Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 2 Hemodynamic effects of the cardiac support device (CSD). (A) Left ventricular pressure–volume relations in one animal before and after long-term CSD use. The darker loops for each condition reflect basal conditions, and the thinner loops were measured during transient load reduction. There was a reduction in both end-diastolic and end-systolic chamber volumes, with preservation of cardiac stroke volume (loop width), and the end-systolic pressure–volume relation shifted leftward, consistent with reversal of chamber remodeling. The diastolic pressure–volume boundary was not altered. (B) Summary of hemodynamic variables before and after long-term CSD use. There was a consistent significant decline in chamber volumes (end-diastolic volume [EDV] and end-systolic volume [ESV]), without a change in cardiac output (CO). End-diastolic pressure (EDP) and end-systolic pressure (ESP) were not significantly changed. EF = ejection fraction.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement