This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Braunwald, E. Articles by Smith, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Braunwald, E. Articles by Smith, S. C., Jr

CONSENSUS DOCUMENT

ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article

A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina)

	Introduction

Top Introduction Risk assessment Early conservative vs. early... Risk factor modification Conclusions References

The ACC/AHA classifications I, II, and III are used to summarize indications as follows:

Class I:Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective.

Class II:Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment.

IIa:Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy.

IIb:Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion.

Class III:Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.

The weight of the evidence was ranked highest (A) if the data were derived from multiple randomized clinical trials that involved large numbers of patients and intermediate (B) if the data were derived from a limited number of randomized trials that involved small numbers of patients or from careful analyses of nonrandomized studies or observational registries. A lower rank (C) was given when expert consensus was the primary basis for the recommendation.

	Risk assessment

Top Introduction Risk assessment Early conservative vs. early... Risk factor modification Conclusions References

 
Clinical features.   Unstable angina and NSTEMI are heterogeneous disorders in which patients have widely varying risks. Risk is an important "driver" of management decisions, and accurate yet simple methods of risk assessment are important for patient care.

Risk was assessed by multivariable regression techniques in patients presenting with UA/NSTEMI in several large clinical trials. Boersma et al. analyzed the relation between baseline characteristics and the incidence of death and the composite of death or myocardial (re)infarction at 30 days in patients who entered the PURSUIT (Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy) trial (2). The most important baseline features associated with death were age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, ST-segment depression, signs of heart failure, and elevation of cardiac biomarkers. From this analysis, a simple risk estimation score was developed.

Antman et al. developed a 7-point risk score, the "TIMI Risk Score," (age greater than or equal to 65 years, more than 3 coronary risk factors, prior angiographic coronary obstruction, ST-segment deviation, more than 2 angina events within 24 h, use of aspirin [ASA] within 7 days, and elevated cardiac markers) (3). The score was defined as the simple sum of these individual prognostic variables. The risk of developing an adverse outcome—death, (re)infarction, or recurrent severe ischemia that required revascularization—ranged from 5% with a score of 0 or 1 to 41% with a score of 6 or 7. The score was derived from data in the TIMI 11B (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 11B) trial (4) and then validated in 3 additional trials—ESSENCE (Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non–Q-wave Coronary Events study) (5), and PRISM-PLUS (Platelet Receptor inhibition for Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and symptoms) (6) and prospectively in one TACTICS-TIMI 18 (Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) 18 (7). A progressively greater benefit from newer therapies such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (4,5), platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists (6), and an invasive strategy (7) with increasing risk score have been reported.

Biomarkers.   The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction (8) emphasized the use of troponins as critical markers of the presence of myocardial necrosis. Although troponins are accurate in identifying myocardial necrosis, the latter is not always secondary to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Therefore, in establishing the diagnosis of NSTEMI, cardiac troponins should be used in conjunction with appropriate clinical features and electrocardiographic changes. Myocardial injury of diverse origins (e.g., myocarditis, trauma, or cardioversion) may cause necrosis and release of troponins. Although these may be considered instances of NSTEMI, they should be distinguished on clinical grounds from the more common form of NSTEMI secondary to coronary atherosclerosis.

Antiplatelet therapy.   Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in the management of UA/NSTEMI. Three classes of antiplatelet drugs (ASA, thienopyridines, and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists) have been found useful in the management of these patients and are the subject of continued intensive investigation and analysis.

Clopidogrel
Given its more rapid onset of action (9,10) and better safety profile compared with ticlopidine, clopidogrel is now the preferred thienopyridine. The CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events) trial (11) randomized 12,562 patients with UA/STEMI who presented within 24 h to placebo or clopidogrel (loading dose of 300 mg followed by 75 mg daily) and followed them for 3 to 12 months; all patients were given aspirin. Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke occurred in 11.5% of patients assigned to placebo and 9.3% of those assigned to clopidogrel (relative risk [RR] 0.80; p less than 0.001). Looking at the individual components of the primary composite and end point, there was a trend in favor of clopidogrel for cardiovascular death and stroke (5.5% and 1.4%, respectively, for placebo vs. 5.1% and 1.2% for clopidogrel), and there was a significant reduction in MI (6.7% vs. 5.2% R.R. = 0.77, p less than 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of non–Q-wave MI (3.8% vs. 3.5%). A reduction in recurrent ischemia was noted within the first few hours after randomization. These salutary results were observed across all subgroups of patients. There was, however, a significant excess of major bleeding (2.7% in the placebo group versus 3.7% in the clopidogrel group; p = 0.003) and of minor bleeding, as well as a (nonsignificant) trend for an increase in life-threatening bleeding. The risk of bleeding was increased in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within the first 5 days after clopidogrel was discontinued.

The CURE trial was performed in hospitals in which there was no routine policy of early invasive procedures, and therefore, revascularization was performed during the initial admission in only 23% of the patients, a substantially lower percentage than currently receive this therapy at most US hospitals. Although the addition of a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist appeared to be well tolerated in patients who were given ASA, clopidogrel, and heparin in CURE, fewer than 10% of patients received this combination. Therefore, additional information on the safety of "quadruple therapy" (heparin [unfractionated or low molecular weight], ASA, clopidogrel, and a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist) should be obtained.

The CURE trial provides strong support for the addition of clopidogrel to ASA on admission in the management of patients with UA and NSTEMI. Clopidogrel appears to be especially useful in hospitals that do not have a routine policy of early invasive procedures and in patients who are not candidates or who do not wish to be considered for revascularization. The optimal duration of therapy with clopidogrel has not been determined. The major benefits in CURE were observed at 30 days, with small additional benefits observed over the subsequent treatment period, which averaged 8 months.

In PCI-CURE, a substudy of CURE, 2,658 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) had been randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with clopidogrel (n = 1,313) or placebo (n = 1,345) (12); all patients also received ASA. Patients were pretreated with placebo or study drug for a median of 10 days before PCI. After the procedure, most patients received open-label thienopyridine (clopidogrel or ticlopidine) for approximately 4 weeks, after which the study drug (placebo or clopidogrel) was again administered for an average of 8 months. The primary end point, a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or urgent target-vessel revascularization within 30 days of PCI, occurred in 86 patients (6.4%) in the placebo group compared with 59 (4.5%) in the clopidogrel group (RR 0.70; p = 0.03). When events that occurred before and after PCI were considered, there was a 31% reduction in cardiovascular death or MI with assignment to clopidogrel (p = 0.002). Thus, in patients with UA and NSTEMI who are given ASA and are undergoing PCI, a strategy of clopidogrel pretreatment followed by at least 1 month and probably longer-term therapy is beneficial in reducing major cardiovascular events (12).

There now appears to be an important role for clopidogrel in patients with UA/NSTEMI, both those who are managed conservatively and those who undergo PCI, especially stenting. However, it is not entirely clear how long therapy should be maintained. Because clopidogrel, when added to ASA, increases the risk of bleeding during major surgery in patients who are scheduled for CABG, if possible, clopidogrel should be withheld for at least 5 days (11) and preferably for 7 days before surgery (13). In many hospitals in which patients with UA/NSTEMI undergo diagnostic catheterization within 24 to 36 h of admission, clopidogrel is not started until it is clear that CABG will not be scheduled within the next several days. A loading dose of clopidogrel can be given to a patient on the catheterization table if a PCI is to be performed immediately. If PCI is not performed, clopidogrel can be begun after the catheterization.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in PCI
The introduction of platelet GP IIb/IIIa antagonists represents an important advance in the treatment of patients with UA/NSTEMI who are undergoing PCI. These drugs take advantage of the fact that platelets play an important role in the development of ischemic complications that may occur in patients with UA/NSTEMI during coronary revascularization procedures. The September 2000 guidelines emphasized the value of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients with UA/NSTEMI who were undergoing PCI (1).

Two trials of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been published since September 2000. The ESPRIT trial (Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy) was a placebo-controlled trial designed to assess whether eptifibatide improved outcome in patients undergoing stenting (14). Fourteen percent of the 2,064 patients enrolled in ESPRIT had UA/NSTEMI. The primary end point (the composite of death, MI, target-vessel revascularization, and "bailout" GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy) was reduced from 10.5% to 6.6% with treatment (p = 0.0015). There was consistency in the reduction of events in all components of the end point and in all major subgroups, including patients with UA/NSTEMI. Major bleeding occurred more frequently in patients who received eptifibatide (1.3%) than in those who received placebo (0.4%; p = 0.027); however, no significant difference in the transfusion rate occurred. At 1 year of follow-up, death or MI occurred in 12.4% of patients assigned to placebo and 8.0% of eptifibatide-treated patients (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.83; p = 0.001) (15).

In the only head-to-head comparison of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, the TARGET trial (Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give similar Efficacy? Trial) randomized 5,308 patients to tirofiban or abciximab before PCI with the intent to perform stenting (16). The primary end point, a composite of death, nonfatal MI, and urgent target-vessel revascularization at 30 days, occurred less frequently in those given abciximab than in those given tirofiban (6.0% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.038). There was a similar direction and magnitude for each component of the end point. The difference in outcome between the 2 treatment groups may be related to a suboptimal dose of tirofiban resulting in inadequate platelet inhibition. However, by six months, the primary end point occurred in a similar percentage of patients in each group (14.9% tirofiban vs. 14.3 % abciximab, NS). Mortality was also similar (1.9% vs. 1.7%, NS) (17).

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists without scheduled PCI
The Global Utilization of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries IV-Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IV-ACS) trial (18) enrolled 7,800 patients with UA/NSTEMI who were admitted to the hospital with more than 5 min of chest pain and ST-segment depression and/or elevated troponin T or I concentration and in whom early (less than 48 h) revascularization was not intended to be conducted. All received ASA and either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or LMWH. They were randomized to placebo, an abciximab bolus and 24-h infusion, or an abciximab bolus and 48-h infusion. The primary end point, death or MI at 30 days, occurred in 8.0% of patients given placebo, 8.2% given 24-h abciximab, and 9.1% given 48-h abciximab, differences that were not statistically significant. At 48 h, death occurred in 0.3%, 0.7%, and 0.9% in these groups, respectively (placebo vs. abciximab 48 h, p = 0.008). The lack of benefit of abciximab was observed in most subgroups, including patients with elevated concentrations of troponin who were at higher risk. Although the explanation for these results is not clear, they indicate that abciximab, at least at the dosing regimen used in GUSTO IV-ACS, is not indicated in the management of patients with UA or NSTEMI in whom an early invasive management strategy is not planned.

In the PRISM-PLUS trial, 1,069 patients did not undergo early PCI. Although tirofiban treatment was associated with a lower incidence of death, MI or death, and MI or refractory ischemia at 30 days, these reductions were not statistically significant (19). In a high-risk subgroup of these patients not undergoing PCI (TIMI risk score greater than or equal to 4) (3), tirofiban appeared to be beneficial whether they underwent PCI (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.01) or not (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99). However, no benefit was observed in the patients at lower risk (6). In the PURSUIT trial, eptifibatide reduced the incidence of death or MI from 15.7% to 14.2% (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.00; p = 0.032) (20).

Boersma et al performed a meta-analysis of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in all 6 large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, including GUSTO IV-ACS (18), which involved 31,402 patients with UA/NSTEMI who were not routinely scheduled to undergo coronary revascularization (21). A small reduction in the odds of death or MI in the active treatment arm (11.8% vs 10.8%; OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.98; p = 0.015) was observed. Unexpectedly, no benefit was observed in women (test for interaction between treatment assignment and gender, p less than 0.0001). However, women with positive troponins derived a treatment benefit that was similar to men. In the meta-analysis, reductions in the end points of death or nonfatal MI considered individually did not achieve statistical significance.

Although not scheduled for coronary revascularization procedures, 11,965 of the 31,402 patients (38%) actually underwent PCI or CABG within 30 days, and in this subgroup, the OR for death or MI in patients assigned to GP IIb/IIIa antagonists was 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.98). In the other 19,416 patients who did not undergo coronary revascularization, the OR for death or MI in the GP IIb/IIIa group was 0.95 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.05, p = NS). Major bleeding complications were increased in the GP IIb/IIIa antagonist-treated group compared with those who received placebo (1.4% vs. 2.4%, p less than 0.0001). The authors concluded that in patients with UA/NSTEMI who were not routinely scheduled for early revascularization and who were at high risk of thrombotic complications, "treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor might therefore be considered" (21). Thus, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are of benefit in high-risk patients with UA/NSTEMI, and their administration, in addition to ASA and heparin, to patients in whom catheterization and PCI are planned received a Class I recommendation. These agents are of questionable benefit in patients who do not undergo PCI. However, the revised guidelines recommend broader indications for a routine invasive strategy (see following text).

Thus, clopidogrel (in addition to aspirin and heparin or low molecular weight heparin) is recommended for patients with UA/NSTEMI in whom a noninterventional approach is planned (Class I recommendation). In patients in whom an interventional approach is planned, a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (in addition to aspirin and heparin or low molecular weight heparin) is recommended (Class I recommendation). No head-to-head comparison of clopidogrel, a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and their combination has been reported. The addition of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor to a subset of patients in the CURE trial who were receiving aspirin, clopidogrel, and heparin appeared to be well tolerated, and current practice frequently involves the use of this combination of drugs. However, until further information on the safety and efficacy of such quadruple therapy becomes available, a Class IIa recommendation is made for the addition of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor for patients with UA/NSTEMI who are receiving aspirin, clopidogrel, and unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin and who are referred for an invasive strategy. A Class I recommendation is made for a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor at the time of PCI in patients receiving heparin and aspirin. Specific updated recommendations for the use of antiplatelet regimens in the revised guidelines are as follows:Class I

1. Antiplatelet therapy should be initiated promptly. ASA should be administered as soon as possible after presentation and continued indefinitely. (Level of Evidence: A)
   
2. Clopidogrel should be administered to hospitalized patients who are unable to take ASA because of hypersensitivity or major gastrointestinal intolerance. (Level of Evidence: A)
   
3. *3. In hospitalized patients in whom an early noninterventional approach is planned, clopidogrel should be added to ASA as soon as possible on admission and administered for at least 1 month (Level of Evidence: A), and for up to 9 months. (Level of Evidence: B)
   
4. *4. A platelet GP IIb/IIIa antagonist should be administered, in addition to ASA and heparin, to patients in whom catheterization and PCI are planned. The GP IIb/IIIa antagonist may also be administered just prior to PCI. (Level of Evidence: A)
   
5. *5. In patients for whom a PCI is planned and who are not at high risk for bleeding, clopidogrel should be started and continued for at least 1 month (Level of Evidence: A) and for up to 9 months. (Level of Evidence: B)
   
6. *6. In patients taking clopidogrel in whom elective CABG is planned, the drug should be withheld for 5 to 7 days. (Level of Evidence: B)
   

*1. Eptifibatide or tirofiban should be administered, in addition to ASA and LMWH or UFH, to patients with continuing ischemia, an elevated troponin, or with other high-risk features in whom an invasive management strategy is not planned. (Level of Evidence: A)

*2. A platelet GP IIb/IIIa antagonist should be administered to patients already receiving heparin, ASA, and clopidogrel in whom catheterization and PCI are planned. The GP IIb/IIIa antagonist may also be administered just prior to PCI. (Level of Evidence: B)

*1. Eptifibatide or tirofiban, in addition to ASA and LMWH or UFH, to patients without continuing ischemia who have no other high-risk features and in whom PCI is not planned. (Level of Evidence: A)

1. Intravenous fibrinolytic therapy in patients without acute ST-segment elevation, a true posterior MI, or a presumed new left bundle-branch block. (Level of Evidence: A)

*2. Abciximab administration in patients in whom PCI is not planned. (Level of Evidence: A)

*New indication, not included in the September 2000 guidelines.

Minor clarification different from full-text version on web site.

Anticoagulant therapy.   The September 2000 guidelines (1) reviewed the evidence regarding the use of intravenous UFH or subcutaneous LMWH. It provided the following Class I recommendation:

"Parenteral anticoagulation with intravenous UFH or subcutaneous LMWH should be added to antiplatelet therapy with ASA or a thienopyridine. (Level of Evidence: B)"

In the interim, a number of studies have appeared that support the use of enoxaparin. In the EVET trial (Enoxaparin VErsus Tinzaparin in the management of unstable coronary artery disease), 2 LMWHs, enoxaparin and tinzaparin, administered for 7 days, were compared in 438 patients with UA/NSTEMI. A preliminary report stated that both the recurrence of unstable angina and the need for revascularization were significantly lower in the enoxaparin group (22). Because the level of anticoagulant activity cannot be easily measured in patients given LMWH (e.g., activated partial thromboplastin time or activated clotting time), interventional cardiologists have expressed concern about the substitution of LMWH for UFH in patients scheduled for catheterization with possible PCI. However, Collet et al. (23) have shown in a small nonrandomized observation study in 293 patients that PCI can be performed safely with UA/NSTEMI patients who received the usual dose of enoxaparin. In NICE-1 (National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin), an observational study, intravenous enoxaparin (1.0 mg/kg) was used in 828 patients undergoing elective PCI without an intravenous GP IIb/IIIa antagonist (24). The rates of bleeding (1.1% major bleeding and 6.2% minor bleeding in 30 days) were comparable to those observed in historical controls with UFH.

An alternative approach is to use LMWH during the period of initial stabilization and to withhold the dose on the morning of the procedure. If an intervention is required and more than 8 h has elapsed since the last dose of LMWH, UFH can be used for PCI according to usual practice patterns. Because the anticoagulant effect of UFH can be more readily reversed than that of LMWH, UFH is preferred in patients likely to undergo CABG within 24 h.

The September 2000 guidelines reflected concern regarding the combined use of LMWH and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Although the data are not definitive, it now appears that GP IIb/IIIa antagonists can be used with LMWH. In the ACUTE II (Anti-thrombotic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin II) study (25), UFH and enoxaparin were compared in patients with UA/NSTEMI who were given tirofiban. The frequencies of both major and minor bleeding were similar, and there was a trend to fewer adverse events in the patients given enoxaparin. A number of other open-label studies have examined the safety of combining enoxaparin with abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in patients with UA/NSTEMI who are treated with PCI or conservatively; of combining enoxaparin with abciximab in patients undergoing elective PCI (26); and of combining dalteparin with abciximab in patients with UA/NSTEMI who are treated conservatively and during PCI (27). Although the majority of these studies relied on historical controls, none suggested that the combination of enoxaparin and a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist was associated with excess bleeding, whether or not the patient also underwent PCI.

Specific recommendations for the use of heparins in the revised guidelines are as follows:Class I

*1. Anticoagulation with subcutaneous LMWH or intravenous UFH should be added to antiplatelet therapy with ASA and/or clopidogrel. (Level of Evidence: A)

*1. Enoxaparin is preferable to UFH as an anticoagulant in patients with UA/NSTEMI, in the absence of renal failure and unless CABG is planned within 24 h. (Level of Evidence: A)

*New indication, not included in the September 2000 guidelines.

Minor clarification different from full-text version on web site.

	Early conservative vs. early invasive strategies

Top Introduction Risk assessment Early conservative vs. early... Risk factor modification Conclusions References

 
The September 2000 guidelines indicated that 2 different treatment strategies, termed "early conservative" and "early invasive," may be used in patients with UA/NSTEMI (1). In the early conservative strategy, coronary angiography is reserved for patients with evidence of recurrent ischemia (angina at rest or with minimal activity or dynamic ST-segment changes) or a strongly positive stress test despite vigorous medical therapy. In the early invasive strategy, patients without clinically obvious contraindications to coronary revascularization are routinely recommended for coronary angiography and angiographically directed revascularization, if possible.

Several trials comparing these 2 strategies were reviewed, but greatest attention was paid to the then-most-recent trial, FRISC II (Fragmin and Fast Revascularization during InStability in Coronary artery disease II) (28). At 1 year, the mortality rate in the invasive strategy group was 2.2% compared with 3.9% in the noninvasive strategy group (p = 0.016) (29). However, in FRISC II, the invasive strategy involved treatment for an average of 6 days in the hospital with LMWH, ASA, nitrates, and beta-blockers before coronary angiography, an approach that would be difficult to adopt in U.S. hospitals.

In the interim, the TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial was reported (7). In this trial, 2,220 patients with UA or NSTEMI were treated with ASA, heparin, and the GP IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban. They were then randomized to an early invasive strategy with routine coronary angiography within 48 h followed by revascularization if the coronary anatomy was deemed suitable, or to a more conservative strategy. In the latter, catheterization was performed only if the patient had recurrent ischemia or a strongly positive stress test. Death, myocardial (re)infarction, or rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome at 6 months occurred in 19.4% of patients assigned to the conservative strategy vs. 15.9% assigned to the invasive strategy (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97; p = 0.025). Occurrence of death or MI was also reduced at 6 months (9.5 % vs 7.3%; p less than 0.05). The beneficial effects on outcome were particularly evident in medium- and high-risk patients, as defined by an elevation of troponin T greater than 0.01 ng/ml or of troponin I greater than 0.1 ng/ml, the presence of ST-segment deviation, or a TIMI risk score greater than or equal to 3 (7,30). In the absence of these high-risk features, outcomes in patients assigned to the 2 strategies were similar. Rates of major bleeding were similar, and lengths of hospital stay were reduced in patients assigned to the invasive strategy. The benefits of the invasive strategy were achieved at no significant increase in the cost of care over the 6-month follow-up period.

Thus, both the FRISC II (28,29) and TACTICS-TIMI 18 (7,30) trials, the 2 most recent trials comparing invasive vs. conservative strategies in patients with UA/NSTEMI, showed a benefit in patients assigned to the invasive strategy. In contrast to earlier trials, a large majority of patients undergoing PCI in these 2 trials received coronary stents as opposed to balloon angioplasty alone. In TACTICS-TIMI 18, treatment included the GP IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban, which was administered for an average of 22 h before coronary angiography. The routine use of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonist in this trial may have eliminated the excess risk of early (within 7 days) acute MI in the invasive arm, an excess risk that was observed in FRISC II and other trials in which there was no routine "upstream" use of a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist. Therefore, an invasive strategy is associated with a better outcome in UA/NSTEMI patients at high risk who receive a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist (7). Although the benefit of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists is well established for patients with UA/NSTEMI who undergo PCI, the optimum time of commencing these drugs—as early as possible after presentation, i.e. "upstream," as in TACTICS-TIMI 18, or just before the PCI—has not been established.

Specific recommendations for the use of an invasive strategy in the revised guidelines are as follows:Class I

1. 1. An early invasive strategy in patients with UA/NSTEMI without serious comorbidity and who have any of the following high-risk indicators: (Level of Evidence: A)
   1. *a) Recurrent angina/ischemia at rest or with low-level activities despite intensive anti-ischemic therapy.
      
   2. *b) Elevated TnT or TnI
      
   3. *c) New or presumably new ST-segment depression
      
   4. Recurrent angina/ischemia with CHF symptoms, an S₃ gallop, pulmonary edema, worsening rales, or new or worsening MR
      
   5. High-risk findings on noninvasive stress testing
      
   6. Depressed LV systolic function (e.g., EF less than 0.40 on noninvasive study)
      
   7. Hemodynamic instability
      
   8. Sustained ventricular tachycardia
      
   9. PCI within 6 months
      
   10. Prior CABG
       
   
   
2. In the absence of any of these findings, either an early conservative or an early invasive strategy may be offered in hospitalized patients without contraindications for revascularization. (Level of Evidence: B)
   

*New indication, not included in the September 2000 guidelines.

Minor clarification different from full-text version on web site.

	Risk factor modification

Top Introduction Risk assessment Early conservative vs. early... Risk factor modification Conclusions References

 
The September 2000 guidelines pointed out that despite the overwhelming evidence for the benefits of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (statin) therapy in patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, almost no data existed about the timing of initiation of therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (1). Indeed, the secondary prevention trials of statins specifically excluded patients with UA/NSTEMI in the acute phase. Fewer than 300 patients had been entered into the trials within 4 months of an acute coronary syndrome.

The Lipid-Coronary Artery Disease (L-CAD) study was a small trial that randomized 126 patients with an acute coronary syndrome to early treatment with pravastatin, alone or in combination with cholestyramine or niacin, or to usual care. At 24 months, the patients who received early aggressive treatment had a lower incidence of clinical events (23%) than the usual-care group (52%; p = 0.005) (31). In the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering) trial, 3,086 patients were randomized to treatment with an aggressive lipid-lowering regimen of atorvastatin 80 mg per day or placebo 24 to 96 h after an acute coronary syndrome (32). At 16 weeks of follow-up, the primary end point of death, nonfatal MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or recurrent severe myocardial ischemia was reduced from 17.4% in the placebo group to 14.8% in the atorvastatin group (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the risk of the following individual end points: death, nonfatal MI, cardiac arrest, or worsening heart failure; however, there were fewer strokes and a lower risk of severe recurrent ischemia in patients assigned to atorvastatin.

Although the evidence from these 2 trials of a beneficial effect of predischarge initiation of lipid-lowering therapy is not yet robust or definitive, observational studies support this policy. In the Swedish Registry of Cardiac Intensive Care of almost 20,000 patients, the adjusted relative risk of mortality was 25% lower in patients in whom statin therapy was initiated before hospital discharge (33). In addition, patients in whom lipid-lowering therapy is begun in the hospital are much more likely to be undergoing such therapy at a later time. In one demonstration project, the Cardiovascular Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program (CHAMP), the in-hospital initiation of lipid-lowering therapy was associated with an increased percentage of patients treated with statins 1 year later (from 10% to 91%) and with a higher frequency of patients whose LDL cholesterol was less than 100 mg/dl (from 6% to 58%) (34). Although additional trials are ongoing, there appear to be no adverse effects and substantial advantages to the initiation of lipid-lowering therapy before hospital discharge (35–37). Such early initiation of therapy has also been recommended in the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP III), which also raised the threshold of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration that required therapy (38). Similar considerations apply to the early initiation of statin therapy following PCI. In the Lescol Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS), 1,669 patients were randomized to receive 80 mg fluvastatin or placebo, beginning two days after PCI. After a follow-up of 3.9 years, the statin-treated group had a lower incidence of clinical events (21.4%) than the placebo group (26.7%), p = 0.01 (39).

In addition to maintaining the original Class I recommendations for LDL cholesterol reduction, specific additional recommendations for the use of lipid-lowering therapy in UA/NSTEMI in the revised guidelines are as follows:Class I

*1. A fibrate or niacin if high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is less than 40 mg per dl, occurring as an isolated finding or in combination with other lipid abnormalities. (Level of Evidence: B)

*1. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and diet for LDL cholesterol greater than 100 mg per dl begun 24 to 96 h after admission and continued at hospital discharge. (Level of Evidence: B)

*New indication, not included in the September 2000 guidelines.

	Conclusions

Top Introduction Risk assessment Early conservative vs. early... Risk factor modification Conclusions References

 
These guidelines address the diagnosis and management of patients with UA and the closely related condition NSTEMI. These life-threatening disorders are a major cause of emergency medical care and are responsible for more than 1.4 million hospitalizations annually in the United States (40). Nearly 60% of these admissions are among persons greater than 65 years old, and almost half occur in women. In 1997, there were 5,315,000 visits to US emergency departments for the evaluation of chest pain and related symptoms (41).

Because of the high incidence of UA/NSTEMI and the seriousness of this condition (approximately 15% rate of death or [re]infarction at 30 days) (1,20), continued research in this field is of the greatest importance. It is encouraging that in the 21 months since the publication of the September 2000 guidelines, a considerable body of additional useful information about these conditions has emerged. Indeed, the progress between September 2000 and June 2002 equals that between 1994, when the first guidelines were published (42), and September 2000.

	Footnotes

 
The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.

This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in September 2002 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2002.

When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, Jones RH, Kereiakes D, Kupersmith J, Levin TN, Pepine CJ, Schaeffer JW, Smith EE III, Steward DE, Theroux P. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1366–74.

This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). Single copies of this document are available for $5 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology Foundation, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699 (product code 71-0227). This document and the companion full-text guidelines (product code 71-0240), are available on the ACC Web site at www.acc.org and the AHA Web site at www.americanheart.org. To purchase additional reprints (specify version): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1,000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342; or E-mail pubauth@heart.org.

	References

Top Introduction Risk assessment Early conservative vs. early... Risk factor modification Conclusions References

 
1. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:970–1062[Free Full Text]

2. Boersma E, Pieper KS, Steyerberg EW, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation: results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators. Circulation. 2000;101:2557–2567[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000;284:835–842[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Antman EM, McCabe CH, Gurfinkel EP, et al. Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non–Q-wave myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B trial. Circulation. 1999;100:1593–1601[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP, et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non–Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:447–452[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Snapinn SM, McCabe CH, Theroux P, Braunwald E. An integrated clinical approach to predicting the benefit of tirofiban in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: application of the TIMI Risk Score for UA/NSTEMI in PRISM-PLUS. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:223–229[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1879–1887[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:959–969[Free Full Text]

9. Cadroy Y, Bossavy JP, Thalamas C, Sagnard L, Sakariassen K, Boneu B. Early potent antithrombotic effect with combined aspirin and a loading dose of clopidogrel on experimental arterial thrombogenesis in humans. Circulation. 2000;101:2823–2828[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Helft G, Osende JI, Worthley SG, et al. Acute antithrombotic effect of a front-loaded regimen of clopidogrel in patients with atherosclerosis on aspirin. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:2316–2321[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502[CrossRef][Medline]

12. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet. 2001;358:527–533[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Physicians’ desk reference. 56 ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Company, Inc; 2002. p. 3085

14. The ESPRIT Investigators. Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356:2037–2044[CrossRef][Medline]

15. O’Shea JC, Hafley GE, Greenberg S, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade with eptifibatide in coronary stent intervention: the ESPRIT trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:2468–2473[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Topol EJ, Moliterno DJ, Herrmann HC, et al. Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1888–1894[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Roffi M, Moliterno DJ, Meier B, et al. Impact of different platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors among diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial (TARGET) 1-year follow-up. Circulation. 2002;105:2730–2736[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Simoons ML. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without early coronary revascularisation: the GUSTO IV-ACS randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;357:1915–1924[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non–Q-wave myocardial infarction. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) Study vestigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1488–1497[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Inhibition of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The PURSUIT Trial Investigators. Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:436–443[CrossRef][Medline]

21. Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2002;359:189–198[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Michalis LK, Papamichail N, Katsouras C. Enoxaparin Versus Tinzaparin in the Management of Unstable Coronary Artery Disease (EVET Study). (abstr)J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(Suppl):365a

23. Collet JP, Montalescot G, Lison L, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention after subcutaneous enoxaparin pretreatment in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Circulation. 2001;103:658–663[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Kereiakes DJ, Grines C, Fry E, et al. Enoxaparin and abciximab adjunctive pharmacotherapy during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2001;13:272–278[Medline]

25. Cohen M, Theroux P, White HD. Anti-Thrombotic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin: The ACUTE II Study. (abstr)Circulation. 2000;102:II826

26. Young JJ, Kereiakes DJ, Grines CL. Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: the NICE 1 and NICE 4 trials. National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin Investigators. J Invasive Cardiol. 2000;12(Suppl E):E14–18[Medline]

27. Kereiakes DJ, Kleiman NS, Fry E, et al. Dalteparin in combination with abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2001;141:348–352[CrossRef][Medline]

28. The FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. Lancet. 1999;354:708–715[CrossRef][Medline]

29. Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, Stahle E, Swahn E. Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease. Lancet. 2000;356:9–16[CrossRef][Medline]

30. Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Rifai N, et al. Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. JAMA. 2001;286:2405–2412[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Arntz HR, Agrawal R, Wunderlich W, et al. Beneficial effects of pravastatin (+/-colestyramine/niacin) initiated immediately after a coronary event (the randomized Lipid-Coronary Artery Disease [L-CAD] Study). Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1293–1298[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study. a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:1711–1718[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Stenestrand U, Wallentin L. Early statin treatment following acute myocardial infarction and 1-year survival. JAMA. 2001;285:430–436[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Fonarow GC, Gawlinski A, Moughrabi S, Tillisch JH. Improved treatment of coronary heart disease by implementation of a Cardiac Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program (CHAMP). Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:819–822[CrossRef][Medline]

35. Muhlestein JB, Horne BD, Bair TL, et al. Usefulness of in-hospital prescription of statin agents after angiographic diagnosis of coronary artery disease in improving continued compliance and reduced mortality. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:257–261[CrossRef][Medline]

36. Fonarow GC, Ballantyne CM. In-hospital initiation of lipid-lowering therapy for patients with coronary heart disease: the time is now. Circulation. 2001;103:2768–2770[Free Full Text]

37. Michels KB, Braunwald E. Estimating treatment effects from observational data: dissonant and resonant notes from the SYMPHONY trials. JAMA. 2002;287:3130–3132[Free Full Text]

38. Executive Summary of the Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497[Free Full Text]

39. Serruys PW, de Feyter P, Macaya C, et al. Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;287:3215–3222[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. National Center for Health Statistics. Detailed diagnoses and procedures: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1996. Data from Vital and Health Statistics. 56 ed. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998. p. 13

41. Nourjah P. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1997 emergency department summary. Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics. 56 ed. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1999. p. 304

42. Braunwald E, Mark DB, Jones RH, et al. Unstable Angina: Diagnosis and Management. AHCPR Publication No 94-0602, 1-154. 56 ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1994. 3-1

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Marso, P. S. Teirstein, D. J. Kereiakes, J. Moses, J. Lasala, and J. A. Grantham Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Use in the United States: Defining Measures of Appropriateness J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 8, 2012; (2012) j.jcin.2011.12.004v1. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. D. Hillis, P. K. Smith, J. L. Anderson, J. A. Bittl, C. R. Bridges, J. G. Byrne, J. E. Cigarroa, V. J. DiSesa, L. F. Hiratzka, A. M. Hutter Jr, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2011; 58(24): e123 - e210. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ozaki, M. Okumura, T. F. Ismail, S. Motoyama, H. Naruse, K. Hattori, H. Kawai, M. Sarai, Y. Takagi, J. Ishii, et al. Coronary CT angiographic characteristics of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes not related to plaque rupture as defined by optical coherence tomography and angioscopy Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2011; 32(22): 2814 - 2823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Peppard, B. M. Held-Godgluck, and R. Beddingfield Use of Prasugrel in a Patient with Clopidogrel Hypersensitivity Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2011; 45(10): e54 - e54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Goldstein, K. M. Chinnaiyan, A. Abidov, S. Achenbach, D. S. Berman, S. W. Hayes, U. Hoffmann, J. R. Lesser, I. A. Mikati, B. J. O'Neil, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 27, 2011; 58(14): 1414 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Karakas, J. L. Januzzi Jr., J. Meyer, H. Lee, C. L. Schlett, Q. A. Truong, W. Rottbauer, F. Bamberg, S. Dasdemir, U. Hoffmann, et al. Copeptin Does Not Add Diagnostic Information to High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Low- to Intermediate-Risk Patients with Acute Chest Pain: Results from the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Computed Tomography (ROMICAT) Study Clin. Chem., August 1, 2011; 57(8): 1137 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Yamaguchi, T. Yamamoto, G. Motomura, S. Ikemura, K. Iwasaki, G. Zhao, and Y. Iwamoto Effects of an anti-platelet drug on the prevention of steroid-induced osteonecrosis in rabbits Rheumatology, July 8, 2011; (2011) ker197v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Roumie, S. Ofner, J. S. Ross, G. Arling, L. S. Williams, D. L. Ordin, and D. M. Bravata Prevalence of Inadequate Blood Pressure Control Among Veterans After Acute Ischemic Stroke Hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, July 1, 2011; 4(4): 399 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Wright, J. L. Anderson, C. D. Adams, C. R. Bridges, D. E. Casey Jr, S. M. Ettinger, F. M. Fesmire, T. G. Ganiats, H. Jneid, A. M. Lincoff, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 10, 2011; 57(19): e215 - e367. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Anderson, C. D. Adams, E. M. Antman, C. R. Bridges, R. M. Califf, D. E. Casey Jr, W. E. Chavey II, F. M. Fesmire, J. S. Hochman, T. N. Levin, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Circulation, May 10, 2011; 123(18): e426 - e579. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Goehler, D. A. Ollendorf, M. Jaeger, J. Ladapo, T. Neumann, G. S. Gazelle, and S. D. Pearson A Simulation Model of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Cardiac CT Triage of Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2011; 196(4): 853 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. G. Blake, J. M. Bargman, K. S. Brimble, S. N. Davison, D. Hirsch, B. B. McCormick, R. S. Suri, P. Taylor, N. Zalunardo, M. Tonelli, et al. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS ADEQUACY 2011 Perit. Dial. Int., March 1, 2011; 31(2): 218 - 239. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Scharnhorst, K. Krasznai, M. van't Veer, and R. Michels Rapid Detection of Myocardial Infarction With a Sensitive Troponin Test Am J Clin Pathol, March 1, 2011; 135(3): 424 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Goldstein, C. D. Bushnell, R. J. Adams, L. J. Appel, L. T. Braun, S. Chaturvedi, M. A. Creager, A. Culebras, R. H. Eckel, R. G. Hart, et al. Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke, February 1, 2011; 42(2): 517 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Durand, A. Chaib, and N. Danchin Chapter 6 Chest pain and chest pain units The ESC Textbook of Acute and Intensive Cardiac Care, December 1, 2010; 1(1): med-9780199584314-chapter - med-9780199584314-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Rastan, O. Akhavuz, and F. W. Mohr Chapter 46 Coronary artery bypass graft surgery The ESC Textbook of Acute and Intensive Cardiac Care, December 1, 2010; 1(1): med-9780199584314-chapter - med-9780199584314-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Swahn, J. Alfredsson, and S. Sederholm Lawesson Chapter 48 Gender considerations in acute coronary syndromes The ESC Textbook of Acute and Intensive Cardiac Care, December 1, 2010; 1(1): med-9780199584314-chapter - med-9780199584314-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. O'Connor, W. Brady, S. C. Brooks, D. Diercks, J. Egan, C. Ghaemmaghami, V. Menon, B. J. O'Neil, A. H. Travers, and D. Yannopoulos Part 10: Acute Coronary Syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Circulation, November 2, 2010; 122(18_suppl_3): S787 - S817. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. F. DeBusk, N. H. Miller, and L. Raby Technical Feasibility of an Online Decision Support System for Acute Coronary Syndromes Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, November 1, 2010; 3(6): 694 - 700. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Arslanian-Engoren, B. Hagerty, and K. A. Eagle Evaluation of the ACT Intervention to Improve Nurses' Cardiac Triage Decisions West J Nurs Res, October 1, 2010; 32(6): 713 - 729. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Ben-Gal, J. W. Moses, R. Mehran, A. J. Lansky, G. Weisz, E. Nikolsky, M. Argenziano, M. R. Williams, A. Colombo, P. E. Aylward, et al. Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Multivessel Disease in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2010; 3(10): 1059 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Lansky, K. Goto, E. Cristea, M. Fahy, H. Parise, F. Feit, E. M. Ohman, H. D. White, K. P. Alexander, M. E. Bertrand, et al. Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of Short- and Long-Term Ischemic Events in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) Trial Circ Cardiovasc Interv, August 1, 2010; 3(4): 308 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Schnell, K. F. Braun, M. Muller, E. Standl, and W. Otter The Munich Myocardial Infarction Registry: impact of C-reactive protein and kidney function on hospital mortality in diabetic patients Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, July 1, 2010; 7(3): 225 - 230. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Squire, P. Quinn, H. Narayan, S. Khan, O. Dhillon, K. Ng, D. Kelly, J. Davies, and L. Ng Identification of potential outcome benefit from ACE inhibition after acute coronary syndrome: a biomarker approach using N-terminal proBNP Heart, June 1, 2010; 96(11): 831 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Laudon, T. R. Behrenbeck, C. M. Wood, K. R. Bailey, C. M. Callahan, J. F. Breen, and L. F. Vukov Computed Tomographic Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment for Evaluating Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Long-term Outcome of a Prospective Blind Study Mayo Clin. Proc., April 1, 2010; 85(4): 314 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kaul and G. A. Diamond Trial and Error: How to Avoid Commonly Encountered Limitations of Published Clinical Trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 2, 2010; 55(5): 415 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Piepoli, U. Corra, W. Benzer, B. Bjarnason-Wehrens, P. Dendale, D. Gaita, H. McGee, M. Mendes, J. Niebauer, A.-D. O. Zwisler, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, February 1, 2010; 17(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C.T. Ng, D. T. Tran, C. Allman, J. Vidaic, and D. Y. Leung Prognostic implications of left ventricular dyssynchrony early after non-ST elevation myocardial infarction without congestive heart failure Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2010; 31(3): 298 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. D. LAZAR and A. M. LINCOFF Prasugrel for acute coronary syndromes: Faster, more potent, but higher bleeding risk Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, December 1, 2009; 76(12): 707 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Domanski and E. R. Schwarz Clinical Review: Is the Perioperative Use of {beta}-Blockers Still Recommended? A Critical Review of Recent Controversies Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2009; 14(4): 258 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, L. A. Fleisher, et al. 2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 24, 2009; 54(22): e13 - e118. [Full Text] [PDF]

				2007 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, et al. 2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Circulation, November 24, 2009; 120(21): e169 - e276. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Hagihara, M. Kazui, A. Kurihara, M. Yoshiike, K. Honda, O. Okazaki, N. A. Farid, and T. Ikeda A Possible Mechanism for the Differences in Efficiency and Variability of Active Metabolite Formation from Thienopyridine Antiplatelet Agents, Prasugrel and Clopidogrel Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2009; 37(11): 2145 - 2152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Nagao, H. Matsuoka, H. Kawakami, H. Higashino, T. Mochizuki, M. Uemura, and S. Shigemi Myocardial Ischemia in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Assessment Using 64-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 1097 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Wrishko, C. S. Ernest II, D. S. Small, Y. G. Li, G. J. Weerakkody, J. R. Riesmeyer, W. L. Macias, S. Rohatagi, D. E. Salazar, E. M. Antman, et al. Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses to Evaluate the Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on Exposure of Prasugrel Active Metabolite in TRITON-TIMI 38 J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2009; 49(8): 984 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Blendea, M Blendea, J Banker, and C A McPherson Troponin T elevation after implanted defibrillator discharge predicts survival Heart, July 15, 2009; 95(14): 1153 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Motoyama, M. Sarai, H. Harigaya, H. Anno, K. Inoue, T. Hara, H. Naruse, J. Ishii, H. Hishida, N. D. Wong, et al. Computed Tomographic Angiography Characteristics of Atherosclerotic Plaques Subsequently Resulting in Acute Coronary Syndrome J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 49 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Mehran, S. J. Pocock, G. W. Stone, T. C. Clayton, G. D. Dangas, F. Feit, S. V. Manoukian, E. Nikolsky, A. J. Lansky, A. Kirtane, et al. Associations of major bleeding and myocardial infarction with the incidence and timing of mortality in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a risk model from the ACUITY trial Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2009; 30(12): 1457 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ebrahimi, C. Dyke, R. Mehran, S. V. Manoukian, F. Feit, D. A. Cox, B. J. Gersh, E. M. Ohman, H. D. White, J. W. Moses, et al. Outcomes Following Pre-Operative Clopidogrel Administration in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: The ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 26, 2009; 53(21): 1965 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Hoffmann, F. Bamberg, C. U. Chae, J. H. Nichols, I. S. Rogers, S. K. Seneviratne, Q. A. Truong, R. C. Cury, S. Abbara, M. D. Shapiro, et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Early Triage of Patients With Acute Chest Pain: The ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2009; 53(18): 1642 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Wilson, B. M. Scirica, E. Braunwald, S. A. Murphy, E. Karwatowska-Prokopczuk, J. L. Buros, B. R. Chaitman, and D. A. Morrow Efficacy of Ranolazine in Patients With Chronic Angina: Observations From the Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled MERLIN-TIMI (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes) 36 Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1510 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Hunt, W. T. Abraham, M. H. Chin, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. Jessup, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, K. Michl, et al. 2009 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): e1 - e90. [Full Text] [PDF]

				2005 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, S. A. Hunt, W. T. Abraham, M. H. Chin, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. Jessup, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, et al. 2009 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Circulation, April 14, 2009; 119(14): e391 - e479. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Phan, C. Shufelt, and C. N. B. Merz Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease JAMA, April 8, 2009; 301(14): 1468 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Doesch, A. Seeger, J. Doering, C. Herdeg, C. Burgstahler, C. D. Claussen, M. Gawaz, S. Miller, and A. E. May Risk Stratification by Adenosine Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Coronary Artery Stenoses of Intermediate Angiographic Severity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 424 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Tricoci, J. M. Allen, J. M. Kramer, R. M. Califf, and S. C. Smith Jr Scientific Evidence Underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines JAMA, February 25, 2009; 301(8): 831 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kitagawa, H. Yamamoto, J. Horiguchi, N. Ohhashi, F. Tadehara, T. Shokawa, Y. Dohi, E. Kunita, H. Utsunomiya, N. Kohno, et al. Characterization of noncalcified coronary plaques and identification of culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome by 64-slice computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 153 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Krumholz, J. L. Anderson, B. L. Bachelder, F. M. Fesmire, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Foody, P. M. Ho, M. N. Kosiborod, F. A. Masoudi, and B. K. Nallamothu ACC/AHA 2008 Performance Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Family Physicians and American College of Emergency Physicians Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Hospital Medicine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 9, 2008; 52(24): 2046 - 2099. [Full Text] [PDF]

				WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, H. M. Krumholz, J. L. Anderson, B. L. Bachelder, F. M. Fesmire, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Foody, P. M. Ho, M. N. Kosiborod, F. A. Masoudi, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Performance Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Emergency Physicians: Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Hospital Medicine Circulation, December 9, 2008; 118(24): 2596 - 2648. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. R. Reeves, T. Y. Wang, K. J. Reid, K. P. Alexander, C. Decker, H. Ahmad, J. A. Spertus, and E. D. Peterson Dissociation Between Hospital Performance of the Smoking Cessation Counseling Quality Metric and Cessation Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, October 27, 2008; 168(19): 2111 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Pundziute, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, I. Decramer, G. Sarno, P. K. Vanhoenacker, E. Boersma, J. H.C. Reiber, M. J. Schalij, W. Wijns, et al. Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: non-invasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2008; 29(19): 2373 - 2381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ang, V. Palakodeti, A. Khalid, S. Tsimikas, Z. Idrees, P. Tran, P. Clopton, N. Zafar, G. Bromberg-Marin, S. Keramati, et al. Elevated Plasma Fibrinogen and Diabetes Mellitus Are Associated With Lower Inhibition of Platelet Reactivity With Clopidogrel J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1052 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Dunlay, K. P. Alexander, C. Melloni, J. L. Kraschnewski, L. Liang, W. B. Gibler, M. T. Roe, E. M. Ohman, and E. D. Peterson Medical Records and Quality of Care in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From CRUSADE Arch Intern Med, August 11, 2008; 168(15): 1692 - 1698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C D Miller, G J Fermann, C J Lindsell, K W Mahaffey, W F Peacock, C V Pollack, J E Hollander, D B Diercks, W B Gibler, and J W Hoekstra on behalf of the EMCREG-International Initial risk stratification and presenting characteristics of patients with evolving myocardial infarctions Emerg. Med. J., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 492 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Ladapo, U. Hoffmann, F. Bamberg, J. T. Nagurney, D. M. Cutler, M. C. Weinstein, and G. S. Gazelle Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary MDCT in the Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 455 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. T. Newsome, R. S. Weller, J. C. Gerancher, M. A. Kutcher, and R. L. Royster Coronary Artery Stents: II. Perioperative Considerations and Management Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 570 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Coylewright, R. S. Blumenthal, and W. Post Placing COURAGE in Context: Review of the Recent Literature on Managing Stable Coronary Artery Disease Mayo Clin. Proc., July 1, 2008; 83(7): 799 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H DOGAN, W J H VELDKAMP, P DIBBETS-SCHNEIDER, A M SPIJKERBOER, B J A MERTENS, L J M KROFT, A DE ROOS, and J GELEIJNS Effects of heart rate, filling and slice thickness on the accuracy of left ventricular volume measurements in a dynamic cardiac phantom using ECG-gated MDCT Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 81(967): 577 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sibbing, G. Busch, S. Braun, S. Jawansky, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, I. Ott, and N. von Beckerath Impact of bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin on platelet aggregation in patients pretreated with 600 mg clopidogrel undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2008; 29(12): 1504 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Crowther and T. E. Warkentin Bleeding risk and the management of bleeding complications in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy: focus on new anticoagulant agents Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 4871 - 4879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Jneid, G. C. Fonarow, C. P. Cannon, I. F. Palacios, T. Kilic, G. V. Moukarbel, A. O. Maree, K. A. LaBresh, L. Liang, L. K. Newby, et al. Impact of Time of Presentation on the Care and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, May 13, 2008; 117(19): 2502 - 2509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. D. White, D. P. Chew, J. W. Hoekstra, C. D. Miller, C. V. Pollack Jr, F. Feit, A. M. Lincoff, M. Bertrand, S. Pocock, J. Ware, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Switching From Either Unfractionated Heparin or Enoxaparin to Bivalirudin in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Managed With an Invasive Strategy: Results From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 6, 2008; 51(18): 1734 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Devlin, J. M. Gore, J. Elliott, N. Wijesinghe, K. A. Eagle, A. Avezum, W. Huang, D. Brieger, and for the GRACE Investigators Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2008; 29(10): 1275 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Y. Wang, A. Y. Chen, E. D. Peterson, R. C. Becker, W. B. Gibler, E. M. Ohman, and M. T. Roe Impact of home warfarin use on treatment patterns and bleeding complications for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: observations from the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2008; 29(9): 1103 - 1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kripalani, L. E. Henderson, T. A. Jacobson, and V. Vaccarino Medication Use Among Inner-City Patients After Hospital Discharge: Patient-Reported Barriers and Solutions Mayo Clin. Proc., May 1, 2008; 83(5): 529 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Pitt, J. Loscalzo, J. Ycas, and J. S. Raichlen Lipid Levels After Acute Coronary Syndromes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1440 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. McCord, H. Jneid, J. E. Hollander, J. A. de Lemos, B. Cercek, P. Hsue, W. B. Gibler, E. M. Ohman, B. Drew, G. Philippides, et al. Management of Cocaine-Associated Chest Pain and Myocardial Infarction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Acute Cardiac Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, April 8, 2008; 117(14): 1897 - 1907. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Hills and S. C. Johnston Trends in Usage of Alternative Antiplatelet Therapy After Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1228 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Melloni, E. D. Peterson, A. Y. Chen, L. A. Szczech, L. K. Newby, R. A. Harrington, W. B. Gibler, E. M. Ohman, S. A. Spinler, M. T. Roe, et al. Cockcroft-Gault Versus Modification of Diet in Renal Disease: Importance of Glomerular Filtration Rate Formula for Classification of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 11, 2008; 51(10): 991 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A Edwards, J. M Bugaresti, and A. C Buchholz Visceral adipose tissue and the ratio of visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue are greater in adults with than in those without spinal cord injury, despite matching waist circumferences Am J Clin Nutr, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 600 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Hagberg, F. Woitalla, and P. Crawford 2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2008; 21(2): 101 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Ko, Y. Wang, D. A. Alter, J. P. Curtis, S. S. Rathore, T. A. Stukel, F. A. Masoudi, J. S. Ross, J. M. Foody, and H. M. Krumholz Regional Variation in Cardiac Catheterization Appropriateness and Baseline Risk After Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 716 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ndrepepa, A. Kastrati, J. Mehilli, F.-J. Neumann, J. ten Berg, O. Bruskina, F. Dotzer, M. Seyfarth, J. Pache, J. Dirschinger, et al. One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab vs. placebo in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after pre-treatment with clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 455 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Noureddine, M. Arevian, M. Adra, and H. Puzantian Response to Signs and Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Differences Between Lebanese Men and Women Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 26 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. Ferraris, F. H. Edwards, D. M. Shahian, and S. P. Ferraris Risk Stratification and Comorbidity Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 199 - 246. [Full Text]

				R. Yuval, D. A. Halon, and B. S. Lewis Perceived Disability and Lifestyle Modification Following Hospitalization for Non-ST Elevation Versus ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: The Patients' Point of View European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, December 1, 2007; 6(4): 287 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Corra, M. Mendes, M. Piepoli, and H. Saner Future perspectives in cardiac rehabilitation: a new European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Position Paper on 'secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation' European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, December 1, 2007; 14(6): 723 - 725. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Singh, R. Arora, A. Khraisat, K. Handa, A. Bahekar, A. Trivedi, and S. Khosla Increased Incidence of In-Stent Thrombosis Related to Cocaine Use: Case Series and Review of Literature Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2007; 12(4): 298 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. S. White and D. Kuo Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Role of Multidetector CT Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 672 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Otter, M. Winter, W. Doering, E. Standl, and O. Schnell C-Reactive Protein in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Diabetes Care, December 1, 2007; 30(12): 3080 - 3082. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Thygesen, J. S. Alpert, H. D. White, and on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 27, 2007; 50(22): 2173 - 2195. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Braunwald, E. Articles by Smith, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Braunwald, E. Articles by Smith, S. C., Jr