|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:827-833, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02962-5 © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
* Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Manuscript received May 14, 2002; revised manuscript received July 29, 2002, accepted September 13, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jonathan R. Lindner, Cardiovascular Division, Box 800158, Medical Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
jlindner{at}virginia.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Myocardial contrast echocardiography can be used to assess perfusion within the risk area before PCS and the extent of necrosis soon after PCS.
METHODS: In 30 patients with AMI, MCE and two-dimensional echocardiography were performed before PCS and 3 to 5 days and 4 weeks after PCS. Contractile reserve was assessed by dobutamine echocardiography at four weeks in patients with persistent severe wall-motion abnormalities.
RESULTS: Of segments without perfusion at 3 to 5 days, 95% had severe hypokinesis to akinesis at 4 weeks. Of segments with normal perfusion at 3 to 5 days, 90% had normal wall motion or mild hypokinesis at 4 weeks, whereas those with partial perfusion at 3 to 5 days were evenly divided between normal wall motion, hypokinesis, and akinesis. In segments with persistent severe wall-motion abnormalities at four weeks, contractile reserve was found in >80% of segments with perfusion, compared with only 10% of segments without detectable perfusion (p < 0.01). The presence of myocardial perfusion by MCE before PCS was associated with maintained or improved perfusion at 3 to 5 days and eventual recovery of resting wall motion.
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial contrast echocardiography performed early after PCS provides information on the extent of infarction, and hence the likelihood for recovery of resting systolic function or contractile reserve. The presence of perfusion before PCS, from either collateral or antegrade flow, predicts the maintenance of perfusion and recovery of systolic function.
| ||||||||||||||||||||
The spatial extent of necrosis can be evaluated early after AMI by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which assesses the region of microvascular damage. In this study, we hypothesized that the extent of viability by MCE performed early after primary coronary stenting (PCS) in patients with AMI predicts the degree of recovery of systolic function; and that in segments with persistent severe wall-motion abnormalities, the presence of at least partial viability by MCE identifies segments with contractile reserve. We also performed MCE before revascularization to determine whether the presence of perfusion in the risk area before PCS, from either collateral flow or antegrade flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA), predicts restoration of normal perfusion after PCS and eventual recovery of resting function.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient population.
Consecutive patients with ST-elevation AMI presenting within 8 h of symptom onset referred for primary PCS were enrolled. The diagnosis of AMI was made on the basis of symptoms consistent with myocardial ischemia for
30 min and
2 mm ST-segment elevation in two or more contiguous electrocardiogram leads. Patients with a history of prior AMI, wall-motion abnormalities in more than one vascular territory on the initial echocardiogram, cardiomyopathy, hemodynamic instability, or allergy to blood products were excluded.
Coronary angiography and stenting. All patients received oral aspirin (324 mg) and intravenous heparin. Angiography was performed using standard views. Coronary angioplasty and stenting (3.0 to 4.5 mm diameter) of the IRA was performed and deemed successful in all patients. Clopidogrel (300 mg) was given orally before PCS and continued (75 mg per day) for the duration of the study. Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist was administered at the discretion of the operating physician. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade (7) before and following PCS was assessed by a reader blind to clinical and echocardiographic data.
MCE. Intermittent ultraharmonic imaging was performed using a Sonos 5500 ultrasound system (Philips Ultrasound, Andover, Massachusetts) with transmission and receive frequencies of 1.3 and 3.6 MHz, respectively. Images were acquired in the apical two-, three-, and four-chamber views. The maximal mechanical index was used and the acoustic focus was placed at the level of the mitral valve and adjusted to the apex when needed to exclude near-field artifacts. A dynamic range of 60 dB was used and compression was set at 80. For each patient, settings were kept constant for all stages.
After acquisition of baseline images, Optison (Mallinckrodt Medical, St. Louis, Missouri) was administered intravenously as a continuous infusion (0.5 ml·min1) and adjusted to produce optimal opacification without far-field attenuation. After several beats of continuous imaging, end-systolic images were acquired at pulsing intervals (PI) of every 1 to 10 cardiac cycles to allow incremental replenishment of microbubbles into the tissue in the ultrasound imaging sector following each high-power pulse (8).
2-D and dobutamine echocardiography.
Wall motion was assessed by 2-D echocardiography with and without contrast enhancement of the left ventricular cavity in the apical two-, three-, and four-chamber imaging planes. Wall motion was assessed using tissue harmonic imaging before contrast infusion. At the end of each microbubble infusion performed for assessment of perfusion, settings were optimized for left ventricular cavity opacification by decreasing the mechanical index to 0.4 to 0.5, placing the acoustic focus at the apex, and adjusting the gain settings as needed. For assessment of contractile reserve at four weeks, wall motion was assessed during infusion of incremental doses of dobutamine from 5 to 20 µg·kg1·min1 during continuous electrocardiogram and blood pressure monitoring. Cine loops were acquired at frame rates
30 Hz.
Data analysis.
Analysis of echocardiographic data was performed by an experienced reader blind to the clinical and angiographic data. Myocardial contrast echocardiography and wall motion data were assessed separately. For each view, the left ventricle was divided into six equal segments. Resting wall motion in each segment was scored as 1 = normal, 2 = mild hypokinesis, 3 = severe hypokinesis, 4 = akinesis, or 5 = dyskinesis based on review of the noncontrast and contrast-enhanced video clips. Segments that were severely hypokinetic to dyskinetic on the initial study before PCS constituted the risk area. For each study, a wall motion score index in the risk area (WMSI-RA) was derived by summing all wall motion scores in the risk area and dividing by the total number of segments. In selected patients with persistent severe wall motion abnormalities (WMSI-RA
2.5 and at least two segments with scores
3) at four weeks, the presence of contractile reserve was defined by an improvement of
1 grade during dobutamine infusion, except for dyskinetic segments, which were considered viable only if a score of
3 was achieved.
Myocardial perfusion was assessed from MCE images obtained during intermittent ultraharmonic imaging. Each segment was assigned a single perfusion score based on both the change in myocardial signal intensity with prolongation of the PI and the degree of opacification at the longest PI. Scores were graded as 2 = normal (homogenous opacification approximating that of the normal region at longest PI and normal rate of increase in signal with PI prolongation), 1 = reduced (partial or reduced opacification compared with the normal region at the longest PI and/or reduced rate of increase in signal intensity with PI prolongation), or 0 = absent (no opacification despite prolongation of the PI). A perfusion score index in the risk area (PSI-RA) was derived by dividing the summed perfusion scores in the risk area by the number of segments. Segments in which perfusion could not be assessed because of attenuation or other imaging artifacts were excluded from analysis for both WMSI-RA and PSI-RA. One-third of all studies were randomly chosen to assess interobserver variability with a second expert reader.
Statistical methods. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Comparisons were made using the Student t test (paired) or by chi-square analysis. The relationship between WMSI-RA and PSI-RA data was analyzed by regression analysis and data were curve-fitted using a least-squares fit. The R value was derived from R2 or the regression sum of squares divided by the total sum of squares. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The perfusion scores on MCE for segments within the risk area assessed 3 to 5 days after PCS according to their perfusion scores before PCS are shown in Figure 1. In the 68 segments with no perfusion (score = 0) before PCS, 51 (75%) had restoration of perfusion (score = 1 or 2) at 3 to 5 days. Myocardial contrast echocardiography images demonstrating almost complete restoration of myocardial perfusion in the risk area after PCS are illustrated in Figure 2. In the 156 risk area segments with partial or normal perfusion (score = 1 or 2) before PCS, 147 (94%) had improved or maintained perfusion at 3 to 5 days, the majority of which was categorized as normal (Fig. 1), whereas only 9 (6%) demonstrated absence of perfusion. Of segments with perfusion before PCS, 45% were in patients who had spontaneous reflow of their IRA on angiography before PCS, whereas the remainder were in patients with occluded arteries. Segmental perfusion scores at 4 weeks were almost identical to those at 3 to 5 days, with differences found in only 14 of 227 segments (6%) within the risk area.
|
|
|
The relation between the PSI-RA 3 to 5 days after PCS and the WMSI-RA at 4 weeks is depicted in Figure 4. Those patients with excellent perfusion in the risk area (high PSI-RA) after PCS had near complete recovery of wall motion (low WMSI-RA), whereas patients with very poor perfusion did not recover function. The relation for all patients was, however, nonlinear owing to lack of recovery of wall motion (high WMSI-RA) in those with an intermediate degree of perfusion in the risk area after PCS. Illustrated in Figure 5 are end-systolic MCE images obtained from a patient with an intermediate PSI-RA and persistent akinesis in much of the risk area. These images suggest that subendocardial or patchy infarction was responsible for lack of recovery of resting wall motion in patients with intermediate perfusion scores.
|
|
2.5 at 4 weeks (patients represented by the initial plateau in Fig. 4) were selected for dobutamine echocardiography. Augmentation in systolic thickening occurred in almost all risk area segments where perfusion was present, and occurred in few segments where perfusion was absent (Fig. 6). For the few segments where contractile reserve was observed despite no perfusion, the risk area was very small, and bordering segments always had normal perfusion.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocardial contrast echocardiography is well suited for assessing the integrity of the microcirculation and, hence, for determining the extent of myocardial necrosis early after AMI (9). Before the development of intravenous ultrasound contrast agents, microbubbles were injected directly into the coronary artery during angiography to assess the distal capillary bed. In the current study, intravenous microbubble administration and intermittent high-power imaging algorithms were used to evaluate regional perfusion, and viability was determined by analyzing both the peak intensity at a long PI and the change in acoustic intensity with prolongation of the PI (10). Assessment of viability with MCE was delayed for several days after PCS because microvascular perfusion in the risk area immediately after epicardial artery reflow is dynamic because of hyperemia (11), and because microvascular reflow can substantially improve or worsen in the first few hours or days after epicardial artery reflow (12). We found that perfusion assessed 3 to 5 days after PCS was almost identical to that measured later in the chronic phase.
In patients with acute or recent AMI, the absence of microvascular perfusion determined by MCE with intracoronary injection of microbubbles predicts lack of recovery of resting left ventricular systolic function, irrespective of whether IRA patency is achieved (1315). More recent studies using intravenous contrast administration and intermittent high-MI imaging techniques have shown similar results (1620). In accord with prior studies, we found that resting wall motion invariably did not recover when myocardial perfusion was absent after PCS. In prior studies, however, the presence of perfusion by MCE early after AMI has not been completely reliable for predicting recovery of resting function (17,18,21). These findings do not necessarily imply a weakness in the imaging technique, but instead reflect the expected long-term outcomes when there is subendocardial or patchy infarction. Wall motion at rest is largely dependent upon endocardial thickening so that the transmural extent of viability in some of these studies may not have been sufficient to allow recovery of systolic function (1,2). In the current study, we determined on a segmental basis that the presence of completely normal perfusion at 3 to 5 days after PCS predicted the presence of normal or near-normal function at 4 weeks. When perfusion was present but reduced, reflecting partial infarction, resting wall motion at four weeks was variable. Many of these segments where resting function remained severely hypokinetic to akinetic were characterized by an epicardial rim of viable tissue.
Even when resting systolic function does not recover, the presence of partial viability after AMI is likely to be beneficial. Although mid- and epicardial portions of the left ventricle contribute little to resting function, they become important for augmentation of systolic performance during exertion. In patients with chronic ischemic dysfunction, revascularization of viable territories leads to improvement in inotropic reserve even when resting akinesia persists (5). Accordingly, we sought to determine whether the presence of viability in segments with persistent severe wall-motion abnormalities after primary revascularization identifies the ability to augment thickening with stress. Contractile reserve was measured by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in the relatively small number of patients with poor wall-motion scores at four weeks. Almost all segments with perfusion had a positive inotropic response, whereas very few segments without perfusion improved. Our results are in accord with a recent report demonstrating that the degree of opacification on MCE (for the entire risk area rather than a segmental basis) correlated with the presence of contractile reserve in patients with recent AMI (21).
The presence of viability in the epicardial portions of the left ventricle overlying the infarct bed is also beneficial for maintaining normal left ventricular shape and preventing adverse left ventricular remodeling (22). Left ventricular dilation after AMI has been shown to occur primarily in patients who have little or no contractile response to dobutamine (6), or who have complete absence of microvascular reflow by MCE with intracoronary injection of microbubbles (23). Hence, it is likely that patients in our study with persistent severe wall motion abnormalities but partial viability after PCS would be protected from adverse remodeling. We believe that more patients and longer follow-up would be required to adequately test this hypothesis.
In patients undergoing primary angioplasty, the presence of TIMI-3 epicardial artery flow before the procedure portends better prognosis in terms of mortality and development of congestive heart failure (24). This benefit is presumably due to preserved microvascular perfusion and enhanced myocardial salvage. In the current study, we demonstrated that microvascular perfusion in the risk area before PCS predicted postprocedural viability and recovery of resting function. Many of these segments were found in patients in whom antegrade flow was detected in the IRA before PCS. The ability of MCE to predict TIMI 2 or 3 flow in the IRA before PCI has been demonstrated previously (20). However, MCE can also be used to assess collateral-derived myocardial blood flow, manifest by contrast enhancement that occurs at long PIs (25,26). It is, therefore, not surprising that perfusion in the risk area before PCS was also detected in a group of patients with completely closed infarct-related arteries. The presence of perfusion within the risk area, even when reduced compared to normal regions, portended a better prognosis in terms of perfusion status after intervention and recovery of resting systolic function. Loss of perfusion after PCS in segments that had normal perfusion before the procedure, presumably a result of distal microvascular embolization, was uncommon.
Methods for quantifying myocardial perfusion by contrast echocardiography are currently available that rely on the assessment of myocardial microvascular blood volume and blood velocity (8). Although quantification may have yielded more objective and reproducible data, it would have limited the clinical relevance of the study for several reasons. First, the means for quantifying perfusion by analyzing PI versus acoustic intensity data are currently not widely applied in the clinical setting. Second, quantification protocols in their current form are time consuming and are unlikely to be used when integrating information on perfusion acquired in the acute setting before PCS.
In summary, results of this study indicate that the extent of myocardial salvage can be determined by MCE early after PCS at a time when viability cannot be accurately assessed by contractile function because of postischemic stunning. Recovery of resting left ventricular function can no longer be considered the gold standard for assessing viability because this parameter does not detect salvage of epicardial portions of the myocardium, which may be important for maintaining left ventricular geometry, providing contractile reserve, and preventing heart failure symptoms. Myocardial contrast echocardiography is capable of detecting partial viability even in territories that remain akinetic, thereby providing information on prognosis and need for further protection from ischemic injury. Because MCE perfusion imaging can be performed rapidly at the patient bedside, it also provides the opportunity to evaluate myocardial blood flow in patients with AMI before intervention. With the evolving paradigms of transferring patients to regional AMI treatment centers for percutaneous intervention, it is possible that this information will prove valuable for determining optimal treatment strategies for individual patients.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time? Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 299 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Rakhit, H. Becher, M. Monaghan, P. Nihoyannopoulis, and R. Senior The clinical applications of myocardial contrast echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2007; 8(3): s24 - s29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Dijkmans, R. Senior, H. Becher, T. R. Porter, K. Wei, C. A. Visser, and O. Kamp Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion: The Evidence So Far J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 5, 2006; 48(11): 2168 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bodi, J. Sanchis, A. Losada, M. P. Lopez-Lereu, D. Garcia, M. Pellicer, F. J. Chorro, and A. Llacer Usefulness of quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography to analyze microvasculature perfusion in patients with a recent myocardial infarction and an open infarct-related artery: comparison with intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 164 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yano, H. Ito, K. Iwakura, R. Kimura, K. Tanaka, A. Okamura, S. Kawano, T. Masuyama, and K. Fujii Myocardial contrast echocardiography with a new calibration method can estimate myocardial viabilityin patients with myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1799 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lindner and J. Sklenar Placing faith in numbers: quantification of perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1814 - 1816. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Biagini, T. W. Galema, A. F. L. Schinkel, W. B. Vletter, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and F. J. Ten Cate Myocardial wall thickness predicts recovery of contractile function after primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1489 - 1493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Weyman The year in echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 7, 2004; 43(1): 140 - 148. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reffelmann, S. L. Hale, J. S. Dow, and R. A. Kloner No-Reflow Phenomenon Persists Long-Term After Ischemia/Reperfusion in the Rat and Predicts Infarct Expansion Circulation, December 9, 2003; 108(23): 2911 - 2917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |