Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1214-1215
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sagar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Jurva, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sagar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Jurva, J.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

Open perforator hypothesis

Bridging epicardial and microvascular circulation*

Kiran Sagar, MD, FACC*,* and Jason Jurva, MD*

* Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Kiran Sagar, Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA.
ksagar{at}mcw.edu


Successful reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction (MI) has traditionally meant restoration of the patency of the epicardial coronary artery. However, increasing evidence suggests that microvascular dysfunction and inadequate tissue perfusion are frequently present despite an open infarct-related artery (1,2). Therefore, optimal reperfusion is being redefined to include patency of infarct-related coronary artery, intact myocardial microvasculature, and tissue perfusion (3). Coronary angiography and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades have been the gold standard for failed or successful reperfusion (4). However, TIMI 3 flow as well as newer angiographic methods including corrected TIMI frame count and myocardial blush (5) may provide incomplete measures of successful reperfusion.

In this issue of the Journal, Voci et al. (6) report that recanalization of intramural perforators emerging from the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) reflect adequate reperfusion in patients with acute anterior MI. They also report that such recanalization has a positive impact on long-term recovery of left ventricular (LV) function. Voci et al. (6) used simple bedside transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to image both the epicardial arteries, that is, LAD and septal perforators. Supporting what they call the "Open Perforator Hypothesis," their data show that the recanalization score better predicts LV functional recovery than restoration of TIMI flow grade 3. This noninvasive Doppler technique has advantages over intracoronary Doppler for predicting myocardial viability (7). Not only it is safe, but it also can measure velocities from regions inaccessible to intracoronary Doppler. However, only limited territory of LAD can be imaged, and there is no data regarding imaging of right or left circumflex coronary artery imaging. Unfortunately, invasive and noninvasive Doppler ultrasound fail to assess microvascular function and tissue perfusion, both crucial for successful reperfusion.

An alternate technique for assessing reperfusion, myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), was first performed during angiography by injecting sonicated contrast solution into the recanalized infarct-related artery (8,9). Since then MCE has shown that up to 25% of patients with acute MI do not have adequate restoration tissue perfusion in the infarct region despite TIMI flow grade 3 in the infarct-related artery. The development of new contrast agents and introduction of improved imaging methods (9) should enable MCE in combination with color Doppler imaging of the epicardial artery to provide a comprehensive evaluation of reperfusion.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to be the most comprehensive technique to evaluate reperfusion as it evaluates epicardial coronary flow, microvascular dysfunction, tissue perfusion, as well as infarct size and LV function (10,11). Wu et al. (13) were the first to assess microvascular integrity with contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with acute MI. Their data demonstrated that, after infarction, microvascular obstruction was a strong prognostic marker even after control for infarct size. However, high costs, long procedure time, and the difficulty in accommodating the unstable patient precludes its widespread application at this time. Future technical advances should help.

In vivo microvascular integrity has been studied by techniques that use radioactive tracers such as thallium-201, technetium-99m pertechnetate, and rubidium-82 (12–15). Thallium-201 is directly taken up by myocardial cells and allows imaging of perfusion independent of infarct-related artery patency. Similarly, positron emission tomography (PET) is a popular technique to assess myocardial perfusion and microvascular function, specifically when combined with vasodilators as adenosine and dipyridamole. Unfortunately, both thallium and PET are difficult to perform in the acute phase of MI, and the ideal time to perform follow-up imaging remains unclear. Kondo et al. (15) have used intracoronary technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin to evaluate microvascular damage at the time of cardiac catheterization.

In summary, the ideal technique to determine the success of reperfusion should be noninvasive, assess epicardial coronary artery patency, microvascular integrity, and tissue perfusion. Currently, only two methods are well-positioned to fulfill these requirements: MRI and cardiac ultrasound. Voci et al.’s (6) use of transthoracic echocardiography/Doppler to image epicardial/intramural vessels appears promising, and has a high specificity for recovery of LV function. A combination of this technique with the new developments in MCE may enable ultrasound to provide a comprehensive evaluation of myocardial reperfusion.


    Footnotes
 
* Editorials published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology reflect the views of the authors and do no necessarily represent the views of JACC or the American College of Cardiology. Back


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. DeWood MA, Spores J, Notske R, et al. Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:897–902[Abstract]

2. Braunwald E. Coronary artery patency in patients with myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1550–1552[Medline]

3. Roe MT, Ohman EM, Maas ACP, et al. Shifting the open artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:9–18[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. The TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932–936[Medline]

5. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996;93:879–888[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Voci P, Mariano E, Pizzuto F, Puddu PE, Romeo F. Coronary recanalization in anterior myocardial infarction: the open preforator hypothesis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1205–1213[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Akasaka T, Yoshida K, Kawamoto T, et al. Relation of phasic coronary flow velocity characteristics with TIMI perfusion grade and myocardial recovery after primary PTCA and rescue stenting. Circulation. 2000;101:2361–2367[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Ragosta M, Camarano G, Kaul S, et al. Microvascular integrity indicates myocardial viability in patients with recent myocardial infarction: new insights using myocardial contrast echo. Circulation. 1994;89:2562–2567[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the "no reflow" phenomenon: a predictor of complication and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996;93:223–228[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Swineburn JM, Lahiri A, Senior R. Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts recovery of dysnergic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:19–25[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Bremerich J, Wendland MF, Ahrden H, et al. Microvascular injury in reperfused infracted myocardium: noninvasive assessment with contrast enhanced echo-planar MRI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:786–793

12. Wu KA, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by MRI in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:765–772[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Schofer J, Mantz R, Mathey DG. Scintigraphic evidence of "no reflow" in humans after coronary thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5:593–598[Abstract]

14. Jeremy RW, Linker JM, Becker LC. Progressive failure of coronary flow during reperfusion of myocardial infarction: documentation of "no reflow" phenomenon with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:695–704[Abstract]

15. Kondo M, Nakano A, Saito D, et al. Assessment of "microvascular no-reflow phenomenon" using technetium 99m macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:2302–2306





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sagar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Jurva, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sagar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Jurva, J.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement