cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1374-1380
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smulyan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Safar, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smulyan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Safar, M. E.

CLINCAL STUDY: PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE

Comparative effects of aging in men and women on the properties of the arterial tree

Harold Smulyan, MD, FACC*, Roland G. Asmar, MD{dagger}, Annie Rudnicki, MD{ddagger}, Gerard M. London, MD§ and Michel E. Safar, MD||

* State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
{dagger} Institut Cardiovasculaire, Paris, France
{ddagger} Covance, Malmaison, France
§ Centre Hospitalier, F. H. Manhes, Fleury-Merogis, France
|| Broussais Hospital, Paris, France

Manuscript received June 7, 2000; revised manuscript received November 15, 2000, accepted January 4, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Harold Smulyan, University Hospital, Upstate Medical University, 750 E. Adams Street, Syracuse, New York 13210
smulyanh{at}upstate.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES

We measured the properties of the arterial tree, seeking differences between men and women as they aged.

BACKGROUND

There are many differences between men and women, besides menopause, which might account for such disparities. These include body height, heart rate, stroke volume and smaller arterial diameters. Any gender differences in arterial stiffness could influence pulse pressure (PP), now recognized as a cardiovascular risk factor.

METHODS

A total of 530 patients (347 men and 183 women) were classified by age into quartiles: ≤40, 41–47, 48–54 and ≥55 years. The middle groups represented the menopausal years. Studies included brachial artery blood pressure (BP), aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), B-mode ultrasonography and wave form analysis of the common carotid artery (CCA), with its conversion to the aortic wave form. Standard echocardiography provided left ventricular dimensions and flows. Calculated values included CCA compliance and distensibility, systemic compliance, stroke volume and peripheral resistance.

RESULTS

At all ages, women had higher heart rates but lower BP than men. Pulse pressure, however, was lower in young women and higher in older women. Measurements influenced by body size, such as CCA diameter, compliance and systemic compliance, were lower in women. Those related to arterial wall properties, such as CCA and aortic distensibility, were the same. Although aortic PWV rose similarly with aging, PWV had more of an influence on PP in women than did mean BP. The reverse was true in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite lower mean BP and similar arterial distensibility, women develop a higher degree of pulsatility with aging, as compared with men. This is mainly due to their smaller physical characteristics, independent of the role of menopause and its related hormonal changes.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CCA = common carotid artery
  DBP = diastolic blood pressure
  HR = heart rate
  IMT = intima-media thickness
  LV = left ventricle
  MBP = mean blood pressure
  PP = pulse pressure
  PWV = pulse wave velocity
  SBP = systolic blood pressure


It is well recognized that aging leads to progressive stiffening of the arterial tree in both men and women. However, multiple factors affecting the arterial tree differ between the two genders. Obviously, estrogenic hormone levels, believed to affect arterial distensibility (1), fluctuate widely in women as they relate to pregnancy and menopause (2, 3), with no counterpart in men. However, there are also nonhormonal differences that affect the behavior of the arterial tree. These include discrepancies in body height, heart rate (HR), stroke volume, arterial compliance and distensibility, all of which influence systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse pressure (PP). This last one is important, because PP has recently been shown to be a predictor of cardiovascular risk in unselected populations (4–6), hypertensive patients (7) and those with myocardial infarctions or congestive heart failure, or both (8,9).

This report compares the influence of a number of nonhormonal factors that affect the arterial tree in men and women, by seeking gender and age differences in a large cohort with a wide age span. The results are statistically analyzed to provide insight into the simultaneous effects of gender and aging on the development of arterial stiffness in men and women.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study cohort.   From January 1995 to June 1997, ~1,500 patients entered the Department of Internal Medicine of Broussais Hospital for a routine cardiovascular evaluation ordered by their general practitioner or cardiologist. These evaluations were requested on the basis of one or more risk factors, including high blood pressure, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus and/or a family history of premature cardiovascular disease, with or without previously identified atherosclerotic disease. From these 1,500 patients, 190 normotensive subjects and 340 subjects with essential hypertension agreed to be studied (n = 530). Hypertension was defined as SBP >140 mm Hg and/or DBP >90 mm Hg, measured on three occasions in the supine position by sphygmomanometry during the preceding month. Patients with all forms of secondary hypertension were excluded on the basis of standard laboratory and radiology tests. Subjects with cancer, insulin-dependent diabetes or severe renal insufficiency (creatinine >120 µmol/liter) were also excluded. The study group was then composed of 236 hypertensive men, 104 hypertensive women, 111 normotensive men and 79 normotensive women. In all hypertensive subjects, pharmacologic therapy had been discontinued at least one month before the study. Subjects had no signs, symptoms or history of stroke or major cardiac or renal disease other than hypertension. No patient received antidiabetic or hypocholesterolemic drugs, hormone replacement therapy or any other cardiovascular drug during the study. Written, informed consent was obtained from each subject after a detailed description of the procedure.

Classification of subjects.   In a previous study, 30,966 French women completed a health questionnaire about age, body weight and height and the presence or absence of menopause. Data thus derived showed that menopause occurred 100% of the time between the ages of 40 and 55 years. Men and women in the present study were therefore classified into four age groups: ≤40 years, 41–47 years, 48–54 years and ≥55 years. This age classification not only divided the cohort into nearly equal quarters, but allowed comparison of premenopausal and postmenopausal data (groups 1 and 4), as well as observations on the middle groups, whose number of menopausal women increased with advancing age.

Blood pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements.   Each subject was studied at 10:00 AM in a controlled environment at a room temperature of 22 ± 2°C. After 20 min of rest in a supine position, brachial SBP, DBP and mean blood pressure (MBP), PP and HR were determined every 3 min with an oscillometric recorder (model 845, Dinamap, Critikon, Tampa, Florida) placed on the left arm. Pulse wave velocity was then measured.

In all 530 subjects, aortic PWV was determined using an automatic device, the Complior (Colson, Garges les Gonesses, France), which allowed on-line pulse wave recording and automatic calculation of PWV. Common carotid artery (CCA) and femoral artery pressure wave forms were recorded noninvasively using a TY-306 Fukuda pressure-sensitive transducer (Fukuda, Tokyo, Japan). Measurement was repeated over 10 different cardiac cycles, and the mean value was used for the final analysis. The distance traveled by the pulse wave was measured over the body surface as the distance between the two recording sites (D), while pulse transit time (t) was automatically determined by the Complior. Pulse wave velocity was automatically calculated as PWV = D/t. Details, as well as validation of this automatic method and its reproducibility, have been reported previously, with intraobserver and interobserver repeatability coefficients >0.90 (10).

In 460 patients, ultrasonography of the heart and CCA was performed. Echocardiographic studies were performed using a Hewlett-Packard Sonos 1000 device equipped with a 2.25-MHz probe, allowing M-mode, two-dimensional and pulsed wave Doppler measurements. Left ventricular (LV) outflow and aortic velocities were recorded from the apical position. Measurements were performed by two physicians according to the methods described by the American Society of Echocardiography (11). Techniques, as well as interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities, have been reported elsewhere (12). The mass of the LV was calculated according to the Penn convention (13). Stroke volume was calculated from the LV outflow velocity integral (cm/s) and aortic outflow area, and cardiac output was calculated as the product of stroke volume and HR.

The pressure wave of the CCA was recorded noninvasively with a pencil-type probe, using a high fidelity Millar strain gain transducer (SPT-301, Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas). The pressure wave form and amplitude of the CCA were recorded by applanation tonometry and converted to a calculated aortic wave form and amplitude, using the Sphygmograph (PWV, Sydney, Australia) and the generalized transfer function (14). The carotid pulses were calibrated assuming that the MBP and DBP, as measured by oscillometry of the brachial artery (vide supra), were the same. The time constant of the last two-thirds of diastolic decay was calculated from the derived aortic pressure curve, as previously reported (15). The diastolic diameter of the CCA was measured by a high resolution B-mode (7.5-MHz transducer) echo-tracking system (Wall-Track System). A complete detailed description of this system, as well as the reproducibility of the measurements, has been published previously (16). The accuracy of the system is ±30 µm for the carotid diameter. The repeatability coefficient of the measurements is ±0.273 mm. Measurements were carried out in the right CCA, 2 cm beneath the bifurcation. The intima-media thickness (IMT) of the CCA was measured on the far wall at the same level as the diameter measurements, with computer-assisted acquisition, processing and storage. The repeatability coefficient of the IMT measurement was ±60 µm. Compliance and distensibility of the CCA were determined from changes in the inner CCA diameter during systole (Ds – Dd; where Ds is the CCA diameter at end systole and Dd is the diameter at end diastole) and the simultaneously measured PP ({Delta}P) of the CCA, using the following formulas:


The repeatability coefficients of the measurement were ±1 kPa–1·10–3 for CCA distensibility and 0.52 m2·kPa–1· 10–7 for CCA compliance.

Statistical analysis.   Statistical analysis was carried out using the NCSS program, release 6.0.21 (©1996 by Jerry Hintze). Covariance analyses used SPSS program, release 4.0.3 (1990) (Chicago, Illinois). As described earlier, we classified all of the study subjects into four age groups, as defined by approximate quartiles of the age distribution. We compared mean values for men and women by using the t test at a nominal two-tailed level of significance (p = 0.05), whereas differences between mean values for the factors of age and gender were evaluated by analysis of variance F tests, also at p = 0.05. In conjunction with testing whether the regression slopes of PP on PWV differed between men and women in an age class, we used age values within the class as a covariate. We explored relationships between explicative variables and PP by using stepwise multiple regression, with the two-tailed partial p value <0.05 as the criterion for variable selection.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The data in Table 1 compare the measured variables for men and women in the overall population. Although the mean ages were the same, HR was higher in women (p = 0.02), but body weight, height, SBP, DBP and MBP were significantly lower. These results were consistent in the subgroups in which carotid and cardiac studies were performed. Arterial distensibility, as measured by PWV, was the same for both genders.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Population Description

 
In Table 2 (A), the mean ages and proportion of hypertensive patients for each group are listed. Table 2 (B and C) and Figures 1 and 2 compare the measured variables from Table 1 for the different age groups in men and women. The following values increased with age in both men and women: SBP, DBP, MBP, PP and PWV. In women, body weight increased initially, then decreased over age 55 years (group 4). Body height decreased with age for both genders. There were gender differences at all ages for body weight and height, DBP and MBP, all of which were lower in women. In contrast, HR was higher in women, except for those >55 years old. Figure 1 shows that, whereas DBP was lower in women than in men in all age groups, SBP was lower in women than in men <40 years of age (p < 0.05), but reached the same level above this age. As a consequence, as seen in Figure 2 (upper panel), PP was lower (p < 0.05) in women than in men <40 years old and higher in women than in men >55 years old (p < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Gender and Age Comparisons

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 (A) Systolic blood pressure (SBP) by gender (p = 0.03) and evolution by age (p < 0.001). (B) Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by gender (p < 0.01) and evolution by age (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons were made by using a Bonferroni test.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Pulse pressure (PP) by gender (p = NS), evolution by age (p < 0.001) and age-gender interaction (p = 0.02). (B) Pulse wave velocity (PWV) by gender (p = NS) and evolution by age (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons were made by using a Bonferroni test.

 
Figure 2 (lower panel) indicates that PWV increased with age similarly in men and women. Figure 3 shows that the regression slopes of the relationship between PP (y axis) and PWV (x axis) are higher in women than in men <47 years old (p < 0.05; p < 0.01) and then became independent of gender beyond this age.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Slopes of regression between PP (y axis) and PWV (x axis) by gender and evolution by age. Pairwise comparisons were made by using a Bonferroni test.

 
The statistically significant independent variables in multiple regression analysis, with PP as the dependent variable, are shown in Table 3. Statistically insignificant variables, not shown in Table 3, include height, weight, gender and age. In the overall population (Table 3, A), PP was most influenced by MBP and PWV, but there was a small, negative role for body weight and HR. In men (Table 3, B), the contribution of both MBP and PWV to the global variance was 22%, similar to the 25% rate in women (Table 3, C). However, the contribution of PWV alone was 17% in women and 9% in men, whereas the contribution of MBP was 8% in women and 13% in men. This illustrates the reduced influence of MBP on compliance and pulsatility in women as compared with men. Finally, the contribution of HR to the variance of PP was observed in men, but not in women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Linear Multiple Regression Analysis of Pulse Pressure as Dependent Variable

 
Table 4 summarizes the findings of carotid, aortic and cardiac variables. Men and women had similar values of the following CCA variables: IMT, wall to lumen ratio, PP and distensibility. In contrast, CCA diameter, distention and compliance were lower in women. With regard to the calculated aortic variables, the slope of the calculated aortic diastolic pressure decay in women was higher and the systemic compliance lower than that in men. This confirmed the compliance data in the CCA.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Arterial and Cardiac Variables

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we sought to define the role of factors, not directly hormone-related, that could explain the differences in circulatory function between men and women. Our interest focused on factors that influence pulsatility, because PP has recently been recognized as a cardiovascular risk factor in diverse clinical populations. To do so, we examined a number of variables that describe the function of the central circulation and the peripheral arterial tree in a cohort of men and women of widely diverse ages. These data were analyzed to detect similarities and differences between the genders in how the arterial tree ages and to determine how these differences influence PP.

Comparisons between men and women of all ages.   With regard to the entire patient group, women had a smaller stature and a faster HR as compared with men. This is true at all ages. A smaller body height has been previously described as a cardiovascular risk, because of the early return of reflected waves to the central aorta in systole rather than diastole (17), and could therefore help to explain the increased PP in older women as compared with older men. A shorter stature also implies reduced length of the arterial tree, a factor believed to be responsible for a faster HR (18), a shorter diastolic period, a shorter diastolic time constant and, at the same peripheral resistance, lower arterial compliance.

As expected, because of their smaller size, women’s CCA dimensions, CCA compliance and calculated systemic compliance are all significantly lower than those in men. However, CCA distensibility, which better reflects the properties of the arterial wall as a material, is no different between men and women. This is supported by the similarity in CCA wall thickness and PWV, confirming a recent report (19). Furthermore, although the CCA diameters were smaller in women, the CCA wall/lumen ratios were identical in men and women, indicating similar values for Young’s modulus. The importance of reduced body height in women was stressed by London et al. (20), who demonstrated an increased CCA augmentation index in women, as well as the differential effects on peripheral and central blood pressures with aging in men and women. Hayward and Kelly (21) also found similar differences in the CCA wave form between men and women, and ascribed them to the differences in body height. Other values reflecting a smaller body size in women than in men include smaller LV diameter, stroke volume, cardiac output, aortic outflow diameter and LV mass. Together, these findings imply that the process of aging on the arterial wall is similar in men and women, and that the differences observed in the arterial tree have more to do with diameter and length than with hormonal changes.

The physiologic effects of a smaller body size in women is a hemodynamic liability that is life long. This phenomenon of decreased compliance in women with similar distensibility, as compared with men, becomes more important as PWV increases secondary to arterial stiffening from advancing age. Reduced arterial compliance explains the lower DBP in women in all age groups. The lower SBP in young women may relate to their lower stroke volume, but could also be due to greater amplification of SBP in the brachial artery of young men, due to their greater body height (17,20). However, with progressive aging and associated arterial stiffening, women’s SBP rises to that of men.

Comparisons between men and women according to age groups.   The different changes in SBP and DBP with aging of men and women produce a lower PP in young women, but a higher PP in older women. In contrast, PP in men rose less with aging, probably due to greater amplification of the pulse in men <40 years old (vide supra). In a recent repeat analysis of the Framingham data, Franklin et al. (22) pointed out that the gender differences of PP as a coronary heart disease risk factor are most striking in those <40 years old. In young males only, there was an inverse relationship between PP and risk, but the risk of increased PP rose in both men and women as they aged. Therefore, it appears from our data that DBP in women is a major determinant of PP throughout life, whereas SBP only becomes important in this regard after menopause and with aging. Together, this information and our data on PP, when used to evaluate cardiovascular risk in men and women, explain the different mechanisms for lower risk at a young age in women and men, and the reversal of that trend with aging.

Those measured values that differ between men and women and change the most during the middle years may be suspected of having a menopausal influence. Figure 3 shows that aortic PWV, a surrogate for distensibility, is more important in predicting PP in young women than in young men. The difference persists between ages 41 and 47 years, but is lost at higher ages. This finding is supported by the multiple regression data, which demonstrate that the influence of MBP and PWV on PP are different between men and women. In men, a higher MBP is more predictive than PWV of the variations in PP, whereas the reverse is true in women. If these speculations are correct, there is no need to invoke the effect of hormonal changes in women with aging to explain the findings.

Effects of menopause.   The published evidence supports the unfavorable effects of a lack of estrogen due to menopause, as well as the favorable circulatory effects of administered estrogen (23–26). The presence of circulating estrogen in young women could account, in part, for their lower SBP and PP. However, the circulatory effects of estrogen are complex, not only involving the endothelium but also raising angiotensinogen levels while lowering renin levels, with possible opposing effects on atrial natriuretic peptides (27,28). The question remains whether the gradual loss of estrogenic function due to menopause translates into brachial arterial blood pressure changes, which can be used to predict cardiovascular risk. This is difficult to demonstrate, because the menopausal changes must somehow be separated from the effects of aging. Faced with these and other problems, Casiglia et al. (29) were unable to demonstrate an effect of menopause, apart from aging, on blood pressure. In contrast, Staessen et al. (30–32) demonstrated an increased rate of rise in SBP versus age in women versus men >50 years old. This was found in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. However, even this group of investigators was cautious in ascribing the findings to the hormonal effects of menopause alone.

Study limitations.   The present study suffers from some of the same limitations as many other previous studies. Our study group includes more hypertensive than normotensive subjects and assumes that the process of aging is similar for both. Therefore, these data may not be applicable to the general population, less of whom are hypertensive. The present study has a cross-sectional design, but uses men as comparisons rather than control subjects. It does provide information on many previously uncorrelated factors (i.e., CCA compliance and distensibility, systemic arterial compliance, cardiac output, stroke volume, ejection fraction, peripheral vascular resistance and aortic PWV), many of which are related to aging.

Conclusions.   It is clear from the published data that estrogen levels affect some areas of the arterial tree, such as the aorta, endothelium and microvasculature. However, it is likely that the menopausal effects on the arterial tree of women who are aging, though present, are sufficiently small and gradual so as to be nearly impossible to distinguish from the concomitant effects of aging alone. At a given LV ejection fraction, the major determinants of PP are MBP and arterial distensibility. Despite the same distensibility and lower MBP, women, as compared with men, develop a greater degree of pulsatility with aging. Therefore, their increased pulsatility is largely influenced by their smaller body size and arterial dimensions, independent of menopause and its related hormonal changes.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gangar KF, Vyas S, Whitehead M, Crook D, Meire H, Campbell S. Pulsatility index in internal carotid artery in relation to transdermal oestradiol and time since menopause. Lancet. 1991;338:839–842[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Gilbert WM. Anatomy and physiology of the placenta, fetal membranes and amniotic fluid. Moore TR, Reiter RC, Rebar RW, Baker VV. Gynecology and Obstetrics. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p. 209–222
  3. Gass MLS. Physiology and pathophysiology at the postmenopausal years. Moore TR, Reiter RC, Rebar RW, Baker VV. Gynecology and Obstetrics. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p. 883–898
  4. Darne B, Girerd X, Safar M, Cambien F, Guise L. Pulsatile versus steady component of blood pressure: a cross-sectional analysis and a prospective analysis on cardiovascular mortality. Hypertension. 1989;13:392–400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Benetos A, Safar M, Rudnichi A, et al. Pulse pressure: a predictor of long-term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population. Hypertension. 1997;30:1410–1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larson MG, Levy D. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1999;100:354–360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Fang J, Madhavan S, Cohen H, Alderman MH. Measures of blood pressure and myocardial infarction in treated hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 1995;13:413–419[Medline]
  8. SAVE InvestigatorsMitchell GF, Moye LA, Braunwald E, et al. Sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure is a powerful independent predictor of recurrent events after myocardial infarction in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Circulation. 1997;96:4254–4260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Domanski MJ, Mitchell GF, Norman JE, Exner DV, Pitt B, Pfeffer MA. Independent prognostic information by sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:951–958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Asmar R, Benetos A, Topouchian J, et al. Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement: validation and clinical application studies. Hypertension. 1995;26:485–490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1990;58:1072–1083
  12. London GM, Marchais SJ, Guerin AP, et al. Salt and water retention and calcium blockade in uremia. Circulation. 1990;82:105–113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 1977;55:613–618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nichols WW, O’Rourke ME. Sphygmocardiography. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries. 4th ed. London, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold; 1998. p. 450–476
  15. Simon AC, Safar ME, Levenson JA, London GM, Levy BI, Chau NP. An evaluation of large arteries’ compliance in man. Am J Physiol. 1979;237:H550–H554
  16. Benetos A, Laurent S, Hoeks AP, Boutouyrie P, Safar ME. Arterial alterations with aging and high blood pressure: a noninvasive study of carotid and femoral artery. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:90–97[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Smulyan H, Marchais SJ, Pannier B, Guerin AP, Safar ME, London GM. Influence of body height on pulsatile arterial hemodynamic data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1103–1109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Elzinga G, Westerhof N. Matching between ventricle and arterial load: an evolutionary process. Circ Res. 1991;68:1495–1500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Van der Heijden-Spek JJ, Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Hoeks AP, Boudier HAS, Van Bortel LM. Effect of age on brachial artery wall properties differs from the aorta and is gender dependent: a population study. Hypertension. 2000;35:637–642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Stimpel M. Influence of sex on arterial hemodynamics and blood pressure: role of body height. Hypertension. 1995;26:514–519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hayward CS, Kelly RP. Gender-related differences in the central arterial pressure waveform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1863–1871[Abstract]
  22. Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larson MG, Levy D. The relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease as a function of age: the Framingham Heart Study. (abstr)J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(Suppl):291A
  23. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, et al. Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:936–941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, et al. Menopause is associated with endothelial dysfunction in women. Hypertension. 1996;28:576–582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sudhir K, Jennings GL, Funder JW, Komesaroff PA. Estrogen enhances basal nitric oxide release in the forearm vasculature in perimenopausal women. Hypertension. 1996;28:330–334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rajkumar C, Kingwell BA, Cameron JD, et al. Hormonal therapy increases arterial compliance in postmenopausal women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:350–356[Abstract]
  27. Schunkert H, Danser AHJ, Hense HW, Derkx FHM, Kürzinger S, Riegger GAJ. Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on the renin-angiotensin system in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1997;95:39–45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kuroski de Bold ML. Estrogen, natriuretic peptides and the renin-angiotensin system. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;41:524–531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Casiglia E, d’Este D, Ginocchio G, et al. Lack of influence on blood pressure and cardiovascular risk profile: a 16-year longitudinal study concerning a cohort of 568 women. J Hypertens. 1996;14:729–736[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Staessen J, Bulpitt CJ, Fagard R, Lijnen P, Amery A. The influence of menopause on blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 1989;3:427–433[Medline]
  31. Staessen JA, Ginocchia G, Thijs L, Fagard R. Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure and menopause in a prospective population study. J Hum Hypertens. 1997;11:507–514[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Staessen JA, Celis H, Fagard R. The epidemiology of the association between hypertension and menopause. J Hum Hypertens. 1998;12:587–592[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
X. Fan, Y. Han, K. Sun, Y. Wang, Y. Xin, Y. Bai, W. Li, T. Yang, X. Song, H. Wang, et al.
Sex Differences in Blood Pressure Response to Antihypertensive Therapy in Chinese Patients with Hypertension
Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2008; 42(12): 1772 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Giannattasio, P. Salvi, F. Valbusa, A. Kearney-Schwartz, A. Capra, M. Amigoni, M. Failla, L. Boffi, F. Madotto, A. Benetos, et al.
Simultaneous Measurement of Beat-to-Beat Carotid Diameter and Pressure Changes to Assess Arterial Mechanical Properties
Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): 896 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. R. Seals, C. A. DeSouza, A. J. Donato, and H. Tanaka
Habitual exercise and arterial aging
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1323 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Hogue, R. Fucetola, T. Hershey, K. Freedland, V. G. Davila-Roman, A. M. Goate, and R. E. Thompson
Risk factors for neurocognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery in postmenopausal women.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 511 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Coylewright, J. F. Reckelhoff, and P. Ouyang
Menopause and Hypertension: An Age-Old Debate
Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 952 - 959.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. F. Mitchell, V. Gudnason, L. J. Launer, T. Aspelund, and T. B. Harris
Hemodynamics of Increased Pulse Pressure in Older Women in the Community-Based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study
Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 1123 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Benjo, R. E. Thompson, D. Fine, C. W. Hogue, D. Alejo, A. Kaw, G. Gerstenblith, A. Shah, D. E. Berkowitz, and D. Nyhan
Pulse Pressure Is an Age-Independent Predictor of Stroke Development After Cardiac Surgery
Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): 630 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P.E. Norman and J.T. Powell
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: The Prognosis in Women Is Worse Than in Men
Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2865 - 2869.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
E. Pinto
Blood pressure and ageing
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2007; 83(976): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
T. Brandt and S. R. Levine
Spontaneous cervical artery dissection: Is there a gender innuendo?
Neurology, September 26, 2006; 67(6): 932 - 933.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
B Jani and C Rajkumar
Ageing and vascular ageing.
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2006; 82(968): 357 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. C. H. Leung, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron
Aortic stiffness affects the coronary blood flow response to percutaneous coronary intervention
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H624 - H630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. McEniery, Yasmin, I. R. Hall, A. Qasem, I. B. Wilkinson, J. R. Cockcroft, and on behalf of the ACCT Investigators
Normal Vascular Aging: Differential Effects on Wave Reflection and Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity: The Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2005; 46(9): 1753 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S.-H. H. Juo, T. Rundek, H.-F. Lin, R. Cheng, M.-Y. Lan, J. S. Huang, B. Boden-Albala, and R. L. Sacco
Heritability of Carotid Artery Distensibility in Hispanics: The Northern Manhattan Family Study
Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2357 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. M. Redfield, S. J. Jacobsen, B. A. Borlaug, R. J. Rodeheffer, and D. A. Kass
Age- and Gender-Related Ventricular-Vascular Stiffening: A Community-Based Study
Circulation, October 11, 2005; 112(15): 2254 - 2262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Krejza, P. Szydlik, D. S. Liebeskind, J. Kochanowicz, O. Bronov, Z. Mariak, and E. R. Melhem
Age and Sex Variability and Normal Reference Values for the VMCA/VICA Index
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 730 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H.M. O. Farouque, J. A. Tremmel, F. R. Shabari, M. Aggarwal, W. F. Fearon, M. K.C. Ng, M. Rezaee, A. C. Yeung, and D. P. Lee
Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2005; 45(3): 363 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. F. Mitchell, H. Parise, E. J. Benjamin, M. G. Larson, M. J. Keyes, J. A. Vita, R. S. Vasan, and D. Levy
Changes in Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection With Advancing Age in Healthy Men and Women: The Framingham Heart Study
Hypertension, June 1, 2004; 43(6): 1239 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. M. Dart, C. D. Gatzka, J. D. Cameron, B. A. Kingwell, Y.-L. Liang, K. L. Berry, C. M. Reid, and G. L. Jennings
Large Artery Stiffness Is Not Related to Plasma Cholesterol in Older Subjects with Hypertension
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 962 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
W S Waring, S H Adwani, O Breukels, D J Webb, and S R J Maxwell
Hyperuricaemia does not impair cardiovascular function in healthy adults
Heart, February 1, 2004; 90(2): 155 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. E. Safar and P. Laurent
Pulse pressure and arterial stiffness in rats: comparison with humans
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): H1363 - H1369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. F. Mitchell, Y. Lacourciere, J.-P. Ouellet, J. L. Izzo Jr, J. Neutel, L. J. Kerwin, A. J. Block, and M. A. Pfeffer
Determinants of Elevated Pulse Pressure in Middle-Aged and Older Subjects With Uncomplicated Systolic Hypertension: The Role of Proximal Aortic Diameter and the Aortic Pressure-Flow Relationship
Circulation, September 30, 2003; 108(13): 1592 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Karamanoglu, P. Lantelme, C. Mestre, and H. Milon
Errors in Estimating Propagation Distances in Pulse Wave Velocity * Response
Hypertension, June 1, 2003; e8(6): .
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. W. Myers, W. B. Farquhar, D. E. Forman, T. D. Williams, D. L. Dierks, and J. A. Taylor
Carotid distensibility characterized via the isometric exercise pressor response
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2592 - H2598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Pini, M. C. Cavalli