|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:2110-2116 © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
,*



* Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cochin Port-Royal Hospital,René Descartes University, Paris, France
SAMU de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
Cardiology Department, Cochin Port-Royal Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France
Manuscript received March 7, 2002; revised manuscript received August 21, 2002, accepted September 13, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Christian Spaulding, Cardiology Department, Cochin Hospital, René Descartes University, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
christian.spaulding{at}cch.ap-hop-paris.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: The global prognosis after successfully resuscitated patients with OHCA remains poor. Clinical studies describing the hemodynamic status of survivors of OHCA and its impact on prognosis are lacking.
METHODS: Among 165 consecutive patients admitted after successful resuscitation from OHCA, 73 required invasive monitoring because of hemodynamic instability, defined as hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs, during the first 72 h. Clinical features and data from invasive monitoring were analyzed.
RESULTS: Hemodynamic instability occurred at a median time of 6.8 h (range 4.3 to 7.3) after OHCA. The initial cardiac index (CI) and filling pressures were low. Then, the CI rapidly increased 24 h after the onset of OHCA, independent of filling pressures and inotropic agents (2.05 [1.43 to 2.90] 8 h vs. 3.19 l/min per m2 [2.67 to 4.20] 24 h after OHCA; p < 0.001). Despite a significant improvement in CI at 24 h, a superimposed vasodilation delayed the discontinuation of vasoactive drugs. No improvement in CI at 24 h was noted in 14 patients who subsequently died of multiorgan failure. Hemodynamic status was not predictive of the neurologic outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of OHCA, hemodynamic instability requiring administration of vasoactive drugs is frequent and appears several hours after hospital admission. It is characterized by a low CI that is reversible in most cases within 24 h, suggesting post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Early death by multiorgan failure is associated with a persistent low CI at 24 h.
| ||||||||||||
Few studies have investigated post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability and myocardial dysfunction in humans (8,9). To address this issue, hemodynamic data during the first 72 h after arrest were prospectively gathered in a consecutive series of 165 patients included in a study on the value of immediate coronary angiography followed, if necessary, by angioplasty after successful resuscitation from OHCA (10). The prevalence, risk factors, and evolution of post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability and myocardial dysfunction, as well as their influence on survival with or without neurologic damage, were assessed.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients who met the criteria were brought directly to the cardiac catheterization laboratory of our hospital, and immediate coronary and left ventricular angiography was performed according to standard techniques. If a recent coronary artery occlusion was found, coronary angioplasty was attempted, unless the infarct-related vessel was too small or the operator considered the procedure to be technically impossible. Standard resuscitation and stabilization procedures were continued during the procedure. The patients were then transported to the medical intensive care unit for supportive treatment, including mechanical ventilation. Hypotension, defined as a mean arterial blood pressure <75 mm Hg, was treated according to the following protocol: 1) volume expansion was determined by the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) measured before left ventricular angiography: volume expansion consisted of 1,000 ml of crystalloids if LVEDP was <18 mm Hg or 500 ml if LVEDP was between 18 and 25 mm Hg; the administration was repeated twice if there was no evidence of pulmonary congestion; and 2) vasoactive drug infusion was initiated if hypotension was unresponsive to volume challenge or when there was no previous volume expansion if LVEDP was >25 mm Hg and/or if clinical or radiologic signs of pulmonary edema were noted. Hemodynamic instability was defined as the need for vasoactive drugs, leading to invasive monitoring by an arterial pressure and pulmonary artery catheter that was performed as soon as possible after the onset of vasoactive drug therapy. Shock was defined by the association between hypotension unresponsive to vasoactive drug infusion and evidence of inadequate organ perfusion revealed by elevated plasma lactate concentrations, metabolic acidosis, or oliguria (<50 ml/h).
Invasive monitoring
A 7F pulmonary artery catheter (Baxter-Edwards, Irvine, California) was inserted through the central port of an introducer in a central vein (internal jugular or subclavian vein) and guided by pressure waveforms into a branch of a pulmonary artery. The right position in Wests third zone was systematically controlled by standard chest radiography. An arterial pressure catheter (Vygon SA, Ecouen, France) was inserted through a radial or femoral artery to continuously monitor blood pressure. Pressure waveforms were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard monitor (Merlin, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, California). Cardiac output was determined by thermodilution after injection of 10 ml of cold isotonic glucose. The cardiac output values represented the average of three measurements within 20% of each other. Cardiac index (CI) was obtained by dividing cardiac output by body surface area.
Data collection
The clinical data collected during resuscitation and hospitalization were prospectively entered in a computer database described previously (10). Coronary angiograms underwent final qualitative and quantitative review. Left ventricular ejection fraction was estimated by the biplane arealength method, as described by Dodge et al. (11). The time of the lowest mean arterial pressure unresponsive to volume expansion, measured by noninvasive methods, was entered as time 0.
Hemodynamic data provided by invasive monitoring were reviewed. Measurements performed immediately after insertion of the pulmonary artery catheter (time 1) were entered in the data base, as well as measurements obtained 4 (time 2) and 12 h (time 3) after insertion. Finally, a fourth set of measurements performed 72 h after the onset of OHCA was included (time 4). If death occurred during the first 72 h, the final measurements were entered as time 4.
The final neurologic status at hospital discharge was assessed using the five-point Pittsburgh modification of the Glasgow outcome categories (1). Cerebral performance categories (CPCs) are defined as follows: CPC-1 = good cerebral performance; CPC-2 = moderate cerebral disability; CPC-3 = severe cerebral disability; CPC-4 = persistent vegetative state; and CPC-5 = brain death or clinical death.
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Cochin Hospital. Because informed consent was impossible to obtain immediately from the patients, the next of kin provided consent for management, according to the protocol described previously, and for the use of data gathered before admission and during the hospital stay for scientific purposes. Survivors also provided consent as soon as possible.
Statistical analysis
Because of asymmetric distribution, continuous variables are reported as median values and interquartile ranges (25th and 75th percentiles). Discrete variables are expressed as percentages. Univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square tests for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for numeric data. Hemodynamic parameter variations were tested using nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskall-Wallis test). Post-hoc comparisons between points in time were performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs, signed, rank-sum test. Parameters found to be significantly associated with hemodynamic instability on univariate analysis were subsequently included in a multivariate logistic regression model to test their independent association. A two-tailed p value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were done on a personal computer using STATA version 7.0 software (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Risk factors for hemodynamic instability after resuscitation
Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The interval between the onset of arrest and the return of spontaneous circulation was significantly longer in group A patients (25 [14 to 38] vs. 15 min [7 to 30], p < 0.01). The dose of epinephrine received during CPR was higher in patients with hemodynamic instability (10 [3 to 15] vs. 2.0 mg [0 to 10], p < 0.01). Similarly, there were more countershocks in group A patients than in group B patients (3 [1 to 6] vs. 2 [1 to 3], p < 0.01). Hemodynamic data gathered during the angiographic procedure showed significant differences between the groups: the left ventricular ejection fraction was decreased in both groups, but significantly lower in group A (32% [25 to 40%] vs. 43% [35 to 50%] in group B, p < 0.01), and LVEDP was higher in group A (18.5 [10 to 32] vs. 12.1 [5 to 25] mm Hg in group B, p < 0.01). A trend toward a higher incidence of post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability was noted if acute coronary occlusion was the cause of OHCA (50.7% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, the dose of epinephrine received during CPR was the only predictive factor of hemodynamic instability (odds ratio 1.05 per mg of epinephrine received during CPR, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.11; p = 0.035).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Risk factors for hemodynamic instability after cardiac arrest. On multivariate analysis, the amount of epinephrine used during CPR predicted the occurrence of hemodynamic instability. Our results confirm experimental data that suggest that epinephrine potentiates myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation (12). Previous clinical studies suggest that high doses of epinephrine given during resuscitation may alter the CI after return of spontaneous circulation and could be an independent predictor of mortality (9,13).
In contrast, the duration of CPR predicted the occurrence of hemodynamic instability by univariate, but not multivariate, analysis. According to our resuscitation procedures, the amount of epinephrine used increased with the CPR duration. This factor may have influenced our multivariate analysis, which was performed in a relatively small number of patients. Therefore, a relationship between CPR duration and hemodynamic instability cannot be excluded.
A trend toward a higher rate of post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability was noted if acute coronary occlusion was the cause of OHCA (50.7% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.06). Global post-resuscitation myocardial stunning may prevent acute compensatory mechanisms during OHCA due to myocardial infarction, such as hyperkinesia of noninfarcted left ventricular segments, thereby potentiating refractory shock and multiorgan failure. In our study, successful angioplasty was always performed within 3 h after the onset of cardiac arrest. Angioplasty failure occurred in eight patients; 5 died of refractory shock. In contrast, a 13.5% mortality rate from refractory shock was noted after successful angioplasty, which compares favorably to the 19.1% mortality rate from refractory shock in patients without acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, a favorable hemodynamic effect of successful angioplasty cannot be excluded. In contrast, no relationship was found between the extent of coronary disease and the occurrence of shock. The amount of ischemic damage occurring during cardiac arrest and resuscitation may therefore be so substantial that even the myocardium fed by normal coronary arteries is severely affected. Severe myocardial dysfunction can therefore occur after cardiac arrest, independent of severe underlying coronary disease.
Evidence for postcardiac arrest myocardial stunning
Our data suggest that myocardial stunning is an important cause of post-resuscitation shock. The left ventricular ejection fraction was severely depressed at hospital admission. The time course of post-resuscitation shock in our study showed marked depression of the CI at 8 h after arrest and a return to normal values within 24 h, with discontinuation of inotropic support at 72 h after the onset of cardiac arrest in survivors. Other common causes of acute myocardial dysfunction, such as hypoxia and hypercapnia, were ruled out by monitoring oxygen transport during the post-resuscitation period. Furthermore, immediate coronary angiography was performed in all patients at admission, and severe but transient myocardial dysfunction was observed in 36 group A patients (49.3%) with no acute coronary occlusion. The characteristics of the myocardial dysfunction observed in our patients are similar to those in previously published experimental reports (5,6). Gazmuri et al. (5) reported post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction by using a model of ventricular fibrillation in pigs. Progressive impairment in contractile function with ventricular dilation was detected early after resuscitation and was maximal at 6 h. Kern et al. (6) studied, using both invasive and noninvasive measurements of left ventricular function, 23 domestic swine successfully resuscitated after 10 or 15 min of untreated cardiac arrest. Severe myocardial systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction was documented and peaked at 2 to 5 h after resuscitation, despite the return of myocardial blood flow to normal levels. Full recovery of this post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction was seen after 48 h.
Superimposed vasodilation
Despite rapid improvement in CI in our patients, hemodynamic instability worsened (mean arterial pressure: 79 mm Hg [69 to 102] at 8 h and 76 mm Hg [69 to 87] at 12 h, p < 0.01; epinephrine perfusion: 1.0 mg/h [0 to 2.2] at 8 h and 1.3 mg/h [0 to 2.0] at 12 h, p < 0.05). Discontinuation of vasopressor drugs was therefore delayed despite improvement of CI. A large volume expansion was initially required (cumulative crystalloid volume infused: 5,000 [3,500 to 6,500] ml at 24 h; 8,000 ml [7,500 to 9,500] at time 4) to maintain filling pressures >12 mm Hg and resulted in hemodilution at day 3 (hemoglobin: 9.8 g/100 ml at day 3 [9.0 to 11.5] vs. 14.6 g/100 ml [13.4 to 15.8] at admission; p < 0.001). Therefore, our data suggest that vasodilation occurred during the first two days after CPR. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results and to characterize the role of each component of post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability. Of particular interest, post-CPR vasodilation has not been clearly identified in animal studies.
Hemodynamic status and neurologic outcome
In contrast to previous experimental data, no relationship between the occurrence and pattern of post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability and neurologic outcome was noted (7). We suggest that aggressive treatment of hemodynamic instability in selected cases is justified during the first days after cardiac arrest, until reliable assessment of the neurologic prognosis can be performed.
Study limitations
Vasoactive drugs and hemodynamic monitoring were started in survivors of OHCA with hemodynamic instability, defined by a mean arterial pressure <75 mm Hg and unresponsiveness to volume expansion. Patients were treated with vasoactive drugs before the occurrence of clinical signs of shock, such as cool extremities, tachycardia, or a decreased urine output. Precise definitions of hemodynamic instability or shock in this setting are lacking; however, close monitoring of blood pressure and administration of vasoactive drugs are recommended (14). Furthermore, variations of renal and hepatic variables were noted at 24 h in patients with hemodynamic instability, thereby suggesting extensive systemic hypoperfusion.
Hemodynamic monitoring was only performed in patients who developed hemodynamic instability after cardiac arrest. A severe alteration in left ventricular ejection fraction was also observed initially in group B (43.0% [35% to 50%]), suggesting that transient myocardial dysfunction was present in all patients, but clinically relevant in selected cases. Serial studies of left ventricular function using noninvasive techniques, such as echocardiography, in all survivors of OHCA would allow a more accurate evaluation of post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction.
Patients with a noncardiac cause of arrest were excluded from the study; therefore, the conclusions of our study cannot be applied to all survivors of OHCA.
Conclusions
In survivors of OHCA, hemodynamic instability leading to the administration of vasoactive drugs is frequent and appears 4 to 7 h after hospital admission. It is associated with the use of high doses of epinephrine during CPR. Post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability is characterized by a low CI and normal or low filling pressures. The CI rapidly increases 24 h after the onset of OHCA, independent of filling pressures and vasoactive agents. A superimposed vasodilation requires a large initial volume expansion and delays the discontinuation of vasopressor drugs. Recovery is most often obtained within three days. This unique hemodynamic profile is suggestive of post-resuscitation myocardial stunning associated with vasodilation. Hemodynamic status did not predict the final neurologic outcome. Aggressive management of post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability therefore seems justified until accurate prediction of the neurologic outcome is feasible.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Gonzalez, R. A. Berg, V. M. Nadkarni, C. B. Vianna, K. B. Kern, S. Timerman, and J. A. Ramires Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Outcome After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Circulation, April 8, 2008; 117(14): 1864 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitati The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): e955 - e977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 7.5: Postresuscitation Support Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-84 - IV-88. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 6: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-73 - III-90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. El-Menyar The Resuscitation Outcome: Revisit the Story of the Stony Heart Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2835 - 2846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Laurent, C. Adrie, C. Vinsonneau, A. Cariou, J.-D. Chiche, A. Ohanessian, C. Spaulding, P. Carli, J.-F. Dhainaut, and M. Monchi High-Volume Hemofiltration After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 2, 2005; 46(3): 432 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Adrie, M. Monchi, I. Laurent, S. Um, S. B. Yan, M. Thuong, A. Cariou, J. Charpentier, and J. F. Dhainaut Coagulopathy After Successful Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Following Cardiac Arrest: Implication of the Protein C Anticoagulant Pathway J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Buxton, A. J. Moss, A. E. Buxton, and A. J. Moss Should everyone with an ejection fraction less than or equal to 30% receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator? Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2537 - 2549. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kolarova, Z. Yi, I. M. Ayoub, and R. J. Gazmuri Cariporide Potentiates the Effects of Epinephrine and Vasopressin by Nonvascular Mechanisms During Closed-Chest Resuscitation Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1327 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Niemann, D. Garner, E. Khaleeli, and R. J. Lewis Milrinone Facilitates Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest and Attenuates Postresuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction Circulation, December 16, 2003; 108(24): 3031 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |