Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:742-743
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madias, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Madias, J. E.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Anasarca and low electrocardiogram voltage: Reply

John E. Madias, MD, FACC*

* Professor of Medicine Chief, Cardiology Division, Elmhurst Hospital Center, 79-01 Broadway, Elmhurst, New York 11373, USA
madiasj{at}nychhc.org


I am grateful to Dr. Brennan for directing me to literature describing a direct correlation of albumin and amplitude of QRS complexes (1). To respond to his inquiry I have modeled an analysis of our data after the study of Dr. Heaf (1). Our patients were critically ill, were followed for a long time (34.5 ± 36.7 days) (2) and inevitably experienced gradual reduction of albumin, despite our concerted efforts to use enteral and/or parenteral feeding. We had not measured albumin daily, but frequently. Thus, I was able to employ values that were the closest to the admission and peak weight albumin values of our patients. The albumin levels available for my analysis were checked on days 0.61 ± 1.71 for admission, and on days 0.43 ± 1.79 of peak weight time point.

Correlation of the sums of all 12 QRS leads ({Sigma}QRS) (2) from admission with the corresponding albumin values revealed an r = 0.057 and a p = 0.77. A similar analysis, carried out for the {Sigma}QRSs obtained on the day of the peak weight and the corresponding albumin values, showed an r = 0.38 and a p = 0.04. Correlation of the percent change in the {Sigma}QRSs between admission and points of the peak body weights, with the percent change in the corresponding albumin values, revealed an r = 0.37 and a p = 0.053.

The difference in our results from the admission time point and the time of peak weight is hard to explain. If there was a real relationship between QRS amplitude and albumin, such a discrepancy should not have been encountered. Moreover, I find it odd to correlate absolute values of albumin with absolute values of amplitude of QRS complexes, taking into consideration that the latter can vary widely among both healthy subjects and patients, while the normal range of the former is 3.3 to 5.3 g/dl in our laboratory.

I find the correlation of change in each of the two correlates more meaningful scientifically, and in our data we found an almost significant association between the drop of albumin and loss of QRS amplitudes. The correlation coefficient was much smaller than the one we reported (r = 0.61) (2) for the association of weight gain and {Sigma}QRS drop. However, some association may exist between albumin and QRS amplitudes, and may be confirmed in patients in whom both daily electrocardiograms and albumin measurements are implemented.

Does this mean that the hypoalbuminemia was causally related to the drop of {Sigma}QRS in our patients, or was this biochemical abnormality "an innocent bystander"? Innocent it is not, for certainly it contributes to the extent of water retention; however, the causative mechanism for the drop in {Sigma}QRSs must have been the weight gain (or fluid retention). Correlation of % weight gain and % albumin drop in our 28 patients was poor (r = 0.02, p = 0.9); also, correlation of the % weight loss and % albumin rise in 9 patients was poor (r = 0.5, p = 0.1). It would have been very interesting to have data on weight change in the patients reported by Heaf (1).

There is evidence that edema fluid has low resistivity (3); thus, its effect on the transfer of cardiac potentials from the heart to the body surface can be explained by Ohm’s law. I am not aware of any work ascribing any mechanistic role for albumin per se in modulating the ECG voltage. Finally, the fact that patient 26 (2) gained 122.4 lb and lost 68.3% of his {Sigma}QRS, while his albumin increased from 1.8 g/dl to 2.7 g/dl, and subsequently lost 77.4 lb and gained 185.9% of his {Sigma}QRS (Fig. 6 of Madias et al. [2]) while his albumin increased merely from 2.9 to 3.0 g/dl, casts serious doubt on the contention that a causative relation between albumin and QRS amplitudes really exists.


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. Heaf JG. Albumin-induced changes in the electrocardiographic QRS complex. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:1530–1533[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Madias JE, Bazaz R, Agarwal H, Win M, Medepalli L. Anasarca-mediated attenuation of the amplitude of electrocardiogram complexes: a description of a heretofore unrecognized phenomenon. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:756–764[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Geddes LA, Baker LE. The specific resistance of biological material—a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng. 1967;5:271–293[CrossRef][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madias, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Madias, J. E.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement