|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1511-1517 © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |


* Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Manuscript received March 13, 2000; revised manuscript received June 12, 2001, accepted July 11, 2001.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. George A. Beller, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, P.O. Box 800158, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0158 USA
gbeller{at}virginia.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was undertaken to define the intrinsic cardiac risk of the patient population referred for dobutamine stress perfusion imaging and to determine whether dobutamine technetium-99m (99mTc)-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging is capable of risk stratification in this population.
BACKGROUND
In animal models, dobutamine attenuates the myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi resulting in underestimation of coronary stenoses. Therefore, we hypothesized that the prognostic value of dobutamine stress 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging might be impaired, owing to reduced detection of coronary stenoses.
METHODS
We reviewed the clinical outcome of 308 patients (166 women, 142 men) who underwent dobutamine stress SPECT 99mTc-sestamibi imaging at our institution from September 1992 through December 1996.
RESULTS
During an average follow-up of 1.9 ± 1.1 years, there were 33 hard cardiac events (18 myocardial infarctions [MI] and 15 cardiac deaths) corresponding to an annual cardiac event rate of 5.8%/year, which is significantly higher than the event rate for patients referred for exercise SPECT imaging at our institution (2.2%/year). Event rates were higher after an abnormal dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT study (10.0%/year) than after a normal study (2.3%/year) (p < 0.01), even after adjusting for clinical variables. In the subgroup (n = 29) with dobutamine-induced ST-segment depression and abnormal SPECT imaging, the prognosis was poor, with annual cardiac death and nonfatal MI rates of 7.9% and 13.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients referred for dobutamine perfusion imaging are a high-risk population, and dobutamine stress 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging is capable of risk stratification in these patients.
| ||||||||||||||
In the canine model of coronary artery stenosis, dobutamine stress attenuates the myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi (15,16), resulting in a significant underestimation of the dobutamine-induced myocardial blood flow heterogeneity on 99mTc-sestamibi perfusion images. In light of these findings, we hypothesized that the prognostic value of dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging might be inferior to that of exercise and vasodilator stressors, owing to reduced detection of coronary artery stenoses.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to define the intrinsic cardiac risk of the patient population referred for dobutamine perfusion imaging and to determine whether dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging is capable of risk stratification in this population.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Image acquisition and interpretation. Technetium-99m-sestamibi images were acquired using a Prism 3000 triple-headed gamma camera (Picker, Cleveland, Ohio) or a Sophy DS-7 single-headed gamma camera (Sopha Medical, Buc, France). Our methods for image acquisition and quantification have been previously described (17,18). Studies were interpreted clinically by one of five experienced observers using visual and quantitative perfusion data. In 179 patients (58%), the quantitative analysis included an automatic comparison of regional 99mTc-sestamibi activity to a gender-specific normal database and a quantitative assessment of regional and global left ventricular systolic function using our counts-based gated SPECT method (17,18).
For the purposes of this study, studies were classified as normal or abnormal according to the absence or presence of focal perfusion defects. Studies interpreted as "probably normal" were grouped with the normal studies. Abnormal studies were subclassified according to the presence or absence of perfusion defect reversibility. Studies with "predominantly fixed" (but minimally reversible) perfusion defects were classified as reversible.
Clinical variables. Three clinical variables were prospectively selected as likely predictors of cardiac events based on the available literature (1,8). The variables were age, history of prior MI (based on clinical history or diagnostic Q waves on electrocardiogram [ECG]) and number of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and present or recent tobacco use).
Follow-up.
Patients were followed using mailed questionnaires, telephone interviews and review of medical records. Follow-up was terminated at last patient contact or at the time of the following end points: nonfatal MI (confirmed by medical records demonstrating a rise and fall in cardiac-specific markers in the setting of prolonged anginal chest pain and/or ECG changes), cardiac death (sudden death in the absence of other identified causes and confirmed by medical records and/or death certificate), noncardiac death (death from any other cause) or coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical). For descriptive purposes, revascularizations occurring
50 days after SPECT imaging were classified as "early," and those occurring >50 days after SPECT imaging were classified as "late." All patients who underwent revascularization were censored from subsequent follow-up analysis. Cardiac events were defined as the combined end point of cardiac death or nonfatal MI.
