|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:2193-2196, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00459-5 © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
* University of Colorado Cardiovascular Institute and Adult Medical Genetic Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Luisa Mestroni, CUCVI and AMGP, Bioscience Park Center, Suite 150, 12635 E. Montview Blvd., Aurora, Colorado 80010-7116, USA.
Luisa.Mestroni{at}uchsc.edu
| Epidemiology and clinical implications of atrial fibrillation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter account for approximately 9,000 deaths and 400,000 hospitalizations annually, and they are the cause of stroke in about 15% of patients (2). The prevalence of AF is estimated to be between 0.5 and 1% in the general population, and the condition affects approximately 2.2 million individuals in the U.S. alone (3). The incidence and prevalence of AF increases with age: approximately 70% of those diagnosed with AF are between 65 and 85 years old (3). Braunwald (4) has recently described AF as a growing "epidemic" as the population of elderly continues to increase. Still, the real frequency of AF is probably underestimated (5) because of the high rate (30% to 45%) of asymptomatic arrhythmia, which frequently goes undetected.
In spite of AFs clinical relevance, the origin and the mechanisms underlying this common arrhythmia have, until recently, been obscure. Atrial fibrillation has been recognized since the early 1900s and typically has been associated with conditions that increase atrial pressure or cause atrial dilation (Table 1). Atrial fibrillation is also associated with cardiomyopathies (610), diseases of the cardiac muscle which are known to be genetically determined in a large proportion of patients. Finally, AF may also occur in patients without any other evidence of heart or systemic disease, a condition known as lone AF. Lone AF accounts for 2% to 31% of the AF patient population (5) and usually affects young and middle-aged adults.
|
| Genetic epidemiology of AF |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The first important advance in this direction has been the identification of a genetic locus for familial AF on chromosome 10q22-q24, by Brugada et al. (12). Three families from Catalonia, Spain, were studied and showed an autosomal dominant pattern of transmission and early onset of the arrhythmia (age 1 to 45 years). Positional cloning and analysis of candidate genes to identify the disease gene are currently ongoing. Since the beginning of their studies, Brugada et al. (11) have collected probands from more than 100 families with familial AF. Their findings revealed that not all families were affected by the chromosome 10q22-q24 locus, suggesting that familial AF is a genetically heterogeneous disorder caused by more than one gene. Their findings also supported the notion that familial AF may be more common than previously suspected.
In this issue of the Journal, Darbar et al. (13) report the results of a large survey performed in the arrhythmia clinic at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Out of 914 patients with AF, 36% had lone AF, and of that patient population, 15% had a familial history of the disorder (5% of the overall population). These findings discount the old idea that familial AF is a rare condition. The age of onset in the 50 probands with familial AF ranged from 25 to 55 years.
The investigators were able to identify four multigeneration families that showed an autosomal dominant pattern of transmission, as previously reported. Interestingly, none of them showed linkage with the locus on chromosome 10 that was reported in the families from Catalonia, suggesting the existence of yet another gene or multiple genes.
The other intriguing feature was that different ventricular responses and different outcomes were observed in the phenotype analysis. In three families, the affected family members had symptomatic AF with rapid ventricular response, in some instances leading to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, which improved after sinus rhythm restoration or rate-control. These families had also experienced a significant incidence of stroke. On the other hand, affected members of the fourth family frequently had asymptomatic AF, with slow ventricular response, atrial myopathy, progression to conduction delay, and "ventricular" cardiomyopathy.
The two different phenotypes described in the study of Darbar et al. (13) may indicate two distinct mechanisms (and corresponding genes or pathways) involved in the origin of AF. The phenotype with AF and slow ventricular response suggests an underlying more diffuse myocardial disease. Indeed, the coexistence of atrial arrhythmia (including AF) and conduction defects are found in cardiomyopathies caused by mutations of cytoskeletal genes of the nuclear lamina, such as emerin and lamin (Table 1) (6,14). On the other hand, the phenotype with AF rapid ventricular response and without primary involvement of the "working" myocardium may suggest an ion channel disease, such as cases of ventricular arrhythmia due to sodium channel mutations (long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, or idiopathic ventricular tachycardia) (14). Most recent advances in the molecular genetics of AF support this hypothesis and are discussed later.
The attempt to define the epidemiology of familial AF by Darbar et al. (13) has several limitations. These include the possibility of a referral bias overestimating the frequency of lone AF, an underestimate due to clinically silent forms, or survey results based on family history rather than clinical evaluation of relatives. Further, the relative frequency of the rapid- and slow-ventricular rate AF in the overall population is unknown. However, the relevant messages emerging from this study are that the familial occurrence of AF is not rare, that the condition is probably due to several different genes and molecular mechanisms, that it may be associated with young age and complications such as stroke and cardiomyopathy, and that patients with this disorder should undergo adequate screening, therapy, and counseling.
| Role of gene mutations in the origin of AF |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The second recent study reports the discovery of the first gene causing lone AF in a Chinese family with autosomal dominant transmission (16). Not surprisingly, the disease-gene (KCNQ1 or KvLQT1) encodes the alpha subunit of the cardiac IKs potassium channel, as well as the KCNQ1/KCNE2 and KCNQ1/KCNE3 potassium channels, and is again involved in atrial repolarization. The disease-causing mutation (S140G) causes a gain-of-function of the KCNQ1/KCNE1 and KCNQ1/KCNE2 channels, reducing the action potential duration and the effective refractory period, therefore inducing a mechanism able to initiate and maintain AF. Interestingly, different mutations in the same gene were found to cause loss-of-function and lead to long QT syndrome (17). The phenotypic heterogeneity of KCNQ1 is not surprising, as it is also observed in other ion channel diseases. For example, as mentioned before, different mutations in SCN5A may cause long QT, conduction defects, and Brugada syndrome (14). The finding of major involvement of K+ channels in the etiology of AF offers the opportunity to develop novel therapeutic strategies, such as IKs blockers.
| Role of the changes in gene expression (electrical remodeling) in maintaining AF |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The advances in understanding the remodeling process may have important clinical implications in terms of prevention (such as early cardioversion, implantable atrial defibrillator, and preventive atrial pacing methods) and therapies to drive reverse remodeling (5). This new understanding will clearly influence future investigations of genes involved in the remodeling pathways that may cause or modulate AF.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
* Editorials published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC or the American College of Cardiology. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Writing Committee Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 651 - 745. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): e149 - e246. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): e257 - e354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Gersh, T. S.M. Tsang, M. E. Barnes, and J. B. Seward The changing epidemiology of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the role of novel risk factors Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2005; 7(suppl_C): C5 - C11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Fox, S. K. Shernan, and S. C. Body Predictive Genomics of Adverse Events After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2004; 8(4): 297 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Havranek and F. A. Masoudi What we're talking about when we talk about race J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 436 - 437. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |