JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:798-803
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silver, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Elkayam, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silver, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Elkayam, U.

CLINICAL STUDY: HEART FAILURE

Effect of nesiritide versus dobutamine on short-term outcomes in the treatment of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure

Marc A. Silver, MD*,*, Darlene P. Horton, MD{dagger}, Jalal K. Ghali, MD{ddagger} and Uri Elkayam, MD§

* Heart Failure Institute, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA
{dagger} Scios Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA
{ddagger} Cardiac Centers of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
§ Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA

Manuscript received August 10, 2001; revised manuscript received November 21, 2001, accepted December 11, 2001.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Marc A. Silver, Director, Heart Failure Institute, Advocate Christ Medical Center, 4440 West 95th Street, Suite 428 South, Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453, USA.
marc.silver{at}advocatehealth.com


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Participating investigators
 References
 
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether nesiritide, administered for acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF), affects healthcare costs by hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions and short-term mortality, compared to dobutamine.

BACKGROUND: Dobutamine is a commonly used inotropic treatment for CHF. Although dobutamine may have favorable hemodynamic and symptomatic effects, its use may be associated with side effects such as tachycardia, cardiac arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia. Nesiritide (B-type natriuretic peptide) is a new intravenous (IV) drug that produces hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement through balanced vasodilatory effects, neurohormonal suppression and enhanced natriuresis and diuresis.

METHODS: From an open-label randomized study of nesiritide versus standard care (SC) in patients with CHF requiring hospitalization, we compared short-term outcome data from patients given nesiritide (0.015 or 0.03 µg/kg per min) with a subgroup of SC patients given dobutamine. A total of 261 patients are included in this analysis.

RESULTS: Compared to dobutamine, both nesiritide doses were administered for a shorter total duration (p < 0.001), and the total duration of all IV vasoactive therapy (including study drug) was also shorter (p ≤ 0.012). Although there was no difference in LOS, there was a trend toward decreased readmissions in the two nesiritide groups (8% and 11%, respectively, vs. 20% in the dobutamine group). Six-month mortality was lower in the nesiritide groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of decompensated CHF with nesiritide may lead to lower healthcare costs and reduced mortality compared to treatment with dobutamine.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  NYHA
  BP
  blood pressure
  CHF
  congestive heart failure
  IV
  intravenous
  LOS
  length of stay
  MI
  myocardial infarction
  NYHA
  New York Heart Association
  SC
  standard care
  VT
  ventricular tachycardia

Heart failure is a healthcare problem of enormous proportion. It has recently been reported to be the primary diagnosis in 872,000 hospital admissions in the U.S. and the secondary diagnosis in an additional 1.8 million admissions (1,2). Dobutamine is a widely used inotropic therapy for decompensated heart failure. Although dobutamine can cause early hemodynamic and symptomatic benefits, its use is limited by potentially serious side effects such as tachycardia, hypotension, myocardial ischemia and cardiac arrhythmias. Furthermore, increased mortality associated with chronic administration of oral inotropic agents has raised concern over the safety of these agents, even when used short term (3–6).

Nesiritide, an intravenous (IV) form of human B-type natriuretic peptide (marketed as Natrecor, Scios, Inc., Sunnyvale, California), is the first in a new pharmacologic class of drug for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF). Given parenterally, nesiritide causes cyclic guanosine monophosphate-mediated balanced arterial and venous dilation and may lead to neurohormonal suppression, natriuresis and diuresis (7–9). Recent evaluation of nesiritide in the treatment of acute decompensated CHF has demonstrated significant symptom improvement, in association with decreased preload and afterload and increased cardiac output, without a proarrhythmic effect (7,8).

To determine if treatment with nesiritide in hospitalized patients with decompensated CHF affected healthcare utilization or longer term outcomes compared to dobutamine, we examined length of stay (LOS), readmissions and six-month mortality data from a subgroup analysis prospective, randomized active-control trial.


   Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Participating investigators
 References
 
Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age with a history of chronic heart failure and were admitted to an acute care hospital for symptomatic, decompensated heart failure requiring inpatient IV vasoactive treatment. Patients were excluded if they had prior treatment for >4 h with an IV vasoactive agent for this episode of heart failure, a myocardial infarction within 48 h before entry into study, valvular stenosis, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, primary pulmonary hypertension, acute myocarditis, complex congenital heart disease, shock, systolic blood pressure (BP) <90 mm Hg or significant hemodynamic instability requiring immediate inotropic or pressor support. All patients gave informed consent, and each institution’s local board for the protection of human subjects approved the study protocol. Prospectively defined end points included duration of IV vasoactive therapy, hospital LOS, hospital readmissions (both all-cause and due to CHF) through day 21 and the need for additional vasoactive agents. Six-month mortality data were collected retrospectively.

In this multicenter open-label (double-blind to nesiritide dose) study, patients were randomized to three treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: 1) standard care (SC), an investigator-chosen single IV vasoactive agent; 2) nesiritide 0.015 µg/kg per min infusion, preceded by a 0.3 µg/kg IV bolus; or 3) nesiritide 0.030 µg/kg per min infusion, preceded by a 0.6 µg/kg IV bolus (Fig. 1). Standard care vasoactive agents included dobutamine, milrinone, nitroglycerin or nitroprusside. Investigators could add a second IV vasoactive agent (or substitute a new agent for the first choice) at their discretion, but nesiritide could not be given as the second agent to SC patients. The addition of a second IV vasodilator to nesiritide therapy was not permitted, but the former could be substituted for the latter. In all groups, dose changes and total duration of therapy were left to investigator’s discretion.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1 Study schema. IV = intravenous.

 
Statistical methods.   This paper summarizes the comparisons of a subgroup of patients randomized to SC who received dobutamine with patients randomized to two doses of nesiritide. Descriptive statistics were provided for gender, age, ethnicity, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, primary etiology of CHF and cardiac history. Summaries of concomitant medication usage, treatment information and healthcare utilization were provided for each treatment group. Generally, continuous data were analyzed by the omnibus F test followed by pairwise contrasts, ordinal data by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pairwise two-sample Wilcoxon tests and categorical data by the generalized Fisher Exact test followed by pairwise Fisher Exact test. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the six-month mortality rate were also provided for each group. Log-rank test was used to assess the differences of six-month mortality between the dobutamine subgroup and each nesiritide dose group. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. No pairwise multiple comparison adjustments are included.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Participating investigators
 References
 
Between January 1997 and July 1997, 305 patients were enrolled into the study from 46 U.S. study sites. One hundred two patients were randomized to SC. Of these, 58 (57%) patients received dobutamine as the first-choice SC agent. One hundred three patients received nesiritide 0.015 µg/kg per min and 100 patients received nesiritide 0.030 µg/kg per min. Baseline demographics and medical history information is summarized in Table 1. The study population was elderly (mean age 65 ± 13 years), 32% were women and 31% were minorities. As intended, 92% of patients had a chronic history of NYHA class III or IV CHF before admission. Fifty-four percent had a history of a previous myocardial infarction (MI), 40% had a history of atrial fibrillation and 24% had a history of ventricular tachycardia (VT) (21% nonsustained and 8% sustained). In general, baseline characteristics (Table 1) and baseline hemodynamics (Table 2) among the groups were well balanced, with the following exceptions: more dobutamine patients had a history of previous MI and ischemia as the primary etiology of CHF, fewer nesiritide 0.015 µg/kg per min patients were white or had a history of sudden death, and more nesiritide 0.030 µg/kg per min patients had a history of sustained VT. Before study drug administration, there were no significant differences in the chronic use of diuretics (83%), digoxin (59%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (60%) or beta-blockers (10%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Demographics and Baseline Medical History

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Baseline Blood Pressure and Heart Rate, and Change From Baseline at 24 h (Mean ± SD)

 
Median duration of study drug was significantly shorter in the nesiritide dose groups than in the dobutamine group by 25 h (nesiritide 0.015 µg/kg per min) and 39 h (nesiritide 0.030 µg/kg per min) (Table 3). In addition, compared to the dobutamine group, patients randomized to nesiritide received one less day of treatment with all IV vasoactive drug therapies combined (overall p = 0.016, pairwise p < 0.05) (Table 3). Dobutamine-treated patients were more likely to undergo both dose increases and dose decreases, whereas nesiritide was more likely to be administered as a fixed-dose infusion (Table 3). The use of combination therapy with other IV vasoactive agents during nesiritide therapy was similar to that observed with dobutamine (overall p = 0.589) (Table 3). A small number of patients (9 in the low-dose and 12 in the high-dose nesiritide groups) were placed on a second IV agent after discontinuing nesiritide. Compared with nesiritide-treated patients, significantly greater numbers of patients treated with dobutamine received a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, dopamine, non-dopamine vasopressors, diuretics or digoxin during treatment with study drug (Table 4). In nesiritide-treated patients who required concomitant IV vasoactive therapy, dobutamine was the most common agent used (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3 Treatment Information

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4 Concomitant Medications During Initial Study Drug Therapy (Number and Percent of Subjects)

 
Overall hospital LOS was no different among the groups (Table 5). The percentage of nesiritide-treated patients (both doses) readmitted for CHF within 21 days was approximately 69% lower than observed in patients receiving dobutamine (p < 0.06 for each nesiritide dose group vs. dobutamine). All-cause readmissions were 60% lower in patients treated with nesiritide 0.015 µg/kg per min (p < 0.05 vs. dobutamine) and 45% lower in the 0.030 µg/kg per min group (p > 0.1 vs. dobutamine, Table 5). Systolic BP at 24 h was significantly reduced in the nesiritide-treated groups compared with the dobutamine-treated group (Table 2). Heart rate for all three groups remained essentially the same after 24 h of treatment. Diastolic BP was significantly reduced from baseline in each nesiritide group, but the changes were not significantly different from dobutamine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5 Healthcare Utilization and Mortality

 
Six-month mortality was lower in the 0.015 µg/kg per min nesiritide group compared with the dobutamine-treated group. Six-month mortality in the 0.030 µg/kg per min nesiritide group was also lower than that observed with dobutamine (Table 5, Fig. 2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier estimate of mortality. Circles = dobutamine (n = 58); squares = nesiritide 0.6 µg/kg 0.030 µg/kg per min (n = 100); triangles = nesiritide 0.3 µg/kg 0.015 µg/kg per min (n = 103).

 
Adverse events.   The incidence of select cardiovascular events reported during the first 24 h of dosing is summarized in Table 6. During the first 24 h, the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic hypotension was higher in the nesiritide treatment groups compared to dobutamine. The events were easily managed with either dose reduction or discontinuation. Bradycardia tended to be more common in the nesiritide-treated groups compared with the dobutamine-treated group, although the difference was not statistically significant (overall p = 0.258).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 6 Selected Cardiovascular Adverse Events During the First 24 h of Dosing (Number and Percent of Subjects)

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Participating investigators
 References
 
Use of nesiritide in the treatment of CHF.   The results of this large multicenter trial demonstrate that, in comparison to dobutamine, the use of nesiritide for the initial management of acute decompensated CHF was associated with a shorter treatment course with IV vasoactive therapy, the use of fewer additional parenteral agents and reduced hospital readmission rates. In patients receiving nesiritide 0.015 µg/kg per min, there was a significantly lower six-month mortality rate compared with patients receiving dobutamine.

Nesiritide versus dobutamine.   Readmission for decompensated CHF is a common event for patients with advanced heart failure and can be affected by the adequacy of initial hospital care (10). The present study suggests that nesiritide may be more effective than dobutamine (shorter treatment course, fewer additional agents) and that these short-term benefits may have longer lived effects (reduced CHF rehospitalization and reduction in mortality). Although the exact mechanisms for the differential effects of nesiritide in this study are not entirely clear, they may include favorable neurohormonal changes and enhanced diuretic effect with nesiritide and/or unfavorable effects of dobutamine such as increased myocardial oxygen consumption, direct myocardial toxicity or arrhythmogenesis.

Pharmacoeconomic considerations.   Decompensated CHF is a major cause of hospital admissions in the U.S. and is the leading cause of acute care hospital admissions for patients over the age of 65 years (1,2). Early improvement of symptoms due to hemodynamic compensation, diuresis and natriuresis is often achieved with parenteral therapy, followed by the transition to an appropriate outpatient regimen. Achieving these goals rapidly and economically is essential for improvement of patient care and control of the financial burden from this condition. Overall cost of care is a complex variable that is based not only on the cost of therapeutic agents and procedures, but also on resource utilization (level of care, treatment of serious complications, LOS, readmission rates), which in turn is affected by the efficacy and safety profiles of the therapeutics used.

Study limitations.   The results of the study are limited by its open-label design, nonrandomized selection of therapies used in the SC group by the investigators and the relatively small number of patients in each subgroup. The dobutamine-treated patients had a higher incidence of ischemia and previous MI compared with the nesiritide-treated patients. Therefore, the choice of dobutamine as the SC agent by the investigator may have selected a sicker patient population for this subgroup. More information from a larger blinded study will be required to confirm the results of this study. In addition, the lack of a placebo group does not allow for the determination of whether the different outcomes observed between the treatment groups were due to a beneficial effect of nesiritide or a detrimental effect of dobutamine. Finally, although the current recommended dose of nesiritide is an infusion of 0.010 µg/kg per min (preceded by a 2 µg/kg bolus), in this study nesiritide was administered at doses one-and-a-half to three times higher.

Conclusions.   This study demonstrated that the use of nesiritide was associated with a shorter treatment course, the use of fewer additional parenteral agents, reduced rehospitalization rate and a significantly lower mortality rate at six months (in the 0.015 µg/kg per min dose group) when compared to dobutamine. Thus, this study suggests that the short-term clinical benefits of nesiritide, the first in the new class of B-type natriuretic peptides for treatment of CHF, may be associated with decreased healthcare utilization costs and improved long-term survival, compared to the commonly used inotropic agent, dobutamine.


   Participating investigators
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Participating investigators
References
 
The Nesiritide Study Group–Comparative Trial Investigators has been previously described (7).


   Footnotes
 
This study was supported by a grant from Scios Inc., Sunnyvale, California.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Participating investigators
 References
 

  1. Rich MW, Nease RF. Cost-effectiveness analysis in clinical practice: the case of heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1690–1700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. O’Connell J, Bristow M. Economic impact of heart failure in the United States: time for a different approach. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993;:S107–112
  3. Packer M, Carver JR, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure: The PROMISE Study Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1468–1475[Abstract]
  4. Massie BM, Berk MR, Brozena SC, et al. Can further benefit be achieved by adding flosequinan to patients with congestive heart failure who remain symptomatic on diuretic, digoxin, and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor?: Results of the Flosequinan-ACE inhibitor Trial (FACET). Circulation. 1993;88:492–501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Packer M, Narahara KA, Elkayam U, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of flosequinan in patients with chronic heart failure: Principal Investigators of the REFLECT Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:65–72[Abstract]
  6. Moe GW, Rouleau JL, Charbonneau L, et al. Neurohormonal activation in severe heart failure: relations to patient death and the effect of treatment with flosequinan. Am Heart J. 2000;139:587–595[Medline]
  7. Colucci WS, Elkayam U, Horton DP, et al. Intravenous nesiritide, a natriuretic peptide, in the treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: Nesiritide Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:246–253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Marcus LS, Hart D, Packer M, et al. Hemodynamic and renal excretory effects of human brain natriuretic peptide infusion in patients with congestive heart failure: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial. Circulation. 1996;94:3184–3189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Abraham WT, Lowes BD, Ferguson DA, et al. Systemic hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and renal effects of a steady-state infusion of human brain natriuretic peptide in patients with hemodynamically decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail. 1998;4:37–44[Medline]
  10. Krumholz HM, Parent EM, Tu N, et al. Readmission after hospitalization for congestive heart failure among Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:99–104[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Circ Heart FailHome page
J. C. Burnett Jr and J. Korinek
The Tumultuous Journey of Nesiritide: Past, Present, and Future
Circ Heart Fail, May 1, 2008; 1(1): 6 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
I. Belenkie
Nesiritide Administration in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 13, 2007; 49(6): 727 - 728.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. T. Abraham, K. F. Adams, G. C. Fonarow, M. R. Costanzo, R. L. Berkowitz, T. H. LeJemtel, M. L. Cheng, J. Wynne, the ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee Investiga, and and the ADHERE Study Group
In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Requiring Intravenous Vasoactive Medications: An Analysis From the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. W. Dec
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: The Shrinking Role of Inotropic Therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 65 - 67.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
J. D. Sackner-Bernstein, M. Kowalski, M. Fox, and K. Aaronson
Short-term Risk of Death After Treatment With Nesiritide for Decompensated Heart Failure: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
JAMA, April 20, 2005; 293(15): 1900 - 1905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart J SupplHome page
M. Gheorghiade and F. Zannad
Modern management of acute heart failure syndromes
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2005; 7(suppl_B): B3 - B7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart J SupplHome page
M. Gheorghiade and G. Filippatos
Reassessing treatment of acute heart failure syndromes: the ADHERE Registry
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2005; 7(suppl_B): B13 - B19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart J SupplHome page
M. S. Nieminen
Pharmacological options for acute heart failure syndromes: current treatments and unmet needs
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2005; 7(suppl_B): B20 - B24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
J. D. Sackner-Bernstein, H. A. Skopicki, and K. D. Aaronson
Risk of Worsening Renal Function With Nesiritide in Patients With Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure
Circulation, March 29, 2005; 111(12): 1487 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
Endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care, Authors/Task Force Members, M. S. Nieminen, M. Bohm, M. R. Cowie, H. Drexler, G. S. Filippatos, G. Jondeau, Y. Hasin, J. Lopez-Sendon, et al.
Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2005; 26(4): 384 - 416.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Witteles, K. Matsuda, and M. B. Fowler
B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Is Effective Therapy before Care
Ann Intern Med, December 7, 2004; 141(11): 895 - 895.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Intensive Care MedHome page
J. Marshall, J. W. Berkenbosch, P. Russo, and J. D. Tobias
Preliminary Experience With Nesiritide in the Pediatric Population
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 164 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Intensive Care MedHome page
M. S. Schamberger
Is There a Use for Nesiritide in Pediatric Patients?
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 171 - 173.
[PDF]

Home page
 The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. J DiDomenico, H. Y Park, M. R. Southworth, H. M Eyrich, R. K Lewis, J. M Finley, and G. T Schumock
Guidelines for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Treatment
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2004; 38(4): 649 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
S. de Denus, C. Pharand, and D. R. Williamson
Brain Natriuretic Peptide in the Management of Heart Failure: The Versatile Neurohormone
Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 652 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
L. W. Stevenson
Clinical Use of Inotropic Therapy for Heart Failure: Looking Backward or Forward? Part I: Inotropic Infusions During Hospitalization
Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 367 - 372.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. V Bobadilla, T. F Oppelt, and T. C Hirshy
Nesiritide Treatment of Noncardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2003; 37(4): 530 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
T. Ito, M. Yoshimura, S. Nakamura, M. Nakayama, Y. Shimasaki, E. Harada, Y. Mizuno, M. Yamamuro, M. Harada, Y. Saito, et al.
Inhibitory Effect of Natriuretic Peptides on Aldosterone Synthase Gene Expression in Cultured Neonatal Rat Cardiocytes
Circulation, February 18, 2003; 107(6): 807 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. Vichiendilokkul, A. Tran, and E. Racine
Nesiritide: A Novel Approach for Acute Heart Failure
Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2003; 37(2): 247 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
U. Elkayam, M. W. Akhter, P. Tummala, S. Khan, and H. Singh
Nesiritide: A New Drug for the Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2002; 7(3): 181 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silver, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Elkayam, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silver, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Elkayam, U.

HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK