Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.
Click on image to view larger version.
Figure 1 Mean stent, neointimal and lumen area changes within the stented segment during the follow-up period. Notably, the RADIUS stents increased by 1.9 ± 1.0 mm2 in mean stent area while the Palmaz-Schatz stents showed no significant changes. On the other hand, the RADIUS stents had a greater amount of neointimal proliferation than the Palmaz-Schatz stents. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Open box = Palmaz-Schatz; solid box = RADIUS.
|
