JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:1918-1925, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00428-5
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonetti, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Barsness, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonetti, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Barsness, G. W.

STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPER

Enhanced external counterpulsation for ischemic heart disease

What’s behind the curtain?

Piero O. Bonetti, MD*, David R. Holmes, Jr, MD, FACC*, Amir Lerman, MD, FACC* and Gregory W. Barsness, MD, FACC*,*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Manuscript received August 1, 2002; revised manuscript received February 21, 2003, accepted February 27, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gregory W. Barsness, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
barsness.gregory{at}mayo.edu


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
 References
 
Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) has been shown to reduce angina and to improve objective measures of myocardial ischemia in patients with refractory angina. Prospective clinical studies and large treatment registries suggest that a course of EECP is associated with prolongation of the time to exercise-induced ST-segment depression and resolution of myocardial perfusion defects, as well as with enhanced exercise tolerance and quality of life. With a growing knowledge base supporting the safety and beneficial clinical effects associated with EECP, this therapy can be considered a valuable treatment option, particularly in patients who have exhausted traditional revascularization methods and yet remain symptomatic despite optimal medical care. However, although the concept of external counterpulsation was introduced almost four decades ago, and despite growing evidence supporting the clinical benefit and safety of this therapeutic modality, little is firmly established regarding the mechanisms responsible for the beneficial effects associated with this technique. Suggested mechanisms contributing to the clinical benefit of EECP include improvement in endothelial function, promotion of coronary collateralization, enhancement of ventricular function, peripheral effects similar to those observed with regular physical exercise, and nonspecific placebo effects. This review summarizes the current evidence for a contribution of these mechanisms to the clinical benefit associated with EECP.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ANP
  atrial natriuretic peptide
  BNP
  brain natriuretic peptide
  CAD
  coronary artery disease
  EECP
  enhanced external counterpulsation
  HGF
  hepatocyte growth factor
  IEPR
  International Enhanced External Counterpulsation Patient Registry
  LV
  left ventricular
  LVEF
  left ventricular ejection fraction
  MUST-EECP
  Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation
  NO
  nitric oxide
  VEGF
  vascular endothelial growth factor

An estimated 6.4 million patients in the U.S. suffer from symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD), and about 400,000 new cases develop each year (1). As more patients survive a primary coronary event, this number will likely continue to grow, as will the cohort of patients who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Unfortunately, a considerable segment of this population is not amenable to standard revascularization procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, because of unsuitable coronary anatomy, multiple previous revascularization attempts, or additional comorbid conditions. Currently, several alternative therapeutic options are available for patients with refractory angina, including neurostimulation (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and spinal cord stimulation), laser revascularization techniques, and enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) (2). Of these modalities, EECP represents the only truly noninvasive technique for which both a reduction of anginal symptoms and an improvement in objective measures of myocardial ischemia have been shown.

Several small trials demonstrated a consistently positive clinical response among patients treated with EECP (Table 1). Benefits associated with EECP include reduction of angina (3–9) and nitrate use (5,6,8), increased exercise tolerance (5,7,9–12), favorable psychosocial effects and enhanced quality of life (13,14), as well as prolongation of the time to exercise-induced ST-segment depression (10,12) and an accompanying resolution of myocardial perfusion defects (5–12). The randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation (MUST-EECP) documented the clinical benefit of EECP in patients with chronic stable angina and positive exercise stress tests (Table 2) (15). Moreover, a MUST-EECP substudy demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life parameters in patients assigned to active treatment, which was sustained during a 12-month follow-up period (16). Results from the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) (17) and the EECP Clinical Consortium (18) have demonstrated that the symptomatic benefit observed in controlled studies also translates to the heterogeneous patient population seen in clinical practice. Moreover, follow-up data indicate that the clinical benefit may be maintained for up to five years in patients with a favorable initial clinical response (8,17,19).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Published Controlled and Uncontrolled Trials of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Patients With Stable Angina

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Effect of EECP on Subjective and Objective Parameters of Myocardial Ischemia in the Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation (MUST-EECP) (15)

 
Despite the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical benefit of EECP therapy in patients with chronic angina, the mechanisms by which this technique improves symptoms are poorly understood. By reviewing the currently available literature, this article summarizes the mechanisms potentially responsible for the clinical benefit observed with EECP.


   Principles and hemodynamic effects of EECP
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
 References
 
A standard EECP treatment course comprises 35 one-hour sessions over a seven-week period. Three pairs of pneumatic cuffs, wrapped around the calves, lower thighs, and upper thighs are sequentially inflated with compressed air from distal to proximal in early diastole and rapidly deflated at the onset of systole (Fig. 1). Analogous to intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, the rapid inflation raises diastolic pressure (diastolic augmentation) while the rapid cuff deflation promotes lower extremity arterial "runoff" and leads to a decrease in systolic pressure (systolic unloading) in both the aorta and the coronary arteries (20). Unlike intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, EECP also enhances venous return, further promoting an increase in cardiac output (21). These hemodynamic effects lead to increased blood flow in multiple vascular beds, including the coronary arterial circulation (Table 3) (20,22).



View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1 Principle of enhanced external counterpulsation. Three pairs of pneumatic cuffs are wrapped around the calves, lower thighs, and upper thighs. During early diastole, these cuffs are inflated sequentially from distal to proximal, resulting in a "milking effect" of blood from the lower extremities. At the onset of systole, all cuffs are deflated, resulting in acute afterload reduction. Modified from the October 2001 Mayo Clinic Health Letter. Copyright Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved. Used with permission.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3 Effect of Enhanced External Counterpulsation on Blood Flow in Different Vascular Beds

 
The magnitude of EECP-associated hemodynamic changes can be estimated noninvasively by measuring the diastolic to systolic effectiveness ratio using finger plethysmography (peak diastolic amplitude divided by the peak systolic amplitude) (Fig. 2). Doppler echocardiographic studies during application of EECP indicate that an effectiveness ratio of 1.5 to 2 is associated with an optimal increase in both systolic antegrade and diastolic retrograde aortic flow (23). However, given that a considerable proportion of patients who derive symptomatic benefit do not achieve an effectiveness ratio of 1.5 to 2, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear (3,24,25).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2 Electrocardiogram (upper panel) and finger plethysmographic recording (lower panel) after initiation of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP). Enhanced external counterpulsation leads to an increase in diastolic pressure (diastolic augmentation) and a decrease in systolic pressure (systolic unloading). The magnitude of EECP-induced hemodynamic changes is commonly assessed by measuring the diastolic-to-systolic effectiveness ratio, which is calculated by dividing the peak diastolic amplitude by the peak systolic amplitude of the finger plethysmographic signal.

 

   Effect on endothelial function
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
 References
 
The endothelium plays a crucial role in vascular homeostasis (26). Whereas normal endothelial function is characterized by atheroprotective properties, endothelial dysfunction is now considered an early step in atherogenesis (27,28). Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by impaired bioavailability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO), which has vasodilatory, antiplatelet, antithrombotic, antiproliferative, and anti-inflammatory properties. However, endothelial production of the major opponent of NO, endothelin-1, a potent vasoconstrictor that also exerts prothrombotic, mitogenic, and proinflammatory effects, is increased in the setting of endothelial dysfunction (29). This imbalance between vasodilators and vasoconstrictors leads to an impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, which represents the functional characteristic of endothelial dysfunction. Importantly, the presence of coronary endothelial dysfunction is associated with myocardial ischemia and an adverse prognosis irrespective of the presence of obstructive coronary lesions (28).

Growing evidence suggests that improvement in endothelial function represents an important mechanism for the clinical benefit observed with EECP. Central to this concept is the increase in organ blood flow observed during treatment (20,22). In the absence of significant vascular obstruction, EECP-induced increases in blood flow translate into enhanced endothelial shear stress (30,31). Increased shear stress represents a major stimulus for endothelial NO release and vasodilation (32–34). Shear stress also modulates endothelial endothelin-1 release, as sustained exposure of the endothelium to low levels of shear stress stimulates endothelin-1 release, whereas longer exposure to higher shear stress levels is associated with a reduction of endothelial endothelin-1 release (34,35). Therefore, an appropriate level of shear stress is considered a key factor for the maintenance of a functional endothelium (36,37).

Given this important role of shear stress for endothelial homeostasis, it seems plausible that EECP, by enhancing vascular shear stress, may favorably affect endothelial function. Supporting this presumption, a significant increase in plasma NO levels was found one month following completion of a course of EECP in patients with CAD (38). In another study, EECP was associated with a significant and dose-related increase in plasma NO levels in patients with CAD whose baseline NO levels were significantly lower than those of healthy controls. Most strikingly, by the end of treatment, average NO levels in treated patients had risen to levels comparable to those measured in the control group (21). Similarly, it was demonstrated that a course of EECP was associated with a significant increase in plasma NO levels and a significant decrease in plasma endothelin-1 levels in patients with CAD. These changes of plasma NO and endothelin-1 levels were in proportion to treatment duration, and these changes from baseline persisted one month after completion of EECP (21).

Enhanced external counterpulsation may also affect oxidative stress, which is associated with various cardiovascular risk factors and is considered a key factor in the development of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis (39). In patients with CAD, EECP was shown to be associated with a linear decrease in plasma markers of oxidative stress in proportion to the number of hours of treatment (21). Although the exact mechanism for the reduction of oxidative stress observed in this study is not clear, it has been shown that reactive oxygen species and NO interact chemically to neutralize each other. It can therefore be speculated that improved endothelial function and increased NO bioavailability with EECP may reduce oxidative stress. Preliminary data also indicate that EECP may decrease plasma angiotensin II levels in patients with CAD (40). Thus, given the promoting effect of angiotensin II on vascular superoxide production (41), EECP-induced lowering of angiotensin II levels might also contribute to a decrease in oxidative stress.

Indirect evidence for the existence of a beneficial effect of EECP on endothelial function stems from the observation that the level of diastolic augmentation, or the effectiveness ratio, tends to increase over the course of treatment (3,25). The magnitude of the effectiveness ratio achieved during EECP depends not only on device-related factors, such as cuff inflation pressure and timing of inflation/deflation sequence, but also on individual patient-dependent parameters, including arterial stiffness. An increase in arterial stiffness leads to systolic pressure elevation and, therefore, decreases the effectiveness ratio. Arterial stiffness is influenced by the functional status of the arterial wall including the bioavailability of endothelium-derived NO. Indeed, endothelial dysfunction is associated with increased arterial stiffness (42). Thus, it can be speculated that an improvement in the effectiveness ratio during EECP mirrors improvement in endothelial function. In line with this hypothesis, recent data of 2,486 patients from the IEPR indicate that patients whose effectiveness ratio improves over the course of treatment also tend to experience the greatest reduction in angina class up to six months after treatment (25), supporting the notion that improvement in endothelial function may, indeed, contribute to the clinical benefit observed with EECP.

Taken together, these indirect findings suggest a desirable effect of EECP on endothelial function. However, further studies to address the effect of EECP on well-established parameters of endothelial function, such as endothelium-dependent vasodilation, are required to more specifically define the impact of EECP on endothelial function.


   Effect on coronary collateral supply
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
 References
 
Enhancement of collateral perfusion involves opening or expansion of preformed collaterals as well as formation of new collateral vessels. Aside from ischemia, an increase in endothelial shear stress is considered a major stimulus for collateral development and recruitment (43), underlying the hypothesis that EECP may exert its beneficial effects at least in part by enhancement of coronary collateralization through development of these shear forces.

The simplest mechanism by which EECP might increase collateral perfusion is by opening preformed collateral channels, either directly via increasing diastolic blood pressure and flow or indirectly via release of vasodilatory mediators such as NO, as discussed earlier. Canine studies have shown an acute, significant increase in the patency of hind limb collateral and anastomotic branches in response to 1 h of external counterpulsation (44) and acute enhancement of capillary density in experimental myocardial infarction treated with external counterpulsation (21). The translation of these findings to the situation in humans, however, is limited by the fact that collaterals develop much faster in dogs than in humans.

Similarly, the shear forces induced by EECP may influence arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Arteriogenesis, the formation of larger collateral arteries via the addition of endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, and connective tissue to preexisting collateral arterioles, represents another mechanism involved in the enhancement of coronary collaterals (45). The primary initiating stimulus for this vascular remodeling process is felt to be an increase in shear stress (44), making arteriogenesis an attractive mechanism by which EECP might improve myocardial perfusion. Angiogenesis, the de novo formation of capillary blood vessels via sprouting of endothelial cells from existing blood vessels, may also be promoted by EECP. Angiogenesis is a complex process that depends on a well-coordinated interplay of a myriad of vascular-specific and -nonspecific factors (46). Notably, vascular shear stress may upregulate endothelial production of growth factors (such as vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and platelet-derived growth factor) that are crucial for the proper sequence of angiogenesis (47,48). In this way, shear stress may also be an important player in the angiogenic process.

Indirect evidence for the existence of a pro-arteriogenic and pro-angiogenic effect of EECP stems from studies showing an increase in various vascular growth factors in response to treatment. A significant increase in plasma VEGF levels was reported in five patients with refractory angina who experienced a 50% reduction in anginal episodes after a course of EECP, whereas no change in plasma VEGF concentration was found in four patients whose symptoms did not respond to EECP (21). Furthermore, in 11 patients with stable angina, an increase in plasma levels of basic fibroblast growth factor, VEGF, and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was demonstrated after a course of EECP (49). Interestingly, HGF is a very potent angiogenic factor that shows a greater angiogenic potential than VEGF (50).

A link between vasodilation and angiogenesis is suggested by the observation that in vivo angiogenesis is accompanied by vasodilation and that several angiogenic factors have vasodilating properties (51). For example, VEGF was shown to enhance endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and activity (52–54), stimulating NO-dependent vasodilation (55). On the other hand, endothelial NO production is crucial for the stimulatory effect of VEGF on the growth of endothelial cells and their organization in network-like structures (53). The strongest evidence for a pivotal role of NO in the angiogenic process stems from a study investigating the angiogenic response in a murine model of hindlimb ischemia (56). In this study, angiogenesis in the ischemic hindlimb was significantly impaired in mice with targeted disruption of the gene encoding endothelial nitric oxide synthase as compared with wild-type controls. These results indicate that NO represents a crucial cofactor for angiogenesis. Thus, it can be speculated that disease states associated with a decrease in NO bioavailability, such as endothelial dysfunction, may limit angiogenesis, whereas interventions that improve endothelial function may promote angiogenesis.

Vasculogenesis, the in situ formation of blood vessels involving bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells, was recently described as an additional mechanism that may contribute to collateral development (57). Aside from certain cytokines or tissue ischemia (58), VEGF may promote endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and differentiation in vivo (59,60). Given the increase in plasma VEGF levels observed in some EECP-treated patients, it can be hypothesized that vasculogenesis might also be a mechanism by which EECP promotes collateral development in certain patients with CAD.

In summary, these findings suggest a potential for EECP to enhance coronary collateralization. Moreover, it appears that the presumed effect of EECP on endothelial function might further increase the pro-angiogenic potential of this technique. However, an increase in plasma levels of various angiogenic growth factors does not necessarily translate into enhanced coronary collateralization, and there is still little direct evidence for a stimulating effect of EECP on cardiac collateral formation. Thus, further studies are necessary to define the exact role of neovascularization for the beneficial effect of EECP.


   Peripheral effect
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
 References
 
The question whether EECP is associated with a nonspecific peripheral "training effect" was studied in 27 patients with chronic stable angina who underwent a maximal stress test before and after a course of EECP (11). After treatment a significant increase in exercise duration was noted in these patients, while peak double product remained unchanged, which was due mainly to a distinct, although not statistically significant, reduction in maximal blood pressure. Similar findings were reported in 175 patients with chronic stable angina who underwent a baseline exercise stress test before EECP treatment and either a maximal exercise stress test or an exercise stress test to the same level as before treatment within six months after completion of EECP therapy (9). In this study, patients who underwent maximal post-EECP exercise stress testing showed a significant improvement in exercise duration with no change in peak double product, whereas the same exercise level as before EECP was achieved with a significantly lower double product, supporting the notion that EECP, similar to physical training, may promote a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance.

Using positron emission tomography, it was found that a course of EECP improved myocardial perfusion, both at rest and in response to dipyridamole, in 11 patients with CAD (38). However, maximal exercise stress tests before and after EECP showed a similar peak double product, despite a significant increase in time to 1-mm ST-segment depression and a trend towards longer total exercise time, suggesting that the increase in exercise tolerance found in these patients was partly due to a peripheral effect of EECP.

These data suggest the importance of both an improvement in myocardial perfusion and a decrease in peripheral resistance in achieving the clinical benefit associated with EECP. Peripheral effects might be particularly important for the symptomatic improvement observed in patients without evidence for enhanced myocardial perfusion after EECP.


   Effect on ventricular function
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
 References
 
By reducing afterload and promoting venous return, EECP acutely enhances cardiac output up to 25% (61,62). However, the venous return augmentation by EECP has also raised concerns about the possibility of inducing pulmonary edema in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function and heart failure. To date, little is known about the effect of EECP in patients with impaired LV function or heart failure, although this procedure was recently granted FDA approval for the treatment of patients with angina and accompanying heart failure. Evidence supporting a beneficial effect of EECP on ventricular function includes an uncontrolled study demonstrating a significant reduction of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) plasma levels in response to a course of EECP in 11 patients with stable angina (10). A similar reduction in plasma levels of BNP but not ANP was found in 12 patients with refractory stable angina and normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after 35 h of EECP (12). Treatment did not alter systolic LV function but significantly improved parameters of diastolic ventricular function, indicating a role for EECP in the treatment of patients with predominant or isolated diastolic ventricular dysfunction. The effect of EECP on LV systolic function was investigated in eight patients with severely impaired LVEF (mean 25%) (63). After EECP therapy, these patients showed a significant increase in LVEF (to 29%), which was accompanied by a significant decrease in resting heart rate.

The presence of LV dysfunction does not appear to substantially impair clinical response to EECP in patients with angina. In a pilot study assessing the effect and safety of EECP in heart failure (64), 26 patients with either idiopathic or ischemic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II to III) and an average LVEF of 23% experienced significantly improved exercise tolerance and quality of life after a course of EECP, with no serious adverse events. A retrospective IEPR analysis demonstrated that 129 patients with a LVEF <35% before treatment achieved similar reductions in angina compared with patients with preserved LV function (65).

In summary, current evidence suggests a positive effect of EECP on both diastolic and systolic ventricular function. Moreover, preliminary data indicate that EECP represents an effective and safe treatment for stable patients with impaired ventricular function. However, we still have to await the results of larger ongoing trials investigating the efficacy and safety of EECP in patients with heart failure before this treatment can be definitively recommended for treatment of this patient population.


   Nonspecific placebo effects
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
Conclusions
 References
 
The prolonged duration of EECP treatment (seven weeks), and the fact that this therapy is limited to specific centers where close medical attention is provided, opens the possibility that nonspecific factors may have a significant effect in reducing the symptoms of treated patients. Such factors include increased patient compliance with drug treatment regimens and close adherence to treatment guidelines among treating physicians and interested practitioners. In addition, several lines of evidence indicate that the use of medical devices may be associated with an enhanced placebo effect (66).

The fact that many patients experience significant symptomatic improvement, even in the absence of optimal diastolic augmentation during treatment, indicates that a placebo effect may indeed contribute to the symptomatic benefit observed with EECP (3,23). Data from the randomized, sham-controlled MUST-EECP trial, however, suggest that nonspecific factors, although possibly contributing to the observed effects, are not the only determinants of the clinical benefit observed with EECP (Table 2) (15).


   Conclusions
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
References
 
Enhanced external counterpulsation is a valuable outpatient procedure, providing acute and long-term relief of anginal symptoms and improved quality of life among a heterogeneous group of patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. Recent evidence suggests that EECP may improve symptoms via various mechanisms, including improvement in endothelial function, promotion of collateralization, enhancement of ventricular function, and peripheral effects similar to those observed in response to regular physical exercise. In addition, nonspecific placebo effects might contribute to the observed symptomatic benefit (Fig. 3). However, most of this evidence is based on the results of small, uncontrolled trials or on preliminary reports. Therefore, controlled trials, including sham-EECP control groups, are needed to further define the role of the presumed mechanisms of action of EECP. Also, more has to be learned about which patients benefit the most from EECP treatment. Finally, the results of ongoing trials in patients with impaired LV function will help define the role of EECP as a therapeutic tool in this rapidly growing patient population. At present, with a symptomatic benefit documented in thousands of patients along with a favorable safety profile, EECP can be considered a valuable treatment option in patients with refractory angina.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3 Possible mechanisms responsible for the clinical benefit associated with enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP). Acute afterload reduction decreases myocardial demand. By increasing coronary blood flow, EECP is thought to promote myocardial collateralization via opening of preformed collaterals, arteriogenesis, and angiogenesis. Increased blood flow and shear stress may also improve coronary endothelial function favoring vasodilation and myocardial perfusion. In addition, improvement in endothelial function may further promote collateral formation by arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Besides a peripheral training effect, a minor placebo effect is considered to contribute to the symptomatic benefit of EECP. ET = endothelin; NO = nitric oxide.

 


   Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Mayo Foundation; the Margarete und Walther Lichtenstein Stiftung Basel, Switzerland; the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel, Switzerland; and an unrestricted grant from Vasomedical Inc. Jonathan Abrams, MD, acted as Guest Editor for this manuscript.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Principles and hemodynamic...
 Effect on endothelial function
 Effect on coronary collateral...
 Peripheral effect
 Effect on ventricular function
 Nonspecific placebo effects
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. American Heart Association. 2002 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2001
  2. Kim MC, Kini A, Sharma SK. Refractory angina pectoris: mechanism and therapeutic options. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:923–934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stys T, Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Lang G, Liuzzo J, Cohn PF. Acute hemodynamic effects and angina improvement with enhanced external counterpulsation. Angiology. 2001;52:653–658[Medline]
  4. Zheng ZS, Li TM, Kambic H, et al. Sequential external counterpulsation (SECP) in China. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1983;29:599–603[Medline]
  5. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Soroff HS, et al. Efficacy of enhanced external counterpulsation in the treatment of angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:859–862[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Zheng ZS, et al. Can angiographic findings predict which coronary patients will benefit from enhanced external counterpulsation? Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1107–1109[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Guo T, Burger L, Cohn PF. Prior revascularization increases the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation. Clin Cardiol. 1998;21:841–844[Medline]
  8. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Cohn PF. Long-term prognosis of patients with angina treated with enhanced external counterpulsation: five-year follow-up study. Clin Cardiol. 2000;23:254–258[Medline]
  9. Stys TP, Lawson WE, Hui JCK, et al. Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on stress radionuclide coronary perfusion and exercise capacity in chronic stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:822–824[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Masuda D, Nohara R, Hirai T, et al. Enhanced external counterpulsation improved myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in patients with chronic stable angina. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1451–1458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Zheng ZS, et al. Improved exercise tolerance following enhanced external counterpulsation: cardiac or peripheral effect? Cardiology. 1996;87:271–275[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Urano H, Ikeda H, Ueno T, Matsumoto T, Murohara T, Imaizumi T. Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise tolerance, reduces exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and improves left ventricular diastolic filling in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:93–99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fricchione GL, Jaghab K, Lawson W, et al. Psychosocial effects of enhanced external counterpulsation in the angina patient. Psychosomatics. 1995;36:494–497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Springer S, Fife A, Lawson W, et al. Psychosocial effects of enhanced external counterpulsation in the angina patient: a second study. Psychosomatics. 2001;42:124–132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Arora RR, Chou TM, Jain D, et al. The Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation (MUST-EECP): effect of EECP on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and anginal episodes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1833–1840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Arora RR, Chou TM, Jain D, et al. Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on health-related quality of life continue 12 months after treatment: a substudy of the multicenter study of enhanced external counterpulsation. J Investig Med. 2002;50:25–32[Medline]
  17. International EECP Patient Registry InvestigatorsBarsness G, Feldman AM, Holmes DR Jr, Holubkov R, Kelsey SF, Kennard ED. The International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR): design, methods, baseline characteristics, and acute results. Clin Cardiol. 2001;24:435–442[Medline]
  18. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Lang G. Treatment benefit in the enhanced external counterpulsation consortium. Cardiology. 2000;94:31–35[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Zheng ZS, et al. Three-year sustained benefit from enhanced external counterpulsation in chronic angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:840–841[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Michaels AD, Accad M, Ports TA, Grossman W. Left ventricular systolic unloading and augmentation of intracoronary pressure and Doppler flow during enhanced external counterpulsation. Circulation. 2002;106:1237–1242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Barsness GW. Enhanced external counterpulsation in unrevascularizable patients. Curr Interv Cardiol Rep. 2001;3:37–43[Medline]
  22. Werner D, Schneider M, Weise M, Nonnast-Daniel B, Daniel WG. Pneumatic external counterpulsation: a new noninvasive method to improve organ perfusion. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:950–952[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Suresh K, Simandl S, Lawson WE, et al. Maximizing the hemodynamic benefit of enhanced external counterpulsation. Clin Cardiol. 1998;21:649–653[Medline]
  24. Michaels AD, Kennard ED, Kelsey SF, et al. Does higher diastolic augmentation predict clinical benefit from enhanced external counterpulsation? Data from the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR). Clin Cardiol. 2001;24:453–458[Medline]
  25. Lakshmi MV, Kennard ED, Kelsey SF, Holubkov R, Michaels AD. Relation of the pattern of diastolic augmentation during a course of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) to clinical benefit (from the International EECP Patient Registry [IEPR]). Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:1303–1305[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Celermajer DS. Endothelial dysfunction: does it matter? Is it reversible? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:325–333[Abstract]
  27. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–809[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Bonetti PO, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:168–75
  29. Lerman A, Burnett JC Jr. Intact and altered endothelium in regulation of vasomotion. Circulation. 1992;86(Suppl III):12–19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Tatineni S, et al. Enhanced coronary blood flow velocity during intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in critically ill patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:359–368[Abstract]
  31. Kern MJ, Aguirre F, Bach R, Donohue T, Siegel R, Segal J. Augmentation of coronary blood flow by intra-aortic balloon pumping in patients after coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:500–511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Corson MA, James NL, Latta SE, Nerem RM, Berk BC, Harrison DG. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to fluid shear stress. Circ Res. 1996;79:984–991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Dimmeler S, Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Hermann C, Busse R, Zeiher AM. Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation. Nature. 1999;399:601–605[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Davies PF. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev. 1995;75:519–560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kuchan MJ, Frangos JA. Shear stress regulates endothelin-1 release via protein kinase C and cGMP in cultured endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H150–156[Medline]
  36. Niebauer J, Cooke JP. Cardiovascular effects of exercise: role of endothelial shear stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1652–1660[Abstract]
  37. Traub O, Berk BC. Laminar shear stress: mechanisms by which endothelial cells transduce an atheroprotective force. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:677–685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Masuda D, Nohara R, Hirai T, et al. Enhanced external counterpulsation improved myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in patients with chronic stable angina. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1451–1458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Cai H, Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the role of oxidant stress. Circ Res. 2000;87:840–844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lawson WE, Hui JCK, Lu L, Zheng ZS, Zhang MQ. Beneficial effects of EECP on the renin-angiotension system in patients with coronary artery disease. (abstr)Eur Heart J. 2001;22(Suppl):538
  41. Mollnau H, Wendt M, Szöcs K, et al. Effects of angiotensin II infusion on the expression and function of NAD(P)H oxidase and components of nitric oxide/cGMP signaling. Circ Res. 2002;90:e58–65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Wilkinson IB, Qasem A, McEniery CM, Webb DJ, Avolino AP, Cockcroft JR. Nitric oxide regulates local arterial distensibility in vivo. Circulation. 2002;105:213–217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Kersten JR, Pagel PS, Chilian WM, Warltier DC. Multifactorial basis for coronary collateralization: a complex adaptive response to ischemia. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43:44–57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Cai D, Wu R, Shao Y. Experimental study of the effect of external counterpulsation on blood circulation in the lower extremities. Clin Invest Med. 2000;23:239–247[Medline]
  45. Van Royen N, Piek JJ, Buschmann I, et al. Stimulation of arteriogenesis; a new concept for the treatment of arterial occlusive disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;49:543–553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Holash J. Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature. 2000;407:242–248[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Gan L, Miocic M, Doroudi R, Selin-Sjögren L, Jern S. Distinct regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in intact human conduit vessels exposed to laminar fluid shear stress and pressure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;272:490–496[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Resnick N, Collins T, Atkinson W, Bonthron DT, Dewey CF Jr, Gimbrone MA. Platelet-derived growth factor B chain promoter contains a cis-acting shear-stress-responsive element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:4591–4595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Masuda D, Nohara K, Kataoka K, Hosokawa R, Kanbara N, Fujita M. Enhanced external counterpulsation promotes angiogenesis factors in patients with chronic stable angina. (abstr)Circulation. 2001;104:445
  50. Van Belle E, Witzenbichler B, Chen D, et al. Potentiated angiogenic effect of scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor via induction of vascular endothelial growth factor. Circulation. 1998;97:381–390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Ziche M, Morbidelli L. Nitric oxide and angiogenesis. J Neurooncol. 2000;50:139–148[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Hood JD, Meininger CJ, Ziche M, Granger HJ. VEGF upregulates ecNOS message, protein, and NO production in human endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:1054–1058
  53. Papapetropoulos A, García-Cardeña G, Madri JA, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide production contributes to the angiogenic properties of vascular endothelial growth factor in human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:3131–3139[Medline]
  54. Fulton D, Gratton JP, McCabe TJ, et al. Regulation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide production by the protein kinase. Akt Nature. 1999;399:597–601
  55. Ku DD, Zaleski JK, Liu S, Brock TA. Vascular endothelial growth factor induces EDRF-dependent relaxation in coronary arteries. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H586–592[Medline]
  56. Murohara T, Asahara T, Silver M, et al. Nitric oxide synthase modulates angiogenesis in response to tissue ischemia. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:2567–2578[Medline]
  57. Freedman SB, Isner JM. Therapeutic angiogenesis for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:54–71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, et al. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bonemarrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999;5:434–438[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Asahara T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, et al. VEGF contributes to postnatal neovascularization by mobilizing bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. EMBO J. 1999;18:3964–3972[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor165 gene transfer augments circulating endothelial progenitor cells in human subjects. Circ Res. 2000;86:1198–1202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Cohen LS, Mullins CB, Mitchell JH, Alsobrook HD. Sequenced external counterpulsation and intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 1973;32:656–661[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Singh MHolmes DR Jr., Tajik AJ, Barsness GW. Noninvasive revascularization by enhanced external counterpulsation: a case study and literature review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:961–965[Medline]
  63. Gorcsan J III, Crawford L, Soran O, et al. Improvement in left ventricular performance by enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(Suppl):230A
  64. Soran OZ, Fleishman B, DeMarco T, et al. Enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with heart failure: a multicenter feasibility study. Congest Heart Fail. 2002;8:204–208[Medline]
  65. Soran O, Kennard ED, Holubkov R, Strobeck J, Feldman AM. Six month outcome of patients with left ventricular dysfunction treated with enhanced external counterpulsation for chronic angina. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(Suppl):598
  66. Kaptchuk TJ, Goldman P, Stone DA, Stason WB. Do medical devices have enhanced placebo effects? J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:786–792[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
M. Esmaeilzadeh, A. Khaledifar, M. Maleki, A. Sadeghpour, N. Samiei, H. Moladoust, F. Noohi, Z. O. Haghighi, and A. Mohebbi
Evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic regional function after enhanced external counter pulsation therapy using strain rate imaging
Eur J Echocardiogr, June 21, 2008; (2008) jen183v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 StrokeHome page
J. H. Han, T. W. Leung, W. W. Lam, Y. O. Soo, A. W. Alexandrov, V. Mok, Y.-F. V. Leung, R. Lo, and K. S. Wong
Preliminary Findings of External Counterpulsation for Ischemic Stroke Patient With Large Artery Occlusive Disease
Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1340 - 1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
G. A Lanza
Alternative treatments for angina
Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 544 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
G. Wu, Z. Du, C. Hu, Z. Zheng, C. Zhan, H. Ma, D. Fang, K. T. Ahmed, R. J. Laham, J. C. K. Hui, et al.
Angiogenic effects of long-term enhanced external counterpulsation in a dog model of myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): H248 - H254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
A. Lerman and A. M. Zeiher
Endothelial Function: Cardiac Events
Circulation, January 25, 2005; 111(3): 363 - 368.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart J SupplHome page
P.W Serruys and J Aoki
Therapeutic options for patients with chronic myocardial ischaemia
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2004; 6(suppl_E): E2 - E11.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
P. Berger
Ranolazine and Other Antianginal Therapies in the Era of the Drug-Eluting Stent
JAMA, January 21, 2004; 291(3): 365 - 367.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Vita and G. F. Mitchell
Effects of shear stress and flow pulsatility on endothelial function: Insights gleaned from external counterpulsation therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 17, 2003; 42(12): 2096 - 2098.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch GeneralHome page
Enhanced External Counterpulsation -- What's the Mechanism of Benefit?
Journal Watch (General), June 27, 2003; 2003(627): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonetti, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Barsness, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonetti, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Barsness, G. W.

HOME