Statistical methods. Event-free survival patterns were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model for time-to-event data. The Wald chi-square test from this model was used to determine the incremental prognostic value of dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. Unpaired t tests were used to compare demographic data from this study with those reported previously for exercise 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging in our laboratory (1). Continuous variables are expressed as median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Failure to achieve target heart rate was not a predictor of cardiac events in our study. The percentage of maximum age-predicted heart rate (%MAPHR) achieved was not a significant predictor of cardiac events (p = 0.84), and including %MAPHR in the multivariable model caused no substantive change in the Cox regression coefficients for the ECG and SPECT results as predictors of cardiac events.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Importance of population risk on observed annual cardiac event rates. A major strength of nuclear perfusion imaging is the ability to identify patients at low risk for future cardiac events. In this study, the annual cardiac event rate in patients with normal dobutamine SPECT studies was 2.3%, which is more than twofold higher than the event rates (<1%) reported after a normal exercise SPECT study (18). Considered in isolation, this relatively high event rate could be interpreted as clinical confirmation of an adverse effect of dobutamine on myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi as predicted in the canine model (15,16). However, cardiac event rates after a normal SPECT perfusion study are determined by two factors: 1) the sensitivity of the test for detecting CAD, and 2) the intrinsic cardiac risk of the population studied. Cardiac event rates will tend to be higher if the test sensitivity is low (patients with "false-negative" results may have subsequent cardiac events) or if the intrinsic cardiac risk of the patient population is high. Therefore, the annual cardiac event rates in patients with normal studies must be interpreted in the context of the overall cardiac risk of the population studied. This is analogous to the well-accepted principle that the predictive values of noninvasive diagnostic testing are dependent on the prevalence of disease in the population examined (19).
This concept is illustrated in Figure 4, which depicts the annual cardiac event rates for patients referred for dobutamine stress (from this study) plotted together with the cardiac event rates in patients referred for exercise SPECT imaging at our institution (1). Excellent risk stratification is achieved with exercise and dobutamine, as reflected by a roughly fivefold differential in cardiac event rates between patients with normal and abnormal SPECT results (0.8% vs. 5.4% for exercise and 2.3% vs. 10.0% for dobutamine, respectively). However, regardless of the SPECT results, the cardiac event rates are higher in patients referred for dobutamine stress, reflecting the higher intrinsic cardiac risk of the population referred for dobutamine stress (event rate of 5.8% vs. 2.2% for patients referred for exercise). Patients with "abnormal" results on exercise 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging have a similar annual cardiac event rate (5.4%) to patients who are simply "referred" for dobutamine SPECT imaging (5.8%).
|
Comparison with experimental findings in the canine model (prognostic importance of fixed defects). Two independent groups of investigators have recently reported that the myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi is attenuated by dobutamine stress in experiments performed using a canine model of coronary artery stenosis (15,16). These experimental findings would suggest that dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging might be relatively insensitive for the detection of mild-to-moderate coronary artery stenoses. At first glance, the excellent risk stratification achieved with dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging in this study might appear to contradict these canine experiments.
However, there are plausible explanations for the apparent discrepancy between the canine experiments and this clinical study. First, in the canine model, a single coronary stenosis is created that reduces flow reserve without reducing resting flow (15), which is clinically analogous to the patient with a moderate single-vessel stenosis without prior MI. In this study, 93 patients (31%) had a history of prior MI. In patients with prior MI, the resting SPECT perfusion image is abnormal; the diagnosis of CAD can be made on the basis of the resting image alone, and the predicted attenuation of 99mTc-sestamibi uptake by dobutamine stress is "prognostically irrelevant." An underestimation of stress perfusion defect severity (as predicted by the canine experiments) would not alter the correct classification of the study as "abnormal" on the basis of a fixed perfusion defect. In support of this hypothesis, we noted that resting images were abnormal in the majority of patients classified as having abnormal SPECT studies (all patients with fixed defects by definition and 90% of patients with "reversible" defects had at least some degree of associated fixed defect). Secondly, in some cases the stress perfusion defect severity may have been artifactually enhanced by persistent regional myocardial dysfunction during post-stress image acquisition (15,20). Dobutamine-induced myocardial stunning has recently been observed in the canine model (15). Finally, it is possible that the interaction between dobutamine and 99mTc-sestamibi is unique to the canine species and does not occur in humans, although the canine species has proved to be a reliable predictor of human radionuclide tracer kinetics in the past.
ECG response to dobutamine. Dobutamine-induced ST-segment depression has been reported to have a sensitivity of 18% to 28% for detecting CAD (2123), a sensitivity that is inferior to that provided by 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT perfusion imaging or echocardiography during dobutamine stress (22).
However, in this study, the ECG response to dobutamine provided significant incremental prognostic information beyond that provided by standard clinical variables. The prognostic information provided by the ECG response was independent of the SPECT imaging results. Of particular clinical relevance is the finding that a low-risk group could be identified on the basis of a concordantly normal ECG response and normal SPECT result. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of the ECG response to dobutamine in risk assessment and clinical decision making.
Study limitations. Our results should be extrapolated with caution to other laboratories and other patient populations. As mentioned previously, we tend to reserve dobutamine stress for patients with contraindications to exercise and vasodilator stressors. The annual cardiac event rates may differ if dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging is used more liberally, such as in patient populations without contraindications to exercise or vasodilators.
Attenuation correction of SPECT perfusion images was not utilized in our study, and gated SPECT imaging was used in only 58% of patients. It is possible that the prognostic value of dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT could be further enhanced by the routine application of these techniques.
Our relatively small population size prevented analysis of the cardiac event rates in patients with abnormal studies according to the extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities. Larger studies would be necessary to define the impact of perfusion defect extent and severity on event-free survival.
The single-day, rest-stress imaging protocol may have resulted in a slight underestimation of stress perfusion defect severity due to contamination of stress tracer distribution by residual tracer activity from the resting injection. However, despite this theoretic limitation, the rest-stress imaging protocol is widely used, and our results are, therefore, relevant to current clinical practice.
Clinical implications. Despite the theoretic potential for underestimation of coronary stenoses, dobutamine 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging is capable of cardiac risk stratification in high-risk patients with contraindications to exercise and vasodilator stressors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Navare, J. F. Mather, and G. V. Heller Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1472 - 1473. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Navare, D. Katten, L. L. Johnson, J. F. Mather, M. S. Fowler, A. W. Ahlberg, N. Miele, and G. V. Heller Risk Stratification With Electrocardiographic-Gated Dobutamine Stress Technetium-99m Sestamibi Single-Photon Emission Tomographic Imaging: Value of Heart Rate Response and Assessment of Left Ventricular Function J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 21, 2006; 47(4): 781 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Tsutsui, A. Elhendy, J. R. Anderson, F. Xie, A. C. McGrain, and T. R. Porter Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Contrast Perfusion Echocardiography Circulation, September 6, 2005; 112(10): 1444 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F.L. Schinkel, A. Elhendy, E. Biagini, R. T. van Domburg, R. Valkema, V. Rizello, C. Pedone, M. Simoons, J. J. Bax, and D. Poldermans Prognostic Stratification Using Dobutamine Stress 99mTc-Tetrofosmin Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Elderly Patients Unable to Perform Exercise Testing J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 12 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch, S. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, L. J. Shaw, G. Germano, and D. S. Berman Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: What is the warranty period of a normal scan? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 16, 2003; 41(8): 1329 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Elhendy, J. J. Bax, and D. Poldermans Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 1634 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. L. Schinkel, A. Elhendy, R. T. van Domburg, J. J. Bax, R. Valkema, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and D. Poldermans Long-term Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT: Single-Center Experience with 8-year Follow-up Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 701 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F.L. Schinkel, A. Elhendy, R. T. van Domburg, J. J. Bax, J. R.T.C. Roelandt, and D. Poldermans Prognostic Value of Dobutamine-Atropine Stress 99mTc-Tetrofosmin Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 767 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Calnon and G. A. Beller Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 15, 2002; 39(10): 1708 - 1709. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Druz Dobutamine stress testing revisited J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 15, 2002; 39(10): 1708 - 1708. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |