|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:557-564, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02868-1 © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |









* AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden
Manuscript received April 29, 2002; revised manuscript received October 4, 2002, accepted November 1, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Troy C. Sarich, AstraZeneca LP, DCC2 W1-345, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, Delaware 19850, USA.
troy.sarich{at}astrazeneca.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Recombinant hirudin (parenteral DTI) and enoxaparin (low molecular weight heparin) have been demonstrated to be clinically effective in acute coronary syndromes. Ximelagatran is currently under investigation for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. The shed blood model allows for the study of thrombin generation and platelet activation in humans in vivo.
METHODS: This was an open-label, parallel-group study involving 120 healthy male volunteers randomized to receive one of three oral doses of ximelagatran (15, 30 or 60 mg), r-hirudin (intravenous) or enoxaparin (subcutaneous) at doses demonstrated to be clinically effective in acute coronary syndromes, or to serve as a control. Thrombin generation (prothrombin fragment 1+2 [F1+2] and thrombin-antithrombin complex [TAT]) and platelet activation (ß-thromboglobulin [ß-TG]) biomarkers were studied using a shed blood model involving blood collection from skin incisions made using standardized bleeding time devices.
RESULTS: Oral ximelagatran, intravenous r-hirudin and subcutaneous enoxaparin rapidly and significantly (p < 0.05) decreased F1+2, TAT and ß-TG levels in shed blood, indicating inhibition of thrombin generation and platelet activation. Statistically significant concentration (melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran)-response relationships for F1+2 (p = 0.005), TAT (p = 0.005) and ß-TG (p < 0.001) levels, with IC50s of 0.376 (F1+2), 0.163 (TAT) and 0.115 (ß-TG) µmol/l, were detected. Melagatran showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with low variability. All drugs were well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of the DTI ximelagatran resulted in a rapid inhibition of both thrombin generation and platelet activation in a concentration-dependent manner using a human shed blood model. The inhibition of thrombin generation by 60 mg ximelagatran was comparable to that observed with doses of r-hirudin and enoxaparin demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Melagatran, the active form of the oral DTI ximelagatran, is a potent thrombin inhibitor with a Ki for thrombin of 2 nmol/l (5,6). After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and converted to melagatran, with low interindividual variability in melagatran plasma concentrations (7). Ximelagatran is currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.
In an initial pilot study using the shed blood model, oral ximelagatran (60 mg) and dalteparin (120 IU/kg) were shown to inhibit thrombin generation (7). The present study was performed to expand upon these previous observations. The primary goal of the study was to investigate the pharmacodynamic effects (thrombin generation and platelet activation) of a range of doses of ximelagatran and parenteral doses of recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) and enoxaparin used in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. The secondary goals were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of melagatran and the tolerability of oral ximelagatran. Additional investigations into the concentration (melagatran)-response relationships for inhibition of thrombin generation and platelet activation following oral ximelagatran were carried out. The parenteral thrombin inhibitor r-hirudin and the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin, at the doses used in this study, have been shown to be effective antithrombotic drugs in large clinical studies of acute coronary syndromes, including OASIS-2 (Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes) (8) and ESSENCE (Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events) (9).
Prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) is produced during the final stage of thrombin formation, and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) reflects in vivo thrombin generation processes. Prothrombin fragment 1+2 and TAT were, therefore, used as biomarkers of thrombin generation. Beta-thromboglobulin (ß-TG), an
-granule protein secreted upon activation of platelets, was used as a biomarker of platelet activation. Although these biomarkers cannot be used for determination of clinical efficacy, understanding the degree of inhibition of thrombin generation and platelet activation may be useful for selecting effective doses of antithrombotic drugs for study in patients with various thromboembolic conditions.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study design
This was a randomized, open-label study involving 120 subjects in six parallel groups (20 per group). Each group received one of the following six treatments: a single oral dose of ximelagatran (15, 30 or 60 mg); r-hirudin (Refludan, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Frankfurt, Germany) as a bolus intravenous (IV) injection (0.4 mg/kg), followed by an IV infusion (0.15 mg/kg/h for 2 h plus 0.075 mg/kg/h for 2 h); a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of enoxaparin (100 U/kg; Klexane, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Paris, France); or an orally administered control (water). The IV infusion of r-hirudin was given at high dose for only 2 h, followed by 2 h at a 50% lower infusion, in order to study the effects of various concentrations of r-hirudin over time.
All subjects were given a complete health examination (including physical examination, electrocardiogram and laboratory screen) within 14 days of the study day and 2 to 5 days after the study day. The subjects were randomized to a treatment group on the morning of the study day. The subjects were compensated according to accepted local practices and ethics committee approval.
Blood sampling
Shed blood
The shed blood sampling technique was performed as previously described (4,7) with minor modifications. A sphygmomanometer was placed on the upper arm and inflated to 45 mm Hg. A standardized disposable device (Simplate IIR, Organon Technika Corp., Durham, North Carolina) was used to make two incisions on the volar surface of the forearm (each 5-mm long and 1-mm deep) parallel to the antecubital crease. Shed blood was collected predosing and 2, 4 and 10 h postdosing directly from the edge of the incisions, starting immediately after incision and until 4 min after incision, using an automated plastic-tipped pipette. The blood was transferred at approximately 30-s intervals during collection into ice-cooled plastic tubes containing a stop solution consisting of sodium citrate 3.8%, EDTA 100 mmol/l, indomethacin 30 µmol/l, sodium heparin 1,500 U/ml, and aprotinin 1,000 U/ml, to prevent further thrombin generation or platelet activation in the sample tube. After blood collection was complete, the incisions were sealed using butterfly bandages. The shed blood samples were centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 5 min, and the plasma was separated and stored at 70°C until analysis.
Venous blood
Venous blood samples (4.5 ml) for the measurement of F1+2, TAT and ß-TG were collected predosing and 2, 4 and 10 h postdosing into stop solution (described previously) at a 1:9 volume ratio to blood. The samples were centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 10 min, and the plasma was separated and stored at 70°C until analysis.
Venous blood samples (4.5 ml) also were collected into citrated tubes predosing and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h postdosing. A small amount of the citrated whole blood was used to measure the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in the ximelagatran groups. The remaining whole blood was then centrifuged for 10 min at 1,500 x g, and the plasma separated and stored frozen (70°C) until determination of either plasma levels of melagatran (ximelagatran groups) or anti-Xa activity (enoxaparin group).
Venous blood samples (3.5 ml) also were collected into tubes containing EDTA predosing and 2, 4, and 10 h postdosing for determination of platelet count for normalization of the ß-TG levels from IU/ml to IU/107 platelets.
Analyses
Prothrombin fragment 1+2, TAT and ß-TG levels were determined in both venous and shed blood samples using ELISA assays (Enzygnost F1+2 and Enzygnost TAT, Behring Diagnostics GmbH, Marburg, Germany; Asserachrom ß-TG, Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres-sur-Seine, France).
Activated partial thromboplastin time was measured using individual TAS-aPTT assay cards and an automated bedside (point of care) Thrombolytic Assessment System (TAS, Pharmanetics Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina) card reader as previously described (7). The TAS-aPTT device generally overestimates conventional laboratory aPTT values.
Citrated plasma samples collected from the subjects who received ximelagatran were analyzed for plasma levels of melagatran using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method (10). Anti-Xa activity was determined using a Coatest Heparin kit (Chromogenix AB, Mölndal, Sweden). For both melagatran (µmol/l) and enoxaparin (anti-Xa activity) the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to maximum concentration (tmax) were estimated as the highest measured plasma concentration and the time at which that concentration was first measured, respectively. The half-life (t
) was estimated as 0.693/k, where k (elimination rate constant) was estimated by linear regression of the logarithm of plasma concentration versus time in the linear portion of the elimination phase. For melagatran, the area under the curve was calculated using the linear/log trapezoidal rule up to the last measurable plasma concentration and then extrapolated to infinity by addition of the last measurable plasma concentration divided by the elimination rate constant (Clast/k).
Statistics
Prothrombin fragment 1+2, TAT and ß-TG data were normalized by logarithmic transformation for the statistical analyses. Statistical analyses of levels of these biomarkers were performed using a repeated measures analysis of variance with treatment and time as factors in the model. Logarithmically transformed predose values were used as a covariate in the model. Comparisons of between-group effects at all measurement points were made and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Group differences were considered statistically significant at a level of p < 0.05 (two-tailed) when the 95% CIs of the ratios excluded 1.0. Post hoc comparisons between the different ximelagatran dose groups were performed using unpaired t tests. No corrections have been made for the multiple comparisons performed in this study. Point estimates and variability are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated.
For the analysis of the concentration-effect relationship (F1+2, TAT and ß-TG in shed blood), a repeated measures model adjusting for time since dose, predose levels and interaction between dose and time since dose was used. No interactions between time since dose and dose were detected. An inhibitory concentration-response model was also fit to the data using nonlinear regression and the following equation:
, where B0 = baseline response, Cp = plasma concentration, and IC50 = concentration resulting in 50% maximal inhibition.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of melagatran in the ximelagatran 15-, 30- and 60-mg dose groups was independent of dose (2.6 ± 0.3, 2.8 ± 0.3 and 2.8 ± 0.3 h, respectively). The variability (coefficient of variation, CV%) in Cmax, AUC, tmax and t
(range of means across doses) was 17% to 24%, 17% to 23%, 10% to 21% and 11% to 12%, respectively. The mean plasma concentrations versus time profiles of melagatran after oral administration of 15, 30 and 60 mg ximelagatran are shown in Figure 6.
|
of 5.0 ± 1.1 h. The variability (CV%) of Cmax, tmax and t
was 7%, 21% and 20%, respectively. Anti-Xa activity in the enoxaparin group predosing and 2, 4, and 10 h postdosing was 0.02 ± 0.02 U/ml, 0.79 ± 0.08 U/ml, 0.83 ± 0.06 U/ml and 0.42 ± 0.07 U/ml, respectively.
Tolerability
Ximelagatran, r-hirudin and enoxaparin were all well tolerated with no laboratory abnormalities, bleeding complications or serious adverse events reported in any of the subjects during the study day.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The doses of r-hirudin and enoxaparin used in this study have been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (8,9). However, in order to investigate the effects of r-hirudin at lower blood concentrations in the present study, the infusion rate was halved after 2 h and then stopped after 4 h. Because both r-hirudin and enoxaparin have been shown to be effective in large clinical studies of acute coronary syndromes, understanding their effects on the shed blood biomarkers and comparing these effects to a range of doses of ximelagatran was considered valuable. Ximelagatran 60 mg appeared to most closely match the inhibition of thrombin generation by r-hirudin and enoxaparin. However, the effect of 60 mg ximelagatran on inhibition of platelet activation was similar to that of r-hirudin, but it was significantly better than that of enoxaparin. Overall, these data suggest that doses of ximelagatran up to 60 mg may be required for clinical efficacy in acute coronary syndromes. These results also suggest that, in this model, direct thrombin inhibition by melagatran is superior for the inhibition of platelet activation to the indirect antithrombin-mediated inhibition of thrombin by enoxaparin. Potential mechanistic explanations for the superior effects on platelets observed with ximelagatran include reduced occupancy of platelet thrombin receptors by catalytically active thrombin and/or smaller molecular size, allowing for easier access to clot-bound thrombin (14).
It is interesting to note that 6 h after the stop of the IV infusion of r-hirudin, which has a reported t
of
1.3 h (15), effects on thrombin generation and platelet activation similar to those with 60 mg ximelagatran (t
3 h) and enoxaparin (t
5 h) were observed. However, a longer terminal t
of
3 h for r-hirudin has been reported, which may explain these observations (16).
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects
Our data suggest that the inhibitory effects of ximelagatran and the LMWHs enoxaparin and dalteparin (7) on thrombin generation are very similar. Excluding the route of administration, ximelagatran and the LMWHs are also similar from a pharmacokinetic point of view. The rapid peak in melagatran plasma concentration following oral administration of ximelagatran is similar to that observed with the LMWHs (tmax 2 to 3 h). This rapid onset of action suggests that treatment of thromboembolism with ximelagatran can be initiated rapidly without concomitant administration of heparin or LMWH, in contrast to the current recommended practice with the oral vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin (17). This approach is supported by findings of a dose-guiding study with ximelagatran in patients with deep vein thrombosis (18). The elimination half-lives of melagatran and LMWHs are comparable, ranging from 3 to 5 h (7,1921). In addition, the variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran is relatively low (<25%) and comparable to that of parenterally administered enoxaparin. Thus, if the shed blood technique is predictive of an antithrombotic effect in patients, ximelagatran is likely to be effective where LMWHs are effective.
Conclusions
Oral administration of the DTI ximelagatran resulted in a rapid inhibition of both thrombin generation and platelet activation in a concentration-dependent manner using a human shed blood model. The inhibition of thrombin generation by 60 mg ximelagatran was comparable to that observed with doses of r-hirudin and enoxaparin demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. The inhibition of platelet activation by 60 mg ximelagatran was comparable to that observed with r-hirudin and superior to that observed with enoxaparin. Numerous clinical trials with ximelagatran, including studies in acute coronary syndrome patients, are currently ongoing.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
hlander K, Gustafsson D, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of the novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran (pINN, formerly H 376/95), compared with standard therapy for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (abstr). Thromb Haemost 2001;Suppl 1:OC2348

the S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving long-term treatment: a population analysis by nonlinear mixed effect modeling (abstr). Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;71:31
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Gruber, U. M. Marzec, L. Bush, E. Di Cera, J. A. Fernandez, M. A. Berny, E. I. Tucker, O. J. T. McCarty, J. H. Griffin, and S. R. Hanson Relative antithrombotic and antihemostatic effects of protein C activator versus low-molecular-weight heparin in primates Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(9): 3733 - 3740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Nisio, S. Middeldorp, and H. R. Buller Direct Thrombin Inhibitors N. Engl. J. Med., September 8, 2005; 353(10): 1028 - 1040. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Gulseth Ximelagatran: An orally active direct thrombin inhibitor Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2005; 62(14): 1451 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Teng, T. C. Sarich, U. G. Eriksson, J. E. Hamer, S. Gillette, K.-M. Schutzer, G. F. Carlson Jr, and P. R. Kowey A Pharmacokinetic Study of the Combined Administration of Amiodarone and Ximelagatran, an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor J. Clin. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 44(9): 1063 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Salem, P. D. Stein, A. Al-Ahmad, H. I. Bussey, D. Horstkotte, N. Miller, and S. G. Pauker Antithrombotic Therapy in Valvular Heart Disease--Native and Prosthetic: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 457S - 482S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F Viles-Gonzalez, V. Fuster, and J. J Badimon Atherothrombosis: A widespread disease with unpredictable and life-threatening consequences Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2004; 25(14): 1197 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Sarich, S. Johansson, K.-M. Schutzer, U. Wall, E. Kessler, R. Teng, and U. G. Eriksson The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ximelagatran, an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Are Unaffected by a Single Dose of Alcohol J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2004; 44(4): 388 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |