|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:2022-2030 © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
,*
* Services de Cardiologie B et , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, Tours, France
Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, Tours, France
Manuscript received March 27, 2002; revised manuscript received July 17, 2002, accepted August 1, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Laurent Fauchier, Service de Cardiologie B, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, 37044 Tours, France.
lfau{at}med.univ-tours.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing is an emerging treatment for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular dyssynchrony. The prognostic values of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony have not been previously compared.
METHODS: A total of 103 patients with IDC were studied. Left bundle branch block was present in 25% of patients. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography was performed and Fourier phase analyses were examined in both ventricles. Difference between the mean phase of left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) assessed interventricular dyssynchrony, and standard deviations (SDs) of the mean phase in each ventricle assessed intraventricular dyssynchrony.
RESULTS: The QRS duration was related to both interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony. A degradation of the hemodynamic status was associated with an increase in intraventricular dyssynchrony but not in interventricular dyssynchrony. With a follow-up of 27 ± 23 months, 18 patients had a major cardiac event (7 cardiac deaths; 11 worsening, leading to heart transplantation). The SDs of the LV and RV mean phase and QRS duration were predictors of cardiac event (all p < 0.0001), but interventricular dyssynchrony was not. Among 13 univariate predictors of cardiac event, the only independent predictors were an increased SD of LV mean phase (p = 0.0004) and an increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Intraventricular dyssynchrony evaluated with phase analysis of radionuclide angiography is an independent predictor of cardiac event in IDC. The prognosis is related to intraventricular rather than to interventricular dyssynchrony in IDC.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A control group included 20 healthy subjects age 42 ± 14 years with no cardiovascular symptoms, a normal general examination, normal electrocardiogram (ECG), normal echocardiography, and coronary angiography in subjects age >50 years.
Electrocardiography and investigations. All the investigations were performed once at baseline. The QRS duration was measured on surface 12-lead ECGs from the first deflection of the QRS complex to the terminal isoelectric component of the complex. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was present in 26 (25%) patients, left anterior hemiblock in 23 (22%), incomplete LBBB in 8 (8%, right bundle branch block (RBBB) in 2 (2%), and mean QRS duration was 113 ± 32 ms. The other investigations that were performed to allow a valuable prognostic study with multivariate analysis included a hemodynamic study and an evaluation of the risk of ventricular arrhythmia: two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography was performed in accordance with the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations. Left ventricular cavity dimensions at end-systole and end-diastole were measured, and fractional shortening index was calculated according to the standard formula. Measurement of peak exercise oxygen consumption was measured in 74 patients who could adequately perform exercise testing. Left heart catheterization by the Judkins technique was performed in all patients with normal coronary angiography, and right heart catheterization was performed with measurements of cardiac index and right atrial, right ventricular, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG recording was performed in all patients with grading of ventricular arrhythmias. The evaluation of heart rate variability in time domain and a recording of signal-averaged ECG were performed with methods described in previous studies from our group (4,5).
Radionuclide techniques.
Acquisition
Red blood cells were labeled in vivo with 740 to 925 MBq of technetium-99m. The ECG was monitored continuously to ensure R-wave gating of the QRS complex. Elimination of ventricular premature beats was obtained with a window threshold of 20% around the mean RR interval during acquisition of projections. Extrasystolic and postextrasystolic cycles were excluded. Multigated equilibrium blood pool scintigrams were acquired at rest until the number of counts was 600,000 in the "best-septal" left anterior oblique projection to provide optimal RV and LV blood pool discrimination. The projection was gated with the ECG to get 16 frames spanning the cardiac cycle.
Scintigrams were acquired for each patient in sinus rhythm. The RV and LV regions of interest were acquired at end-diastole and end-systole for the respective ventricle. Regions of interest were drawn automatically by the computer with adjustments of border definition performed by an observer blinded to the state of conduction. After correction for background counts, LV and RV ejection fractions (EFs) were computed using the formula:
![]() |
Nuclear phase imaging
Phase images were generated from the scintigraphic data using a commercially available computer program. The identical scintigraphic data used to generate RV and LV EFs were digitally processed to display the "phase" for each pixel overlaying the equilibrium blood pool and gated to the ECG R-wave. The phase program assigns a phase angle to each pixel of the phase image, derived from the first Fourier harmonic of time. The phase angle corresponds to the relative sequence and pattern of ventricular contraction during the cardiac cycle. Color-encoded phase images with corresponding histograms were generated for each patient. Scintigrams were intensity-coded for amplitude, the other parameter of Fourier first harmonic study. Phase images were generated for cardiac regions using a continuous color scale, corresponding to phase angles from 0° to 360°. Mean phase angles were computed for RV and LV blood pools as the arithmetic mean phase angle for all pixels in the ventricular region of interest. Mode was the angle with the highest value on the histogram of phases. Interventricular dyssynchrony was evaluated with the difference between LV and RV mean phase angles (RV-LV delay) and also with its absolute value (interventricular delay) considering that some patients were found to have a negative RV-LV delay. Intraventricular contractile synchrony in each ventricle was measured as the standard deviation (SD) of the mean phase angle for the RV and LV blood pools. Results were expressed in angle (°) and time in milliseconds (mean of the cardiac cycle duration during acquisition · angle/360).
Statistical analysis. All values are given as mean ± SD. Comparisons between groups were made using the Student t test. Linear regression analysis was carried out to correlate quantitative variables. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and curves were compared using the log-rank test. Major cardiac events included cardiac death and worsening of HF, leading to heart transplantation. The effects of all the parameters were studied with univariate and multivariate regression analysis (proportional hazards model). A forward stepwise model with a p value for entry of 0.05 was used. Statview 5.0 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, California) was used for statistical analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The general characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1, and the results of the phase analysis of ERNA in degrees (°) and in milliseconds are shown in Table 2. Compared to all the other subjects, patients with LBBB had an increased RV-LV delay (51 ± 66 ms vs. 16 ± 35 ms, p = 0.001) and an increased left intraventricular dyssynchrony (SD of LV mean phase 77 ± 41 ms vs. 50 ± 22 ms, p < 0.0001). According to QRS duration < or > 120 ms (whether the patient had LBBB or RBBB), we found a clear increase in SD of LV in mean phase, of interventricular delay and at a less degree of SD of RV mean phase in patients with QRS duration >120 ms (Table 2). As the results of phase analysis of ERNA expressed in degrees did not provide more pertinent information than results in milliseconds, particularly at the time of the analysis of survival, we only display in the results the statistical analysis about phase analysis expressed in milliseconds to avoid redundancy, although the complete analysis has been performed for both units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An interesting finding is that the QRS duration seemed to reflect similarly interventricular and left intraventricular dyssynchrony as coefficients of correlation with QRS duration were 0.56 and 0.57 for interventricular delay and SD of LV mean phase, respectively. Moreover, the location of the dyssynchrony seemed similar whether patients had a marked increase in QRS duration or not. Concerning interventricular dyssynchrony, the interventricular delay (whether LV or RV was delayed compared to the other ventricle) was more related to QRS duration or to the degree of LV dilation than the delay of LV compared to RV, a value that was often positive but that could be negative in some cases. The positive correlation between peak VO2 and RV-LV delay is surprising and may only have been due to hazard in view of the number of comparisons performed.
Dilated cardiomyopathy is associated with structural abnormalities of ventricular myocardium with both ventricular activation and mechanical contraction (6). The proposed mechanisms for global cardiac abnormalities in isolated LBBB are altered ventricular activation, delayed LV contraction, RV-LV dyssynchrony, decreased LV diastolic time, or abnormal septal motion, with decreased LV EF (7). The prognostic value of ventricular dyssynchrony using QRS duration measured on surface ECG has been known for several years and has been found in several studies (8,9). Improvements in hemodynamic status have recently been demonstrated during atrial synchronized BiV (1). At this time, selection of patients with HF candidate to BiV is usually done with measurement of QRS duration using surface ECG, and good responders to BiV may experience a significant reduction in QRS duration during BiV compared to bad responders (10). Although the mechanisms of the deleterious effect of a long QRS duration may be multiple, the fact that the strategy of resynchronization therapy began with a biventricular stimulation is a reflection that the first idea was to decrease the interventricular delay. Some preliminary findings suggest that BiV or LV pacing may also induce LV intraventricular resynchronization (11). That may also explain the favorable results that are very often found with LV pacing alone (12,13) or that are nearly similar when comparing LV pacing to BiV (1417) in HF patients in acute studies or with a mid-term follow-up. However, the fact that RV dyssynchrony correlated with QRS width, some hemodynamic parameters, and even with cardiovascular events implies that at least some patients have a significant RV dyssynchrony, even if it is not at the same degree as LV dyssynchrony. Therefore, compared to BiV, using LV pacing alone may increase RV asynchrony, which raises the question whether this may adversely affect prognosis.
Some methods recently proposed to evaluate more precisely the myocardial dyssynchrony have used cardiac ultrasound (18); Doppler interventricular delay calculated as the difference between aortic and pulmonary pre-ejection delay (19); three-dimensional echocardiography (20); color kinesis (21); or tissue Doppler imaging (22), which was perhaps the most promising method. However, although these methods provide some very accurate information about the location and the degree of dyssynchrony in ventricles and about the effects of resynchronization therapy with BiV, none of them at this time have really evaluated the prognostic value of the parameters that have been proposed.
We consider that our results may provide some interesting data for all the techniques that could be proposed to evaluate ventricular dyssynchrony in dilated cardiomyopathy. It seems more pertinent to find reliable and noninvasive parameters that could evaluate intraventricular dyssynchrony (mainly in LV but also in RV) rather than parameters reflecting interventricular dyssynchrony, because we found that interventricular delay was not a prognostic factor in our series of patients. Moreover, no clear relationships were found between the degradation of the functional and hemodynamic status and the increase in the interventricular dyssynchrony. Although highly speculative, one could suggest that the aim of the resynchronization therapy could rather be to obtain a decrease in parameters of intraventricular dyssynchrony if one hopes to improve clinical status and affect prognosis positively. As QRS duration is a reflection of both inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony, it is possible that QRS duration may also decrease with an intraventricular resynchronization.
The studies about phase analysis of ERNA to evaluate dyssynchrony in HF focused on resynchronization therapy with BiV or LV pacing and concerned short series of patients with observation of the beneficial effects of the therapy. Toussaint et al. (23) used phase analysis of ERNA to quantify short- and long-term impact of BiV on cardiac synchronization in 21 patients with drug refractory dilated cardiomyopathy and marked electrical dyssynchrony (QRS 180 ± 15 ms) with measurements at baseline, day 8 after BiV pacemaker implant, and after a follow-up of 12 months with BiV. Biventricular pacing reversed LV apex-to-base activation time, and increased LV and RV EF. The study by Kerwin et al. (2) showed that during BiV, their patients interventricular contractile synchrony improved overall. The degree of interventricular dyssynchrony present at baseline correlated with the magnitude of improvement in synchrony during BiV. The LV EF increased in all 13 patients in the Kerwin et al. (2) study during BiV and correlated significantly with improvement in RV/LV synchrony during BiV. Moreover, Le Rest and colleagues (24) investigated 17 patients with either ischemic or primary dilated cardiomyopathy in NYHA functional class III or IV who received an LV pacemaker. They performed three equilibrium-gated blood pool studies in each patient, one before pacing and two after pacer implantation (one with pacing on, and one after turning off the pacemaker). Phase analysis demonstrated a significant decrease of the interventricular phase shift (delta[pi]) with LV pacing. Clinical improvement was observed in patients with an initial positive delta(pi) that decreased with pacing and/or an initial LV phase SD >50° that decreased with pacing. This latter result is another indicator that the beneficial impact of LV pacing is not limited to interventricular delay. The intraventricular dyssynchrony may also be improved (or may at least be modified) with LV pacing. As for the echocardiographic studies previously mentioned, an evaluation of the prognosis of the dyssynchrony and of its location was not an objective of any of these studies and was not performed.
We found that the results of phase analyses expressed in milliseconds were more pertinent than those expressed in degrees, a result that might be surprising. The results in milliseconds have the advantage that they take into account the duration of the cardiac cycle. Considering that tachycardia (or decreased duration of RR cycle) is a recognized risk factor of events in these patients, one might have thought that the expression of dyssynchrony in milliseconds was a reflection of both dyssynchrony and tachycardia. However, tachycardia should have decreased the quantification of dyssynchrony expressed in ms compared to degrees and it should be noted that the bad prognosis was related to increased measurements in ms of dyssynchrony. Thus, the results expressed in milliseconds may be more accurate to evaluate the real consequences of each dyssynchrony (intra LV, intra-RV, or interventricular on the cardiac filling and cardiac outpout.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S-A Chang, H-K Kim, H-Y Lee, S-Y Choi, B-K Koo, Y-J Kim, D-W Sohn, B-H Oh, Y-B Park, Y-S Choi, et al. Restoration of left ventricular synchronous contraction after acute myocardial infarction by stem cell therapy: new insights into the therapeutic implication of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction Heart, August 1, 2008; 94(8): 995 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Albertsen, J. C. Nielsen, S. H. Poulsen, P. T. Mortensen, A. K. Pedersen, P. S. Hansen, H. K. Jensen, and H. Egeblad DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Henneman, E. E. van der Wall, C. Ypenburg, G. B. Bleeker, N. R. van de Veire, N. A. Marsan, J. Chen, E. V. Garcia, J. J.M. Westenberg, M. J. Schalij, et al. Nuclear Imaging in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2001 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Henneman, J. Chen, P. Dibbets-Schneider, M. P. Stokkel, G. B. Bleeker, C. Ypenburg, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, E. V. Garcia, and J. J. Bax Can LV Dyssynchrony as Assessed with Phase Analysis on Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Predict Response to CRT? J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1104 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wieneke, K. Sattler, C. von Birgelen, D. Bose, M. Haude, W. Rechenberg, S. Sack, N. Dagres, and R. Erbel Impact of intraventricular conduction delay on coronary haemodynamics: a study with intracoronary Doppler in patients with bundle branch blocks and normal coronary arteries. Europace, March 1, 2006; 8(3): 151 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-Y. Cho, J.-K. Song, W.-J. Park, S.-W. Han, S.-H. Choi, Y.-C. Doo, D.-J. Oh, and Y. Lee Mechanical Dyssynchrony Assessed by Tissue Doppler Imaging Is a Powerful Predictor of Mortality in Congestive Heart Failure With Normal QRS Duration J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 20, 2005; 46(12): 2237 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Helm, C. Leclercq, O. P. Faris, C. Ozturk, E. McVeigh, A. C. Lardo, and D. A. Kass Cardiac Dyssynchrony Analysis Using Circumferential Versus Longitudinal Strain: Implications for Assessing Cardiac Resynchronization Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2760 - 2767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Wood and M. H Picard Utility of echocardiography in the evaluation of individuals with cardiomyopathy Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): 707 - 712. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Donato, A. Toso, V. Dor, M. Sabatier, G. Barletta, L. Menicanti, F. Fantini, and the RESTORE Group Surgical Ventricular Restoration Improves Mechanical Intraventricular Dyssynchrony in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2536 - 2543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Blanc, V. Bertault-Valls, M. Fatemi, M. Gilard, P.-Y. Pennec, and Y. Etienne Midterm Benefits of Left Univentricular Pacing in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Circulation, April 13, 2004; 109(14): 1741 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bader, S. Garrigue, S. Lafitte, S. Reuter, P. Jais, M. Haissaguerre, J. Bonnet, J. Clementy, and R. Roudaut Intra-left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony: A new independent predictor of severe cardiac events in heart failure patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 248 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Kass Predicting cardiac resynchronization response by qrs duration: The long and short of it J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 17, 2003; 42(12): 2125 - 2127. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stellbrink and B. Nowak The importance of being synchronous: on the prognostic value of ventricular conduction delay in heart failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 4, 2002; 40(11): 2031 - 2033. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |