indicate a prognostic value of the T-786C polymorphism, which might be revealed by an ongoing follow-up study. Furthermore, only a minority of our study population was women, while estrogens are known to enhance NO availability and to account for protection of fertile women from CV events. We could confirm the usefulness of the T-786C polymorphism as a predictor of CAD in men but not in women; however, we cannot exclude the possibility that this study was underpowered to detect an association of the T-786C eNOS polymorphism with CAD in both genders.

In conclusion, we have found that a functional polymorphism of the eNOS gene, the T-786C, which is located in the promoter region, was significantly associated with severe CAD, independent of the other common CV risk factors in Caucasian patients.


    Footnotes
 
Supported by grants of the Italian Cabinet of University and Scientific Research (MURST) to ACP (9906193152_001/06) and by research grants from Regione Veneto (863/01/98) F.O.R.I.C.A. (FOundation for advanced Research In hypertension and CArdiovascular diseases) and by Unindustria Treviso to G.P.R.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. American Heart Association 2001. Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2001. p. 14–16
  2. Winkelmann BR, Hager J, Kraus WE, et al. Genetics of coronary heart disease: current knowledge and research principles. Am Heart J. 2000;140:S11–26[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Achenbach S, Daniel WG. Noninvasive coronary angiography—an acceptable alternative? N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1909–1910[Free Full Text]
  4. Linder L, Kiowski W, Buhler FR, Luscher TF. Indirect evidence for release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in human forearm circulation in vivo: blunted response in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1990;81:1762–1767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Spiegelhalter DJ, Georgakopoulos D, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in healthy men years before the age-related decline in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:471–476[Abstract]
  6. Luscher TF, Tanner FC, Tschudi MR, Noll G. Endothelial dysfunction in coronary artery disease. Annu Rev Med. 1993;44:395–418[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Al Suwaidi J, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DRJ, Lerman A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000;101:948–954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Huang PL, Huang Z, Mashimo H, et al. Hypertension in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nature. 1995;377:239–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Ohashi Y, Kawashima S, Hirata K, et al. Hypotension and reduced nitric oxide-elicited vasorelaxation in transgenic mice overexpressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:2061–2071[Medline]
  10. Shesely EG, Maeda N, Kim HS, et al. Elevated blood pressures in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13176–13181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Aji W, Ravalli S, Szabolcs M, et al. L-arginine prevents xanthoma development and inhibits atherosclerosis in LDL receptor knockout mice. Circulation. 1997;95:430–437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Feng Q, Song W, Lu X, et al. Development of heart failure and congenital septal defects in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2002;106:873–879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ishizuka T, Takamizawa-Matsumoto M, Suzuki K, Kurita A. Endothelin-1 enhances vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in tumor necrosis factor alpha-stimulated vascular endothelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;369:237–245[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Rossi GP, Seccia TM, Nussdorfer GG. Reciprocal regulation of endothelin-1 and nitric oxide: relevance in the physiology and pathology of the cardiovascular system. Int Rev Cytol. 2001;209:241–272[Medline]
  15. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. Nature. 1999;340:115–126
  16. Nadaud S, Bonnardeaux A, Lathrop M, Soubrier F. Gene structure, polymorphism and mapping of the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;198:1027–1033[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Andrew PJ, Mayer B. Enzymatic function of nitric oxide synthases. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43:521–531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hingorani AD. Polymorphisms in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and atherogenesis: John French Lecture 2000. Atherosclerosis. 2001;154:521–527[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Bonnardeaux A, Nadaud S, Charru A, Jeunemaitre X, Corvol P, Soubrier F. Lack of evidence for linkage of the endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase gene to essential hypertension. Circulation. 1995;91:96–102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Nakayama T, Soma M, Izumi Y, Kanmatsuse K, Esumi M. CA repeat polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene in the Japanese. Hum Hered. 1995;45:301–302[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hunt SC, Williams CS, Sharma AM, Inoue I, Williams RR, Lalouel JM. Lack of linkage between the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1996;10:27–30[Medline]
  22. Nakayama T, Soma M, Takahashi Y, Izumi Y, Kanmatsuse K, Esumi M. Association analysis of CA repeat polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene with essential hypertension in Japanese. Clin Genet. 1997;51:26–30[Medline]
  23. Yoshimura M, Yasue H, Nakayama M, et al. A missense Glu298Asp variant in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with coronary spasm in the Japanese. Hum Genet. 1998;103:65–69[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Ichihara S, Yamada Y, Fujimura T, Nakashima N, Yokota M. Association of a polymorphism of the endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene with myocardial infarction in the Japanese population. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:83–86[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Miyamoto Y, Saito Y, Kajiyama N, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is positively associated with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1998;32:3–8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Poirier O, Mao C, Mallet C, et al. Polymorphisms of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene—no consistent association with myocardial infarction in the ECTIM study. Eur J Clin Invest. 1999;29:284–290[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Yahashi Y, Kario K, Shimada K, Matsuo M. The 27-bp repeat polymorphism in intron 4 of the endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase gene and ischemic stroke in a Japanese population. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1998;9:405–409[Medline]
  28. Markus HS, Ruigrok Y, Ali N, Powell JF. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase exon 7 polymorphism, ischemic cerebrovascular disease and carotid atheroma. Stroke. 1998;29:1908–1911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Nakayama M, Yasue H, Yoshimura M, et al. T-786->C mutation in the 5'-flanking region of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with coronary spasm. Circulation. 1999;99:2864–2870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rossi GP, Taddei S, Virdis A, et al. The T-786C and Glu298Asp polymorphisms of the endothelial nitric oxide gene affect the forearm blood flow responses of Caucasian hypertensive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:938–45
  31. Persu A, Stoenoiu MS, Messiaen T, et al. Modifier effect of eNOS in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:229–241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Leeson CPM, Hingorani AD, Mullen MJ, et al. Glu298Asp endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism interacts with environmental and dietary factors to influence endothelial function. Circ Res. 2002;90:1153–1158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Droma Y, Hanaoka M, Ota M, et al. Positive association of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms with high-altitude pulmonary edema. Circulation. 2002;106:826–830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Savvidou MD, Vallance PJ, Nicolaides KH, Hingoraniz AD. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism and maternal vascular adaptation to pregnancy. Hypertension. 2001;38:1289–1293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Jeerooburkhan N, Jones LC, Bujac S, et al. Genetic and environmental determinants of plasma nitrogen oxides and risk of ischemic heart disease. Hypertension. 2001;38:1054–1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hingorani AD, Liang CF, Fatibene J, et al. A common variant of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (Glu298->Asp) is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease in the UK. Circulation. 1999;100:1515–1520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Pessina AC, Cesari M, Colonna S, et al. Rationale and design of the "GENICA" study (Genetic and Environmental factors In Coronary Atherosclerosis): a study of the genetic factors playing a role in the development of coronary atherosclerosis. High Blood Pressure Cardiovasc Prev. 2001;9:83–85
  38. Puavilai G, Chanprasertyotin S, Sriphrapradaeng A. Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance: 1997 criteria by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (ADA), 1998 WHO consultation criteria, and 1985 WHO criteria: World Health Organization. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999;44:21–26[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497[Free Full Text]
  40. Chalmers J. The 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines for the management of hypertension. Med J Aust. 1999;171:458–459[Medline]
  41. Wang XL, Sim AS, Badenhop RF, McCredie RM, Wilcken DE. A smoking-dependent risk of coronary artery disease associated with a polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene. Nat Med. 1996;2:41–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Shimasaki Y, Yasue H, Yoshimura M, et al. Association of the missense Glu298Asp variant of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene with myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1506–1510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Miyamoto Y, Saito Y, Nakayama M, et al. Replication protein A1 reduces transcription of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene containing a -786T->C mutation associated with coronary spastic angina. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2629–2637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Nakayama M, Yasue H, Yoshimura M, et al. T(-786)->C mutation in the 5'-flanking region of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with myocardial infarction, especially without coronary organic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:628–634[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Gardemann A, Lohre J, Cayci S, Katz N, Tillmanns H, Haberbosch W. The T allele of the missense Glu(298)Asp endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism is associated with coronary heart disease in younger individuals with high atherosclerotic risk profile. Atherosclerosis. 2002;160:167–175[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Hibi K, Ishigami T, Tamura K, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism and acute myocardial infarction. Hypertension. 1998;32:521–526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Yoshimura M, Yasue H, Nakayama M, et al. Genetic risk factors for coronary artery spasm: significance of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene T-786->C and missense Glu298Asp variants. J Investig Med. 2000;48:367–374[Medline]
  48. Philip I, Plantefeve G, Vuillaumier-Barrot S, et al. G894T polymorphism in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with an enhanced vascular responsiveness to phenylephrine. Circulation. 1999;99:3096–3098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Tesauro M, Thompson WC, Rogliani P, Qi L, Chaudhary PP, Moss J. Intracellular processing of endothelial nitric oxide synthase isoforms associated with differences in severity of cardiopulmonary diseases: cleavage of proteins with aspartate vs. glutamate at position 298. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2832–2835[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Maiolino, M. Cesari, D. Sticchi, M. Zanchetta, L. Pedon, K. Antezza, A. C. Pessina, and G. P. Rossi
Plasma Adiponectin for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in High-Risk Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3333 - 3340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
I. Zineh, A. L. Beitelshees, and M. J. Haller
NOS3 Polymorphisms Are Associated With Arterial Stiffness in Children With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 689 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. P. Casas, G. L. Cavalleri, L. E. Bautista, L. Smeeth, S. E. Humphries, and A. D. Hingorani
Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Polymorphisms and Cardiovascular Disease: A HuGE Review
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2006; 164(10): 921 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Ahsan, G. Mohd, T. Norboo, M. A. Baig, and M. A. Q. Pasha
Heterozygotes of NOS3 Polymorphisms Contribute to Reduced Nitrogen Oxides in High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema.
Chest, November 1, 2006; 130(5): 1511 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. P. Rossi, G. Maiolino, M. Zanchetta, D. Sticchi, L. Pedon, M. Cesari, D. Montemurro, R. De Toni, S. Zavattiero, and A. C. Pessina
The T-786C Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Genotype Predicts Cardiovascular Mortality in High-Risk Patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 19, 2006; 48(6): 1166 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
E.J.F. Danson, Y.H. Zhang, C.E. Sears, A.R. Edwards, B. Casadei, and D.J. Paterson
Disruption of inhibitory G-proteins mediates a reduction in atrial {beta}-adrenergic signaling by enhancing eNOS expression
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2005; 67(4): 613 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
Y. Liu, K. P. Burdon, C. D. Langefeld, S. R. Beck, L. E. Wagenknecht, S. S. Rich, D. W. Bowden, and B. I. Freedman
T-786C Polymorphism of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Is Associated with Albuminuria in the Diabetes Heart Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1085 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Cesari, M. Zanchetta, A. Burlina, L. Pedon, G. Maiolino, D. Sticchi, A. C. Pessina, and G. P. Rossi
Hyperhomocysteinemia Is Inversely Related With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Predicts Cardiovascular Mortality in High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease Hypertensives
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 115 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. Cattaruzza, T. J. Guzik, W. Slodowski, A. Pelvan, J. Becker, M. Halle, A. B. Buchwald, K. M. Channon, and M. Hecker
Shear Stress Insensitivity of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression as a Genetic Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease
Circ. Res., October 15, 2004; 95(8): 841 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. van Onna, A. A. Kroon, A. J.H.M. Houben, D. Koster, M. P.A. Zeegers, L. H.G. Henskens, A. W. Plat, H. E.J.H. Stoffers, and P. W. de Leeuw
Genetic Risk of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Disease: The Candidate Gene Approach in a Renal Angiography Cohort
Hypertension, October 1, 2004; 44(4): 448 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. P. Rossi, G. Maiolino, J. P. Casas, A. D. Hingorani, S. E. Humphries, L. Smeeth, and L. E. Bautista
Do Meta-Analyses of Association Studies of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Variants and Ischemic Heart Disease Provide Conclusive Answers? * Response
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): e305 - e306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
T. Awata, T. Neda, H. Iizuka, S. Kurihara, T. Ohkubo, N. Takata, M. Osaki, M. Watanabe, Y. Nakashima, T. Sawa, et al.
Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Is Associated With Diabetic Macular Edema in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2004; 27(9): 2184 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. J. F. Danson, K. S. Mankia, S. Golding, T. Dawson, L. Everatt, S. Cai, K. M. Channon, and D. J. Paterson
Impaired regulation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase and heart rate during exercise in mice lacking one nNOS allele
J. Physiol., August 1, 2004; 558(3): 963 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. P. Rossi and G. Maiolino
Association of gene polymorphisms with coronary artery disease in low- or high-risk subjects defined by conventional risk factors
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 209 - 209.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
U. Paradossi, E. Ciofini, A. Clerico, N. Botto, A. Biagini, and M. G. Colombo
Endothelial Function and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Young Healthy Subjects Among Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Glu298->Asp and T-786->C Polymorphisms
Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1305 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
G. P. Rossi and G. Maiolino
Letter to the Editor: T-786C and G894T Variants of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene and Training-Induced Correction of Endothelial Dysfunction in Coronary Artery Disease Patient
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(2): e11 - 11.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
B. Voetsch and J. Loscalzo
Genetic Determinants of Arterial Thrombosis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(2): 216 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. P. Rossi, M. Cesari, R. De Toni, M. Zanchetta, G. Maiolino, L. Pedon, C. Ganzaroli, P. Maiolino, and A. C. Pessina
Antibodies to Oxidized Low-Density Lipoproteins and Angiographically Assessed Coronary Artery Disease in White Patients
Circulation, November 18, 2003; 108(20): 2467 - 2472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Maiolino, G. P. Rossi, D. M. McNamara, M. Bedi, R. Holubkov, L. Postava, R. Ramani, K. Janosko, M. Mathier, G. A. MacGowan, et al.
Effect of the Asp298 Variant of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase on Survival for Patients With Congestive Heart Failure * Response
Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108 (15): e112 - e112.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Batalla, J. R. Reguero, and E. Coto
The T-786C endothelial nitric oxide synthase genotype and coronary artery disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1140 - 1140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. P. Rossi, M. Cesari, and A. C. Pessina
The T-786C endothelial nitric oxide synthase genotype and coronary artery disease: Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1140 - 1141.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow