cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:515-520
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vallbracht, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schultheiss, H.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vallbracht, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schultheiss, H.-P.

CLINCAL STUDY

Endothelial dysfunction of peripheral arteries in patients with immunohistologically confirmed myocardial inflammation correlates with endothelial expression of human leukocyte antigens and adhesion molecules in myocardial biopsies

Katja B. Vallbracht, MD*,*, Peter L. Schwimmbeck, MD*, Bettina Seeberg, MD*, Uwe Kühl, MD, PhD* and Heinz-Peter Schultheiss, MD*

* Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Manuscript received December 12, 2001; revised manuscript received April 10, 2002, accepted May 14, 2002.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Katja B. Vallbracht, University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Department of Cardiology, Free University of Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany.
vallbrac{at}zedat.fu-berlin.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether myocardial inflammation (MC) and endothelial activation are associated with clinically detectable endothelial dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: In patients with MC, immunohistologic evaluation of myocardial biopsies demonstrates a cellular infiltrate of lymphocytes in the myocardium and endothelial activation, as indicated by enhanced expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-1, HLA-DR and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1. This chronic inflammatory process may be associated with endothelial dysfunction.

METHODS: In 65 patients with suspected MC, endothelial function of the radial artery was noninvasively assessed. By means of high-resolution ultrasound, diameter changes in response to reactive hyperemia (endothelium-dependent), as compared with glyceroltrinitrate (endothelium-independent), were analyzed. In the myocardial biopsies, MC was confirmed by immunohistology in 53 patients; 12 patients with normal myocardial biopsies served as controls. Endothelial expression of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1 was semiquantitatively evaluated by immunohistology. To minimize other factors influencing endothelial function, patients with coronary artery disease, diabetes, severely impaired left ventricular function or more than one arteriosclerotic risk factor were excluded from this study.

RESULTS: Endothelial function, as determined by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), in patients with MC was impaired (FMDMC 4.28%), as compared with controls (FMDCo 10.10%). The severity of endothelial dysfunction in patients with MC correlated significantly with the extent of endothelial expression of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1 in myocardial biopsies. Endothelium-independent vasodilation was not affected by MC or endothelial activation.

CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial inflammation is associated with endothelial dysfunction of peripheral arteries. The severity of endothelial dysfunction correlates with the extent of endothelial activation.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAM
  cell adhesion molecule
  Co
  control group
  ECG
  electrocardiogram
  EF
  ejection fraction
  FMD
  flow-mediated vasodilation
  GTN
  glyceroltrinitrate
  GTN-MD
  glyceroltrinitrate-mediated vasodilation
  HLA
  human leukocyte antigen
  ICAM
  intercellular adhesion molecule
  MC
  myocardial inflammation


Endothelial function plays a central roll in the development of vascular disease and represents a marker of prognostic relevance; endothelial dysfunction in coronary artery disease is associated with increased development of adverse coronary events (1,2). After heart transplantation, endothelial dysfunction anticipates the development of transplant vasculopathy and transplant failure (3–5). Endothelial dysfunction has been observed in association with acute systemic inflammatory immune responses (6,7). It has been correlated with levels of C-reactive protein (8). Furthermore, clinical studies have shown that endothelial function can be restored by suppression of inflammation in patients with systemic vasculitis (9).

Immunohistologic evaluation of myocardial biopsies in patients with myocardial inflammation (MC) demonstrates a myocardial lymphocyte infiltrate and endothelial activation that can be detected by enhanced expression of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) (10,11). Thus, the vessel wall is involved in the inflammatory process. Cell adhesion molecule expression is generally regulated by proinflammatory cytokines that can effect not only the local vasculature in the heart, but also, systemically, the peripheral vessels. A correlation between coronary and peripheral endothelial function has been demonstrated for other diseases (12). The aim of the study presented here was to investigate whether the inflammatory process in the myocardium leads to a systemic deterioration of endothelial function. Furthermore, we aimed to elucidate if the severity of endothelial dysfunction in patients with MC correlates with the extent of endothelial activation, as detected by enhanced expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-1, HLA-DR and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 in myocardial biopsies.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population.   We included 65 consecutive patients with suspected MC, considering clinical symptoms and noninvasive testing as electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography or spiroergometry. When coronary artery disease was excluded by angiography, myocardial biopsies were obtained to establish a diagnosis. According to the findings in the myocardial biopsies, the patients were divided into a group with MC and a control group (Co). In 53 patients, MC was confirmed by immunohistology in myocardial biopsies; 12 patients had normal myocardial biopsies (Co). To minimize other confounding factors on endothelial dysfunction, patients with coronary artery disease (1,2), diabetes (13), more than one risk factor for arteriosclerosis (13–16), overt arteriosclerosis or other severe disease, like malignancy, autoimmune disorders, renal or hepatic failure or recent operations, were excluded from this study. As heart failure is known to affect endothelial function (17–22), we excluded patients with severely impaired left ventricular contractility (ejection fraction [EF] <35%). At the time of the study, the majority of patients was already on cardiovascular medication, which is known to influence endothelial function (23–25). To exclude acute effects, all cardiovascular medication was ceased 12 h to 48 h before the study, depending on half-life. Patients were required to have sinus rhythm. Of 74 patients screened, 9 had exclusion criteria; 65 met the inclusion criteria.

Informed consent was obtained from all patients; the study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Free University of Berlin.

Myocardial biopsies
Sample preparation
Endomyocardial biopsies from the right ventricular septum were obtained by standard percutaneous transvenous femoral approach with a standard bioptome. For immunohistologic evaluation, the samples were prepared as published previously (11); biopsies were embedded in Tissue Tec (Sakura Finetek Europe, Zouterwoude, The Netherlands), immediately snap-frozen in methylbutane, cooled in liquid nitrogen at –70°C and then serially cut into cryosections of 5 µm thickness. Six to nine sections from a single biopsy were analyzed for each antibody per patient. After fixation in cold acetone, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubating the cryosections with 0.3% H2O2 in phosphate buffered solution (Dulbeco, Seromed Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). The cryosections were then incubated with monoclonal mouse antibody in PBS, containing 5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Seromed Biochrom) (saturation of unspecific protein binding sites). The slides were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse antibody, dilution 1:200 (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany). Immunoreactive staining was developed by use of 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (Merck, Germany), being converted by peroxidase to a red precipitate. The antibodies used are commercially available from Dianova (anti-HLA) and Serva (anti-ICAM).

Immunohistologic evaluation
Immunohistologically stained leucocytes were counted per high-power field (400-fold magnification, 0.28 mm2) by use of a Leica (Bensheim, Germany) MDRD microscope in all available fields (>10 fields per antibody). The mean cell counts per high-power field were computed. Myocardial inflammation was confirmed in myocardial biopsies, if more than seven CD3+ lymphocytes per 1 mm2 tissue were identified and/or if interstitial and/or endothelial expression of CAMs was enhanced. Endothelial expression of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1 was semiquantitatively scaled 1 to 3, according to intensity of immunoperoxidase staining of endothelial cells. Endothelial CAM-expression grade 1 represents faint staining (normal), grade 2 represents intense staining, and grade 3 represents abundant immunoreactivity (Fig. 1). As HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1 are constitutively expressed on endothelial cells, expression was enhanced, if immunoreactivity staining exceeded grade 1. The criteria for endothelial activation were met if, for two or more CAMs, immunoreactivity staining exceeded grade 1. Endothelial activation was graded according to the sum of endothelial expression of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1: 3 to 4 normal, 5 to 7 moderate, 8 to 9 abundant. The myocardial biopsies were examined and analyzed by two independent blinded observers.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Myocardial biopsies with normal (left panel) versus enhanced (right panel) expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules, as determined by immunohistology. Magnification x 400.

 
Endothelial function
Endothelial function of the radial artery was assessed. By means of high-resolution ultrasound, diameter changes in response to reactive hyperemia (flow-mediated vasodilation [FMD]), as compared with glyceroltrinitrate (GTN) (endothelium-independent vasodilation [GTN-MD]), were detected, referring to the standard protocols (26,27). Accuracy and reproducibility have been documented (27); a low coefficient of variation for measurements of arterial diameter and a high correlation between consecutive control measurements have been demonstrated (26). Flow-mediated vasodilation in response to reactive hyperemia (FMD) represents endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity, whereas vasodilation in response to GTN (GTN-MD) indicates smooth muscle cell function and is independent of endothelial function. Reactive hyperemia, induced by distal cuff occlusion and release, leads to a release of endothelium-dependent vasodilator substances mediated by shear stress, rather than ischemic metabolites. This endothelium-dependent vasodilation can be blocked by the nitric oxide synthase-inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (23,22). As the vessel diameter after reactive hyperemia is usually maximal after 45 s to 60 s, when flow velocity has already normalized, vasodilation is not due to physical requirements of enhanced flow (13,26,27).

Technical settings
The radial artery was examined by two-dimensional ultrasound images, with a 10-MHz linear array transducer and a standard 128XP/10c-system (Acuson, Mountain View, California). The transducer was positioned distal to the elbow to achieve a longitudinal picture of the radial artery. Transmit zone, depth and gain were set to optimize images of the lumen/arterial-wall interface; images were magnified by resolution box function; machine operating parameters were not changed during the study. Diameters were measured by means of a computerized edge detection program (Cardiovascular Imaging Software, Information-Integrity, Boston, Massachusetts); the images were acquired ECG-triggered at end-diastole throughout the study. Arterial flow velocity was measured by pulsed Doppler signal at a 70° angle to the vessel throughout the study.

Study protocol
The subject lay at rest for at least 10 min before beginning the scan for endothelial function. A resting scan was recorded for 1 min. A pneumatic tourniquet, placed at the subject’s wrist, was then inflated to a pressure of 300 mm Hg for 3 min. The release immediately induces increased blood flow in the subject’s forearm for few seconds, which represents the stimulus for endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Vasodilation is generally maximal after 60 s, when flow has already normalized. The vessel was continuously scanned during the procedure, from baseline until 5 min after release of the cuff. A break of 10 min with the patient continuously supine was required before the scan for endothelium-independent vasodilation was started. After a resting scan, 400 µg GTN was administered sublingually; the scan continued for 5 min after application. Maximal vasodilation generally occurs 4 min to 5 min after GTN administration. One experienced person performed all scans. The computer-assisted calculation of vessel diameters was conducted in a blinded fashion. The ECG was monitored continuously, and blood pressure was controlled throughout the study. All cardiovascular medication was ceased 12 h to 48 h before the study, depending on half-life.

Calculations
Flow-mediated vasodilation represents the percentage of diameter increase caused by shear stress, compared with baseline. The GTN-MD represents the percentage of diameter increase induced by GTN, compared with baseline. Flow was calculated from Doppler flow velocity and vessel diameter. Reactive hyperemia was calculated as the maximum flow recorded within the first 15 s after cuff deflation divided by flow during the baseline scan.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS Inc. (Chicago, Illinois) software, version 10.0 for IBM-PC. Descriptive data are expressed as mean ± SD. Quantitative data were correlated by use of the Spearman p rank-order analysis, calculating the coefficient of correlation r. Quantitative data were compared to qualitative data by use of the Kruskal-Wallis test on rank sums for independent samples, followed by a post-hoc multiple comparison procedure, if appropriate. To compare quantitative data of two groups, the Mann-Whitney U test was applied. Statistical significance was inferred at p < 0.01.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients characteristics.   Mean age of the 53 patients was 44 ± 13 years; 21 were men, 32 women, mean left ventricular EF was 62 ± 12% (Table 1). All patients were normotensive and had normal lipid levels. Five subjects were treated for hypertension, three for hypercholesterolemia, three were smokers. The patients were on standard cardiovascular medication. There were no significant differences in risk factors or medication between patients at different levels of endothelial activation (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Patient Characteristics

 
Mean age of the 12 control subjects was 45 ± 13 years; six were men, six women, mean EF was 63 ± 14% (Table 1). All patients were normotensive and had normal lipid levels. Two subjects were treated for hypertension, one for hypercholesterolemia, one was a smoker.

Myocardial biopsies
Myocardial inflammation was confirmed by immunohistology in 53 subjects, applying the criteria described above. A total of 12 subjects had normal myocardial biopsies.

Endothelial activation, as demonstrated by enhanced expression of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1 in myocardial biopsies, was detected in 43 (81%) of the 53 patients; the extent and the pattern of distribution varied: 5 patients had normal expression levels of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1, 6 had enhanced expression of only HLA-1, 7 had enhanced expression of HLA-1 and HLA-DR, 11 had enhanced expression of HLA-1 and ICAM-1, and 24 had enhanced expression of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1. The number of patients for each level of endothelial activation is depicted in Table 1.

Endothelial function
General characteristics
Heart rate (74 ± 8 beats/min) and blood pressure (systolic 121 ± 9 mm Hg, diastolic 74 ± 8 mm Hg) did not change significantly during measurements. Hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between controls and patients with MC, nor between different levels of endothelial activation. Adequate reactive hyperemia as a stimulus for endothelium-dependent vasodilation was achieved in all subjects. Mean resting diameter of the radial artery was 2.47 ± 0.47 mm; after reactive hyperemia the mean diameter increased to 2.60 ± 0.48 mm and after GTN to 3.11 ± 0.49 mm (Table 1).

FMD
Endothelial function, as determined by FMD of the radial artery, in patients with MC, was significantly impaired (FMDMC 4.28%), as compared with controls (FMDCo 10.10%) (Fig. 2) (p < 0.001). The severity of endothelial dysfunction in patients with MC correlates significantly with the extent of endothelial expression of HLA-1 (r = –0.459, p = 0.001), HLA-DR (r = –0.287, p = 0.037) and ICAM-1 (r = –0.385, p = 0.004) in myocardial biopsies (Fig. 3). With increasing, enhanced expression of endothelial CAMs (sum score), endothelial function was progressively impaired, as measured by decreasing FMD (r = –0.433, p = 0.001) (Table 1, Figs. 3 and 4).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (left panel) and glyceroltrinitrate endothelium-independent vasodilation (GTN-MD) (right panel) in peripheral arteries in patients with myocardial inflammation (MC) as compared with patients with normal myocardial biopsies (Control). Significant difference for FMD (p < 0.001); no significant difference for GTN-MD.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in peripheral arteries in relation to endothelial expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-1, HLA-DR and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) in myocardial biopsies of patients with myocardial inflammation. Significant differences (p < 0.05).

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in peripheral arteries in relation to endothelial activation (sum score) in myocardial biopsies (Co). Significant correlation (r –0.656, p < 0.001). MC = myocardial inflammation.

 
GTN-MD
Endothelium-independent vasodilation in patients with MC (GTN-MDMC 27.67 ± 8.58) did not differ significantly from endothelium-independent vasodilation in controls (GTN-MDCo 28.12 ± 8.37) (Fig. 2) (p = 0.754). There was no significant correlation between endothelium-independent GTN-MD of peripheral arteries and the extent of endothelial expression of HLA-1 (r = –0.178, p = 0.202), HLA-DR (r = –0.014, p = 0.922), ICAM-1 (r = –0.085, p = 0.546) or the sum score of CAM expression (r = –0.099, p = 0.480) in myocardial biopsies.

Impact of left ventricular function
In patients with MC, left ventricular function, as determined by EF in left ventricular angiography, had an effect on endothelium-dependent vasodilation, as well as endothelium-independent vasodilation; there was a significant correlation between FMD and EF (r = 0.414, p = 0.002), as well as GTN-MD and EF (r = 0.299, p = 0.030). However, there were no significant differences in left ventricular function (EF), comparing the different patient groups according to the levels of endothelial activation (Table 1). Additionally, there was no significant correlation between EF and endothelial activation, as determined by endothelial expression of HLA-1 (r = –0.062, p = 0.660), HLA-DR (r = –0.019, p = 0.895), ICAM-1 (r = –0.261, p = 0.059) and the sum score of endothelial activation (r = –0.174, p = 0.212).

Impact of age
As all subjects in our study population were middle-aged, with only small variations, age had no impact on endothelial function. In patients with MC, there was no significant correlation between age and endothelial function (r = –0.033, p = 0.816) nor between age and endothelial activation (r = –0.097, p = 0.489). There were no significant differences in age comparing the different patient groups according to the levels of endothelial activation (Table 1).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study demonstrate a systemic endothelial dysfunction in patients with immunohistologically confirmed MC. For the first time, endothelial activation in myocardial biopsies has been associated with systemic endothelial dysfunction in patients with MC. The severity of endothelial dysfunction correlates with the extent of endothelial expression of HLA-1, HLA-DR and ICAM-1.

As other factors with impact on endothelial function have been minimized or excluded in this study, we interpret our findings towards a direct interaction between endothelial activation by inflammatory processes and endothelial dysfunction. Endothelium-independent vasoreactivity was not affected by MC or endothelial activation.

The impact of systemic inflammation (6,7,9) or circulating systemic inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (8) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (28,29) on endothelial function has been demonstrated for other diseases. Cytokine-stimulated adhesion molecule expression has been observed in cultured human cardiac endothelial cells (30). Similar mechanisms may play a role for endothelial dysfunction in patients with MC. Endothelial dysfunction of peripheral arteries in patients with MC could either be caused by systemic endothelial CAM expression due to generalized vascular inflammation or by circulating cytokines induced by the inflammatory process in the heart.

A correlation between coronary and peripheral endothelial function has been demonstrated for arteriosclerosis (12). Our recent research is focused on investigating these relations in patients with MC.

Consistent with the literature (17–21,22), we found a correlation between endothelial dysfunction and left ventricular dysfunction. As left ventricular function was equally mildly impaired in all groups with different levels of endothelial activation, this did not alter our results with respect to the effect of endothelial activation and inflammation on endothelial function. Endothelial activation and left ventricular function, both, independently from each other, predict endothelial dysfunction in patients with MC.

To interpret our findings within a clinical context, it is important to understand that endothelial dysfunction potentially represents a marker of prognostic relevance (1,3,4). For patients with ischemic heart disease and after transplantation, this has already been demonstrated (1–5); for patients with MC, it remains to be verified.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to Ms. Wolf for her assistance in organizing the patients’ appointments.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schächinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2000;101:1899–1906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Al Suwaidi J, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000;101:948–954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Davis SF, Yeung AC, Meredith IT, et al. Early endothelial dysfunction predicts the development of transplant coronary artery disease at 1 year post-transplant. Circulation. 1996;93:457–462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Weis M, Hartmann A, Olbrich HG, et al. Prognostic significance of coronary flow reserve on left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1998;65:103–108[Medline]
  5. Wildhirt SM, Weis M, Schulze C, et al. An association between microvascular endothelial dysfunction, transcardiac nitric oxide production and pro-inflammatory cytokines after heart transplantation in humans. Transpl Int. 2000;13(Suppl 1):S228–234
  6. Hingorani AD, Cross J, Kharbanda RJ, et al. Acute systemic inflammation impairs endothelium-dependent dilatation in humans. Circulation. 2000;102:994–999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Dhillon R, Clarkson P, Donald AE, et al. Endothelial dysfunction late after Kawasaki disease. Circulation. 1996;94:2103–2106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fichtlscherer S, Rosenberger G, Walter DH, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein levels and impaired endothelial vasoreactivity in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2000;102:1000–1006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Raza K, Thambyrajah J, Townend JN, et al. Suppression of inflammation in primary systemic vasculitis restores vascular endothelial function: lessons for atherosclerotic disease? Circulation. 2000;102:1470–1472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kühl U, Noutsias M, Seeberg B, et al. Immunohistological evidence for a chronic intramyocardial inflammatory process in dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart. 1996;75:295–300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Noutsias M, Seeberg B, Schultheiss HP, et al. Expression of cell adhesion molecules in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1999;99:2124–2131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Anderson TJ, Uehata A, Gerhard MD, et al. Close relationship of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations. J Am Cardiol. 1995;26:1235–1241
  13. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Bull C, et al. Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors and their interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1468–1474[Abstract]
  14. Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem CJ, et al. Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1154–1160[Abstract]
  15. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Georgakopoulos D, et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults. Circulation. 1993;88:2149–2155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Reddy KG, Nair RN, Sheehan HM, et al. Evidence that selective endothelial dysfunction may occur in the absence of angiographic or ultrasound atherosclerosis in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:833–843[Abstract]
  17. Kubo SH, Rector TS, Bank AJ, et al. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is attenuated in patients with heart failure. Circulation. 1991;84:1589–1596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Drexler H, Hayoz D, Münzel T, et al. Endothelial function in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1596–1601[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Hayoz D, Drexler H, Münzel T, et al. Flow mediated arteriolar dilation is abnormal in congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1993;87(Suppl VII):VII92–96
  20. Hornig B, Arakawa N, Haussmann D, et al. Differential effects of quinaprilat on endothelial function of conduit arteries in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1998;98:2842–2848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hornig B, Arakawa N, Kohler C, et al. Vitamin C improves endothelial function in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1998;97:363–368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hornig B, Maier V, Drexler H. Physical training improves endothelial function in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1996;93:210–214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hornig B, Kohler C, Drexler H. Role of bradykinin in mediating vascular effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in humans. Circulation. 1997;95:1115–1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Creager MA, Roddy M. Effect of captopril and enalapril on endothelial function in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 1994;24:499–505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hornig B, Arakawa N, Haussmann D, et al. Differential effects of quinaprilat on endothelial function of conduit arteries in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1998;98:2842–2848
  26. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, et al. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;340:1111–1115[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Sorensen KE, Celermajer DS, Spiegelhalter DJ, et al. Non-invasive measurement of human endothelium dependent arterial responses: accuracy and reproducibility. Br Heart J. 1995;74:247–253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wang P, Ba Z, Caudry I. Administration of tumor necrosis factor alpha in vivo depresses endothelium dependent vasorelaxation. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H2535–2541
  29. Fichtlscherer S, Rossig L, Breuer S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor antagonism with etanercept improves systemic endothelial vasoreactivity in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2001;104:3023–3025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. McDouall RM, Farrar MW, Khan S, et al. Unique sensitivities to cytokine regulated expression of adhesion molecules in human heart-derived endothelial cells. Endothelium. 2001;8:25–40[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. Schachinger, A. Aicher, N. Dobert, R. Rover, J. Diener, S. Fichtlscherer, B. Assmus, F. H. Seeger, C. Menzel, W. Brenner, et al.
Pilot Trial on Determinants of Progenitor Cell Recruitment to the Infarcted Human Myocardium
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14): 1425 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Foglieni, F. Maisano, L. Dreas, A. Giazzon, G. Ruotolo, E. Ferrero, L. Li Volsi, S. Coli, G. Sinagra, B. Zingone, et al.
Mild inflammatory activation of mammary arteries in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2831 - H2837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
T. W. Yeo, D. A. Lampah, R. Gitawati, E. Tjitra, E. Kenangalem, Y. R. McNeil, C. J. Darcy, D. L. Granger, J. B. Weinberg, B. K. Lopansri, et al.
Impaired nitric oxide bioavailability and L-arginine reversible endothelial dysfunction in adults with falciparum malaria
J. Exp. Med., October 29, 2007; 204(11): 2693 - 2704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. B. Vallbracht, P. L. Schwimmbeck, U. Kuhl, U. Rauch, B. Seeberg, and H.-P. Schultheiss
Differential Aspects of Endothelial Function of the Coronary Microcirculation Considering Myocardial Virus Persistence, Endothelial Activation, and Myocardial Leukocyte Infiltrates
Circulation, April 12, 2005; 111(14): 1784 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Tschope, C.-T. Bock, M. Kasner, M. Noutsias, D. Westermann, P.-L. Schwimmbeck, M. Pauschinger, W.-C. Poller, U. Kuhl, R. Kandolf, et al.
High Prevalence of Cardiac Parvovirus B19 Infection in Patients With Isolated Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction
Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. B. Vallbracht, P. L. Schwimmbeck, U. Kuhl, B. Seeberg, and H.-P. Schultheiss
Endothelium-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of Systemic Arteries Is Impaired in Patients With Myocardial Virus Persistence
Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2938 - 2945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Anselmi, A. Abbate, F. Girola, G. Nasso, G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, G. Possati, and M. Gaudino
Myocardial ischemia, stunning, inflammation, and apoptosis during cardiac surgery: a review of evidence
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 304 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
M. Noutsias, M. Pauschinger, H.-P. Schultheiss, and U. Kuhl
Advances in the immunohistological diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2002; 4(suppl_I): I54 - I62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vallbracht, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schultheiss, H.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vallbracht, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schultheiss, H.-P.

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home