Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1270-1271
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Portman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lupinetti, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Portman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lupinetti, F. M.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply

Michael A. Portman, MD, FACCa, Frank Cecchin, MD, FACCa, Thomas K. Jones, MD, FACCa, Julie A. Davis, MDa and Flavian M. Lupinetti, MDa

a The Heart Center, Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA

mportm{at}chmc.org


The letters from Drs. Davidson and Karl and Dr. Phoon highlight the controversy and difficulties inherent in planning intervention for anomalous origin of the coronary arteries (AOCA). The principal goal of our study was to estimate the prevalence of these anomalies in a relatively normal and asymptomatic population (1). This represents only the first step in defining a disease process. Phoon correctly states that the true natural history of these coronary artery anomalies is unknown. The sporadic nature of AOCA causes difficulties in determining the natural history of these abnormalities when they present as an incidental finding. Conceivably, a national or international registry for such patients could be established with the goal of defining both the natural and surgical history of these patients.

We concur with the management outline described in the editorial comment by Pellicia (2). Certainly, surgical intervention is mandatory in any young patient with symptoms; or those with AOCA as an incidental finding and signs of myocardial perfusion abnormalities identified after rigorous laboratory examination. Pellicia states that uncertainty exists regarding patients without symptoms or signs of myocardial ischemia. Therefore, it seems reasonable that these patients are not exposed to risk for sudden death, and surgical management should be considered. One can take issue with Phoon’s statement that "activity can be modified, and therefore risk can be reduced." Behavioral modification might be possible, but at what price? Our patients and their families are routinely provided the option of reduced physical activity as an alternative to operative intervention. In this population of otherwise healthy young persons, lifestyle considerations tend to direct the families to choose surgical treatment.

The surgical approach depends on the specific anatomy and circumstances. Davidson and Karl suggest that aortocoronary bypass grafting may not be the optimal procedure for AOCA. We agree that arterioplasty involving the ostium is appropriate and perhaps preferable, when the right coronary artery with anomalous origin (ARCA) follows an intramural course. We have performed this operation in two patients with good immediate results. In two other patients, the ARCA did not demonstrate an intramural course, and bypass seemed preferable. We have operated on three patients with left coronary arteries arising from the right sinus, all without intramural component and all were bypassed. All of these grafts have remained patent up to three years postoperatively.

Furthermore, two of the three grafts were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass, thus avoiding possible neurological complications. The long-term results including graft patency duration for these surgical procedures remain unknown. Extrapolation of data regarding Kawasaki disease patients to AOCA patients may not be appropriate (3). Kawasaki disease is a vasculitic syndrome associated with increased risk for thrombosis (4). Vascular remodeling can continue for years (5) and possibly promote graft occlusion. Such vascular pathology does not exist in AOCA patients.


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. Davis JA, Cecchin F, Jones TK, Portman MA. Major coronary anomalies in a pediatric population: incidence and clinical importance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:593–597[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Pellicia A. Congenital coronary anomalies in young patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:598–600[Free Full Text]

3. Yoshikawa Y, Yagihara T, Kameda Y, et al. Result of surgical treatments in patients with coronary-arterial occlusive disease after Kawasaki disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:515–519[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Miura N, Terai M, Meng TG, Sato T, Niimi H. Serum thrombopoietin levels in Kawasaki disease. Br J Haematol. 1998;100:387–388[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Suzuki A, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Komatsu K, et al. Active remodeling of the coronary arterial lesions in the late phase of Kawasaki disease: immunohistochemical study. Circulation. 2000;101:2935–2941[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Portman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lupinetti, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Portman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lupinetti, F. M.

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement